Impacts of aerosol–photolysis interaction and aerosol–radiation feedback on surface-layer ozone in North China during multi-pollutant air pollution episodes
Hao Yang,Lei Chen,Hong Liao,Jia Zhu,Wenjie Wang,and Xin Li
Hao Yang
Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Atmospheric Environment Monitoring and Pollution Control, Jiangsu Collaborative Innovation Center of Atmospheric Environment and Equipment Technology, School of Environmental Science and Engineering, Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology, Nanjing 210044, China
Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Atmospheric Environment Monitoring and Pollution Control, Jiangsu Collaborative Innovation Center of Atmospheric Environment and Equipment Technology, School of Environmental Science and Engineering, Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology, Nanjing 210044, China
Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Atmospheric Environment Monitoring and Pollution Control, Jiangsu Collaborative Innovation Center of Atmospheric Environment and Equipment Technology, School of Environmental Science and Engineering, Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology, Nanjing 210044, China
Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Atmospheric Environment Monitoring and Pollution Control, Jiangsu Collaborative Innovation Center of Atmospheric Environment and Equipment Technology, School of Environmental Science and Engineering, Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology, Nanjing 210044, China
Wenjie Wang
State Joint Key Laboratory of Environmental Simulation and Pollution Control, College of Environmental Sciences and Engineering, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China
State Joint Key Laboratory of Environmental Simulation and Pollution Control, College of Environmental Sciences and Engineering, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China
Viewed
Total article views: 4,565 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML
PDF
XML
Total
Supplement
BibTeX
EndNote
3,215
1,152
198
4,565
315
81
114
HTML: 3,215
PDF: 1,152
XML: 198
Total: 4,565
Supplement: 315
BibTeX: 81
EndNote: 114
Views and downloads (calculated since 02 Mar 2021)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 02 Mar 2021)
Total article views: 3,041 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML
PDF
XML
Total
Supplement
BibTeX
EndNote
2,264
606
171
3,041
171
71
101
HTML: 2,264
PDF: 606
XML: 171
Total: 3,041
Supplement: 171
BibTeX: 71
EndNote: 101
Views and downloads (calculated since 29 Mar 2022)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 29 Mar 2022)
Total article views: 1,524 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML
PDF
XML
Total
Supplement
BibTeX
EndNote
951
546
27
1,524
144
10
13
HTML: 951
PDF: 546
XML: 27
Total: 1,524
Supplement: 144
BibTeX: 10
EndNote: 13
Views and downloads (calculated since 02 Mar 2021)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 02 Mar 2021)
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Total article views: 4,565 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 4,565 with geography defined
and 0 with unknown origin.
Total article views: 3,041 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 3,041 with geography defined
and 0 with unknown origin.
Total article views: 1,524 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 1,524 with geography defined
and 0 with unknown origin.
Aerosols can influence O3 through aerosol–radiation interactions, including aerosol–photolysis interaction (API) and aerosol–radiation feedback (ARF). The weakened photolysis rates and changed meteorological conditions reduce surface-layer O3 concentrations by up to 9.3–11.4 ppb, with API and ARF contributing 74.6 %–90.0 % and 10.0 %–25.4 % of the O3 decrease in three episodes, respectively, which indicates that API is the dominant way for O3 reduction related to aerosol–radiation interactions.
Aerosols can influence O3 through aerosol–radiation interactions, including aerosol–photolysis...