Articles | Volume 24, issue 10
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-6385-2024
© Author(s) 2024. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-6385-2024
© Author(s) 2024. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Intercomparison of aerosol optical depths from four reanalyses and their multi-reanalysis consensus
Marine Meteorology Division, Naval Research Laboratory, Monterey, CA, USA
Jeffrey S. Reid
Marine Meteorology Division, Naval Research Laboratory, Monterey, CA, USA
Melanie Ades
Research Department, European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts, Reading, UK
Angela Benedetti
Research Department, European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts, Reading, UK
Peter R. Colarco
Atmospheric Chemistry and Dynamics Laboratory, NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD, USA
Arlindo da Silva
Global Modeling and Assimilation Office, NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD, USA
Tom F. Eck
Biospheric Sciences Laboratory, NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD, USA
Goddard Earth Sciences Technology and Research II, University of Maryland, Baltimore County, Baltimore, MD, USA
Johannes Flemming
Research Department, European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts, Reading, UK
Edward J. Hyer
Marine Meteorology Division, Naval Research Laboratory, Monterey, CA, USA
Zak Kipling
Research Department, European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts, Reading, UK
Samuel Rémy
Atmospheric Composition Department, HYGEOS, Lille, France
Tsuyoshi Thomas Sekiyama
Meteorological Research Institute, Japan Meteorological Agency, Tsukuba, Japan
Taichu Tanaka
Information Infrastructure Department, Japan Meteorological Agency, Tokyo, Japan
Keiya Yumimoto
Research Institute for Applied Mechanics, Kyushu University, Kasuga, Japan
Jianglong Zhang
Department of Atmospheric Sciences, University of North Dakota, Grand Forks, ND, USA
Viewed
Total article views: 6,440 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 01 Nov 2023)
| HTML | XML | Total | Supplement | BibTeX | EndNote | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4,632 | 1,635 | 173 | 6,440 | 589 | 191 | 331 |
- HTML: 4,632
- PDF: 1,635
- XML: 173
- Total: 6,440
- Supplement: 589
- BibTeX: 191
- EndNote: 331
Total article views: 3,614 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 31 May 2024)
| HTML | XML | Total | Supplement | BibTeX | EndNote | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3,007 | 517 | 90 | 3,614 | 133 | 97 | 158 |
- HTML: 3,007
- PDF: 517
- XML: 90
- Total: 3,614
- Supplement: 133
- BibTeX: 97
- EndNote: 158
Total article views: 2,826 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 01 Nov 2023)
| HTML | XML | Total | Supplement | BibTeX | EndNote | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1,625 | 1,118 | 83 | 2,826 | 456 | 94 | 173 |
- HTML: 1,625
- PDF: 1,118
- XML: 83
- Total: 2,826
- Supplement: 456
- BibTeX: 94
- EndNote: 173
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Total article views: 6,440 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 6,413 with geography defined
and 27 with unknown origin.
Total article views: 3,614 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 3,595 with geography defined
and 19 with unknown origin.
Total article views: 2,826 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 2,818 with geography defined
and 8 with unknown origin.
| Country | # | Views | % |
|---|
| Country | # | Views | % |
|---|
| Country | # | Views | % |
|---|
| Total: | 0 |
| HTML: | 0 |
| PDF: | 0 |
| XML: | 0 |
- 1
1
| Total: | 0 |
| HTML: | 0 |
| PDF: | 0 |
| XML: | 0 |
- 1
1
| Total: | 0 |
| HTML: | 0 |
| PDF: | 0 |
| XML: | 0 |
- 1
1
Latest update: 08 May 2026
Short summary
The study compares and evaluates monthly AOD of four reanalyses (RA) and their consensus (i.e., ensemble mean). The basic verification characteristics of these RA versus both AERONET and MODIS retrievals are presented. The study discusses the strength of each RA and identifies regions where divergence and challenges are prominent. The RA consensus usually performs very well on a global scale in terms of how well it matches the observational data, making it a good choice for various applications.
The study compares and evaluates monthly AOD of four reanalyses (RA) and their consensus (i.e.,...
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint