Articles | Volume 22, issue 7
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 4581–4597, 2022
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-4581-2022

Special issue: Resolving uncertainties in solar geoengineering through multi-model...

Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 4581–4597, 2022
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-4581-2022
Research article
08 Apr 2022
Research article | 08 Apr 2022

Impacts of three types of solar geoengineering on the Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation

Mengdie Xie et al.

Related authors

Northern-high-latitude permafrost and terrestrial carbon response to two solar geoengineering scenarios
Yangxin Chen, Duoying Ji, Qian Zhang, John C. Moore, Olivier Boucher, Andy Jones, Thibaut Lurton, Michael J. Mills, Ulrike Niemeier, Roland Séférian, and Simone Tilmes
Earth Syst. Dynam., 14, 55–79, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-14-55-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-14-55-2023, 2023
Short summary
PInc-PanTher estimates of Arctic permafrost soil carbon under the GeoMIP G6solar and G6sulfur experiments
Aobo Liu, John C. Moore, and Yating Chen
Earth Syst. Dynam., 14, 39–53, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-14-39-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-14-39-2023, 2023
Short summary
Opinion: The Scientific and Community-Building Roles of the Geoengineering Model Intercomparison Project (GeoMIP) - Past, Present, and Future
Daniele Visioni, Ben Kravitz, Alan Robock, Simone Tilmes, Jim M. Haywood, Olivier Boucher, Mark Lawrence, Peter Irvine, Ulrike Niemeier, Lili Xia, Gabriel Chiodo, Chris Lennard, Shingo Watanabe, John C. Moore, and Helene Muri
Atmos. Chem. Phys. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-2022-766,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-2022-766, 2022
Preprint under review for ACP
Short summary
Regional dynamical and statistical downscaling temperature, humidity and wind speed for the Beijing region under stratospheric aerosol injection geoengineering
Jun Wang, John C. Moore, Liyun Zhao, Chao Yue, and Zhenhua Di
Earth Syst. Dynam., 13, 1625–1640, https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-13-1625-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-13-1625-2022, 2022
Short summary
Changes in global teleconnection patterns under global warming and stratospheric aerosol intervention scenarios
Abolfazl Rezaei, Khalil Karami, Simone Tilmes, and John C. Moore
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2022-974,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2022-974, 2022
Short summary

Related subject area

Subject: Dynamics | Research Activity: Atmospheric Modelling | Altitude Range: Stratosphere | Science Focus: Physics (physical properties and processes)
Driving mechanisms for the El Niño–Southern Oscillation impact on stratospheric ozone
Samuel Benito-Barca, Natalia Calvo, and Marta Abalos
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 15729–15745, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-15729-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-15729-2022, 2022
Short summary
Exploring the link between austral stratospheric polar vortex anomalies and surface climate in chemistry-climate models
Nora Bergner, Marina Friedel, Daniela I. V. Domeisen, Darryn Waugh, and Gabriel Chiodo
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 13915–13934, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-13915-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-13915-2022, 2022
Short summary
The impact of improved spatial and temporal resolution of reanalysis data on Lagrangian studies of the tropical tropopause layer
Stephen Bourguet and Marianna Linz
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 13325–13339, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-13325-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-13325-2022, 2022
Short summary
Dynamics of ENSO-driven stratosphere-to-troposphere transport of ozone over North America
John R. Albers, Amy H. Butler, Andrew O. Langford, Dillon Elsbury, and Melissa L. Breeden
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 13035–13048, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-13035-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-13035-2022, 2022
Short summary
Ozone–gravity wave interaction in the upper stratosphere/lower mesosphere
Axel Gabriel
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 10425–10441, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-10425-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-10425-2022, 2022
Short summary

Cited articles

Ahlm, L., Jones, A., Stjern, C. W., Muri, H., Kravitz, B., and Kristjánsson, J. E.: Marine cloud brightening – as effective without clouds, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 13071–13087, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-13071-2017, 2017. 
Angel, R.: Feasibility of cooling the Earth with a cloud of small spacecraft near the inner Lagrange point (L1), P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA., 103, 17184–17189, 2006. 
Bentsen, M., Bethke, I., Debernard, J. B., Iversen, T., Kirkevåg, A., Seland, Ø., Drange, H., Roelandt, C., Seierstad, I. A., Hoose, C., and Kristjánsson, J. E.: The Norwegian Earth System Model, NorESM1-M – Part 1: Description and basic evaluation of the physical climate, Geosci. Model Dev., 6, 687–720, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-6-687-2013, 2013. 
Buckley, M. W. and Marshall, J.: Observations, inferences, and mechanisms of the Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation: A review, Rev. Geophys., 54, 5–63, https://doi.org/10.1002/2015RG000493, 2016. 
Cao, L., Duan, L., Bala, G., and Caldeira, K.: Simultaneous stabilization of global temperature and precipitation through cocktail geoengineering, Geophys. Res. Lett., 44, 7429–7437, https://doi.org/10.1002/2017GL074281, 2017. 
Download
Short summary
We use data from six Earth system models to estimate Atlantic meridional overturning circulation (AMOC) changes and its drivers under four different solar geoengineering methods. Solar dimming seems relatively more effective than marine cloud brightening or stratospheric aerosol injection at reversing greenhouse-gas-driven declines in AMOC. Geoengineering-induced AMOC amelioration is due to better maintenance of air–sea temperature differences and reduced loss of Arctic summer sea ice.
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint