Articles | Volume 25, issue 2
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-1121-2025
© Author(s) 2025. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-1121-2025
© Author(s) 2025. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Urban ozone formation and sensitivities to volatile chemical products, cooking emissions, and NOx upwind of and within two Los Angeles Basin cities
Chelsea E. Stockwell
CORRESPONDING AUTHOR
NOAA Chemical Sciences Laboratory, Boulder, CO 80305, USA
Matthew M. Coggon
NOAA Chemical Sciences Laboratory, Boulder, CO 80305, USA
Rebecca H. Schwantes
NOAA Chemical Sciences Laboratory, Boulder, CO 80305, USA
Colin Harkins
NOAA Chemical Sciences Laboratory, Boulder, CO 80305, USA
Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, CO 80309, USA
Bert Verreyken
NOAA Chemical Sciences Laboratory, Boulder, CO 80305, USA
now at: Royal Belgian Institute for Space Aeronomy (BIRA-IASB), Brussels, Belgium
now at: Biosystems Dynamics and Exchanges (BIODYNE), Gembloux Agro-Bio Tech, University of Liège, Liège, Belgium
Congmeng Lyu
NOAA Chemical Sciences Laboratory, Boulder, CO 80305, USA
Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, CO 80309, USA
Qindan Zhu
NOAA Chemical Sciences Laboratory, Boulder, CO 80305, USA
Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, CO 80309, USA
now at: Department of Earth, Atmospheric and Planetary Sciences, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA
NOAA Chemical Sciences Laboratory, Boulder, CO 80305, USA
Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, CO 80309, USA
now at: Department of Energy, Environmental and Chemical Engineering, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO 63130, USA
Jessica B. Gilman
NOAA Chemical Sciences Laboratory, Boulder, CO 80305, USA
Aaron Lamplugh
NOAA Chemical Sciences Laboratory, Boulder, CO 80305, USA
Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, CO 80309, USA
now at: Technical Services Program, Air Pollution Control Division, Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment, Denver, CO 80246, USA
Jeff Peischl
NOAA Chemical Sciences Laboratory, Boulder, CO 80305, USA
Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, CO 80309, USA
now at: NOAA Global Monitoring Laboratory, Boulder, CO 80305, USA
Michael A. Robinson
NOAA Chemical Sciences Laboratory, Boulder, CO 80305, USA
Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, CO 80309, USA
Patrick R. Veres
NOAA Chemical Sciences Laboratory, Boulder, CO 80305, USA
now at: National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, CO 80307, USA
NOAA Chemical Sciences Laboratory, Boulder, CO 80305, USA
Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, CO 80309, USA
Andrew W. Rollins
NOAA Chemical Sciences Laboratory, Boulder, CO 80305, USA
Kristen Zuraski
NOAA Chemical Sciences Laboratory, Boulder, CO 80305, USA
Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, CO 80309, USA
Sunil Baidar
NOAA Chemical Sciences Laboratory, Boulder, CO 80305, USA
Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, CO 80309, USA
Shang Liu
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Northeastern University, Boston, MA 02115, USA
Toshihiro Kuwayama
California Air Resources Board, Sacramento, CA 95814, USA
Steven S. Brown
NOAA Chemical Sciences Laboratory, Boulder, CO 80305, USA
Brian C. McDonald
NOAA Chemical Sciences Laboratory, Boulder, CO 80305, USA
Carsten Warneke
NOAA Chemical Sciences Laboratory, Boulder, CO 80305, USA
Viewed
Total article views: 9,936 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 15 Jul 2024)
| HTML | XML | Total | Supplement | BibTeX | EndNote | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7,194 | 2,091 | 651 | 9,936 | 627 | 168 | 248 |
- HTML: 7,194
- PDF: 2,091
- XML: 651
- Total: 9,936
- Supplement: 627
- BibTeX: 168
- EndNote: 248
Total article views: 5,555 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 28 Jan 2025)
| HTML | XML | Total | Supplement | BibTeX | EndNote | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4,423 | 1,049 | 83 | 5,555 | 374 | 76 | 110 |
- HTML: 4,423
- PDF: 1,049
- XML: 83
- Total: 5,555
- Supplement: 374
- BibTeX: 76
- EndNote: 110
Total article views: 4,381 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 15 Jul 2024)
| HTML | XML | Total | Supplement | BibTeX | EndNote | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2,771 | 1,042 | 568 | 4,381 | 253 | 92 | 138 |
- HTML: 2,771
- PDF: 1,042
- XML: 568
- Total: 4,381
- Supplement: 253
- BibTeX: 92
- EndNote: 138
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Total article views: 9,936 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 9,934 with geography defined
and 2 with unknown origin.
Total article views: 5,555 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 5,553 with geography defined
and 2 with unknown origin.
Total article views: 4,381 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 4,381 with geography defined
and 0 with unknown origin.
| Country | # | Views | % |
|---|
| Country | # | Views | % |
|---|
| Country | # | Views | % |
|---|
| Total: | 0 |
| HTML: | 0 |
| PDF: | 0 |
| XML: | 0 |
- 1
1
| Total: | 0 |
| HTML: | 0 |
| PDF: | 0 |
| XML: | 0 |
- 1
1
| Total: | 0 |
| HTML: | 0 |
| PDF: | 0 |
| XML: | 0 |
- 1
1
Cited
14 citations as recorded by crossref.
- Biogenic and anthropogenic contributions to urban terpenoid fluxes E. Katz et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-15281-2025
- Ozone Production Efficiencies in the Three Largest United States Cities from Airborne Measurements W. Chace et al. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.5c02073
- Comparative Impacts of Freight and Non-truck Traffic on NOx and Ozone Concentrations in the Los Angeles Basin A. Moore et al. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsestair.5c00396
- Identification of surface ozone sensitivity for NO₂ and secondary HCHO in Sweden S. Budakoti https://doi.org/10.1186/s44329-026-00047-9
- Multi-decadal ozone air quality and the role of temperature in Switzerland during summertime C. Nussbaumer et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-26-5355-2026
- Photochemical formation process of ozone and spatiotemporally targeted control strategies along the transport pathways in the Pearl River Delta region Y. Li et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jes.2025.05.032
- Residential Emissions of Volatile Organic Compounds Contribute to Urban Air Pollution C. Arata et al. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsestair.5c00482
- Insights on ozone formation sensitivity in Southeast and East Asian megacities during ASIA-AQ C. Cho et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-26-6097-2026
- Ozone pollution: a persistent challenge in large cities like Mexico City, Los Angeles and Beijing E. Velasco et al. https://doi.org/10.14324/111.444/ucloe.3448
- Fate of isoprene peroxy radical constrains the urban photochemical regime M. Robinson et al. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aea6509
- Soil and litter emission sources as important contributors to ozone production from volatile organic compounds in island tropical forests H. Zhou et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2025.122297
- Integrated Modeling for Chemistry of Indoor Environments: Progress and Future Perspectives M. Shiraiwa et al. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsestair.5c00422
- Top-Down Evaluation of Volatile Chemical Product Emissions Using a Lagrangian Framework B. Verreyken et al. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.4c10117
- Evaluating near-field effects of large point source emissions on ambient ozone with coupled Lagrangian and Eulerian models M. Zhang et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2025.127157
14 citations as recorded by crossref.
- Biogenic and anthropogenic contributions to urban terpenoid fluxes E. Katz et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-15281-2025
- Ozone Production Efficiencies in the Three Largest United States Cities from Airborne Measurements W. Chace et al. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.5c02073
- Comparative Impacts of Freight and Non-truck Traffic on NOx and Ozone Concentrations in the Los Angeles Basin A. Moore et al. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsestair.5c00396
- Identification of surface ozone sensitivity for NO₂ and secondary HCHO in Sweden S. Budakoti https://doi.org/10.1186/s44329-026-00047-9
- Multi-decadal ozone air quality and the role of temperature in Switzerland during summertime C. Nussbaumer et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-26-5355-2026
- Photochemical formation process of ozone and spatiotemporally targeted control strategies along the transport pathways in the Pearl River Delta region Y. Li et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jes.2025.05.032
- Residential Emissions of Volatile Organic Compounds Contribute to Urban Air Pollution C. Arata et al. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsestair.5c00482
- Insights on ozone formation sensitivity in Southeast and East Asian megacities during ASIA-AQ C. Cho et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-26-6097-2026
- Ozone pollution: a persistent challenge in large cities like Mexico City, Los Angeles and Beijing E. Velasco et al. https://doi.org/10.14324/111.444/ucloe.3448
- Fate of isoprene peroxy radical constrains the urban photochemical regime M. Robinson et al. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aea6509
- Soil and litter emission sources as important contributors to ozone production from volatile organic compounds in island tropical forests H. Zhou et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2025.122297
- Integrated Modeling for Chemistry of Indoor Environments: Progress and Future Perspectives M. Shiraiwa et al. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsestair.5c00422
- Top-Down Evaluation of Volatile Chemical Product Emissions Using a Lagrangian Framework B. Verreyken et al. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.4c10117
- Evaluating near-field effects of large point source emissions on ambient ozone with coupled Lagrangian and Eulerian models M. Zhang et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2025.127157
Saved (final revised paper)
Latest update: 08 Jun 2026
Short summary
In urban areas, emissions from everyday products like paints, cleaners, and personal care products, along with non-traditional sources such as cooking, are increasingly important and impact air quality. This study uses a box model to evaluate how these emissions impact ozone in the Los Angeles Basin and quantifies the impact of gaseous cooking emissions. Accurate representation of these and other anthropogenic sources in inventories is crucial for informing effective air quality policies.
In urban areas, emissions from everyday products like paints, cleaners, and personal care...
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint