Articles | Volume 23, issue 9
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-5149-2023
© Author(s) 2023. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Special issue:
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-5149-2023
© Author(s) 2023. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Opinion
| Highlight paper
| 
05 May 2023
Opinion | Highlight paper |
| 05 May 2023
| 05 May 2023
Opinion: The scientific and community-building roles of the Geoengineering Model Intercomparison Project (GeoMIP) – past, present, and future
Daniele Visioni
CORRESPONDING AUTHOR
Sibley School of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA
Ben Kravitz
Department of Earth and Atmospheric Science, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, USA
Atmospheric Sciences and Global Change Division, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, WA, USA
Alan Robock
Department of Environmental Sciences, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ, USA
Simone Tilmes
National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, CO, USA
Jim Haywood
Met Office Hadley Centre, Exeter, UK
College of Engineering, Mathematics and Physical Sciences, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
Olivier Boucher
Institut Pierre-Simon Laplace, Sorbonne Université/CNRS, Paris, France
Mark Lawrence
Institute for Advanced Sustainability Studies (IASS), Berliner Str. 130, 14467 Potsdam, Germany
Institute of Environmental Sciences and Geography, University of Potsdam, Potsdam, Germany
Peter Irvine
Earth Sciences, University College London, London, UK
Ulrike Niemeier
Max Planck Institute for Meteorology, Hamburg, Germany
Department of Environmental Sciences, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ, USA
Gabriel Chiodo
Institute for Atmospheric and Climate Science, ETH Zürich, Zurich, Switzerland
Chris Lennard
Climate System Analysis Group, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa
Shingo Watanabe
Japan Agency for Marine-Earth Science and Technology, Natsushimacho, Yokosuka, Kanagawa, Japan
John C. Moore
College of Global Change and Earth System Science, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, China
CAS Center for Excellence in Tibetan Plateau Earth Sciences, Beijing, China
Arctic Centre, University of Lapland, Rovaniemi, 96101, Finland
Helene Muri
Department of Energy and Process Engineering, Industrial Ecology Programme, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway
Viewed
Total article views: 5,979 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 08 Dec 2022)
| HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4,968 | 918 | 93 | 5,979 | 83 | 92 |
- HTML: 4,968
- PDF: 918
- XML: 93
- Total: 5,979
- BibTeX: 83
- EndNote: 92
Total article views: 4,933 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 05 May 2023)
| HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4,294 | 563 | 76 | 4,933 | 74 | 85 |
- HTML: 4,294
- PDF: 563
- XML: 76
- Total: 4,933
- BibTeX: 74
- EndNote: 85
Total article views: 1,046 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 08 Dec 2022)
| HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 674 | 355 | 17 | 1,046 | 9 | 7 |
- HTML: 674
- PDF: 355
- XML: 17
- Total: 1,046
- BibTeX: 9
- EndNote: 7
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Total article views: 5,979 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 6,087 with geography defined
and -108 with unknown origin.
Total article views: 4,933 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 5,007 with geography defined
and -74 with unknown origin.
Total article views: 1,046 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 1,080 with geography defined
and -34 with unknown origin.
| Country | # | Views | % |
|---|
| Country | # | Views | % |
|---|
| Country | # | Views | % |
|---|
| Total: | 0 |
| HTML: | 0 |
| PDF: | 0 |
| XML: | 0 |
- 1
1
| Total: | 0 |
| HTML: | 0 |
| PDF: | 0 |
| XML: | 0 |
- 1
1
| Total: | 0 |
| HTML: | 0 |
| PDF: | 0 |
| XML: | 0 |
- 1
1
Cited
14 citations as recorded by crossref.
- Trends in Solar Radiation Modification (Solar Geoengineering) M. SUGIYAMA & S. WATANABE 10.5363/tits.29.2_56
- Physically based equation representing the forcing-driven precipitation in climate models D. Lee et al. 10.1088/1748-9326/acf50f
- Paul J. Crutzen – a pioneer in Earth system science and a founding member of the journal Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics R. Müller et al. 10.5194/acp-23-15445-2023
- Engineering biology and climate change mitigation: Policy considerations J. Symons et al. 10.1038/s41467-024-46865-w
- Climate intervention using marine cloud brightening (MCB) compared with stratospheric aerosol injection (SAI) in the UKESM1 climate model J. Haywood et al. 10.5194/acp-23-15305-2023
- A protocol for model intercomparison of impacts of marine cloud brightening climate intervention P. Rasch et al. 10.5194/gmd-17-7963-2024
- Comparison of UKESM1 and CESM2 simulations using the same multi-target stratospheric aerosol injection strategy M. Henry et al. 10.5194/acp-23-13369-2023
- Stratospheric transport and tropospheric sink of solar geoengineering aerosol: a Lagrangian analysis H. Sun et al. 10.1038/s41612-024-00664-8
- Solar Geoengineering in the Polar Regions: A Review A. Duffey et al. 10.1029/2023EF003679
- Thermosteric and dynamic sea level under solar geoengineering C. Yue et al. 10.1038/s41612-023-00466-4
- Reduced Ice Loss From Greenland Under Stratospheric Aerosol Injection J. Moore et al. 10.1029/2023JF007112
- Potential effects of climate change and solar radiation modification on renewable energy resources A. Kumler et al. 10.1016/j.rser.2024.114934
- G6-1.5K-SAI: a new Geoengineering Model Intercomparison Project (GeoMIP) experiment integrating recent advances in solar radiation modification studies D. Visioni et al. 10.5194/gmd-17-2583-2024
- Uncertainties and confidence in stratospheric aerosol injection modelling: a systematic literature review A. Määttänen et al. 10.1093/oxfclm/kgae007
14 citations as recorded by crossref.
- Trends in Solar Radiation Modification (Solar Geoengineering) M. SUGIYAMA & S. WATANABE 10.5363/tits.29.2_56
- Physically based equation representing the forcing-driven precipitation in climate models D. Lee et al. 10.1088/1748-9326/acf50f
- Paul J. Crutzen – a pioneer in Earth system science and a founding member of the journal Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics R. Müller et al. 10.5194/acp-23-15445-2023
- Engineering biology and climate change mitigation: Policy considerations J. Symons et al. 10.1038/s41467-024-46865-w
- Climate intervention using marine cloud brightening (MCB) compared with stratospheric aerosol injection (SAI) in the UKESM1 climate model J. Haywood et al. 10.5194/acp-23-15305-2023
- A protocol for model intercomparison of impacts of marine cloud brightening climate intervention P. Rasch et al. 10.5194/gmd-17-7963-2024
- Comparison of UKESM1 and CESM2 simulations using the same multi-target stratospheric aerosol injection strategy M. Henry et al. 10.5194/acp-23-13369-2023
- Stratospheric transport and tropospheric sink of solar geoengineering aerosol: a Lagrangian analysis H. Sun et al. 10.1038/s41612-024-00664-8
- Solar Geoengineering in the Polar Regions: A Review A. Duffey et al. 10.1029/2023EF003679
- Thermosteric and dynamic sea level under solar geoengineering C. Yue et al. 10.1038/s41612-023-00466-4
- Reduced Ice Loss From Greenland Under Stratospheric Aerosol Injection J. Moore et al. 10.1029/2023JF007112
- Potential effects of climate change and solar radiation modification on renewable energy resources A. Kumler et al. 10.1016/j.rser.2024.114934
- G6-1.5K-SAI: a new Geoengineering Model Intercomparison Project (GeoMIP) experiment integrating recent advances in solar radiation modification studies D. Visioni et al. 10.5194/gmd-17-2583-2024
- Uncertainties and confidence in stratospheric aerosol injection modelling: a systematic literature review A. Määttänen et al. 10.1093/oxfclm/kgae007
Latest update: 20 Nov 2024
Executive editor
Climate is changing, and the evidence for this fact increases every day. Therefore, research is addressing the question of how the impact of climate change could be alleviated by influencing the climate of the Earth through geoengineering. Research on such issues has increased tremendously since the seminal paper on this topic by Paul Crutzen in 2006. An entire project, the Geoengineering Model Intercomparison Project (GeoMIP), was started in 2010 aimed at understanding the physical processes and projected impacts of solar geoengineering. The paper by Visioni et al. discusses the successes and missed opportunities of the GeoMIP project and gives recommendations regarding both future model experiments and more general activities. The paper will be without doubt a focus and a nucleation point of future discussions on the aspect of geoengineering.
Climate is changing, and the evidence for this fact increases every day. Therefore, research is...
Short summary
Geoengineering indicates methods aiming to reduce the temperature of the planet by means of reflecting back a part of the incoming radiation before it reaches the surface or allowing more of the planetary radiation to escape into space. It aims to produce modelling experiments that are easy to reproduce and compare with different climate models, in order to understand the potential impacts of these techniques. Here we assess its past successes and failures and talk about its future.
Geoengineering indicates methods aiming to reduce the temperature of the planet by means of...
Special issue
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint