Articles | Volume 24, issue 10
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-6385-2024
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-6385-2024
Research article
 | 
31 May 2024
Research article |  | 31 May 2024

Intercomparison of aerosol optical depths from four reanalyses and their multi-reanalysis consensus

Peng Xian, Jeffrey S. Reid, Melanie Ades, Angela Benedetti, Peter R. Colarco, Arlindo da Silva, Tom F. Eck, Johannes Flemming, Edward J. Hyer, Zak Kipling, Samuel Rémy, Tsuyoshi Thomas Sekiyama, Taichu Tanaka, Keiya Yumimoto, and Jianglong Zhang

Viewed

Total article views: 1,543 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total Supplement BibTeX EndNote
1,188 308 47 1,543 80 33 39
  • HTML: 1,188
  • PDF: 308
  • XML: 47
  • Total: 1,543
  • Supplement: 80
  • BibTeX: 33
  • EndNote: 39
Views and downloads (calculated since 01 Nov 2023)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 01 Nov 2023)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 1,543 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 1,530 with geography defined and 13 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 

Cited

Latest update: 20 Nov 2024
Download
Short summary
The study compares and evaluates monthly AOD of four reanalyses (RA) and their consensus (i.e., ensemble mean). The basic verification characteristics of these RA versus both AERONET and MODIS retrievals are presented. The study discusses the strength of each RA and identifies regions where divergence and challenges are prominent. The RA consensus usually performs very well on a global scale in terms of how well it matches the observational data, making it a good choice for various applications.
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint