Articles | Volume 25, issue 20
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-12923-2025
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-12923-2025
Research article
 | 
17 Oct 2025
Research article |  | 17 Oct 2025

Operational, diagnostic, and probabilistic evaluation of AQMEII-4 regional-scale ozone dry deposition: time to harmonize our LULC masks

Ioannis Kioutsioukis, Christian Hogrefe, Paul A. Makar, Ummugulsum Alyuz, Jesse O. Bash, Roberto Bellasio, Roberto Bianconi, Tim Butler, Olivia E. Clifton, Philip Cheung, Alma Hodzic, Richard Kranenburg, Aura Lupascu, Kester Momoh, Juan Luis Perez-Camaño, Jonathan Pleim, Young-Hee Ryu, Roberto San Jose, Donna Schwede, Ranjeet Sokhi, and Stefano Galmarini

Viewed

Total article views: 973 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total Supplement BibTeX EndNote
879 64 30 973 29 20 34
  • HTML: 879
  • PDF: 64
  • XML: 30
  • Total: 973
  • Supplement: 29
  • BibTeX: 20
  • EndNote: 34
Views and downloads (calculated since 19 Mar 2025)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 19 Mar 2025)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 973 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 921 with geography defined and 52 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Latest update: 17 Oct 2025
Download
Short summary
Deposition is key in air quality modeling. An unprecedented evaluation of the Air Quality Model Evaluation International Initiative phase 4 models is performed on different deposition schemes in relation to the land use and land cover (LULC) used. Among the results, LULC masks have to be harmonized and up-to-date information used in place of masks that are outdated and too coarse. Alternatively, LULC masks should be evaluated and intercompared when multiple model results are analyzed.
Share
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint