Articles | Volume 25, issue 2
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-1121-2025
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-1121-2025
Research article
 | 
28 Jan 2025
Research article |  | 28 Jan 2025

Urban ozone formation and sensitivities to volatile chemical products, cooking emissions, and NOx upwind of and within two Los Angeles Basin cities

Chelsea E. Stockwell, Matthew M. Coggon, Rebecca H. Schwantes, Colin Harkins, Bert Verreyken, Congmeng Lyu, Qindan Zhu, Lu Xu, Jessica B. Gilman, Aaron Lamplugh, Jeff Peischl, Michael A. Robinson, Patrick R. Veres, Meng Li, Andrew W. Rollins, Kristen Zuraski, Sunil Baidar, Shang Liu, Toshihiro Kuwayama, Steven S. Brown, Brian C. McDonald, and Carsten Warneke
Abstract

Volatile chemical products (VCPs) and other non-traditional anthropogenic sources, such as cooking, contribute substantially to the volatile organic compound (VOC) budget in urban areas, but their impact on ozone formation is less certain. This study employs Lagrangian box modeling and sensitivity analyses to evaluate ozone response to sector-specific VOC and nitrogen oxide (NOx) emissions in two Los Angeles (LA) Basin cities during the summer of 2021. The model simulated the photochemical processing and transport of temporally and spatially gridded emissions from the FIVE-VCP-NEI17NRT inventory and accurately simulates the variability and magnitude of O3, NOx, and speciated VOCs in Pasadena, CA. VOC sensitivity analyses show that anthropogenic VOCs (AVOC) enhance the mean daily maximum 8 h average ozone in Pasadena by 13 ppb, whereas biogenic VOCs (BVOCs) contribute 9.4 ppb. Of the ozone influenced by AVOCs, VCPs represent the largest fraction at 45 %, while cooking and fossil fuel VOCs are comparable at 26 % and 29 %, respectively. NOx sensitivity analyses along trajectory paths indicate that the photochemical regime of ozone varies spatially and temporally. The modeled ozone response is primarily NOx-saturated across the dense urban core and during peak ozone production in Pasadena. Lowering the inventory emissions of NOx by 25 % moves Pasadena to NOx-limited chemistry during afternoon hours and shrinks the spatial extent of NOx saturation towards downtown LA. Further sensitivity analyses show that using VOCs represented by a separate state inventory requires steeper NOx reductions to transition to NOx sensitivity, further suggesting that accurately representing VOC reactivity in inventories is critical to determining the effectiveness of future NOx reduction policies.

1 Introduction

Decreases in emissions of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) and nitrogen oxides (NOx= NO + NO2) have coincided with reduced ozone (O3) pollution in many United States (US) urban centers (Warneke et al., 2012; Jiang et al., 2018; Kim et al., 2022). As reductions from automotive emissions and other point sources continue, the relative contribution from understudied anthropogenic VOCs (AVOCs), including volatile chemical products (VCPs), to the total emitted VOCs in urban areas continues to rise (McDonald et al., 2018b; Gkatzelis et al., 2021b) and is important for O3 and acetyl peroxynitrate (PAN) formation (Coggon et al., 2021). Other non-traditional emission sources, including commercial and residential cooking, contribute to the urban VOC (Coggon et al., 2024a; Peng et al., 2022; Wernis et al., 2022) and aerosol (Hayes et al., 2013; Robinson et al., 2006; Robinson et al., 2018) mixture, though the atmospheric impacts and spatial–temporal distributions are not well studied. Attributing O3 to specific VOC emission sources is challenging, and some methods rely on reactivity estimates (e.g., maximum incremental activity) to predict O3 formation potential (OFP), which may not reflect realistic atmospheric processing (Gu et al., 2021a; Venecek et al., 2018). Alternative approaches invoke complex source apportionment or tagging methods (Wang et al., 2019; Li et al., 2023; Butler et al., 2020). Models using inventory emissions are a useful tool for O3 source attribution as they simulate transport and photochemical processing (Abdi-Oskouei et al., 2022; Coggon et al., 2021) while simultaneously enabling sensitivity analyses that directly relate to potential emissions scenarios.

Ozone formation depends on the initial mix and reactivity of VOCs and total NOx and is known to respond non-linearly to changes in their atmospheric concentrations (Seinfeld, 1989; Kleinman et al., 1997; Kleinman, 2005; Edwards et al., 2014). In regions characterized by high VOC mixing ratios and lower NOx, O3 production increases with the addition of NOx since the rate of radical propagation and NO2 production is limited by NO. This chemical regime is often termed “NOx-limited” or “NOx-sensitive”. In contrast, if NOx mixing ratios are high relative to VOC reactivity, the opposite dependence on NOx is observed and O3 production is considered “NOx-saturated” (also termed “VOC-limited”, “VOC-sensitive”, or “radical-limited”). In this regime, increasing NOx suppresses OH radicals and limits the production of peroxy radicals, which propagate ozone by reacting with NO to form NO2. The addition of VOCs or reduction of NOx in this chemical regime increases O3 production. Defining these two distinct chemical regimes in urban areas is critical to understanding effective mitigation strategies, and this paper investigates the sensitivity of ozone mixing ratios to changes in emissions and ozone precursors.

The Los Angeles (LA) Basin in California is among the few remaining regions of the USA where O3 mixing ratios exceed the National Ambient Air Quality Standard (NAAQS) for ground-level O3 (8 h average of 70 ppb) with an extreme classification. Significant efforts to mitigate O3 production in the LA Basin have focused on emissions control. Reductions in AVOCs, carbon monoxide (CO), and NOx, primarily from the transportation sector, have reduced ground-level O3 and particulate matter (PM2.5) for decades (McDonald et al., 2018b; Warneke et al., 2012; McDonald et al., 2013; Pollack et al., 2013). Many of these downward trends have leveled off in recent years, with daily maximum O3 in some locations actually increasing since 2010 (Jin et al., 2008; Gaudel et al., 2020; Kim et al., 2022). This could be the result of unanticipated trends in emissions (McDonald et al., 2018b), increasing the influence of regional background sources (Silvern et al., 2019); long-range transport (Cooper et al., 2015); changes in atmospheric chemistry (Laughner and Cohen, 2019); and/or consequences of a changing climate with more frequent, longer-lasting, and more intense heat waves in the USA (Habeeb et al., 2015). A clear understanding of O3 precursors from anthropogenic and biogenic emission sources is key to identifying and targeting NOx and VOC control strategies in the LA Basin and other major US cities.

The spatiotemporal distribution of emissions and geography of the LA Basin complicate the dependence of O3 production on NOx, encompassing both NOx-limited and NOx-saturated regimes that are seasonally and spatially dependent. Historically, ozone production in the urban core is NOx-saturated during peak production (Pollack et al., 2012), whereas locations further downwind transition to NOx-limited chemistry (Jin et al., 2020; Perdigones et al., 2022; LaFranchi et al., 2011; Pusede and Cohen, 2012). The emission reductions prompted by the COVID-19 pandemic showed mixed results across the LA Basin (Parker et al., 2020; Parker et al., 2022; Schroeder et al., 2022; Pennington et al., 2023); however, when considering meteorology, O3 formation remains NOx-saturated in the densely populated areas and becomes NOx-limited further east (Parker et al., 2022) or on average basin-wide (Schroeder et al., 2022). In general, the extent of the NOx-saturated regime continues to shrink in many urban areas (Koplitz et al., 2022), but spatial O3 sensitivities depend on local and upwind emissions, chemical processing, meteorology, and temperature that can vary throughout the day (Nussbaumer and Cohen, 2020).

Determining the O3 chemical regime, either directly or indirectly, remains challenging. Studies have evaluated changes to O3 between weekdays and weekends to infer O3 responses to changes in transportation emissions (termed the “weekday–weekend”, or WD–WE, effect). The WD–WE effect centers on lower NOx on weekends as commercial transportation declines, while VOC emissions remain similar. WD–WE estimates are limited spatially and temporally and are complicated by reduced overnight O3 titration impacting O3 background (Peischl et al., 2023). Other approaches estimate changes in VOCs and NOx through proxies such as satellite column-integrated formaldehyde (HCHO) to NO2 ratios, which may fail near transitional regimes and are limited by the satellite spatiotemporal resolution (Schroeder et al., 2017). Direct chemical indicators using termination products of HOx–NOx cycling (Sillman, 1995; Martin et al., 2004; Vermeuel et al., 2019) or measured/simulated radical production and loss have also been explored (Kleinman et al., 1997; Mao et al., 2010; Abdi-Oskouei et al., 2022; Sakamoto et al., 2019; Robinson et al., 2021; Kleinman, 2005; Rickly et al., 2023). Analyzing the ozone response to NOx and VOC perturbations in smog chambers is the most direct method to evaluate O3 sensitivity (Wu et al., 2022); however, the approach is practically limited by the location and time of sampling and does not account for dilution, mixing, or deposition (Wu et al., 2024).

Chemical transport models (CTMs) and box models have been used to evaluate the O3 response to changes in precursor emissions and meteorology. Box models require observational constraints to accurately simulate O3 mixing ratios, while CTMs require substantial computation time to determine the O3 response to multiple emissions perturbations. In this study, we employ a multi-process Lagrangian box model that simulates the spatial and temporal evolution of emissions in the LA Basin. This model is used to simulate summertime O3 formation and to evaluate O3 sensitivities to changing NOx and VOCs as air masses transit to two locations downwind of downtown Los Angeles: Pasadena and Redlands, CA. To fully represent the processes that impact O3 production, the model is informed with anthropogenic and biogenic VOCs from state-of-the-science emissions inventories and employs refined chemical mechanisms, ground-site observations, and meteorological variables from chemical transport models to fully represent the processes that impact O3 production. The model is first evaluated by comparing it to month-long measurements in Pasadena, CA, collected in the summer of 2021. Then, anthropogenic ozone is attributed to sector-specific VOC sources, and the impact of NOx and VOC perturbations on O3 formation is quantified to determine the photochemical regime at different locations and times across the LA Basin. Lastly, the O3 response to total VOCs and their reactivity is evaluated by scaling VOCs to match a separate state anthropogenic emissions inventory.

2 Methods

2.1 Campaign description

The 2021 Southwest Urban NOx and VOC Experiment (SUNVEx; https://csl.noaa.gov/projects/sunvex/, last access: 1 June 2024) field campaign was conducted at the California Institute of Technology in Pasadena, CA (34.1403° N, 118.1254° W), from 2 August to 6 September 2021. The site has been previously described as a receptor for the pollutants of downtown Los Angeles and other upwind sources (de Gouw et al., 2018; Ryerson et al., 2013). Measurements were conducted either in a trailer or within a stationary mobile laboratory (34.1403° N, 118.1254° W), both of which sampled air from the same 10 m tower. The mobile laboratory was deployed to characterize the spatial distribution and to determine the local sources of emissions for times within two periods (2–6 August and 31 August–3 September 2021). Onboard measurements during hours when the mobile laboratory was away from the ground site were excluded from this analysis. Companion continuous measurements were collected nearby at the Ronald and Maxine Linde Laboratory (34.1364° N, 118.1268° W). Table 1 highlights the comprehensive measurements used in this work. Many of these measurements and techniques are described in detail elsewhere (see references in Table 1) and were used to evaluate box model simulations of speciated VOCs, CO, NO, NO2, total oxidized nitrogen (NOy= NOx+ NOx reservoirs), acyl peroxynitrates (PANs), nitric acid (HNO3), and O3 (see Sect. 3). The Stationary Doppler lidar On a Trailer (StaDOT) was co-located at the Pasadena site and measured the planetary boundary layer height.

Hourly measurements of O3 and relative humidity at the Dearborn Reservoir (34.059° N, 117.1473° W) air monitoring site, managed by the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD), were used to evaluate the modeled O3 in Redlands, CA. This site was not equipped extensively; therefore model constraints and evaluations are limited.

Table 1Summary of instrumentation, utilized measurements, and time resolution reported for the SUNVEx campaign in Pasadena, CA.

Download Print Version | Download XLSX

2.2 Lagrangian box model

A Lagrangian box model was built using the Framework for 0-D Atmospheric Modeling (F0AM) (Wolfe et al., 2016) and simulated the evolution of emissions; the chemistry; and the dilution of VOCs, NOx, CO, and other trace gases as air was transported across the LA Basin from 7 August–7 September 2021. The box model is designed to complement the Weather Research and Forecasting model coupled with Chemistry (WRF-Chem) simulations described by Zhu et al. (2024a), which was configured using anthropogenic emissions from the FIVE-VCP-NEI17NRT inventory and an updated chemical mechanism named RACM2B-VCP. The WRF-Chem model accurately reproduced O3 and many speciated VOCs across the LA Basin during the summer of 2021. The box model in this study leverages the WRF-Chem output to constrain transport and meteorological variability (see Sect. 2.2.2) and is configured with the same emissions (see Sect. 2.2.3) and chemistry (see Sect. 2.2.4) as described by Zhu et al. (2024a), with modifications detailed in the following subsections. The box model is intended to evaluate O3 responses to emissions perturbations and to assess sector contributions to photochemical O3 observed at two receptor sites. The model can also be used for mechanism development, which is challenging to perform in CTMs. Here, we focus on describing the model and corresponding O3 responses to anthropogenic VOC and NOx perturbations.

2.2.1 Model overview

In its basic form, air accumulates emissions that react and are transported over several hours across the LA Basin before reaching either the Pasadena or the Redlands receptor sites. Typically, daytime transport in the LA Basin is that of sea-breeze meteorology, where air parcels originate near the coast (Santa Monica and San Pedro bays) and are advected inland, as shown for representative trajectory paths in Fig. 1 (Washenfelder et al., 2011; Wagner et al., 2012; Hayes et al., 2015). Variability in meteorology and advection can complicate this typical transport pattern; therefore, back trajectories were calculated to estimate a series of air parcel coordinates that move with the wind at 15 min intervals, arriving hourly at each receptor site throughout the month (see Sect. 2.2.2).

For all species, the box model assumes that mixing ratios are controlled by emissions, chemical reactions, and dilution from vertical expansion with background air, and ignores deposition and aerosol uptake. The initial concentrations for most VOCs and NOx are assumed to be zero, while initial O3 mixing ratios are set using an air monitoring site near the coast. At each model step coordinate (latitude, longitude, time), the corresponding emissions (Ei) within an 8×8 km area footprint (A) are mixed into a volume defined by the height of the planetary boundary layer (h). Dilution is represented by a first-order rate constant (kdil) and is calculated based on the changes in boundary layer height between model steps. Chemical processing occurs within each model step, and the resulting concentrations set the starting conditions for each subsequent step. A simplified representation of a moving trajectory path is shown in Fig. S1 in the Supplement, and the basic equation describing this evolution of a given species is provided by Eq. (1):

(1) d C i d t = E i ( t ) h ( t ) A + r i ( t ) - k dil ( t ) ( C i - C b , i ) ,

where Ci is the concentration of a given species per volume (molec. cm−3), Ei(t) is the emission rate based on the time-varying emissions inventory (molec. s−1; see Sect. 2.2.3), h(t) is the time-varying planetary boundary layer height from Doppler lidar measurements or 3-D-model simulations (cm; see Sect. 2.2.5), A is the footprint area represented by the box model (cm2), ri(t) denotes the reaction rates (molec. cm−3 s−1) that account for the chemical production and loss of Ci, kdil(t) is the time-varying first-order dilution rate calculated based on boundary layer expansion (s−1), and Cb,i is the background concentration of a given species mixed from outside of the model that represents air from the residual layer or free troposphere entraining into the box. The following sections detail each process represented by Eq. (1).

https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/25/1121/2025/acp-25-1121-2025-f01

Figure 1Example FLEXPART backward-trajectory paths initiated in Pasadena or Redlands, CA. Red dashes indicate the location of the particle cluster center of mass at 15 min intervals overlaid with 4 km spatial grids colored by hourly D5 siloxane emission rates from the FIVE-VCP-NEI17NRT inventory. An example model area boundary (8×8 km perimeter) used to extract emissions for a single model step is shown in yellow.

2.2.2 FLEXPART-WRF back-trajectory analysis

Trajectory paths were generated with a limited-area version of the FLEXible PARTicle dispersion model (FLEXPART) (Stohl et al., 2005) driven with meteorological input provided by the Weather Research and Forecasting v4.2.2 (WRF) numerical weather prediction model (FLEXPART-WRF) (Brioude et al., 2013) and an adapted turbulent parameterization (Verreyken et al., 2019). The dynamical setup from the WRF-Chem model was optimized for the SUNVEx campaign by Verreyken et al. (2025). The model was run on a 4 × 4 km domain covering California and Nevada with the High-Resolution Rapid Refresh (HRRR) (Benjamin et al., 2016) model providing initial and boundary conditions. The boundary layer was simulated using the Mellor–Yamada–Nakanishi–Niino (MYNN) (Nakanishi and Niino, 2009) algorithm with an eddy diffusivity mass flux (EDMF) parameterization (Olson et al., 2019).

The model calculates particle dispersion backwards, releasing 25 000 particles (air parcels) between the surface and 20 m above ground level. For particle masses released hourly in FLEXPART-WRF, trajectories were followed back for 18 h. To simulate the trajectory of air parcels arriving hourly, coordinates (latitude, longitude, altitude) were derived every 15 min as the center of mass of the main particle cluster. Ancillary information (photolysis rates, boundary layer height, temperature, pressure) was obtained at each coordinate from 4-D interpolation along each trajectory from the WRF-Chem simulation (Grell et al., 2005) completed for the SUNVEx campaign period (Zhu et al., 2024a). More information about the WRF-Chem setup can be found in Zhu et al. (2024a).

The FLEXPART-WRF trajectory analysis generated 744 different air mass tracks arriving in Pasadena and Redlands each, every hour from 7 August–7 September (Fig. S2). Meteorology was most consistent midday when the boundary layer was fully developed and sea-breeze meteorology pushed air masses from the coastline northeastwards towards Pasadena, as represented by Fig. 1 and the average trajectory paths shown in Fig. S2. The back-trajectory analysis revealed that air parcels arriving in Pasadena at midday (between 13:00–18:00 PDT) had been transported from the coast for 4–5 h on average. The transport further east towards Redlands, CA, is more complex, and the back-trajectory analysis suggests air parcels often originated further south and not always along the coastline. All backward trajectories from the Pasadena and Redlands receptor sites were traced back 4.5 and 9 h, respectively, and the average hourly paths are shown in Fig. S2 in the Supplement.

2.2.3 Emissions

Anthropogenic emissions of CO, NOx, and VOCs were injected into each model step along the trajectory path from the spatially resolved (4 × 4 km) hourly FIVE-VCP-NEI17NRT anthropogenic emissions inventory (McDonald et al., 2018a, b; He et al., 2024) for the conterminous USA. The near-real-time (NRT) emission development is extensively detailed in the Supplement of He et al. (2024) and was extracted for the month of August 2021. Briefly, on-road and non-road engine sources are from the Fuel-Based Inventory for Vehicle Emissions (FIVE) and are updated using fuel sales (Harkins et al., 2021; McDonald et al., 2014). Volatile chemical product (VCP) emissions (McDonald et al., 2018b; Coggon et al., 2021) are included and updated using scaling factors calculated from economic activity statistics. VCP sectors include cleaning/degreasing agents, personal care products, adhesives, coatings, inks, and pesticides. Emissions outside of the USA, such as from Mexico and Canada, as well as shipping emissions, are from the Copernicus Atmospheric Monitoring Service (CAMS) (Doumbia et al., 2021). Oil and gas emissions (O&G) are from the Fuel-based Oil and Gas (FOG) inventory of Francoeur et al. (2021). For pollutants where data are available, power-plant emissions are from the Continuous Emissions Monitoring System (CEMS). Point sources and other area source (gridded) emissions not categorized as VCPs include a mix of evaporative sources, industrial processes, and fossil-fuel- and biomass-combustion-related emissions and are taken from the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 2017 National Emissions Inventory (NEI) (https://www.epa.gov/air-emissions-inventories/2017-nationalemissions-inventory-nei-data, last access: 1 June 2024) and are updated with scaling factors calculated from relevant energy and economic metrics. For the purposes of this analysis, point source emissions have been spatially mapped to the same 4 × 4 km grid that the gridded emissions are available on. Area and non-VCP point emissions are grouped with the other fossil fuel sources in this analysis. The fossil fuel sectors comprise diesel exhaust, evaporative gasoline, gasoline exhaust, off-road diesel and gas, commercial marine vessel, power-plant, and fuel-based oil and gas emissions.

Inventory emissions are hourly and produced for three categories, representative of days of the week: weekdays, Saturdays, and Sundays. The diel emission profiles from FIVE for on-road emissions are detailed in McDonald et al. (2014), while those for off-road emissions are found in McDonald et al. (2018a), with updates to marine gasoline provided by Yu et al. (2023). Most VCP diel profiles are sourced from the EPA 2014 NEI, version 2, with personal care updated to reflect the emissions of D5 siloxane as outlined by Coggon et al. (2018). Temporal profiles for other sources were taken from the 2017 NEI (https://gaftp.epa.gov/air/emismod/2017/, last access: 1 June 2024). Further details about the monthly scaling adjustments to generate near-real-time (NRT) emissions to account for rapid changes in human activity, as well as other details of the anthropogenic emissions inventory, are described by He et al. (2024). Beyond the emissions configuration described by He et al. (2024), updates to the chemical speciation of the VOCs from VCP emissions were made and are described in Zhu et al. (2024a). Figure 1 shows an example of the spatially and temporally resolved grids for D5 siloxane (a representative VCP) from FIVE-VCP-NEI17NRT.

Biogenic emissions (mol s−1 km−2) were extracted from 4 km spatially and temporally resolved grids retrieved from WRF-Chem model results for biogenic emissions generated using the Biogenic Emission Inventory System (BEIS) v3.14 for the months of August and September 2021. The inventory included urban vegetation related to urban land cover types and leaf area index. BEIS input emissions parameters for August and September 2021 were run through WRF-Chem for the study period using the same meteorology as that used for the FLEXPART-WRF back-trajectory analysis. WRF-Chem uses the BEIS input parameters and meteorology to calculate hourly simulated biogenic emissions specific to each day of the study time period, which are then retrieved from their 4 × 4 km grid. Monoterpene emissions were assumed to be 37 % limonene, 53 % α-pinene, and 10 % eucalyptol (Van Rooy et al., 2021; Zhu et al., 2024a).

Recently commercial and residential cooking emissions were observed to be important contributors to urban emissions and were estimated to represent as much as 21 % of the total anthropogenic VOC emissions in Las Vegas, NV (Coggon et al., 2024a). These emissions include saturated and unsaturated aldehydes (C3C10), long-chain fatty acids, monoterpenes, and ethanol. The FIVE-VCP-NEI17NRT inventory was updated to include cooking emissions estimated using source apportionment reported by Coggon et al. (2024a) and was then spatially distributed onto the same 4 × 4 km grid as other anthropogenic emissions using population density. A temporal profile representing human activity was taken from the commercial cooking profile used in the 2017 NEI (Supplement, Fig. S3). All measured C8 and C9 saturated aldehydes (octanal and nonanal) were entirely attributed to the cooking sector and served as cooking markers. Ethanol is a major VOC in urban areas, and it is challenging to fully resolve its mass using apportionment techniques. The ethanol attributed exclusively to cooking was lower than that estimated from cooking VOC fluxes from spatially distributed aircraft flux and indoor measurements (Arata et al., 2021; Pfannerstill et al., 2023), and therefore an upper bound was estimated by increasing ethanol to match the median ethanol-to-nonanal ratio from aircraft fluxes in LA (Zhu et al., 2025). Supplement Table S1 shows the speciation profile and chemical mechanism mapping for cooking VOCs used here. There remains some uncertainty in how the cooking VOC mixture and emission rate varies between cities, and Coggon et al. (2024a) discuss that Las Vegas, NV (where the cooking emissions estimate per population was determined) is a major entertainment city and that the number of restaurants per capita may be among the highest in the USA. While the density of cooking emissions might be higher in Las Vegas, the mass spectrum attributed to cooking compared well to a more recent source apportionment analysis in Toronto, ON, Canada (Rivellini et al., 2024).

Total anthropogenic emissions from FIVE-VCP-NEI17NRT are available on an hourly basis. The total emissions of a given species (Ei; molec. s−1) extracted into each model step is outlined by Eq. (2). First, individual emission rate cell grids (ei; molec. s−1) whose centers were encompassed within the defined domain area of the box (A) at a given air parcel location (latitude, longitude) and time (t) are summed. The total emission is then divided by the product of the number of summed grid cells (n) and the grid resolution of the inventory (agrid; 4 × 4 km) and then multiplied by the cross-sectional area of the defined box (A; 8 × 8 km). Finally, emission rates are interpolated to a 15 min time basis and implemented into Eq. (1) as Ei(t). This renormalization technique was tested at different box model grid resolutions to confirm that the total mass was conserved.

(2) E i = 0 n e i n × a grid × A

2.2.4 Chemistry

Chemical reactions are represented by RACM2B-VCP, a mechanism described in detail by Zhu et al. (2024a). Briefly, the mechanism is based on the Berkeley Regional Atmospheric Chemistry Mechanism version 2 (RACM2_Berkeley2.0), which incorporates a more complex representation of organic nitrate chemistry (Zare et al., 2018) along with monoterpene and isoprene oxidation (Browne et al., 2014). Reactions for oxygenated VOCs primarily emitted from VCPs are incorporated based on the reactions described by Coggon et al. (2021) and include surrogates for alcohols and glycol ethers (isopropanol, propylene glycol, glycerol). Additional reactions for specific VCP tracers of personal care products (D5 siloxane), solvent-borne coatings (parachlorobenzotrifluoride, PCBTF), adhesives (D4 siloxane), and insecticides (p-dichlorobenzene) (Gkatzelis et al., 2021a) are included to track VCP tracer emissions and chemistry in the chemical transport models. Additional chemistry for long-chain saturated and unsaturated aldehydes was added to reflect the OH oxidation of key cooking emissions and the varying chemical pathways forming O3 and PAN. This included the addition of lumped saturated and unsaturated cooking aldehydes along with explicit reactions for octanal and nonanal (Coggon et al., 2024a). The reaction rates and product branching ratios for the OH and NO3 oxidation of lumped saturated cooking aldehydes (CALD), nonanal (NALD), and octanal (OALD) are based on calculations from GECKO-A (https://geckoa.lisa.u-pec.fr/index.php, last access: 1 January 2024)(Aumont et al., 2005), IUPAC (Mellouki et al., 2021), and Atkinson and Arey (2003). The reaction rates and branching ratios for the OH, O3, and NO3 oxidation of lumped unsaturated cooking aldehydes (CUALD) are assumed to be generally similar to methacrolein oxidation, with minor updates to the products considering that CUALD has five carbons. The cooking VOC mapping and chemical mechanism updates are outlined in the Supplement, Tables S1 and S2. The distributions of the inventory cooking emissions and the VOC OH reactivity chemically lumped to RACM2B-VCP species are shown in Fig. S4 in the Supplement. The unresolved mass from source apportionment was attributed to hydrocarbons, which typically fragment in PTR-ToF-MS and have been reported in laboratory cooking studies (Schauer et al., 1999).

The RACM2B-VCP used in WRF-Chem simulations during SUNVEx (Zhu et al., 2024a) included a parameterization for the aerosol uptake of isoprene nitrates and monoterpene nitrates and added the uptake of several inorganic species using uptake coefficients, aerosol surface area, and aerosol diameter. In this work, these mechanisms were reverted back to the constant reaction rates for isoprene and monoterpene nitrates employed by RACM2_Berkeley2.0 as estimated by Zare et al. (2018). Additionally, the aerosol uptakes of NO3, NO2, and HO2 were ignored as aerosol parameters were not extracted from the WRF-Chem runs.

2.2.5 Meteorology, dilution, and entrainment

The model used pressure, temperature, and relative humidity from WRF-Chem along the trajectory paths and was constrained with ground-site measurements in Pasadena. Photolysis frequencies for key chemical species needed in RACM-based mechanisms were retrieved along each trajectory from 4-D interpolation of the WRF-Chem simulation. The Tropospheric Ultraviolet and Visible Radiation Model version 5.3.2 (Madronich and Flocke, 1997) was used for photolysis parameterization and mapped to RACM2B-VCP as outlined by Zhu et al. (2024a). Photolysis frequencies account for photon attenuation by clouds or highly absorbing aerosol (e.g., biomass burning smoke) and varied in space and time. The WRF-Chem-calculated photolysis frequencies along each Pasadena trajectory were bias-corrected using observed NO2 photolysis rate (jNO2) comparisons to WRF-modeled jNO2 at the receptor site. This assumption generally lowered upwind daytime photolysis frequencies by 15 %–20 %. Measured jNO2 was interpolated during periods when shadows blocked instrument retrievals.

An entrainment rate was applied to account for dilution with surrounding air from the expansion of the planetary boundary layer (PBL) between model steps. WRF-Chem-simulated PBL heights were used to account for spatial and temporal changes along each trajectory path. A constant dilution (0.2 h−1) was iteratively determined from a best fit with observations and applied as the boundary layer collapsed from day into night to account for some advection and diffusive mixing. This value is consistent with other urban plume dilution estimates (Dillon et al., 2002; Nunnermacker et al., 1998; Vermeuel et al., 2019). The regional background concentrations for most VOCs were negligible compared to primary emissions in the dense urban core. For species with larger backgrounds including small oxygenates, the box was diluted with regional background mixing ratios estimated from mobile laboratory measurements, regional air quality monitoring stations, or WRF-Chem chemical concentrations retrieved near the coast, and these are included in Table S3 in the Supplement. The background carbon monoxide (CO) mixing ratio increased during the latter half of the campaign as the air mass was impacted by aged wildfire smoke. The initial NOx concentration was set to zero, while the background NO-to-NO2 ratio was set to 0.20. As the box transits across the LA Basin, NOx emissions are injected into the box and then partitioned to NO and NO2 based on the previous model step. The modeled NO-to-NO2 ratio closely matched observations (see Sect. 3.2). The background O3 mixing ratios entrained into the box volume ranged from 20–40 ppb based on mixing ratios observed in the free troposphere above Pasadena in 2023 using the Jet Propulsion Laboratory's Small Mobile Ozone Lidar (https://tolnet.larc.nasa.gov/download, last access: 1 November 2024), which fall into the range of background O3 estimated near the California coast from both models (Fiore et al., 2014; Dolwick et al., 2015) and measurements (Jaffe et al., 2018).

The initial VOC concentrations were assumed to be zero or taken as regional background concentrations (Supplement, Table S3) Ozone concentrations were initialized using mixing ratios measured at a surface air quality monitoring site near the coast that was along the average trajectory path to Pasadena (Westchester SCAQMD; 33.9551° N, 118.4305° W; labeled as LAX in Fig. 1). The time series and diel profile used as the initial ozone mixing ratio are shown in the Supplement, Fig. S5.

3 Model evaluation

3.1 Ozone

Figure 2a shows the measured and simulated time series of hourly O3 in Pasadena during the SUNVEx campaign. The box model accurately predicts O3 variability with a normalized mean bias (NMB) of 0.001 and a coefficient of determination (R2) of 0.77. The NMB is taken as the hourly mean of the model (Mod) relative to the hourly observational mean (Obs) minus 1 as shown in Eq. (3).

(3) NMB = Mod Obs - 1

The box model meteorology simplifications are challenged during boundary layer and meteorological transitions as surface winds and temperatures shift in the early mornings and late evenings. This is evident as the boundary layer collapses and transitions to stagnant winds overnight, which results in VOCs and NOx accumulation and subsequent O3 titration that is not always fully captured in the model (Strobach et al., 2024). The model's ability to recreate O3 production during daylight hours (07:00–19:00 local time, LT) yields an NMB of 0.01 with an average absolute bias of 0.57 ppb. A companion 3-D chemical transport simulation (WRF-Chem) was configured over the LA Basin during SUNVEx with FIVE-VCP-NEI17NRT emissions and a similar RACM2B-VCP mechanism scheme. The 3-D model more explicitly represents complex meteorology and vertical/horizontal transport over broader spatial scales and accurately simulated O3 in Pasadena and at 11 additional sites across the LA Basin. Zhu et al. (2024a) reported an NMB of +0.08 and an R2 of 0.83 in Pasadena. While the box model is constrained to simpler meteorological assumptions, the general agreement between these two models provides confidence that the box model can be used to conduct detailed VOC and NOx sensitivity analyses (further described in Sect. 4) that are more computationally expensive in a 3-D model.

The time series in Fig. 2a and diel pattern in Fig. 2b show peak O3 in Pasadena typically occurred between 13:00 and 15:00 LT, whereas peak O3 in Redlands occurred between 15:00 and 17:00 LT (Fig. S6b). As indicated in Fig. 2, the model overpredicts O3 during peak model production (NMB =+0.03; absolute bias =+1.7 ppb), which was not obvious from the calculated NMB since the estimate included all daytime hours on the shoulders of peak production. The box model mechanisms primarily include gas-phase chemistry, which differs from the full 3-D-model RACM2B-VCP mechanism used in WRF-Chem. The simplified mechanism used in the box model is missing processes that include HO2, inorganic, and aerosol loss pathways, but the box model simulation agrees well with the more complex chemical transport model. The day-to-day agreement varies in both models and is likely driven by uncertainty in meteorology, dilution, and vertical distribution.

The FIVE-VCP-NEI17NRT inventory reflects temporal and spatial usage patterns including those that describe differences in emissions on weekdays versus weekend days and heavy-duty vehicle usage impacting NOx (Yu et al., 2023). The inventory generally does not reproduce VCP and fossil fuel VOC fluctuations driven by temperature that might be expected with evaporative changes. The temperature sensitivity of biogenic VOCs (BVOCs), including isoprene from BEIS, is captured and reflected in the O3 variability throughout August, as shown by Zhu et al. (2024a). While model–measurement comparisons vary day to day, on average the model accurately reproduces O3 during primary production, and therefore all trajectories are included in further analysis. The daily maximum 8 h average (MDA8) O3 is important when considering the NAAQS set at 70 ppb for ground-level ozone. Figure S7 in the Supplement shows the O3 diel profile for the 8 h moving average during the sampling period, and the average ± standard deviation MDA8 O3 from the model (59.5 ± 7.2 ppb) compared well with observations (60.4 ± 13.3 ppb) in Pasadena.

https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/25/1121/2025/acp-25-1121-2025-f02

Figure 2(a) The observed ozone time series (grey lines) overlaid with box model output (red markers) in Pasadena, CA (date format: month/day/year). (b) The median diel profile of modeled (red) and measured (grey) ozone. The mean is a dashed line, and the median is marked by the solid line, with shaded regions indicating the 75th- and 25th-quartile ranges. (c) The median diel profile of NO2 observations (grey) and model output (blue).

Download

The modeled and observed O3 time series and diel pattern for Redlands, CA, are shown in Fig. S6a and b in the Supplement. The model configuration yields an NMB of 0.02 and an R2 of 0.68, and while the model effectively reproduces average O3, the periods of difference are more frequent than in Pasadena, with a larger spread in the 25th- and 75th-quartile ranges. The NMB and absolute bias during peak production periods (15:00–17:00 LT) were 0.11 and 9 ppb, respectively. The complex meteorology, topography, and uncertain dilution further downwind of the urban core complicate the model's ability to accurately simulate O3 variability. Additionally, while O3 is produced from local sources, the transport of O3, VOCs, and NOx from upwind sources becomes more important. The population density is lower in the eastern portion of the basin, but NOx still accumulates to reach mixing ratios comparable to those of downtown LA (Nussbaumer et al., 2023; Chen et al., 2013). The model simulations in Pasadena demonstrate that the emissions and chemistry in the model are accurate; however, in Redlands, applying entrainment rates calculated from PBL height caused overdilution, and instead constant dilution rates (0.1–0.2 h−1) were assumed. While the meteorological constraints on the model for Redlands are more limited, the results provide a useful comparison to the Pasadena site for the O3 sensitivity analyses outlined in Sect. 4.2.

3.2 NOx and NOy

Figure 2c shows the modeled and measured NO2 diel pattern and demonstrates that the relative amounts of daytime NO2 are captured well by the model. Both the measurements and the model exhibit an early-morning increase as traffic emissions mix into a shallow boundary layer. The median NO2 in the model agrees to within measurement uncertainties during peak ozone (13:00–15:00 LT). The diel patterns of NO and NOx are shown in Fig. 8a–b in the Supplement. NO2 is less variable than NO during the day, though the observations show a small enhancement of NO2 around 13:00 LT that is attributed to the transport and arrival of the downtown LA plume (Borbon et al., 2013). The model shows a small yet discernible enhancement in NO2 around 13:00 LT. The diel profiles for several longer-lived VOCs, predominately associated with the transportation sector (e.g., benzene and carbon monoxide), show a perceptible midday enhancement starting around 13:00 LT (see Supplement, Fig. S9). This suggests that the model captures the downtown LA plume as expected from previous work (de Gouw et al., 2018) but with a small difference in timing compared to the observations. The observations are likely influenced by local anthropogenic sources since the site was located near parking facilities on a university campus in proximity to other commercial buildings and on-campus traffic. The model configuration yields an NMB during daylight hours of +0.30 for NOx, with a positive bias in both NO2 and NO (see Fig. S10). The NMB lowers to 0.04 when limiting the calculation to afternoon hours when O3 is primarily enhanced (12:00–16:00 LT). The model allows the NO-to-NO2 ratio to vary, and the modeled ratio closely matches observations (Fig. S8c). The diurnal profile of modeled NOy is shown with the observed NOy diurnal profile in Fig. S8d in the Supplement. Additional NOy measurements on top of the Linde Laboratory were higher than those measured at the primary site, and the modeled NOy falls between the two measurements during peak ozone.

3.3 VOCs

Model evaluation of VOCs showed similar results to that of O3 and NOx. Figure S10 in the Supplement summarizes the NMB and coefficients of determination (R2) for observed species that overlap with explicit compounds in RACM2B-VCP on an hourly timescale. For comparisons with ground-site observations, VOC measurements were excluded when the mobile laboratory conducted drives (during times between 31 August–3 September). The NMB calculations are shown for all species during daylight hours when chemistry is important (07:00–19:00 LT) and for the full simulation including high nighttime mixing ratios that might be influenced by local emissions (de Gouw et al., 2018). The chemistry of secondary products is best explained by the model during midday hours when the boundary layer is fully developed and uncertainties due to dilution and dynamic meteorology are reduced. In contrast, primary VOCs undergo chemical oxidation during the daytime that cause lower mixing ratios. Generally, the NMB for most VOCs is within ± 50 %. Biases are likely a result of uncertainties in the emissions inventory as well as of influences of local emission sources on hourly surface observations. While the model cannot reproduce rapid fluctuations in absolute mixing ratios caused by local sources, it does capture concentration trends across the sampling period as shown in Fig. 3a–e. The time series and median diel patterns for selected VOC tracers show that the model over-accumulates many VOCs at night, even when using higher-than-observed PBL heights prescribed overnight by WRF-Chem. Considering the meteorological limitations of the box model and challenges in both measuring and modeling the nocturnal boundary layer (Lee et al., 2023), the agreement within a factor of 2 overnight is reasonable. Relatively, daytime agreement is more important for investigating O3 production chemical regimes, as will be discussed in Sect. 4.2. The VOC tracers in Fig. 3a–e were chosen to represent various emission source sectors, including toluene for mobile sources, D5 siloxane for VCPs, octanal for cooking, methyl vinyl ketone (MVK) + methacrolein (MACR) for biogenics, and formaldehyde (HCHO) as a secondary oxidation product and a proxy for VOC OH reactivity (Sillman, 1995). Additional diel patterns for overlap species are compiled in Fig. S9 in the Supplement.

Aromatic VOCs emitted predominately by the mobile sector (toluene, benzene) are slightly overpredicted during the day, but the diel patterns, especially for benzene (Fig. S9), capture the afternoon enhancement that represents the LA plume. This suggests that the traditional mobile sources are well represented in the emissions inventory. Oxygenated VOCs from VCPs contribute significantly to the urban VOC makeup and reactivity in large cities (Coggon et al., 2021; McDonald et al., 2018b) and are represented explicitly in the emissions inventory and RACM2B-VCP. This includes the chemistry of several oxygenated VOCs as outlined by Coggon et al. (2021) (methanol, ethanol, isopropanol, ethylene glycol, propylene glycol, glycerol, acetone) and additional VCP tracers added to the mechanism by Zhu et al. (2024a), including D5 siloxane, D4 siloxane, and PCBTF used in personal care products, adhesives, and coatings/paints. These VCP tracers were generally overestimated by the model and similar model–measurement VCP biases were observed when evaluating WRF-Chem simulation with SUNVEx ground-site data. It is challenging to evaluate inventories at a single site, and agreement generally improves when averaged across several ground sites or when compared to aircraft observations, as shown in Zhu et al. (2024a).

Coggon et al. (2024a) showed that octanal and nonanal are emitted by cooking activities and were added to the model inventory and chemical mechanisms, along with additional saturated and unsaturated aldehydes, fatty acids, monoterpenes, and ethanol based on a VOC source apportionment in Las Vegas, NV. The modeled octanal and nonanal agree well with the measurements at night but are low at midday when local lunchtime cooking activity is expected. This suggests that better constraints on the temporal variability in cooking VOCs are needed in the inventory. Ethanol has been shown previously to be emitted by cooking activities indoors (Arata et al., 2021), though at higher amounts than was resolved by source apportionment in Las Vegas, NV. The ethanol diel pattern (Fig. S9) from the base scenario agrees well with observations before noon but remains low in the early afternoon. Additional measurements in urban areas are needed to better constrain the temporal pattern and magnitude of cooking VOCs, including ethanol, in the emissions inventory.

The model using the biogenic inventory BEIS v3.14 underestimated isoprene, MACR, and MVK in Pasadena. Evaluations of BEIS v3.61 with v3.14 suggest leaf canopy and land-use updates increase BVOC emissions across California (Bash et al., 2016). To better account for the influence of biogenic emissions on modeled O3 production, BEIS v3.14 emissions were increased by 50 % to improve agreement with MACR and MVK, the first-generation oxidative products of isoprene, which have much longer lifetimes compared to isoprene and better represent the upwind atmospheric chemistry of emissions (Warneke et al., 2010). Even after scaling the biogenic emissions up, both isoprene and monoterpenes remain underpredicted compared to observations. Pasadena is more densely vegetated than many areas upwind in the basin, and Coggon et al. (2024b) showed that the ground site was significantly impacted by local vegetation. Therefore, it is not unexpected that observations are higher and may not be representative of the entire basin.

The simulated mixing ratios of secondary products including PAN, nitric acid (HNO3), formaldehyde (HCHO), and acetaldehyde (CH3CHO) are biased low but within 25 %. Formaldehyde and acetaldehyde are large contributors to VOC reactivity (VOCr) in urban areas. Both are directly emitted but are mostly formed chemically through secondary pathways, where major precursors include isoprene and alkenes (Luecken et al., 2012; de Gouw et al., 2018). HCHO serves as a proxy for total VOCr as the two are often correlated during the daytime, while the HCHO-to-NO2 ratio has been used as an indicator of O3 sensitivity (Sillman, 1995; Hong et al., 2021; Duncan et al., 2010). Acetaldehyde is also important for PAN formation, which itself is an important NOx and radical reservoir. Lastly, HNO3 represents a dominant sink of radicals and NOx. Based on this level of model–measurement agreement, the model adequately represents the important emissions and chemical reactions that influence O3 formation necessary to perform sensitivity analyses to determine meaningful relationships between VOC emission sectors, NOx, and the O3 observed at the Pasadena ground site (Sect. 4).

https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/25/1121/2025/acp-25-1121-2025-f03

Figure 3Left panels: the time series of box model output concentrations (ppb) overlaid with observations (grey lines) in Pasadena. The selected VOCs include (a) toluene (mobile sources, blue dots), (b) D5 siloxane (VCPs/personal care, pink dots), (c) octanal (cooking, orange dots), (d) methacrolein plus methyl vinyl ketone (biogenics, green dots), and (e) formaldehyde (VOCr proxy, maroon dots). Right panels: the median diel pattern for each VOC box model output (colored) overlaid with observations (grey) (date format: month/day/year). Shaded regions indicate the 75th- and 25th-quartile ranges.

Download

4 Sensitivity analysis

4.1 Contribution of anthropogenic and biogenic VOCs to ozone

VOC sensitivity analyses were conducted to evaluate the contribution of anthropogenic and biogenic VOCs to the amount of O3 produced at the Pasadena and Redlands ground sites. For each VOC sensitivity test, emissions for VOCs from an individual emission sector were set to zero (Sectori VOCs=0), while NOx emissions remained constant, and the change in ozone (ΔO3) was calculated by comparison to the base case simulation with full emissions. The change in MDA8 O3 from anthropogenic VOCs in each emission sector in the FIVE-VCP-NEI17NRT inventory was summed to estimate the total O3 from anthropogenic VOCs (termed “AVOC ozone”) following Eq. (4).

(4) AVOC ozone = i no. of sectors Ozone Base - Ozone Sector i VOCs = 0

In order to test for non-linearity in the response of this approach, additional sensitivity analyses were also conducted by reducing individual source sector VOCs by 10 % rather than zeroing completely and then multiplying the O3 change by a factor of 10. The results from both tests agree to within 2 % on average for anthropogenic sectors. It is important to note that the anthropogenic O3 contributions would likely increase for the fossil fuel sectors if both VOCs and NOx were removed; however, zeroing both VOCs and NOx from fossil fuels would significantly alter O3 chemical regimes. Similar analyses were conducted for BEIS to determine the contribution of biogenic VOCs to ozone (termed “BVOC ozone”). In Sect. 4.2 we will show that O3 production in Pasadena occurs near the transition from NOx-saturated to NOx-sensitive chemistry; thus, the analyses described below reflect AVOC and BVOC O3 produced under predominantly NOx-saturated (i.e., VOC-limited) conditions.

The pie chart in Fig. 4a shows the source sector AVOC O3 contributions determined at MDA8 O3 (total contribution: 13 ± 2 ppb), and Fig. S11b in the Supplement shows the AVOC OH reactivity distribution by emission sector. The distribution shows that AVOCs from VCP sectors account for 45 % (5.8 ± 1.3 ppb) of the mean AVOC MDA8 O3, while fossil fuels including other area emissions account for 29 % (3.8 ± 0.8 ppb). In contrast, Coggon et al. (2021) showed fossil fuels were 60 % of the AVOC O3 in New York City (NYC) at midday during an exceedance event. The magnitude and spatial distribution of both VCP and fossil fuel emissions differ between the cities, likely driven by differing populations and traffic densities (see Fig. S7 in Coggon et al., 2021, and Fig. S11). This includes a larger contribution from off-road engines in LA (Kim et al., 2022; Khare and Gentner, 2018). The dominant VCP source sectors in LA were different than in NYC. The construction-related industrial sectors, such as coatings and adhesives, contribute > 70 % of the VCP O3 compared to < 50 % in NYC. Coatings and adhesives emit aromatics and alkanes, where aromatics are more efficient at producing ozone than the most oxygenated VOCs (Carter, 2010) and are dominant ingredients in household and other consumer sources (e.g., personal care products and cleaning agents) (Coggon et al., 2021). Qin et al. (2021) estimated that 9 ± 2 ppb of MDA8 O3 in LA in the early summer of 2010 was due to VCPs. This is higher than estimated in this work (5.2 ppb), with a higher relative contribution to the total MDA8 O3. The absolute MDA8 O3 likely differed between studies due to the seasonality of biogenic O3 production, while the absolute VCP VOC contribution differs with usage and regulation changes in the last decade. Seltzer et al. (2022) attributed 4 ppb of midday O3 (up to 6–8 ppb) to VCPs in Los Angeles using 2016 emission estimates. Coggon et al. (2021) attributed 5–12 ppb of AVOC O3 from VCPs downwind of NYC, while Abdi-Oskouei et al. (2022) attributed 2.7 ppb to VCPs in Chicago. Overall, this work agrees with previous assessments of VCP contributions to O3.

Cooking emissions were not considered in any previous analysis, and in Pasadena the contribution to AVOC ozone was comparable to that of fossil fuels (26 %; 3.4 ± 1.5 ppb) and accounts for an important fraction of the AVOC OH reactivity (Fig. S11). Primary cooking emissions include a mix of both saturated and unsaturated aldehydes, including dienals, that have a high reactivity towards OH radicals. Figure S4b in the Supplement shows these aldehydes account for over 70 % of the cooking VOC OH reactivity, and therefore it is not surprising that over a quarter of the anthropogenic ozone is attributed to cooking VOCs, which had not previously been recognized as a significant source. There remains some uncertainty in the O3 attribution since studies measuring both the composition and the magnitude of cooking emissions in outdoor urban areas are limited (Rivellini et al., 2024; Coggon et al., 2024a). Increasing the source-apportioned cooking ethanol to improve agreement with aircraft flux estimates (see Sect. 2.2.3) produces 0.6 ppb more O3 from cooking emissions, which provides some measure of uncertainty for O3 attributed to cooking VOCs. This highlights the need for more measurements to refine emissions estimates in urban areas. This is one of the first studies to show the cooking VOC contribution to O3 formation in urban areas and demonstrates that cooking emissions are important for AVOC O3 formation.

Biogenic emissions are dependent on season and temperature (Guenther et al., 1993) and can contribute significantly to VOC reactivity and O3 formation during summer (Gu et al., 2021b; Liu et al., 2022). It is critical to quantify the impact of urban vegetation and biogenic VOCs on O3 and air quality as their impact can minimize the effectiveness of VOC emissions control (Schlaerth et al., 2023). The model suggests that BVOC MDA8 O3 in Pasadena was  9.4 ppb, or approximately 42 % of total VOC MDA8 O3 (i.e., AVOC + BVOC MDA8 O3). Figure 4b shows the average sectoral distribution of O3 as air is transported from the coast, ending at Pasadena at 15:00 LT. This increase in BVOC contribution to O3 from the coast inland is consistent with a VOC OH reactivity analysis in the South Coast Air Basin (Liu et al., 2022). Along the entire trajectory, BVOCs account for a significant fraction of the total VOC O3 and are comparable to AVOC ozone. It is important to note that the BVOC fraction of O3 is estimated following a 50 % increase in the prescribed BEIS BVOCs, as described in Sect. 3.3. While anthropogenic VOCs have significantly decreased over the past decades, urban vegetation and their biogenic VOC emissions have generally remained constant and will continue to be a major contributor to urban O3 formation, especially in NOx-saturated regimes like downtown LA, as will be described below.

The AVOC O3 distribution from the box model sensitivity analysis in Redlands is consistent with what was shown above for Pasadena (Supplement, Fig. S12a). In Redlands the population density is lower, which might be the reason why the relative O3 contribution from fossil fuels grows slightly from 29 % to 31 %. There is only a minor decrease in the contribution of cooking, and the BVOC contribution grows slightly (Supplement, Fig. S12b), continuing the increasing BVOC O3 contribution further inland (Fig. 4b) (Liu et al., 2022). Although the spatial distribution of NOx and VOCs varies basin-wide, the distribution and the magnitude of photochemically produced O3 from AVOC and BVOC do not change significantly between Pasadena and Redlands, CA.

https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/25/1121/2025/acp-25-1121-2025-f04

Figure 4(a) The fractional contribution to MDA8 ozone from anthropogenic VOC sources in Pasadena, CA, including VCPs (purple shading), fossil fuels (yellow shading), and cooking (blue) VOC emissions. (b) The absolute contribution of anthropogenic and biogenic VOC sources to ozone averaged along trajectories initialized near the coast and reaching Pasadena at 15:00 LT.

Download

4.2 Spatial and temporal ozone sensitivity to NOx

Ozone chemical production regimes are often investigated over broad spatial scales (e.g., the entire contiguous USA, large urban areas) during seasons with the highest O3 (Koplitz et al., 2022; Jung et al., 2022; Jin et al., 2020). Studies and methods to investigate seasonal or diurnal trends are more limited (Jin and Holloway, 2015; Wu et al., 2022, 2024). NOx, VOCs, and meteorology vary widely across the LA Basin, and the Lagrangian trajectory box model is an effective tool to explore ozone responses to NOx emissions in space and time upwind and at receptor sites. Here, the O3 responses to NOx perturbations are estimated for all of the modeled trajectories within a well-mixed boundary layer, and they therefore do not represent effects due to gradients in shorter-lived species. For each trajectory, NOx emissions were scaled by a factor of 0.2–3 in 10 % increments from the base condition while VOCs remained constant. The O3 response relative to the change in emitted NOx (ΔO3/ΔNOx) characterizes the chemical regimes as NOx-limited (ΔO3/ΔNOx>0); NOx-saturated (ΔO3/ΔNOx<0); or at the transition point (ΔO3/ΔNOx=0), where the response to NOx turns over. The initial sign of ΔO3/ΔNOx identifies the existing chemical regime predicted by the box model at a specific location and time. The difference between the NOx emissions in the base case simulation and where ΔO3/ΔNOx=0 approximates the change in NOx required to transition between chemical regimes. For example, if ΔO3/ΔNOx at a location and time is initially negative in the base case scenario, lowering NOx results in a transition from a NOx-saturated to NOx-limited regime. The change in NOx emissions required to reach this transition (termed ΔNOxtransition) is calculated as

(5) Δ NO x transition ( % ) = NO x Δ O 3 / Δ NO x = 0 - NO x base NO x base × 100 ,

where NOxΔO3/ΔNOx=0 denotes the NOx emissions at the transition point and NOxbase denotes those represented by the base case simulation. Hourly trajectories arriving in Pasadena between 12:00 and 20:00 LT are shown in Fig. S13 in the Supplement, where each location along the trajectory path is colored by ΔNOxtransition as a percentage. Figure 5a shows the average gridded (8 × 8 km) ΔNOxtransition, considering only those grids where the total number of data points exceeds 50 for times between 12:00 and 20:00 LT. Warmer colors indicate that the location is currently NOx-saturated (negative ΔNOxtransition), cooler colors indicate that it is NOx-limited (positive ΔNOxtransition), and the status of nearing transition (ΔNOxtransition=± 10 %) is indicated in pale yellow. Figure 5a also shows the average trajectory paths to both Pasadena and Redlands during those times. Similarly, Fig. S14 in the Supplement shows the average ΔNOxtransition, bounded within ± 8 km of the average trajectory track in 4 km segments and overlaid with each backward-trajectory coordinate series. Figures 5a and b and S14 show that at locations nearest to the coast or transiting from further south in the basin, where NOx and VOC emissions are lowest, the regime is primarily NOx-limited on average. As the air parcels transit across the urban core and through downtown LA, where the density of emissions is high and pollutants increase rapidly, the sensitivity crosses into a NOx-saturated regime. The typical transport pathway to Redlands does not pass through downtown LA, and ΔNOxtransition indicates that the upwind trajectory and Redlands itself are situated near or outside the NOx-saturated core. The chemical regime and the amount of NOx required to transition vary by upwind location and time of day, as shown in Figs. S13 and S14 in the Supplement.

Figure 5c shows the average diurnal profile of ΔNOxtransition in Pasadena for all trajectories arriving during sunlit hours during the campaign period. The background color highlights when ozone production is NOx-saturated (red), NOx-sensitive (blue), or nearing transition (yellow). The model suggests that Pasadena is primarily NOx-saturated for most hours of the day and then shifts only slightly into the NOx-limited chemistry at 15:00 LT. The NOx diel pattern shown in Fig. S8a in the Supplement shows high NOx availability for reaction with radicals during early daylight hours, which then decreases rapidly, allowing radical–radical reactions to compete. Although NO concentrations may be high enough to titrate O3 during these early hours, this process is unlikely to impact O3 response during primary production periods. The short period of NOx sensitivity would only require less than a 10 % increase in NOx emissions to shift back to a NOx-saturated regime. Pasadena O3 production exhibiting NOx-saturated chemistry but near the transitional point supports previous modeling conclusions that the NOx-saturated regime is shrinking in many urban centers, including the LA Basin (Koplitz et al., 2022), and Pasadena is near this transition. This is also supported by previous observations, such as an analysis of the WD–WE effect, where NOx is lower during weekend days. Ozone trends in Pasadena from the late 2010s show weekend MDA8 O3 being only marginally higher than weekday averages, whereas the basin-wide averages are the opposite (Kim et al., 2022). Wu et al. (2024) showed clear WD–WE patterns in NOx emissions in Pasadena with higher median weekend O3 than weekday concentrations in both August and September 2021. The results from both of these studies suggest that Pasadena remains NOx-saturated, though the weekend effect is less pronounced than in earlier decades. In addition, Wu et al. (2024) used direct O3 response measurements in chamber experiments to show that the O3 photochemical regime in Pasadena remained NOx-saturated between 10:00 and 12:00 LT in August 2021. Uncertainty in the modeled response to NOx is primarily driven by the absolute NOx emissions designated by the FIVE-VCP-NEI17NRT inventory. Figure S8 shows that the model tends to overestimate NOx levels (NMB =+0.30), although this bias varies in time. Importantly, evaluating model performance using surface observations impacted by local emissions may not be fully representative. Consequently, the inventory NOx emissions remain unadjusted and are not constrained to match observations. As a result, the subsequent analysis focuses on understanding the O3 response to inventory NOx, which is often used to inform emissions control strategies.

Two additional simulations were conducted to evaluate the sensitivity for scenarios of higher and lower NOx emissions (Fig. 5c). Increasing the base case NOx by 25 % shows that Pasadena sits squarely in the NOx-saturated regime throughout the entire day, which represents NOx levels  4.5 years earlier in 2016–2017 assuming a NO2 reduction rate estimated from 2011–2015 (5.6 ± 3.6 % yr−1) (Jiang et al., 2018). Reducing NOx by an additional 25 % pushes Pasadena into a NOx-limited regime for over 6 h of the day during peak O3. Figure 5c also shows that O3 production in Redlands was primarily NOx-limited during the sampling period. This result is consistent with previous modeling observations, which show that air masses in the NOx-saturated urban core transition to NOx-limited further downwind (Koplitz et al., 2022; Schroeder et al., 2022; Jung et al., 2022). These modeled O3 responses to NOx in Redlands compare well to WD–WE evaluations in regions further east in the LA Basin (Kim et al., 2022).

https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/25/1121/2025/acp-25-1121-2025-f05

Figure 5(a) The NOx emissions required to reach the transition between chemical regimes (ΔNOxtransition, %) averaged in 8 × 8 km grids for times between 12:00–20:00 LT, only where n>50. Warmer colors ( %) indicate that the location is currently NOx-saturated, cooler colors (+ %) indicate that it is NOx-limited, and pale yellow (neutral) indicates the status of nearing the transitional regime (ΔNOxtransition=± 10 %). The average trajectory path to Pasadena and Redlands is indicated by black markers. (b) The average NOx emissions required to reach the transition within ± 8 km of each average trajectory path as a function of distance from the coastline (km) to Pasadena (top) and Redlands (bottom). (c) The predicted average (solid line) change in NOx needed to transition between photochemical O3 chemical regimes in Pasadena, CA. Red shading designates the current chemical regime as NOx-saturated, and blue shading designates NOx-limited. The dashed lines simulate the sensitivity as the base case NOx is increased and reduced by 25 %. The solid grey line designates sensitivity results in Redlands, CA.

4.3 Impact of inventory selection on MDA8 O3 sensitivity

Ozone is also sensitive to total VOCs and their reactivity. Figure 6 shows the baseline campaign average MDA8 O3 and its response to changes to NOx emissions (black line), while Fig. S15 in the Supplement shows the corresponding net ozone production rate (PO3; ppb h−1) response to NOx. The black vertical markers show the point where the mean MDA8 O3 transitions between chemical regimes (ΔMDA8 O3/ΔNOx≈0), and the hatched line reflects the base case NOx emissions. The sensitivity analysis shown in Figs. 6 and S15 illustrates that in Pasadena at the transition point, a 10 % to 20 % decrease in NOx would result in a shift to NOx-sensitive chemistry based on MDA8 O3. These model conditions represent the FIVE-VCP-NEI17NRT emissions described in Sect. 3.3, which include cooking VOCs and BVOCs from BEIS v3.14 that were increased by 50 %.

Figure 6 also compares FIVE-VCP-NEI17NRT to other anthropogenic inventories, including the National Emissions Inventory (NEI), which is the standard for determining US emissions standards, represented by the California Emissions Projection Analysis Model (CEPAM2019v1.03) tool used by the California Air Resources Board (CARB) to estimate the average annual anthropogenic emissions by region in California. The emissions prescribed by CEPAM2019v1.03 closely match the 2017 NEI (https://ww2.arb.ca.gov/applications/emissions-air-basin, last access: 6 June 2024). The distributions of VOCs from FIVE-VCP-NEI17NRT and CEPAM2019v1.03 (hereafter designated “CARB CEPAM”) are shown in Fig. S16 in the Supplement for VCPs, on-road and off-road engines, fuel-based oil and gas, and cooking VOCs in the South Coast Air Basin (SoCAB). In Las Vegas, NV, the fraction of cooking VOCs to the total VOC distribution is less than 1 % in the NEI, whereas 21 % of the total VOC mass was determined to be cooking-related emissions by source apportionment (Coggon et al., 2024a). The cooking contribution to AVOCs and speciation determined in Las Vegas was distributed in SoCAB based on population density within the FIVE-VCP-NEI17NRT inventory as described in Sect. 2.2.3. To more realistically represent cooking VOCs in the NEI, the O3 response to NOx when zeroing cooking emissions is shown as the blue trace in Fig. 6, which shifts Pasadena into NOx saturation and lowers the mean MDA8 O3. Without cooking VOCs, the total VOC reactivity in Pasadena is lower compared to FIVE-VCP-NEI17NRT and will require a NOx reduction of approximately 30 % to shift into a NOx-limited photochemical regime. These results show that representing the VOC reactivity from cooking emissions is important for interpreting the impact of NOx reductions on O3 formation in Pasadena. Further characterization of cooking VOCs in urban areas and evaluating their representation in models may help inform future O3 mitigation strategies.

In addition, the VCP emissions from FIVE-VCP-NEI17NRT for 2021 are 4 times higher than CARB CEPAM for 2017 in SoCAB. This is similar to the study by McDonald et al. (2018b), which found that VCP emissions in Los Angeles from FIVE-VCP were a factor of 2.5 higher than those of CARB. Similarly, Qin et al. (2021) showed that scaling the 2011 NEI VCP emissions up by a factor of 3–4 improved agreement with the FIVE-VCP-modeled OH reactivity in California. A recent study by Pfannerstill et al. (2023) also identified mismatches in the spatial distribution of VOC emissions within SoCAB compared to the inventory. While the VOC emissions from on-road engines are comparable, off-road VOCs represented by FIVE-VCP are approximately 50 % lower than those in CARB CEPAM. The red trace in Fig. 6 shows the MDA8 O3 response to NOx after scaling FIVE-VCP-NEI17NRT AVOC emissions to reflect what is used in the 2017 CARB CEPAM for the VCP, mobile, and cooking sectors. The VOC adjustments lowered total MDA8 ozone and suggest that even larger model NOx reductions would be needed to transition to NOx-limited chemistry in Pasadena (40 % decrease needed to reach ΔMDA8 O3/ΔNOx≈0). Finally, the yellow trace shows MDA8 O3 responses with unadjusted BEIS v3.14 BVOCs. As expected, lower biogenic emissions push the model further into a NOx-saturated regime. This sensitivity analysis is used to compare the updated FIVE-VCP-NEI17NRT emissions to anthropogenic and biogenic emissions inventories commonly used in regulatory models.

The sensitivity analyses highlight the impact of the total VOCs and the composition of anthropogenic VOCs on MDA8 O3 (and PO3) and its response to changing NOx, especially in a VOC-sensitive regime. Emissions inventories are needed to accurately represent all emission sources and total VOC reactivity (Zhu et al., 2025), and the uncertainty between inventories leads to uncertainties in the predicted efficacy of emissions control strategies. NOx reductions have been effective in reducing O3, and it is expected that NOx reductions will continue in the near future (Schroeder et al., 2022; Kim et al., 2022; Koplitz et al., 2022; Wu et al., 2024; Nussbaumer and Cohen, 2020). Figure 6 demonstrates that with an observationally constrained inventory (e.g., FIVE-VCP-NEI17NRT), model simulations would suggest that the LA Basin as a whole is nearing a NOx-sensitive chemical regime and that the spatial extent of NOx-saturated chemistry is directionally shrinking towards downtown LA. In these model simulations, Pasadena is nearing a transitional regime. On the other hand, model simulations using emissions representative of the NEI suggest that O3 in much of the LA Basin is more NOx-saturated and that a nearly 40 % decrease in NOx is needed to transition. These differences are significant and could potentially alter conclusions on the efficacy of NOx reduction policies. More studies are needed to describe the statistical confidence levels in which various scenarios will achieve a consistent NOx-limited regime in Pasadena, especially in the context of future O3 exceedance events that drive O3 design values. This study demonstrates that accurate VOC representation in models can improve the prediction of O3 formation and is required to inform various NOx and VOC emission reduction decisions to effectively achieve O3 levels that satisfy the NAAQS.

https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/25/1121/2025/acp-25-1121-2025-f06

Figure 6The change in the campaign average MDA8 O3 in Pasadena as NOx is scaled from its initial mixing ratio (hatched line) for the following scenarios: (1) base model emissions that includes FIVE-VCP-NEI17NRT anthropogenic VOCs, cooking VOCs, and BEIS BVOCs scaled up 50 % (black line); (2) base emissions excluding cooking VOCs (blue); (3) base emissions excluding cooking VOCs with VCP VOCs scaled down and off-road VOCs adjusted to better match the CARB CEPAM inventory emissions (red); and (4) BVOCs scaled down to match the original BVOCs prescribed by BEIS coupled with WRF-Chem (yellow). The location of the transition between photochemical regimes is indicated by the black vertical markers, and VOCr is taken as the trajectory average.

Download

5 Conclusions

A detailed, multi-process Lagrangian box model was developed to determine O3 sensitivities to NOx and VOC emissions from VCPs, fossil fuels, cooking, and biogenics in the Los Angeles Basin. A comparison of the box model output of O3, NOx, and speciated VOCs with measurements in Pasadena, CA, during SUNVEx suggests that the FIVE-VCP-NEI17NRT gridded inventory is effective in representing LA emissions in space and time. The box model incorporated variables from a 3-D model together with updated VOC chemistry to accurately simulate ozone (hourly normalized mean bias =0.001; R2=0.77) and other products of atmospheric chemistry. This included updated chemical mechanisms that better represent the chemistry of oxygenated VOCs emitted from sources such as VCPs and cooking (e.g., saturated and unsaturated aldehydes).

The model proved to be a practical tool to evaluate O3 response to small perturbations and shows that cooking VOCs contribute nearly as much as fossil fuel VOCs to MDA8 AVOC O3 in Pasadena ( 26 %). The relative contributions in other cities likely vary based on restaurant density, VCP usage, and transportation activity, but this remains one of the first studies to show O3 production from cooking emissions in an urban area. Additional measurements in other cities are critical to evaluating cooking VOC representation in emissions inventories, both temporally and spatially. The inclusion of cooking VOCs impacts NOx and VOC control assessments, highlighting the importance of accurately representing VOC reactivity and chemistry in inventories and model simulations. The model suggests BVOCs are still an important O3 precursor (9.4 ppb) that cannot be easily controlled.

The modeled ozone sensitivity analysis with full inventory emissions suggests that the urban core of Los Angeles, including Pasadena, remains primarily NOx-saturated during peak O3 production and shifts to NOx-limited farther east towards Redlands. Pasadena sits near the transitional point and requires approximately a 10 %–20 % reduction in NOx to transition, indicating that the spatial extent of NOx saturation is shrinking across the LA Basin. Scaling FIVE-VCP-NEI17NRT VOC emissions to better reflect those represented by the 2017 NEI and CARB CEPAM lowers absolute O3 and pushes Pasadena further into NOx-saturated chemistry, suggesting a 40 % NOx reduction is needed to shift photochemical regimes. Accurately representing VOCs and their reactivity in emissions inventories is critical to determining absolute O3 formation and to determining how NOx reductions may impact O3.

Code and data availability

Data for the SUNVEx campaign are available from the NOAA CSL data repository (https://csl.noaa.gov/projects/sunvex/ (Stockwell et al., 2025), NOAA Chemical Sciences Laboratory, 2023). WRF-Chem simulations are available at https://github.com/NOAA-CSL/WRF-Chem_CSL_Publications/tree/main/Qindan_Zhu_et_al_2024 (Zhu et al., 2024b), and emissions files from FIVE-VCP-NEI17NRT for the SUNVEx campaign can be found at https://csl.noaa.gov/groups/csl7/measurements/2021sunvex/emissions/ (Harkins and McDonald, 2025).

Supplement

The supplement related to this article is available online at: https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-1121-2025-supplement.

Author contributions

CES, MMC, LX, JBG, AL, JP, MAR, PRV, AWR, KZ, SB, SL, TK, SB, and CW conducted measurements during the SUNVEx and RECAP-CA campaigns. CH and ML developed the FIVE-VCP-NEI17NRT inventory with added cooking emissions. BV and CL performed the FLEXPART-WRF analysis. RHS and QZ performed model simulations in WRF-Chem and added cooking mechanisms to RACM2B-VCP. BM oversaw inventory, FLEXPART-WRF, and WRF-Chem development. CES and MMC performed the box model analysis. CES prepared the manuscript with contributions from all co-authors.

Competing interests

At least one of the (co-)authors is a member of the editorial board of Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics. The peer-review process was guided by an independent editor, and the authors also have no other competing interests to declare.

Disclaimer

Publisher’s note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. While Copernicus Publications makes every effort to include appropriate place names, the final responsibility lies with the authors.

Acknowledgements

The O3 and NOy measurements on the Caltech campus were supported with funding from the Resnick Sustainability Institute, and we thank Paul Wennberg and John Crounse for those measurements and for assistance in the campaign organization. We thank J. Andrew Neuman for his assistance with measurements on the iodide CIMS during SUNVEx. We thank Seyedmorteza Amini for helping configure CARB's mobile research platforms and instrument data loggers for RECAP-CA, a California-specific companion study to SUNVEx.

Financial support

This research has been supported by the US Environmental Protection Agency STAR program (grant no. 84001001); Clark County, NV (grant no. 20-022001); the California Air Resources Board (grant no. 20RD002); the Coordinating Research Council (grant no. A-132) and the Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences (grant nos. NA17OAR4320101 and NA22OAR4320151). The statements, findings, and conclusions are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Environmental Protection Agency and have not been formally reviewed by the EPA.

Review statement

This paper was edited by Bryan N. Duncan and reviewed by two anonymous referees.

References

Abdi-Oskouei, M., Roozitalab, B., Stanier, C. O., Christiansen, M., Pfister, G., Pierce, R. B., McDonald, B. C., Adelman, Z., Janseen, M., Dickens, A. F., and Carmichael, G. R.: The Impact of Volatile Chemical Products, Other VOCs, and NOx on Peak Ozone in the Lake Michigan Region, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 127, e2022JD037042, https://doi.org/10.1029/2022JD037042, 2022. 

Arata, C., Misztal, P. K., Tian, Y., Lunderberg, D. M., Kristensen, K., Novoselac, A., Vance, M. E., Farmer, D. K., Nazaroff, W. W., and Goldstein, A. H.: Volatile organic compound emissions during HOMEChem, Indoor Air, 31, 2099–2117, https://doi.org/10.1111/ina.12906, 2021. 

Atkinson, R. and Arey, J.: Atmospheric Degradation of Volatile Organic Compounds, Chem. Rev., 103, 4605–4638, https://doi.org/10.1021/cr0206420, 2003. 

Aumont, B., Szopa, S., and Madronich, S.: Modelling the evolution of organic carbon during its gas-phase tropospheric oxidation: development of an explicit model based on a self generating approach, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 5, 2497–2517, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-5-2497-2005, 2005. 

Bash, J. O., Baker, K. R., and Beaver, M. R.: Evaluation of improved land use and canopy representation in BEIS v3.61 with biogenic VOC measurements in California, Geosci. Model Dev., 9, 2191–2207, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-9-2191-2016, 2016. 

Benjamin, S. G., Weygandt, S. S., Brown, J. M., Hu, M., Alexander, C. R., Smirnova, T. G., Olson, J. B., James, E. P., Dowell, D. C., Grell, G. A., Lin, H., Peckham, S. E., Smith, T. L., Moninger, W. R., Kenyon, J. S., and Manikin, G. S.: A North American Hourly Assimilation and Model Forecast Cycle: The Rapid Refresh, Mon. Weather Rev., 144, 1669–1694, https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR-D-15-0242.1, 2016. 

Bonin, T. A., Carroll, B. J., Hardesty, R. M., Brewer, W. A., Hajny, K., Salmon, O. E., and Shepson, P. B.: Doppler Lidar Observations of the Mixing Height in Indianapolis Using an Automated Composite Fuzzy Logic Approach, J. Atmos. Ocean. Technol., 35, 473–490, https://doi.org/10.1175/JTECH-D-17-0159.1, 2018. 

Borbon, A., Gilman, J. B., Kuster, W. C., Grand, N., Chevaillier, S., Colomb, A., Dolgorouky, C., Gros, V., Lopez, M., Sarda-Esteve, R., Holloway, J., Stutz, J., Petetin, H., McKeen, S., Beekmann, M., Warneke, C., Parrish, D. D., and de Gouw, J. A.: Emission ratios of anthropogenic volatile organic compounds in northern mid-latitude megacities: Observations versus emission inventories in Los Angeles and Paris, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 118, 2041–2057, https://doi.org/10.1002/jgrd.50059, 2013. 

Brioude, J., Arnold, D., Stohl, A., Cassiani, M., Morton, D., Seibert, P., Angevine, W., Evan, S., Dingwell, A., Fast, J. D., Easter, R. C., Pisso, I., Burkhart, J., and Wotawa, G.: The Lagrangian particle dispersion model FLEXPART-WRF version 3.1, Geosci. Model Dev., 6, 1889–1904, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-6-1889-2013, 2013. 

Browne, E. C., Wooldridge, P. J., Min, K. E., and Cohen, R. C.: On the role of monoterpene chemistry in the remote continental boundary layer, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 1225–1238, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-1225-2014, 2014. 

Butler, T., Lupascu, A., and Nalam, A.: Attribution of ground-level ozone to anthropogenic and natural sources of nitrogen oxides and reactive carbon in a global chemical transport model, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 10707–10731, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-10707-2020, 2020. 

Carter, W. P. L.: Development of the SAPRC-07 chemical mechanism, Atmos. Environ., 44, 5324–5335, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2010.01.026, 2010. 

Chen, D., Li, Q., Stutz, J., Mao, Y., Zhang, L., Pikelnaya, O., Tsai, J. Y., Haman, C., Lefer, B., Rappenglück, B., Alvarez, S. L., Neuman, J. A., Flynn, J., Roberts, J. M., Nowak, J. B., de Gouw, J., Holloway, J., Wagner, N. L., Veres, P., Brown, S. S., Ryerson, T. B., Warneke, C., and Pollack, I. B.: WRF-Chem simulation of NOx and O3 in the L.A. basin during CalNex-2010, Atmos. Environ., 81, 421–432, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2013.08.064, 2013. 

Coggon, M. M., McDonald, B. C., Vlasenko, A., Veres, P. R., Bernard, F., Koss, A. R., Yuan, B., Gilman, J. B., Peischl, J., Aikin, K. C., DuRant, J., Warneke, C., Li, S.-M., and de Gouw, J. A.: Diurnal Variability and Emission Pattern of Decamethylcyclopentasiloxane (D5) from the Application of Personal Care Products in Two North American Cities, Environ. Sci. Technol., 52, 5610–5618, https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.8b00506, 2018. 

Coggon, M. M., Gkatzelis, G. I., McDonald, B. C., Gilman, J. B., Schwantes, R. H., Abuhassan, N., Aikin, K. C., Arend, M. F., Berkoff, T. A., Brown, S. S., Campos, T. L., Dickerson, R. R., Gronoff, G., Hurley, J. F., Isaacman-VanWertz, G., Koss, A. R., Li, M., McKeen, S. A., Moshary, F., Peischl, J., Pospisilova, V., Ren, X., Wilson, A., Wu, Y., Trainer, M., and Warneke, C.: Volatile chemical product emissions enhance ozone and modulate urban chemistry, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 118, e2026653118, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2026653118, 2021. 

Coggon, M. M., Stockwell, C. E., Xu, L., Peischl, J., Gilman, J. B., Lamplugh, A., Bowman, H. J., Aikin, K., Harkins, C., Zhu, Q., Schwantes, R. H., He, J., Li, M., Seltzer, K., McDonald, B., and Warneke, C.: Contribution of cooking emissions to the urban volatile organic compounds in Las Vegas, NV, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 24, 4289–4304, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-4289-2024, 2024a. 

Coggon, M. M., Stockwell, C. E., Claflin, M. S., Pfannerstill, E. Y., Xu, L., Gilman, J. B., Marcantonio, J., Cao, C., Bates, K., Gkatzelis, G. I., Lamplugh, A., Katz, E. F., Arata, C., Apel, E. C., Hornbrook, R. S., Piel, F., Majluf, F., Blake, D. R., Wisthaler, A., Canagaratna, M., Lerner, B. M., Goldstein, A. H., Mak, J. E., and Warneke, C.: Identifying and correcting interferences to PTR-ToF-MS measurements of isoprene and other urban volatile organic compounds, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 801–825, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-801-2024, 2024b. 

Cooper, O. R., Langford, A. O., Parrish, D. D., and Fahey, D. W.: Challenges of a lowered U.S. ozone standard, Science, 348, 1096–1097, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaa5748, 2015. 

de Gouw, J. A., Gilman, J. B., Kim, S.-W., Alvarez, S. L., Dusanter, S., Graus, M., Griffith, S. M., Isaacman-VanWertz, G., Kuster, W. C., Lefer, B. L., Lerner, B. M., McDonald, B. C., Rappenglück, B., Roberts, J. M., Stevens, P. S., Stutz, J., Thalman, R., Veres, P. R., Volkamer, R., Warneke, C., Washenfelder, R. A., and Young, C. J.: Chemistry of Volatile Organic Compounds in the Los Angeles Basin: Formation of Oxygenated Compounds and Determination of Emission Ratios, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 123, 2298–2319, https://doi.org/10.1002/2017JD027976, 2018. 

Dillon, M. B., Lamanna, M. S., Schade, G. W., Goldstein, A. H., and Cohen, R. C.: Chemical evolution of the Sacramento urban plume: Transport and oxidation, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 107, ACH 3-1–ACH 3-15, https://doi.org/10.1029/2001JD000969, 2002. 

Dolwick, P., Akhtar, F., Baker, K. R., Possiel, N., Simon, H., and Tonnesen, G.: Comparison of background ozone estimates over the western United States based on two separate model methodologies, Atmos. Environ., 109, 282–296, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2015.01.005, 2015. 

Doumbia, T., Granier, C., Elguindi, N., Bouarar, I., Darras, S., Brasseur, G., Gaubert, B., Liu, Y., Shi, X., Stavrakou, T., Tilmes, S., Lacey, F., Deroubaix, A., and Wang, T.: Changes in global air pollutant emissions during the COVID-19 pandemic: a dataset for atmospheric modeling, Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 13, 4191–4206, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-13-4191-2021, 2021. 

Duncan, B. N., Yoshida, Y., Olson, J. R., Sillman, S., Martin, R. V., Lamsal, L., Hu, Y., Pickering, K. E., Retscher, C., Allen, D. J., and Crawford, J. H.: Application of OMI observations to a space-based indicator of NOx and VOC controls on surface ozone formation, Atmos. Environ., 44, 2213–2223, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2010.03.010, 2010. 

Edwards, P. M., Brown, S. S., Roberts, J. M., Ahmadov, R., Banta, R. M., deGouw, J. A., Dubé, W. P., Field, R. A., Flynn, J. H., Gilman, J. B., Graus, M., Helmig, D., Koss, A., Langford, A. O., Lefer, B. L., Lerner, B. M., Li, R., Li, S.-M., McKeen, S. A., Murphy, S. M., Parrish, D. D., Senff, C. J., Soltis, J., Stutz, J., Sweeney, C., Thompson, C. R., Trainer, M. K., Tsai, C., Veres, P. R., Washenfelder, R. A., Warneke, C., Wild, R. J., Young, C. J., Yuan, B., and Zamora, R.: High winter ozone pollution from carbonyl photolysis in an oil and gas basin, Nature, 514, 351–354, https://doi.org/10.1038/nature13767, 2014. 

Eilerman, S. J., Peischl, J., Neuman, J. A., Ryerson, T. B., Aikin, K. C., Holloway, M. W., Zondlo, M. A., Golston, L. M., Pan, D., Floerchinger, C., and Herndon, S.: Characterization of Ammonia, Methane, and Nitrous Oxide Emissions from Concentrated Animal Feeding Operations in Northeastern Colorado, Environ. Sci. Technol., 50, 10885–10893, https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.6b02851, 2016. 

Fiore, A. M., Oberman, J. T., Lin, M. Y., Zhang, L., Clifton, O. E., Jacob, D. J., Naik, V., Horowitz, L. W., Pinto, J. P., and Milly, G. P.: Estimating North American background ozone in U.S. surface air with two independent global models: Variability, uncertainties, and recommendations, Atmos. Environ., 96, 284–300, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2014.07.045, 2014. 

Francoeur, C. B., McDonald, B. C., Gilman, J. B., Zarzana, K. J., Dix, B., Brown, S. S., de Gouw, J. A., Frost, G. J., Li, M., McKeen, S. A., Peischl, J., Pollack, I. B., Ryerson, T. B., Thompson, C., Warneke, C., and Trainer, M.: Quantifying Methane and Ozone Precursor Emissions from Oil and Gas Production Regions across the Contiguous US, Environ. Sci. Technol., 55, 9129–9139, https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.0c07352, 2021. 

Gaudel, A., Cooper, O. R., Chang, K. L., Bourgeois, I., Ziemke, J. R., Strode, S. A., Oman, L. D., Sellitto, P., Nédélec, P., Blot, R., Thouret, V., and Granier, C.: Aircraft observations since the 1990s reveal increases of tropospheric ozone at multiple locations across the Northern Hemisphere, Sci. Adv., 6, eaba8272, https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aba8272, 2020. 

Gkatzelis, G. I., Coggon, M. M., McDonald, B. C., Peischl, J., Aikin, K. C., Gilman, J. B., Trainer, M., and Warneke, C.: Identifying Volatile Chemical Product Tracer Compounds in U.S. Cities, Environ. Sci. Technol., 55, 188–199, https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.0c05467, 2021a. 

Gkatzelis, G. I., Coggon, M. M., McDonald, B. C., Peischl, J., Gilman, J. B., Aikin, K. C., Robinson, M. A., Canonaco, F., Prevot, A. S. H., Trainer, M., and Warneke, C.: Observations Confirm that Volatile Chemical Products Are a Major Source of Petrochemical Emissions in U.S. Cities, Environ. Sci. Technol., 55, 4332–4343, https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.0c05471, 2021b. 

Grell, G. A., Peckham, S. E., Schmitz, R., McKeen, S. A., Frost, G., Skamarock, W. C., and Eder, B.: Fully coupled “online” chemistry within the WRF model, Atmos. Environ., 39, 6957–6975, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2005.04.027, 2005. 

Gu, S., Guenther, A., and Faiola, C.: Effects of Anthropogenic and Biogenic Volatile Organic Compounds on Los Angeles Air Quality, Environ. Sci. Technol., 55, 12191–12201, https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.1c01481, 2021a. 

Gu, S., Guenther, A., and Faiola, C.: Effects of Anthropogenic and Biogenic Volatile Organic Compounds on Los Angeles Air Quality, Environ. Sci. Technol., 55, 12191–12201, https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.1c01481, 2021b. 

Guenther, A. B., Zimmerman, P. R., Harley, P. C., Monson, R. K., and Fall, R.: Isoprene and monoterpene emission rate variability: Model evaluations and sensitivity analyses, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 98, 12609–12617, https://doi.org/10.1029/93JD00527, 1993. 

Habeeb, D., Vargo, J., and Stone, B.: Rising heat wave trends in large US cities, Nat. Hazards, 76, 1651–1665, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-014-1563-z, 2015. 

Harkins, C., McDonald, B. C., Henze, D. K., and Wiedinmyer, C.: A fuel-based method for updating mobile source emissions during the COVID-19 pandemic, Environ. Res. Lett., 16, 065018, https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ac0660, 2021. 

Harkins, C. and McDonald, B. C.: FIVE-VCP-NEI17NRT emission inventory, [data set], https:// csl.noaa.gov/groups/csl7/measurements/2021sunvex/emissions/ (last access: 1 June 2024), 2025. 

Hayes, P. L., Carlton, A. G., Baker, K. R., Ahmadov, R., Washenfelder, R. A., Alvarez, S., Rappenglück, B., Gilman, J. B., Kuster, W. C., de Gouw, J. A., Zotter, P., Prévôt, A. S. H., Szidat, S., Kleindienst, T. E., Offenberg, J. H., Ma, P. K., and Jimenez, J. L.: Modeling the formation and aging of secondary organic aerosols in Los Angeles during CalNex 2010, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 5773–5801, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-5773-2015, 2015. 

Hayes, P. L., Ortega, A. M., Cubison, M. J., Froyd, K. D., Zhao, Y., Cliff, S. S., Hu, W. W., Toohey, D. W., Flynn, J. H., Lefer, B. L., Grossberg, N., Alvarez, S., Rappenglück, B., Taylor, J. W., Allan, J. D., Holloway, J. S., Gilman, J. B., Kuster, W. C., de Gouw, J. A., Massoli, P., Zhang, X., Liu, J., Weber, R. J., Corrigan, A. L., Russell, L. M., Isaacman, G., Worton, D. R., Kreisberg, N. M., Goldstein, A. H., Thalman, R., Waxman, E. M., Volkamer, R., Lin, Y. H., Surratt, J. D., Kleindienst, T. E., Offenberg, J. H., Dusanter, S., Griffith, S., Stevens, P. S., Brioude, J., Angevine, W. M., and Jimenez, J. L.: Organic aerosol composition and sources in Pasadena, California, during the 2010 CalNex campaign, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 118, 9233–9257, https://doi.org/10.1002/jgrd.50530, 2013. 

He, J., Harkins, C., O'Dell, K., Li, M., Francoeur, C., Aikin, K. C., Anenberg, S., Baker, B., Brown, S. S., Coggon, M. M., Frost, G. J., Gilman, J. B., Kondragunta, S., Lamplugh, A., Lyu, C., Moon, Z., Pierce, B. R., Schwantes, R. H., Stockwell, C. E., Warneke, C., Yang, K., Nowlan, C. R., González Abad, G., and McDonald, B. C.: COVID-19 perturbation on US air quality and human health impact assessment, PNAS Nexus, 3, pgad483, https://doi.org/10.1093/pnasnexus/pgad483, 2024. 

Hong, Q., Liu, C., Hu, Q., Zhang, Y., Xing, C., Su, W., Ji, X., and Xiao, S.: Evaluating the feasibility of formaldehyde derived from hyperspectral remote sensing as a proxy for volatile organic compounds, Atmos. Res., 264, 105777, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2021.105777, 2021. 

Jaffe, D. A., Cooper, O. R., Fiore, A. M., Henderson, B. H., Tonnesen, G. S., Russell, A. G., Henze, D. K., Langford, A. O., Lin, M., and Moore, T.: Scientific assessment of background ozone over the U.S.: Implications for air quality management, Elementa, 6, 30 pp., https://doi.org/10.1525/elementa.309, 2018. 

Jiang, Z., McDonald, B. C., Worden, H., Worden, J. R., Miyazaki, K., Qu, Z., Henze, D. K., Jones, D. B. A., Arellano, A. F., Fischer, E. V., Zhu, L., and Boersma, K. F.: Unexpected slowdown of US pollutant emission reduction in the past decade, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 115, 5099–5104, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1801191115, 2018. 

Jin, L., Tonse, S., Cohan, D. S., Mao, X., Harley, R. A., and Brown, N. J.: Sensitivity Analysis of Ozone Formation and Transport for a Central California Air Pollution Episode, Environ. Sci. Technol., 42, 3683–3689, https://doi.org/10.1021/es072069d, 2008. 

Jin, X. and Holloway, T.: Spatial and temporal variability of ozone sensitivity over China observed from the Ozone Monitoring Instrument, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 120, 7229–7246, https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JD023250, 2015. 

Jin, X., Fiore, A., Boersma, K. F., Smedt, I. D., and Valin, L.: Inferring Changes in Summertime Surface Ozone–NOx–VOC Chemistry over U.S. Urban Areas from Two Decades of Satellite and Ground-Based Observations, Environ. Sci. Technol., 54, 6518–6529, https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.9b07785, 2020. 

Jung, J., Choi, Y., Mousavinezhad, S., Kang, D., Park, J., Pouyaei, A., Ghahremanloo, M., Momeni, M., and Kim, H.: Changes in the ozone chemical regime over the contiguous United States inferred by the inversion of NOx and VOC emissions using satellite observation, Atmos. Res., 270, 1–14, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2022.106076, 2022. 

Khare, P. and Gentner, D. R.: Considering the future of anthropogenic gas-phase organic compound emissions and the increasing influence of non-combustion sources on urban air quality, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 5391–5413, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-5391-2018, 2018. 

Kim, S.-W., McDonald, B. C., Seo, S., Kim, K.-M., and Trainer, M.: Understanding the Paths of Surface Ozone Abatement in the Los Angeles Basin, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 127, e2021JD035606, https://doi.org/10.1029/2021JD035606, 2022. 

Kleinman, L. I.: The dependence of tropospheric ozone production rate on ozone precursors, Atmos. Environ., 39, 575–586, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2004.08.047, 2005. 

Kleinman, L. I., Daum, P. H., Lee, J. H., Lee, Y.-N., Nunnermacker, L. J., Springston, S. R., Newman, L., Weinstein-Lloyd, J., and Sillman, S.: Dependence of ozone production on NO and hydrocarbons in the troposphere, Geophys. Res. Lett., 24, 2299–2302, https://doi.org/10.1029/97GL02279, 1997. 

Koplitz, S., Simon, H., Henderson, B., Liljegren, J., Tonnesen, G., Whitehill, A., and Wells, B.: Changes in Ozone Chemical Sensitivity in the United States from 2007 to 2016, ACS Environ. Au, 2, 206–222, https://doi.org/10.1021/acsenvironau.1c00029, 2022. 

LaFranchi, B. W., Goldstein, A. H., and Cohen, R. C.: Observations of the temperature dependent response of ozone to NOx reductions in the Sacramento, CA urban plume, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 6945–6960, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-6945-2011, 2011. 

Laughner, J. L. and Cohen, R. C.: Direct observation of changing NOx lifetime in North American cities, Science, 366, 723–727, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aax6832, 2019. 

Lee, H.-J., Jo, H.-Y., Kim, J.-M., Bak, J., Park, M.-S., Kim, J.-K., Jo, Y.-J., and Kim, C.-H.: Nocturnal Boundary Layer Height Uncertainty in Particulate Matter Simulations during the KORUS-AQ Campaign, Remote Sens., 15, 300, https://doi.org/10.3390/rs15020300, 2023. 

Lerner, B. M., Gilman, J. B., Aikin, K. C., Atlas, E. L., Goldan, P. D., Graus, M., Hendershot, R., Isaacman-VanWertz, G. A., Koss, A., Kuster, W. C., Lueb, R. A., McLaughlin, R. J., Peischl, J., Sueper, D., Ryerson, T. B., Tokarek, T. W., Warneke, C., Yuan, B., and de Gouw, J. A.: An improved, automated whole air sampler and gas chromatography mass spectrometry analysis system for volatile organic compounds in the atmosphere, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 10, 291–313, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-10-291-2017, 2017. 

Li, P., Yang, Y., Wang, H., Li, S., Li, K., Wang, P., Li, B., and Liao, H.: Source attribution of near-surface ozone trends in the United States during 1995–2019, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 23, 5403–5417, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-5403-2023, 2023. 

Liu, S., Barletta, B., Hornbrook, R. S., Fried, A., Peischl, J., Meinardi, S., Coggon, M., Lamplugh, A., Gilman, J. B., Gkatzelis, G. I., Warneke, C., Apel, E. C., Hills, A. J., Bourgeois, I., Walega, J., Weibring, P., Richter, D., Kuwayama, T., FitzGibbon, M., and Blake, D.: Composition and reactivity of volatile organic compounds in the South Coast Air Basin and San Joaquin Valley of California, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 10937–10954, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-10937-2022, 2022. 

Luecken, D. J., Hutzell, W. T., Strum, M. L., and Pouliot, G. A.: Regional sources of atmospheric formaldehyde and acetaldehyde, and implications for atmospheric modeling, Atmos. Environ., 47, 477–490, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2011.10.005, 2012. 

Madronich, S. and Flocke, S.: Theoretical Estimation of Biologically Effective UV Radiation at the Earth's Surface, Solar Ultraviolet Radiation, Berlin, Heidelberg, 23–48, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-03375-3_3, 1997. 

Mao, J., Ren, X., Chen, S., Brune, W. H., Chen, Z., Martinez, M., Harder, H., Lefer, B., Rappenglück, B., Flynn, J., and Leuchner, M.: Atmospheric oxidation capacity in the summer of Houston 2006: Comparison with summer measurements in other metropolitan studies, Atmos. Environ., 44, 4107–4115, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2009.01.013, 2010. 

Martin, R. V., Fiore, A. M., and Van Donkelaar, A.: Space-based diagnosis of surface ozone sensitivity to anthropogenic emissions, Geophys. Res. Lett., 31, L06120, https://doi.org/10.1029/2004GL019416, 2004. 

McDonald, B. C., Gentner, D. R., Goldstein, A. H., and Harley, R. A.: Long-Term Trends in Motor Vehicle Emissions in U.S. Urban Areas, Environ. Sci. Technol., 47, 10022–10031, https://doi.org/10.1021/es401034z, 2013. 

McDonald, B. C., McBride, Z. C., Martin, E. W., and Harley, R. A.: High-resolution mapping of motor vehicle carbon dioxide emissions, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 119, 5283–5298, https://doi.org/10.1002/2013JD021219, 2014. 

McDonald, B. C., McKeen, S. A., Cui, Y. Y., Ahmadov, R., Kim, S.-W., Frost, G. J., Pollack, I. B., Peischl, J., Ryerson, T. B., Holloway, J. S., Graus, M., Warneke, C., Gilman, J. B., de Gouw, J. A., Kaiser, J., Keutsch, F. N., Hanisco, T. F., Wolfe, G. M., and Trainer, M.: Modeling Ozone in the Eastern U.S. using a Fuel-Based Mobile Source Emissions Inventory, Environ. Sci. Technol., 52, 7360–7370, https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.8b00778, 2018a. 

McDonald, B. C., de Gouw, J. A., Gilman, J. B., Jathar, S. H., Akherati, A., Cappa, C. D., Jimenez, J. L., Lee-Taylor, J., Hayes, P. L., McKeen, S. A., Cui, Y. Y., Kim, S.-W., Gentner, D. R., Isaacman-VanWertz, G., Goldstein, A. H., Harley, R. A., Frost, G. J., Roberts, J. M., Ryerson, T. B., and Trainer, M.: Volatile chemical products emerging as largest petrochemical source of urban organic emissions, Science, 359, 760–764, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaq0524, 2018b. 

Mellouki, A., Ammann, M., Cox, R. A., Crowley, J. N., Herrmann, H., Jenkin, M. E., McNeill, V. F., Troe, J., and Wallington, T. J.: Evaluated kinetic and photochemical data for atmospheric chemistry: volume VIII – gas-phase reactions of organic species with four, or more, carbon atoms ( ≥  C4), Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 4797–4808, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-4797-2021, 2021. 

Nakanishi, M. and Niino, H.: Development of an Improved Turbulence Closure Model for the Atmospheric Boundary Layer, J. Meteorol. Soc. Jpn. Ser. II, 87, 895–912, https://doi.org/10.2151/jmsj.87.895, 2009. 

Nunnermacker, L. J., Imre, D., Daum, P. H., Kleinman, L., Lee, Y.-N., Lee, J. H., Springston, S. R., Newman, L., Weinstein-Lloyd, J., Luke, W. T., Banta, R., Alvarez, R., Senff, C., Sillman, S., Holdren, M., Keigley, G. W., and Zhou, X.: Characterization of the Nashville urban plume on July 3 and July 18, 1995, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 103, 28129–28148, https://doi.org/10.1029/98JD01961, 1998. 

Nussbaumer, C. M. and Cohen, R. C.: The Role of Temperature and NOx in Ozone Trends in the Los Angeles Basin, Environ. Sci. Technol., 54, 15652–15659, https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.0c04910, 2020. 

Nussbaumer, C. M., Place, B. K., Zhu, Q., Pfannerstill, E. Y., Wooldridge, P., Schulze, B. C., Arata, C., Ward, R., Bucholtz, A., Seinfeld, J. H., Goldstein, A. H., and Cohen, R. C.: Measurement report: Airborne measurements of NOx fluxes over Los Angeles during the RECAP-CA 2021 campaign, EGUsphere [preprint], https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-601, 2023. 

Olson, J. B., Kenyon, J. S., Angevine, W. A., Brown, J. M., Pagowski, M., and Sušelj, K.: A Description of the MYNN-EDMF Scheme and the Coupling to Other Components in WRF–ARW, NOAA Tech. Memo. OAR GSD-61, NOAA, 42 pp., https://doi.org/10.25923/n9wm-be49, 2019. 

Parker, H. A., Hasheminassab, S., Crounse, J. D., Roehl, C. M., and Wennberg, P. O.: Impacts of Traffic Reductions Associated With COVID-19 on Southern California Air Quality, Geophys. Res. Lett., 47, e2020GL090164, https://doi.org/10.1029/2020gl090164, 2020. 

Parker, L. K., Johnson, J., Grant, J., Vennam, P., Parikh, R., Chien, C.-J., and Morris, R.: Ozone Trends and the Ability of Models to Reproduce the 2020 Ozone Concentrations in the South Coast Air Basin in Southern California under the COVID-19 Restrictions, Atmosphere, 13, 528, https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos13040528, 2022. 

Peischl, J., Aikin, K. C., McDonald, B. C., Harkins, C., Middlebrook, A. M., Langford, A. O., Cooper, O. R., Chang, K.-L., and Brown, S. S.: Quantifying anomalies of air pollutants in 9 U.S. cities during 2020 due to COVID-19 lockdowns and wildfires based on decadal trends, Elementa, 11, 25 pp., https://doi.org/10.1525/elementa.2023.00029, 2023. 

Peng, Y., Mouat, A. P., Hu, Y., Li, M., McDonald, B. C., and Kaiser, J.: Source appointment of volatile organic compounds and evaluation of anthropogenic monoterpene emission estimates in Atlanta, Georgia, Atmos. Environ., 288, 119324, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2022.119324, 2022. 

Pennington, E. A., Wang, Y., Schulze, B. C., Seltzer, K. M., Yang, J., Zhao, B., Jiang, Z., Shi, H., Venecek, M., Chau, D., Murphy, B. N., Kenseth, C. M., Ward, R. X., Pye, H. O. T., and Seinfeld, J. H.: An Updated Modeling Framework to Simulate Los Angeles Air Quality. Part 1: Model Development, Evaluation, and Source Apportionment, EGUsphere [preprint], https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-749, 2023. 

Perdigones, B. C., Lee, S., Cohen, R. C., Park, J.-H., and Min, K.-E.: Two Decades of Changes in Summertime Ozone Production in California's South Coast Air Basin, Environ. Sci. Technol., 56, 10586–10595, https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.2c01026, 2022. 

Pfannerstill, E. Y., Arata, C., Zhu, Q., Schulze, B. C., Woods, R., Harkins, C., Schwantes, R. H., McDonald, B. C., Seinfeld, J. H., Bucholtz, A., Cohen, R. C., and Goldstein, A. H.: Comparison between Spatially Resolved Airborne Flux Measurements and Emission Inventories of Volatile Organic Compounds in Los Angeles, Environ. Sci. Technol., 57, 15533–15545, https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.3c03162, 2023. 

Pollack, I. B., Ryerson, T. B., Trainer, M., Neuman, J. A., Roberts, J. M., and Parrish, D. D.: Trends in ozone, its precursors, and related secondary oxidation products in Los Angeles, California: A synthesis of measurements from 1960 to 2010, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 118, 5893–5911, https://doi.org/10.1002/jgrd.50472, 2013. 

Pollack, I. B., Ryerson, T. B., Trainer, M., Parrish, D. D., Andrews, A. E., Atlas, E. L., Blake, D. R., Brown, S. S., Commane, R., Daube, B. C., de Gouw, J. A., Dubé, W. P., Flynn, J., Frost, G. J., Gilman, J. B., Grossberg, N., Holloway, J. S., Kofler, J., Kort, E. A., Kuster, W. C., Lang, P. M., Lefer, B., Lueb, R. A., Neuman, J. A., Nowak, J. B., Novelli, P. C., Peischl, J., Perring, A. E., Roberts, J. M., Santoni, G., Schwarz, J. P., Spackman, J. R., Wagner, N. L., Warneke, C., Washenfelder, R. A., Wofsy, S. C., and Xiang, B.: Airborne and ground-based observations of a weekend effect in ozone, precursors, and oxidation products in the California South Coast Air Basin, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 117, D00V05, https://doi.org/10.1029/2011JD016772, 2012. 

Pusede, S. E. and Cohen, R. C.: On the observed response of ozone to NOx and VOC reactivity reductions in San Joaquin Valley California 1995–present, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 8323–8339, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-8323-2012, 2012. 

Qin, M., Murphy, B. N., Isaacs, K. K., McDonald, B. C., Lu, Q., McKeen, S. A., Koval, L., Robinson, A. L., Efstathiou, C., Allen, C., and Pye, H. O. T.: Criteria pollutant impacts of volatile chemical products informed by near-field modelling, Nat. Sustain., 4, 129–137, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-020-00614-1, 2021. 

Rickly, P. S., Coggon, M. M., Aikin, K. C., Alvarez, R. J., II, Baidar, S., Gilman, J. B., Gkatzelis, G. I., Harkins, C., He, J., Lamplugh, A., Langford, A. O., McDonald, B. C., Peischl, J., Robinson, M. A., Rollins, A. W., Schwantes, R. H., Senff, C. J., Warneke, C., and Brown, S. S.: Influence of Wildfire on Urban Ozone: An Observationally Constrained Box Modeling Study at a Site in the Colorado Front Range, Environ. Sci. Technol., 57, 1257–1267, https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.2c06157, 2023. 

Rivellini, L.-H., Jorga, S., Wang, Y., Lee, A. K. Y., Murphy, J. G., Chan, A. W., and Abbatt, J. P. D.: Sources of Wintertime Atmospheric Organic Pollutants in a Large Canadian City: Insights from Particle and Gas Phase Measurements, ACS ES&T Air, 1, 690–703, https://doi.org/10.1021/acsestair.4c00039, 2024. 

Robinson, A. L., Subramanian, R., Donahue, N. M., Bernardo-Bricker, A., and Rogge, W. F.: Source Apportionment of Molecular Markers and Organic Aerosol. 3. Food Cooking Emissions, Environ. Sci. Technol., 40, 7820–7827, https://doi.org/10.1021/es060781p, 2006. 

Robinson, E. S., Gu, P., Ye, Q., Li, H. Z., Shah, R. U., Apte, J. S., Robinson, A. L., and Presto, A. A.: Restaurant Impacts on Outdoor Air Quality: Elevated Organic Aerosol Mass from Restaurant Cooking with Neighborhood-Scale Plume Extents, Environ. Sci. Technol., 52, 9285–9294, https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.8b02654, 2018. 

Robinson, M. A., Neuman, J. A., Huey, L. G., Roberts, J. M., Brown, S. S., and Veres, P. R.: Temperature-dependent sensitivity of iodide chemical ionization mass spectrometers, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 15, 4295–4305, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-4295-2022, 2022. 

Robinson, M. A., Decker, Z. C. J., Barsanti, K. C., Coggon, M. M., Flocke, F. M., Franchin, A., Fredrickson, C. D., Gilman, J. B., Gkatzelis, G. I., Holmes, C. D., Lamplugh, A., Lavi, A., Middlebrook, A. M., Montzka, D. M., Palm, B. B., Peischl, J., Pierce, B., Schwantes, R. H., Sekimoto, K., Selimovic, V., Tyndall, G. S., Thornton, J. A., Van Rooy, P., Warneke, C., Weinheimer, A. J., and Brown, S. S.: Variability and Time of Day Dependence of Ozone Photochemistry in Western Wildfire Plumes, Environ. Sci. Technol., 55, 10280–10290, https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.1c01963, 2021. 

Rollins, A. W., Rickly, P. S., Gao, R. S., Ryerson, T. B., Brown, S. S., Peischl, J., and Bourgeois, I.: Single-photon laser-induced fluorescence detection of nitric oxide at sub-parts-per-trillion mixing ratios, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 13, 2425–2439, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-2425-2020, 2020. 

Ryerson, T. B., Andrews, A. E., Angevine, W. M., Bates, T. S., Brock, C. A., Cairns, B., Cohen, R. C., Cooper, O. R., de Gouw, J. A., Fehsenfeld, F. C., Ferrare, R. A., Fischer, M. L., Flagan, R. C., Goldstein, A. H., Hair, J. W., Hardesty, R. M., Hostetler, C. A., Jimenez, J. L., Langford, A. O., McCauley, E., McKeen, S. A., Molina, L. T., Nenes, A., Oltmans, S. J., Parrish, D. D., Pederson, J. R., Pierce, R. B., Prather, K., Quinn, P. K., Seinfeld, J. H., Senff, C. J., Sorooshian, A., Stutz, J., Surratt, J. D., Trainer, M., Volkamer, R., Williams, E. J., and Wofsy, S. C.: The 2010 California Research at the Nexus of Air Quality and Climate Change (CalNex) field study, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 118, 5830–5866, https://doi.org/10.1002/jgrd.50331, 2013. 

Sakamoto, Y., Sadanaga, Y., Li, J., Matsuoka, K., Takemura, M., Fujii, T., Nakagawa, M., Kohno, N., Nakashima, Y., Sato, K., Nakayama, T., Kato, S., Takami, A., Yoshino, A., Murano, K., and Kajii, Y.: Relative and Absolute Sensitivity Analysis on Ozone Production in Tsukuba, a City in Japan, Environ. Sci. Technol., 53, 13629–13635, https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.9b03542, 2019. 

Schauer, J. J., Kleeman, M. J., Cass, G. R., and Simoneit, B. R. T.: Measurement of Emissions from Air Pollution Sources, 1. C1 through C29 Organic Compounds from Meat Charbroiling, Environ. Sci. Technol., 33, 1566–1577, https://doi.org/10.1021/es980076j, 1999. 

Schlaerth, H. L., Silva, S. J., and Li, Y.: Characterizing Ozone Sensitivity to Urban Greening in Los Angeles Under Current Day and Future Anthropogenic Emissions Scenarios, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 128, e2023JD039199, https://doi.org/10.1029/2023JD039199, 2023. 

Schroeder, J. R., Cai, C., Xu, J., Ridley, D., Lu, J., Bui, N., Yan, F., and Avise, J.: Changing ozone sensitivity in the South Coast Air Basin during the COVID-19 period, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 12985–13000, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-12985-2022, 2022. 

Schroeder, J. R., Crawford, J. H., Fried, A., Walega, J., Weinheimer, A., Wisthaler, A., Müller, M., Mikoviny, T., Chen, G., Shook, M., Blake, D. R., and Tonnesen, G. S.: New insights into the column CH2O / NO2 ratio as an indicator of near-surface ozone sensitivity, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 122, 8885–8907, https://doi.org/10.1002/2017JD026781, 2017. 

Seinfeld, J. H.: Urban Air Pollution: State of the Science, Science, 243, 745–752, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.243.4892.745, 1989. 

Seltzer, K. M., Murphy, B. N., Pennington, E. A., Allen, C., Talgo, K., and Pye, H. O. T.: Volatile Chemical Product Enhancements to Criteria Pollutants in the United States, Environ. Sci. Technol., 56, 6905–6913, https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.1c04298, 2022. 

Sillman, S.: The use of NOy, H2O2, and HNO3 as indicators for ozone-NOx-hydrocarbon sensitivity in urban locations, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 100, 14175–14188, https://doi.org/10.1029/94JD02953, 1995. 

Silvern, R. F., Jacob, D. J., Mickley, L. J., Sulprizio, M. P., Travis, K. R., Marais, E. A., Cohen, R. C., Laughner, J. L., Choi, S., Joiner, J., and Lamsal, L. N.: Using satellite observations of tropospheric NO2 columns to infer long-term trends in US NOx emissions: the importance of accounting for the free tropospheric NO2 background, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 8863–8878, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-8863-2019, 2019. 

Stockwell, C. E., Coggon, M. M., Schwantes, R. H., Harkins, C., Verreyken, B., Lyu, C., Zhu, Q., Xu, L., Gilman, J. B., Lamplugh, A., Peischl, J., Robinson, M. A., Veres, P. R., Li, M., Rollins, A. W., Zuraski, K., Baidar, S., Liu, S., Kuwayama, T., Brown, S. S., McDonald, B. C., and Warneke, C.: NOAA Chemical Sciences Laboratory SUVNEx dataset for “Urban ozone formation and sensitivities to volatile chemical products, cooking emissions, and NOx upwind of and within two Los Angeles Basin cities”, [data set], https://csl.noaa.gov/projects/sunvex/ (last access: 1 June 2024), 2025. 

Stohl, A., Forster, C., Frank, A., Seibert, P., and Wotawa, G.: Technical note: The Lagrangian particle dispersion model FLEXPART version 6.2, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 5, 2461–2474, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-5-2461-2005, 2005. 

Strobach, E. J., Baidar, S., Carroll, B. J., Brown, S. S., Zuraski, K., Coggon, M., Stockwell, C. E., Xu, L., Pichugina, Y. L., Brewer, A., Warneke, C., Peischl, J., Gilman, J., McCarty, B., Holloway, M., and Marchbanks, R.: An Air Quality and Boundary Layer Dynamics Analysis of the Los Angeles Basin Area During the Southwest Urban NOx and VOCs Experiment (SUNVEx), EGUsphere [preprint], https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-447, 2024. 

Van Rooy, P., Tasnia, A., Barletta, B., Buenconsejo, R., Crounse, J. D., Kenseth, C. M., Meinardi, S., Murphy, S., Parker, H., Schulze, B., Seinfeld, J. H., Wennberg, P. O., Blake, D. R., and Barsanti, K. C.: Observations of Volatile Organic Compounds in the Los Angeles Basin during COVID-19, ACS Earth Space Chem., 5, 3045–3055, https://doi.org/10.1021/acsearthspacechem.1c00248, 2021. 

Venecek, M. A., Carter, W. P. L., and Kleeman, M. J.: Updating the SAPRC Maximum Incremental Reactivity (MIR) scale for the United States from 1988 to 2010, J. Air Waste Manag. Assoc., 68, 1301–1316, https://doi.org/10.1080/10962247.2018.1498410, 2018. 

Vermeuel, M. P., Novak, G. A., Alwe, H. D., Hughes, D. D., Kaleel, R., Dickens, A. F., Kenski, D., Czarnetzki, A. C., Stone, E. A., Stanier, C. O., Pierce, R. B., Millet, D. B., and Bertram, T. H.: Sensitivity of Ozone Production to NOx and VOC Along the Lake Michigan Coastline, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 124, 10989–11006, https://doi.org/10.1029/2019JD030842, 2019. 

Verreyken, B., Brioude, J., and Evan, S.: Development of turbulent scheme in the FLEXPART-AROME v1.2.1 Lagrangian particle dispersion model, Geosci. Model Dev., 12, 4245–4259, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-4245-2019, 2019. 

Verreyken, B. W. D., Harkins, C., Li, M., Angevine, W., Stockwell, C., Xu, L., Coggon, M., Gilman, J., Warneke, C., Strobach, E. J., Brown, S., McCarty, B., Marchbanks, R., Baidar, S., Brewer, A., Pfannerstill, E., Arata, C., Goldstein, A., Brioude, J., and McDonald, B. C.: Top-down Evaluation of Volatile Chemical Product Emissions using a Largangian Framework, submitted, 2025. 

Wagner, N. L., Riedel, T. P., Roberts, J. M., Thornton, J. A., Angevine, W. M., Williams, E. J., Lerner, B. M., Vlasenko, A., Li, S. M., Dubé, W. P., Coffman, D. J., Bon, D. M., de Gouw, J. A., Kuster, W. C., Gilman, J. B., and Brown, S. S.: The sea breeze/land breeze circulation in Los Angeles and its influence on nitryl chloride production in this region, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 117, D00V24, https://doi.org/10.1029/2012JD017810, 2012. 

Wang, P., Chen, Y., Hu, J., Zhang, H., and Ying, Q.: Attribution of Tropospheric Ozone to NOx and VOC Emissions: Considering Ozone Formation in the Transition Regime, Environ. Sci. Technol., 53, 1404–1412, https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.8b05981, 2019. 

Warneke, C., de Gouw, J. A., Del Negro, L., Brioude, J., McKeen, S., Stark, H., Kuster, W. C., Goldan, P. D., Trainer, M., Fehsenfeld, F. C., Wiedinmyer, C., Guenther, A. B., Hansel, A., Wisthaler, A., Atlas, E., Holloway, J. S., Ryerson, T. B., Peischl, J., Huey, L. G., and Hanks, A. T. C.: Biogenic emission measurement and inventories determination of biogenic emissions in the eastern United States and Texas and comparison with biogenic emission inventories, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 115, D00F18, https://doi.org/10.1029/2009JD012445, 2010. 

Warneke, C., de Gouw, J. A., Holloway, J. S., Peischl, J., Ryerson, T. B., Atlas, E., Blake, D., Trainer, M., and Parrish, D. D.: Multiyear trends in volatile organic compounds in Los Angeles, California: Five decades of decreasing emissions, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 117, D00V17, https://doi.org/10.1029/2012JD017899, 2012. 

Washenfelder, R. A., Young, C. J., Brown, S. S., Angevine, W. M., Atlas, E. L., Blake, D. R., Bon, D. M., Cubison, M. J., de Gouw, J. A., Dusanter, S., Flynn, J., Gilman, J. B., Graus, M., Griffith, S., Grossberg, N., Hayes, P. L., Jimenez, J. L., Kuster, W. C., Lefer, B. L., Pollack, I. B., Ryerson, T. B., Stark, H., Stevens, P. S., and Trainer, M. K.: The glyoxal budget and its contribution to organic aerosol for Los Angeles, California, during CalNex 2010, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 116, D00V02, https://doi.org/10.1029/2011jd016314, 2011. 

Wernis, R. A., Kreisberg, N. M., Weber, R. J., Drozd, G. T., and Goldstein, A. H.: Source apportionment of VOCs, IVOCs and SVOCs by positive matrix factorization in suburban Livermore, California, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 14987–15019, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-14987-2022, 2022. 

Wild, R. J., Edwards, P. M., Dubé, W. P., Baumann, K., Edgerton, E. S., Quinn, P. K., Roberts, J. M., Rollins, A. W., Veres, P. R., Warneke, C., Williams, E. J., Yuan, B., and Brown, S. S.: A Measurement of Total Reactive Nitrogen, NOy, together with NO2, NO, and O3 via Cavity Ring-down Spectroscopy, Environ. Sci. Technol., 48, 9609–9615, https://doi.org/10.1021/es501896w, 2014. 

Wolfe, G. M., Marvin, M. R., Roberts, S. J., Travis, K. R., and Liao, J.: The Framework for 0-D Atmospheric Modeling (F0AM) v3.1, Geosci. Model Dev., 9, 3309–3319, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-9-3309-2016, 2016. 

Wu, S., Lee, H. J., Anderson, A., Liu, S., Kuwayama, T., Seinfeld, J. H., and Kleeman, M. J.: Direct measurements of ozone response to emissions perturbations in California, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 4929–4949, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-4929-2022, 2022. 

Wu, S., Alaimo, C. P., Zhao, Y., Green, P. G., Young, T. M., Liu, S., Kuwayama, T., Coggon, M. M., Stockwell, C. E., Xu, L., Warneke, C., Gilman, J. B., Robinson, M. A., Veres, P. R., Neuman, J. A., and Kleeman, M. J.: O3 Sensitivity to NOx and VOC During RECAP-CA: Implication for Emissions Control Strategies, ACS ES&T Air, 1, 536–546, https://doi.org/10.1021/acsestair.4c00026, 2024. 

Yu, K. A., Li, M., Harkins, C., He, J., Zhu, Q., Verreyken, B., Schwantes, R. H., Cohen, R. C., McDonald, B. C., and Harley, R. A.: Improved Spatial Resolution in Modeling of Nitrogen Oxide Concentrations in the Los Angeles Basin, Environ. Sci. Technol., 57, 20689–20698, https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.3c06158, 2023. 

Yuan, B., Koss, A. R., Warneke, C., Coggon, M., Sekimoto, K., and de Gouw, J. A.: Proton-Transfer-Reaction Mass Spectrometry: Applications in Atmospheric Sciences, Chem. Rev., 117, 13187–13229, https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.7b00325, 2017. 

Zare, A., Romer, P. S., Nguyen, T., Keutsch, F. N., Skog, K., and Cohen, R. C.: A comprehensive organic nitrate chemistry: insights into the lifetime of atmospheric organic nitrates, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 15419–15436, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-15419-2018, 2018. 

Zhu, Q., Schwantes, R. H., Coggon, M., Harkins, C., Schnell, J., He, J., Pye, H. O. T., Li, M., Baker, B., Moon, Z., Ahmadov, R., Pfannerstill, E. Y., Place, B., Wooldridge, P., Schulze, B. C., Arata, C., Bucholtz, A., Seinfeld, J. H., Warneke, C., Stockwell, C. E., Xu, L., Zuraski, K., Robinson, M. A., Neuman, J. A., Veres, P. R., Peischl, J., Brown, S. S., Goldstein, A. H., Cohen, R. C., and McDonald, B. C.: A better representation of volatile organic compound chemistry in WRF-Chem and its impact on ozone over Los Angeles, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 24, 5265–5286, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-5265-2024, 2024a. 

Zhu, Q., Schwantes, R. H., Coggon, M., Harkins, C., Schnell, J., He, J., Pye, H. O. T., Li, M., Baker, B., Moon, Z., Ahmadov, R., Pfannerstill, E. Y., Place, B., Wooldridge, P., Schulze, B. C., Arata, C., Bucholtz, A., Seinfeld, J. H., Warneke, C., Stockwell, C. E., Xu, L., Zuraski, K., Robinson, M. A., Neuman, A., Veres, P. R., Peischl, J., Brown, S. S., Goldstein, A. H., Cohen, R. C., and McDonald, B. C.: Analysis code and WRF-Chem source code for “A better representation of volatile organic compound chemistry in WRF-Chem and its impact on ozone over Los Angeles”, GitHub [code], https://github.com/NOAA-CSL/WRF-Chem_CSL_Publications/tree/main/Qindan_Zhu_et_al_2024TS15 (last access: 1 June 2024), 2024b. 

Zhu, Q., Schwantes, R. H., Stockwell, C. E., Harkins, C., Lyu, C., Coggon, M., Warneke, C., Schnell, J., He, J., Pye, H. O. T., Li, M., Ahmadov, R., Pfannerstill, E. Y., Place, B., Wooldridge, P., Schulze, B. C., Arata, C., Bucholtz, A., Seinfeld, J. H., Xu, L., Zuraski, K., Robinson, M. A., Neuman, J. A., Gilman, J., Lamplugh, A., Veres, P. R., Peischl, J., Rollins, A., Brown, S. S., Goldstein, A. H., Cohen, R. C., and McDonald, B. C.: Incorporating Cooking Emissions to Better Simulate the Impact of Zero-Emission Vehicle Adoption on Ozone Pollution in Los Angeles, submitted, 2025. 

Download
Short summary
In urban areas, emissions from everyday products like paints, cleaners, and personal care products, along with non-traditional sources such as cooking, are increasingly important and impact air quality. This study uses a box model to evaluate how these emissions impact ozone in the Los Angeles Basin and quantifies the impact of gaseous cooking emissions. Accurate representation of these and other anthropogenic sources in inventories is crucial for informing effective air quality policies.
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint