Articles | Volume 24, issue 10
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-6385-2024
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-6385-2024
Research article
 | 
31 May 2024
Research article |  | 31 May 2024

Intercomparison of aerosol optical depths from four reanalyses and their multi-reanalysis consensus

Peng Xian, Jeffrey S. Reid, Melanie Ades, Angela Benedetti, Peter R. Colarco, Arlindo da Silva, Tom F. Eck, Johannes Flemming, Edward J. Hyer, Zak Kipling, Samuel Rémy, Tsuyoshi Thomas Sekiyama, Taichu Tanaka, Keiya Yumimoto, and Jianglong Zhang

Download

Interactive discussion

Status: closed

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse

Peer review completion

AR: Author's response | RR: Referee report | ED: Editor decision | EF: Editorial file upload
AR by P. Xian on behalf of the Authors (14 Mar 2024)  Author's response   Author's tracked changes   Manuscript 
ED: Publish as is (27 Mar 2024) by Stelios Kazadzis
AR by P. Xian on behalf of the Authors (02 Apr 2024)
Download
Short summary
The study compares and evaluates monthly AOD of four reanalyses (RA) and their consensus (i.e., ensemble mean). The basic verification characteristics of these RA versus both AERONET and MODIS retrievals are presented. The study discusses the strength of each RA and identifies regions where divergence and challenges are prominent. The RA consensus usually performs very well on a global scale in terms of how well it matches the observational data, making it a good choice for various applications.
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint