Articles | Volume 25, issue 20
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-13493-2025
© Author(s) 2025. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-13493-2025
© Author(s) 2025. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Measurement report
| 
23 Oct 2025
Measurement report |
| 23 Oct 2025
| 23 Oct 2025
Measurement report: Microphysical and optical characteristics of radiation fog – a study using in situ, remote sensing, and balloon techniques
Katarzyna Nurowska
CORRESPONDING AUTHOR
Faculty of Physics, Institute of Geophysics, University of Warsaw, Pasteura 5, 02-093 Warszawa, Poland
Przemysław Makuch
Institute of Oceanology, Polish Academy of Sciences, Powstańców Warszawy 55, 81-712 Sopot, Poland
Krzysztof Mirosław Markowicz
Faculty of Physics, Institute of Geophysics, University of Warsaw, Pasteura 5, 02-093 Warszawa, Poland
Related authors
Michalina Broda, Olga Zawadzka-Mańko, Michał T. Chiliński, Katarzyna Nurowska, Szymon Kłapiński, Przemysław Makuch, and Krzysztof M. Markowicz
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-6467, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-6467, 2026
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for Atmospheric Measurement Techniques (AMT).
Short summary
Short summary
This study shows that balloon-borne instruments with low-cost particle sensors can reliably measure how airborne particles are distributed with height in the atmosphere. The sensors were tested during field measurements in southeastern Poland which identified particle layers transported over long distances including wildfire smoke and desert dust. The results indicate that this approach can improve aerosol observations and support better representation of aerosol processes in atmospheric models.
Michalina Broda, Olga Zawadzka-Mańko, Michał T. Chiliński, Katarzyna Nurowska, Szymon Kłapiński, Przemysław Makuch, and Krzysztof M. Markowicz
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-6467, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-6467, 2026
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for Atmospheric Measurement Techniques (AMT).
Short summary
Short summary
This study shows that balloon-borne instruments with low-cost particle sensors can reliably measure how airborne particles are distributed with height in the atmosphere. The sensors were tested during field measurements in southeastern Poland which identified particle layers transported over long distances including wildfire smoke and desert dust. The results indicate that this approach can improve aerosol observations and support better representation of aerosol processes in atmospheric models.
Michalina Broda, Olga Zawadzka-Mańko, Krzysztof Markowicz, Peng Xian, and Edward Hyer
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 25, 14015–14043, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-14015-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-14015-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
A new method was developed to estimate the share of smoke from different regions at a selected location using satellite observations and model data. Applied in Warsaw, it shows fires from North America contribute over sixty-five percent, surpassing Europe's share, highlighting the importance of intercontinental transport, which may be generalized across Europe. This is an important step in understanding how smoke particles from distant fires impact climate and atmosphere locally.
Grzegorz M. Florczyk and Krzysztof M. Markowicz
Adv. Sci. Res., 22, 13–18, https://doi.org/10.5194/asr-22-13-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/asr-22-13-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Our study investigates how air pollution affects lower troposphere behavior. While the overall height of this layer did not change significantly under heavy pollution, we found a slight delay in the start of air movement and a rapid rise of warm air pockets. We also found out that absorbing aerosols warms the air despite blocking sunlight. For the layer height, no dominant effect was found. This research improves our understanding of how pollution influences atmospheric dynamics.
Michele Bertò, David Cappelletti, Elena Barbaro, Cristiano Varin, Jean-Charles Gallet, Krzysztof Markowicz, Anna Rozwadowska, Mauro Mazzola, Stefano Crocchianti, Luisa Poto, Paolo Laj, Carlo Barbante, and Andrea Spolaor
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 12479–12493, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-12479-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-12479-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
We present the daily and seasonal variability in black carbon (BC) in surface snow inferred from two specific experiments based on the hourly and daily time resolution sampling during the Arctic spring in Svalbard. These unique data sets give us, for the first time, the opportunity to evaluate the associations between the observed surface snow BC mass concentration and a set of predictors corresponding to the considered meteorological and snow physico-chemical parameters.
Cited articles
Antoine, S., Honnert, R., Seity, Y., Vié, B., Burnet, F., and Martinet, P.: Evaluation of an Improved AROME Configuration for Fog Forecasts during the SOFOG3D Campaign, Weather and Forecasting, 38, 1605–1620, https://doi.org/10.1175/WAF-D-22-0215.1, 2023. a
Bari, D., Bergot, T., and Tardif, R.: Fog Decision Support Systems: A Review of the Current Perspectives, Atmosphere, 14, https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos14081314, 2023. a, b
Bergot, T., Terradellas, E., Cuxart, J., Mira, A., Leichti, O., Mueller, M., and Nielsen, N. W.: Intercomparison of single-column numerical models for the prediction of radiation fog, Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology, 46, 504–521, https://doi.org/10.1175/JAM2475.1, 2007. a
Bergot, T., Escobar, J., and Masson, V.: Effect of small-scale surface heterogeneities and buildings on radiation fog: Large-eddy simulation study at Paris–Charles de Gaulle airport, Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society, 141, 285–298, https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.2358, 2015. a
Betts, A. K.: Cloud Thermodynamic Models in Saturation Point Coordinates, Journal of Atmospheric Sciences, 39, 2182–2191, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1982)039<2182:CTMISP>2.0.CO;2, 1982. a
Boutle, I., Price, J., Kudzotsa, I., Kokkola, H., and Romakkaniemi, S.: Aerosol–fog interaction and the transition to well-mixed radiation fog, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 7827–7840, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-7827-2018, 2018. a, b, c
Boutle, I., Angevine, W., Bao, J.-W., Bergot, T., Bhattacharya, R., Bott, A., Ducongé, L., Forbes, R., Goecke, T., Grell, E., Hill, A., Igel, A. L., Kudzotsa, I., Lac, C., Maronga, B., Romakkaniemi, S., Schmidli, J., Schwenkel, J., Steeneveld, G.-J., and Vié, B.: Demistify: a large-eddy simulation (LES) and single-column model (SCM) intercomparison of radiation fog, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 319–333, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-319-2022, 2022. a
Brenguier, J. L.: Parameterization of the Condensation Process: A Theoretical Approach, Journal of Atmospheric Sciences, 48, 264–282, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1991)048<0264:POTCPA>2.0.CO;2, 1991. a
Brenguier, J.-L., Pawlowska, H., Schüller, L., Preusker, R., Fischer, J., and Fouquart, Y.: Radiative Properties of Boundary Layer Clouds: Droplet Effective Radius versus Number Concentration, Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences, 57, 803–821, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(2000)057<0803:RPOBLC>2.0.CO;2, 2000. a
Capobianco, G. and Lee, M. D.: The Role of Weather in General Aviation Accidents: An Analysis of Causes, Contributing Factors and ISSUES, Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 45, 190–194, https://doi.org/10.1177/154193120104500241, 2001. a
Cermak, J. and Bendix, J.: Detecting ground fog from space – a microphysics-based approach, International Journal of Remote Sensing, 32, 3345–3371, https://doi.org/10.1080/01431161003747505, 2011. a, b, c
Chang, F.-L. and Li, Z.: Estimating the vertical variation of cloud droplet effective radius using multispectral near-infrared satellite measurements, Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 107, AAC 7–1–AAC 7–12, https://doi.org/10.1029/2001JD000766, 2002. a
Egli, S., Maier, F., Bendix, J., and Thies, B.: Vertical distribution of microphysical properties in radiation fogs – A case study, Atmospheric Research, 151, 130–145, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2014.05.027, 2015. a, b, c, d
Fu, Q. and Liou, K. N.: On the Correlated k-Distribution Method for Radiative Transfer in Nonhomogeneous Atmospheres, Journal of Atmospheric Sciences, 49, 2139–2156, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1992)049<2139:OTCDMF>2.0.CO;2, 1992. a, b
Fu, Q. and Liou, K. N.: Parameterization of the Radiative Properties of Cirrus Clouds, Journal of Atmospheric Sciences, 50, 2008–2025, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1993)050<2008:POTRPO>2.0.CO;2, 1993. a, b
George, J. J.: Fog, American Meteorological Society, Boston, MA, 1179–1189, ISBN 978-1-940033-70-9, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-940033-70-9_95, 1951. a
Gilardoni, S., Massoli, P., Giulianelli, L., Rinaldi, M., Paglione, M., Pollini, F., Lanconelli, C., Poluzzi, V., Carbone, S., Hillamo, R., Russell, L. M., Facchini, M. C., and Fuzzi, S.: Fog scavenging of organic and inorganic aerosol in the Po Valley, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 6967–6981, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-6967-2014, 2014. a
Gultepe, I.: A Review on Weather Impact on Aviation Operations: Visibility, Wind, Precipitation, Icing, Journal of Airline Operations and Aviation Management, 2, https://doi.org/10.56801/jaoam.v2i1.1, 2023. a, b
Gultepe, I., Pearson, G., Milbrandt, J. A., Hansen, B., Platnick, S., Taylor, P., Gordon, M., Oakley, J. P., and Cober, S. G.: The Fog Remote Sensing and Modeling Field Project, Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 90, 341–360, https://doi.org/10.1175/2008BAMS2354.1, 2009. a
Hagan, D. H. and Kroll, J. H.: Assessing the accuracy of low-cost optical particle sensors using a physics-based approach, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 13, 6343–6355, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-6343-2020, 2020. a
Han, S.-Q., Hao, T.-Y., Zhang, M., Yao, Q., Liu, J.-L., Cai, Z.-Y., and Li, X.-J.: Observation Analysis on Microphysics Characteristics of Long-lasting Severe Fog and Haze Episode at Urban Canopy Top, Aerosol and Air Quality Research, 18, 2475–2486, https://doi.org/10.4209/aaqr.2017.10.0416, 2018. a
Kasper, D. M.: Slots, Property Rights and Secondary Markets: Efficiency and Slot Allocation at US Airports, Taylor and Francis, https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315262963-27, 2016. a
Khain, A. P., Beheng, K. D., Heymsfield, A., Korolev, A., Krichak, S. O., Levin, Z., Pinsky, M., Phillips, V., Prabhakaran, T., Teller, A., van den Heever, S. C., and Yano, J.-I.: Representation of microphysical processes in cloud-resolving models: Spectral (bin) microphysics versus bulk parameterization, Reviews of Geophysics, 53, 247–322, https://doi.org/10.1002/2014RG000468, 2015. a
Lakra, K. and Avishek, K.: A review on factors influencing fog formation, classification, forecasting, detection and impacts, Rendiconti Lincei. Scienze Fisiche e Naturali, 33, 319–353, 2022. a
Maronga, B. and Bosveld, F. C.: Key parameters for the life cycle of nocturnal radiation fog: a comprehensive large-eddy simulation study, Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society, 143, 2463–2480, https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.3100, 2017. a
Mason, J.: The Physics of Radiation Fog, Journal of the Meteorological Society of Japan Ser. II, 60, 486–499, https://doi.org/10.2151/jmsj1965.60.1_486, 1982. a
Mazoyer, M., Lac, C., Thouron, O., Bergot, T., Masson, V., and Musson-Genon, L.: Large eddy simulation of radiation fog: impact of dynamics on the fog life cycle, Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 17, 13017–13035, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-13017-2017, 2017. a
Mazoyer, M., Burnet, F., and Denjean, C.: Experimental study on the evolution of droplet size distribution during the fog life cycle, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 11305–11321, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-11305-2022, 2022. a
Mohammadi, M., Nowak, J. L., Bertens, G., Moláček, J., Kumala, W., and Malinowski, S. P.: Cloud microphysical measurements at a mountain observatory: comparison between shadowgraph imaging and phase Doppler interferometry, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 15, 965–985, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-965-2022, 2022. a
Nowak, J. L., Mohammadi, M., and Malinowski, S. P.: Applicability of the VisiSize D30 shadowgraph system for cloud microphysical measurements, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 14, 2615–2633, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-2615-2021, 2021. a
Nurowska, K.: Microphysical and optical data of radiation fog in Strzyżów Valley, Poland, University of Warsaw [data set], https://doi.org/10.58132/WPKQNT, 2025. a, b
Okita, T.: Observations of the vertical structure of a stratus cloud and radiation fogs in relation to the mechanism of drizzle formation, Tellus, 14, 310–322, https://doi.org/10.3402/tellusa.v14i3.9556, 1962. a, b, c, d
Philip, A., Bergot, T., Bouteloup, Y., and Bouyssel, F.: The Impact of Vertical Resolution on Fog Forecasting in the Kilometric-Scale Model AROME: A Case Study and Statistics, Weather and Forecasting, 31, 1655–1671, https://doi.org/10.1175/WAF-D-16-0074.1, 2016. a
Pinnick, R. G., Hoihjelle, D. L., Fernandez, G., Stenmark, E. B., Lindberg, J. D., Hoidale, G. B., and Jennings, S. G.: Vertical Structure in Atmospheric Fog and Haze and Its Effects on Visible and Infrared Extinction, Journal of Atmospheric Sciences, 35, 2020–2032, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1978)035<2020:VSIAFA>2.0.CO;2, 1978. a
Pithani, P., Ghude, S., Naidu, c., Kulkarni, R., Steeneveld, G.-J., Sharma, A., Prabha, T., Chate, D., Gultepe, I., Jenamani, R., and Rajeevan, M.: WRF model Prediction of a dense fog event occurred during Winter Fog Experiment (WIFEX), Pure and Applied Geophysics, 176, 1827–1846, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00024-018-2053-0, 2019. a
Poku, C., Ross, A. N., Hill, A. A., Blyth, A. M., and Shipway, B.: Is a more physical representation of aerosol activation needed for simulations of fog?, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 7271–7292, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-7271-2021, 2021. a
Price, J.: Radiation Fog. Part I: Observations of Stability and Drop Size Distributions, Boundary-Layer Meteorology, 139, 167–191, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10546-010-9580-2, 2011. a, b
Román-Cascón, C., Yagüe, C., Sastre, M., Maqueda, G., Salamanca, F., and Viana, S.: Observations and WRF simulations of fog events at the Spanish Northern Plateau, Adv. Sci. Res., 8, 11–18, https://doi.org/10.5194/asr-8-11-2012, 2012. a
Stevens, S. E.: Trends in Instrument Flight Rules (IFR) Conditions at Major Airports in the United States, Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology, 58, 615–620, https://doi.org/10.1175/JAMC-D-18-0301.1, 2019. a
Thoma, C., Schneider, W., Masbou, M., and Bott, A.: Integration of Local Observations into the One Dimensional Fog Model PAFOG, Pure and Applied Geophysics, 169, 881–893, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00024-011-0357-4, 2011. a
Toledo, F., Haeffelin, M., Wærsted, E., and Dupont, J.-C.: A new conceptual model for adiabatic fog, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 13099–13117, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-13099-2021, 2021. a, b, c
Wærsted, E. G., Haeffelin, M., Dupont, J.-C., Delanoë, J., and Dubuisson, P.: Radiation in fog: quantification of the impact on fog liquid water based on ground-based remote sensing, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 10811–10835, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-10811-2017, 2017. a, b, c, d
Wendish, M., Mertes, S., Heintzenberg, J., Wiedensohler, A., Schell, D., Wobrock, W., Frank, G., Martinsson, B. G., Fuzzi, S., Orsi, G., Kos, G., and Berner, A.: Drop size distribution and LWC in Po valley fog, Contributions to Atmospheric Physics, 71, 87–100, https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-0031779779&partnerID=40&md5=9b5423094749ae926835f315751c4503 (last access: 20 December 2024), 1998. a
Yau, M. and Rogers, R.: A Short Course in Cloud Physics, Elsevier Science, ISBN 9780080570945, https://books.google.pl/books?id=ClKbCgAAQBAJ (last access: 20 December 2024), 1996. a
Ye, X., Wu, B., and Zhang, H.: The turbulent structure and transport in fog layers observed over the Tianjin area, Atmospheric Research, 153, 217–234, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2014.08.003, 2015. a
Zhou, B., Du, J., Gultepe, I., and Dimego, G.: Forecast of Low Visibility and Fog from NCEP: Current Status and Efforts, Pure and Applied Geophysics, 169, 895–909, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00024-011-0327-x, 2012. a
Short summary
This study explores the properties of radiation fog in Southeastern Poland, focusing on how droplets and water content vary with height. Data from three September 2023 fog events show that larger droplets form near the ground, while fog dissipates from both the top and bottom. Key findings include average droplet sizes, water content, and how fog impacts radiation. The results improve understanding of fog behavior and its environmental effects.
This study explores the properties of radiation fog in Southeastern Poland, focusing on how...
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint