Articles | Volume 22, issue 4
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 2487–2505, 2022
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-2487-2022
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 2487–2505, 2022
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-2487-2022

Research article 24 Feb 2022

Research article | 24 Feb 2022

Frequent new particle formation at remote sites in the subboreal forest of North America

Frequent new particle formation at remote sites in the subboreal forest of North America
Meinrat O. Andreae1,2,3, Tracey W. Andreae1, Florian Ditas1,4, and Christopher Pöhlker1 Meinrat O. Andreae et al.
  • 1Max Planck Institute for Chemistry, Mainz, Germany
  • 2Scripps Institution of Oceanography, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA
  • 3Department of Geology and Geophysics, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
  • 4Hessian Agency for Nature Conservation, Environment and Geology, Wiesbaden, Germany

Correspondence: Meinrat O. Andreae (m.andreae@mpic.de)

Abstract

The frequency and intensity of new particle formation (NPF) over remote forest regions in the temperate and boreal zones, and thus the importance of NPF for the aerosol budget and life cycle in the pristine atmosphere, remains controversial. Whereas NPF has been shown to occur relatively frequently at several sites in Scandinavia, it was found to be nearly absent at a mid-continental site in Siberia. To explore this issue further, we made measurements of aerosol size distributions between 10 and 420 nm diameter at two remote sites in the transition region between temperate and boreal forest in British Columbia, Canada. The measurements covered 23 d during the month of June 2019, at the time when NPF typically reaches its seasonal maximum in remote midlatitude regions. These are the first such measurements in a near-pristine region on the North American continent. Although the sites were only 150 km apart, there were clear differences in NPF frequency and intensity between them. At the Eagle Lake site, NPF occurred daily, and nucleation-mode particle concentrations reached above 5000 cm−3. In contrast, at the Nazko River site, there were only six NPF events in 11 d, and the nucleation-mode particle concentrations only reached about 800 cm−3. The reasons for this difference could not be conclusively resolved with the available data; they may include air mass origins, preexisting aerosols, and the density and type of forest cover in the surrounding regions. In contrast to observations in other temperate and boreal environments, we found that NPF at our sites occurred at nighttime just as frequently as during daytime. Together with the lack of identifiable sources of sulfuric acid precursor species in the fetch region of our sites, this suggests that nucleation of extremely low volatility organics was the predominant NPF mechanism. Our results indicate that extended measurement campaigns with a more comprehensive set of instrumentation to investigate the role of NPF in the remote forest regions of North America are essential for a deeper scientific understanding of this important process and its role in the global aerosol budget.

1 Introduction

Uncertainty regarding the magnitude of aerosol direct and indirect radiative effects is the largest contributor to the persistent uncertainty of net radiative forcing, which drives global and regional climate change (Boucher et al., 2013; Seinfeld et al., 2016; Bellouin et al., 2020; Naik et al., 2021). As this forcing is, by definition, the difference between present-day and preindustrial radiative effects, both need to be known accurately to assess present-day forcing and prognosticate future forcings. Because of the strong nonlinearity of the aerosol effects on cloud microphysics and precipitation, this applies in particular to the aerosol indirect effects, also referred to as aerosol–cloud interactions (ACIs) (Twomey et al., 1984; Rosenfeld et al., 2008; Carslaw et al., 2013, 2017). Adding the same amount of pollution aerosol to a preindustrial atmosphere with a very low initial particle concentration would cause a much greater radiative forcing than adding the same amount to an atmosphere with a higher preindustrial background (Carslaw et al., 2013; Gordon et al., 2016; Hamilton et al., 2018).

Because ACIs are driven by the microphysical perturbations of cloud properties by aerosols, they are a function of the number concentration of cloud condensation nuclei (CCN), i.e., the subset of aerosol particles that can nucleate cloud droplets. It is, thus, essential to understand the sources and life cycles of this particle class in both polluted and pristine atmospheres. While some CCN are the result of physical processes that directly release particles into the atmosphere (e.g., sea spray and mineral dust), a large and possibly dominant fraction of CCN is the result of the secondary production of particles from the condensation of trace vapors. Models suggest that around 40 %–70 % of global CCN originate from the nucleation of gaseous compounds and the subsequent growth of the nucleated embryos into aerosol particles, a process called new particle formation (NPF) (Merikanto et al., 2009; Wang and Penner, 2009; Yu and Luo, 2009; Zhang et al., 2012; Dunne et al., 2016; Gordon et al., 2017; Kerminen et al., 2018). The importance of NPF for the global CCN budget may be higher in pristine than in anthropogenically perturbed atmospheres: Gordon et al. (2017) estimated a contribution from NPF of 67 % of CCN for the preindustrial atmosphere in contrast to 54 % for the present day.

Under present-day conditions, sulfuric acid (H2SO4) driven pathways are considered to dominate daytime nucleation, based on laboratory studies (Sipilä et al., 2010) and field measurements at numerous sites (Kerminen et al., 2018; Nieminen et al., 2018), e.g., Hyytiälä, Finland (Ehn et al., 2010; Kulmala et al., 2013); the High Arctic (Giamarelou et al., 2016); and marine environments (Brean et al., 2021; Zheng et al., 2021). In these pathways, gaseous H2SO4 is required to form the initial clusters, which are stabilized synergistically by NH3, amines, and organics, particularly highly oxidized molecules (HOMs) (Zhang et al., 2012; Kulmala et al., 2013; Schobesberger et al., 2013; Riccobono et al., 2014; Dal Maso et al., 2016; Kürten et al., 2018; Lehtipalo et al., 2018). In addition to these H2SO4-driven pathways, models and laboratory studies suggest that pure organic nucleation, possibly ion-induced, may be a significant source of new particles in the present-day pristine and preindustrial atmospheres (Jokinen et al., 2015; Gordon et al., 2016; Kirkby et al., 2016; Gordon et al., 2017; Zhu and Penner, 2019). This has been supported by observations at some remote upper-tropospheric sites, e.g., in the Himalayas (Bianchi et al., 2021) and the Bolivian Andes (Rose et al., 2015).

In contrast to H2SO4-driven NPF, which most commonly happens in the first half of the day, pure organic nucleation can also result from the nighttime oxidation of biogenic volatile organic compounds (BVOCs) by ozone or by autoxidation to form HOMs with extremely low volatility. Nighttime nucleation has been observed to occur frequently in some environments with low condensation sinks (Vehkamäki et al., 2004; Lee et al., 2008; Suni et al., 2008). HOM dimer concentrations have their maxima during the night (Sulo et al., 2021), and HOMs from monoterpene oxidation have been observed to drive nighttime nucleation in springtime at Hyytiälä (Rose et al., 2018). Laboratory studies and quantum chemical calculations demonstrate the important role of monoterpene oxidation products for nighttime nucleation (Ortega et al., 2012; Bianchi et al., 2019). Once new particles with diameters of a few nanometers have formed, they can grow by condensation of additional sulfates and organics. Particle growth at sites without high pollution levels is dominated by the condensation of organics, mostly from the oxidation of biogenic VOCs (Riipinen et al., 2012; Ehn et al., 2014; Dal Maso et al., 2016; Tröstl et al., 2016; Bianchi et al., 2019).

Reviews of the worldwide distribution of NPF events have shown them to occur in all types of environments, from very remote to highly polluted (Kerminen et al., 2018; Nieminen et al., 2018; Bousiotis et al., 2021). Generally, NPF frequencies are highest at pollution-impacted sites, e.g., the Po Valley (Kontkanen et al., 2016), Mexico City (Dunn et al., 2004), and Beijing (Yan et al., 2021). However, NPF has also been shown to occur quite frequently at rural sites, such as Hyytiälä, Finland, where the highest frequency is observed in spring with 47 % of days being NPF days (Dada et al., 2018; Nieminen et al., 2018). The role that anthropogenic emissions play at these rural and some remote sites is still unclear. In a study at a remote site in northern Finland, Kyrö et al. (2014) showed that the frequency of NPF events declined with decreasing SO2 emissions from a smelter in the region. Similarly, NPF was found to occur fairly frequently at two Siberian sites located in the boreal forest (Dal Maso et al., 2008), but the proximity of high-emitting urban and industrial regions (Tomsk and Irkutsk) makes the interpretation of these results problematic. This also applies to the few NPF studies in North America at sites in the temperate forest zone. At Egbert, Ontario, Canada, nucleation occurred frequently, but SO2 concentrations in the range of 1–3 ppb during event days are clear evidence of substantial anthropogenic input even under relatively clean conditions for this site (Pierce et al., 2014). Similarly, SO2 concentrations of 0.3–1 ppb indicate a significant anthropogenic influence at an isoprene-dominated site in the Ozark Mountains, Missouri, where frequent and intense NPF was observed (Yu et al., 2014). At Whistler, British Columbia, there was evidence for NPF on 5 d during a period of atmospheric high pressure and elevated temperatures, but the presence of SO2 in the range of 0.05–0.1 ppb suggests that anthropogenic emissions also played a role here (Pierce et al., 2012).

Unfortunately, there are very few NPF studies at truly remote continental sites, in part because it is quite difficult to find sites with near-pristine conditions on the continents (Andreae, 2007). The sites classified as remote in Nieminen et al. (2018) are all in regions where significant anthropogenic pollution can be expected, at least much of the time, e.g., Finokalia, Greece, and Mt. Waliguan, China. In contrast to these “remote” sites, where annual median NPF frequencies of around 20 % have been observed, NPF was found to be very rare during multiyear observations at very remote sites in central Siberia (Wiedensohler et al., 2019; Uusitalo et al., 2021) and almost absent in the central Amazon Basin (Andreae et al., 2015; Varanda Rizzo et al., 2018; Wimmer et al., 2018; Franco et al., 2021). In the Amazon, NPF was, however, detected occasionally at sites affected by the pollution plume from Manaus, indicating the effect of even quite small amounts of anthropogenic inputs on NPF (Varanda Rizzo et al., 2018; Wimmer et al., 2018).

The stark contrast between the observations of frequent NPF at the Scandinavian rural and remote sites and its near-absence at our remote Siberian and Amazon sites prompted us to question whether NPF in the planetary boundary layer over vegetated land surfaces would only occur in the presence of at least a minor amount of recent anthropogenic SO2 inputs or if it could also happen in a truly pristine environment. In particular, we were interested in addressing this question in an area comparable to the temperate-to-boreal forest environment that has been shown to be a prolific source of new particles in northern Europe. Based on maps of aerosol optical depth (e.g., Huneeus et al., 2012), vegetation types, topography, and potential anthropogenic sources, we identified the interior of British Columbia, Canada, as a suitable region for a pilot study. Measurements in this region seemed especially important in view of the fact that no studies on NPF had been conducted at any near-pristine site in North America.

The objectives of our study were (1) to determine whether NPF in a pristine subboreal forest environment was frequent, like at the Scandinavian sites, or almost nonexistent, like at the central Siberian sites; (2) elucidate the role of anthropogenic SO2 emissions in NPF by making measurements in a region where such emissions were likely to be negligible; (3) examine the hypothesis that nighttime NPF would be frequent in the absence of significant sources of H2SO4 vapor; and (4) examine whether the results from such a limited pilot study would warrant future, more comprehensive and extended studies. Here, we present the results of measurements of aerosol size distributions in the range between 10 and 420 nm diameter at two remote sites in the transition region between temperate and boreal forest in British Columbia, Canada, collected over 23 d during the month of June 2019. From these measurements, we derived estimates of NPF frequency, particle growth rate, and condensation sink.

2 Methods

2.1 Measurement sites

Our measurements were conducted at two remote locations in the Fraser River basin of British Columbia, Canada (Fig. 1a). The basin lies between the Coast Mountains to the west and the Rocky Mountains to the east and has a generally gentle topography, dominant coniferous forest cover, and very low population density (<0.5 km−2). The few larger towns are along the Fraser River and Highway 97, far downwind (70 to 160 km) of our sites during the prevailing westerly winds. Back trajectory analysis showed that the sampled air masses did not contact this inhabited region.

2.1.1 Eagle Lake

The Eagle Lake (EL) site (51.90 N, 124.38 W; 1066 m a.s.l.) is on a small, isolated ranch surrounded by large tracts of predominantly evergreen forest (Fig. 1b). Evergreen needleleaf closed and open forest together make up 85 % of land cover in the fetch region, with the remainder dominated by herbaceous vegetation and bare/sparse plant cover. Visual examination showed a low abundance of aspen in the region. A small lake (Eagle Lake) lies northwest of the site. A few cabins are located about 4 km away on the other side of the lake. Access is by a rough road that dead-ends at the ranch. The instrumentation was deployed in a small cabin west of the ranch house. Electric power was provided by a small hydroelectric generator. The aerosol inlet was located about 2 m a.g.l., and the sample air was brought into the cabin by ca. 2 m of 6.25 mm o.d. copper tubing. Tests comparing measurements with and without the inlet tubing at times with a pronounced nucleation mode showed no detectable particle loss. The air was sampled without the use of a dryer.

https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/22/2487/2022/acp-22-2487-2022-f01

Figure 1(a) Overview map of the sampling area (map base © Google Earth). (b, c) Land cover maps with backward trajectory densities, represented by 0.3, 0.5, and 0.7 contour lines, for Eagle Lake and Nazko River. The pie charts in panels (b) and (c) represent the land cover fractions (in %) for the areas within the 0.7 contour line.

2.1.2 Nazko River

The Nazko River (NR) site consists of a small isolated cabin (53.08 N, 123.56 W; 840 m a.s.l.) on the western bank of the Nazko River (Fig. 1c). The fetch region is characterized by a patchwork of evergreen forest and open areas with regrowth of small pines, abundant small and medium-sized aspen, and weedy vegetation. The area covered by evergreen needleleaf forest in the fetch region represents 74 % of land cover, whereas the area classified as unknown open forest (6 %) and herbaceous vegetation (18 %), much of which includes aspen, covers a much larger fraction at NR than at EL. A small gravel road runs about 200 m west of the site, with a traffic volume of a few tens of vehicles per day. No response from the few passing cars could be detected in the data. There is no human habitation for at least 80 km in the upwind fetch of the site. Electricity was provided by line power. The instrument was located in a small shed upwind of the cabin, with an inlet layout similar to that at EL.

2.2 Instrumentation

The measurements of aerosol number size distribution were made with a NanoScan 3910 SMPS (scanning mobility particle sizer, TSI Inc., Shoreview, MN, USA). The NanoScan 3910 SMPS uses a unipolar corona charger, a radial differential mobility analyzer, and an isopropanol-based condensation particle counter (CPC). It measures nanoparticle size distributions from 10 to 420 nm (13 channels) in 1 min intervals. The response is linear between 102 and 106 cm−3, and the sizing accuracy is better than 8 %. Based on the manufacturer, particle diameters and concentrations agree to within 5 % with measurements made using a TSI SMPS 3936, and the reproducibility for the median particle diameter and total concentration are 1.1 % and 2.7 %, respectively (TSI Inc., 2013). An independent study showed similar agreement, with deviations of particle size ≤4 % and deviations of concentration ≤10 % (Vo et al., 2018). The instrument was calibrated by the manufacturer before the field deployment. For the calculation of aerosol mass concentrations, the density of 1.2 g cm−3 specified by the manufacturer was used. Concentration data are reported relative to ambient temperature and pressure.

2.3 Meteorological information

Meteorological data were obtained from the NARR (North American Regional Reanalysis) database using the NOAA (National Ocean and Atmospheric Administration) READY (Real-time Environmental Applications and Display sYstem) tool (Rolph et al., 2017). The NARR data are available on a 3-hourly, 32 km grid. The NARR project is an extension of the NCEP Global Reanalysis, which is run over the North American region. The NARR model uses the very high resolution NCEP Eta Model (32 km/45 layer) along with the Regional Data Assimilation System (RDAS), which assimilates precipitation along with other variables. Backward trajectories (BTs) were computed using the NOAA Hybrid Single-Particle Lagrangian Integrated Trajectory (HYSPLIT) model with meteorological input data from the Global Data Assimilation System (GDAS, 1 resolution) (Stein et al., 2015).

2.4 Land cover and footprint analysis

For the land cover and footprint analysis, BTs were generated with HYSPLIT using the matrix option with nine individual BTs within areas of about 35 km×35 km centered around the Eagle Lake and Nazko River sites. The matrix option was chosen to obtain a regional instead of a rather localized representation of the air mass history. As meteorological input data, the Global Data Assimilation System (GDAS) output with 0.5 resolution as well as the Global Forecast System (GFS) output with 0.25 resolution were used. As the GFS 0.25 data were only available from 12 June 2019 onwards, the GDAS 0.5 data had to be used before this point. BTs were generated from 4 until 26 June 2019. Their starting height was 100 m, and their duration was 48 h.

The further analysis steps were conducted in the QGIS software package (version 3.12, QGIS development team; https://www.qgis.org/, last access: 15 January 2022) using the coordinate reference of the World Geodetic System from 1984 (WGS84). For both sites, the individual BT files were merged into density maps, and the highest densities were normalized to unity. Subsequently, the 0.7, 0.5, and 0.3 contour lines were calculated. The land cover data for 2019 were obtained from the Copernicus Global Land Service (https://land.copernicus.eu/global/products/lc, last access: 6 February 2021). The land cover fractions (pie charts) were calculated within the 0.7 contour line.

2.5 Ancillary aerosol data

Concentrations of sea salt, dust, and black carbon (BC) aerosol for the study region were obtained from the Modern-Era Retrospective analysis for Research and Applications, Version 2 (MERRA-2) database using the Giovanni online data system (https://disc.gsfc.nasa.gov/datasets?project=MERRA-2, last access: 1 October 2021).

2.6 Identification of NPF events and calculation of NPF parameters

New particle formation events were identified using the procedure and criteria of Kulmala et al. (2012). The criteria for an NPF event were as follows: (1) a distinct increase in Nnuc (particles with 10–24 nm diameter) concentrations, (2) formation of a new nucleation mode persisting for more than 2 h, and (3) growth of the nucleation mode over several hours. The NPF event identification was first performed by an automated routine (Franco et al., 2021) and then verified visually on the basis of the daily surface plots of the time series of the number size distributions and the time evolution of Nnuc particles. A few events erroneously flagged as NPF by the automated algorithm were removed.

We estimated the condensation sink (CS) at our sites from size distribution data from the NanoScan and the dust and sea salt concentrations from the MERRA-2 reanalysis, using the equations in Kulmala et al. (2012). The size distribution of dust and sea salt was represented by a single mode at 3.5 µm with a geometric standard deviation of 2.0 (Albani et al., 2014). The CS was completely dominated by the submicron aerosol, with dust and sea salt typically contributing less than 1 %. For comparability with other sites, we calculated the CS using the diffusion coefficient of H2SO4, although, as will be discussed below, it is more likely that the actual condensing species were organic compounds.

We calculated the growth rates (GRs) of the newly formed particles based on the method of Kulmala et al. (2012) by fitting modes to the observed size distributions and deriving the time rate of change in the modal diameter during the growth phase of the NPF event.

Given the lower cutoff of our instrument at 10 nm, we were not able to derive an estimate for the actual nucleation rate, J. Instead, we calculated the formation rate of particles >10 nm, J10, from the rate of increase of the particle number concentrations in the 10–24 nm size range during the early part of the NPF events, following the method of Kulmala et al. (2012). We applied the correction for the coagulation sink, using the parameterization given in Eq. (7) of that paper to derive the coagulation sink related to the condensation sink.

3 Results and discussion

3.1 Meteorological background

The meteorological conditions at both sites during the study periods are summarized in Fig. 2a and b. Overall, conditions at both sites were mostly fair or partly cloudy, with abundant sunshine and occasional light showers. Overcast skies were encountered occasionally, most frequently in the morning or during the passage of showers. An extended period of overcast conditions from 9 to 11 June at EL consisted mostly of high thin cloud. Daytime shortwave radiation levels showed midday maxima generally between 600 and 900 W m−2.

The passage of a synoptic cycle at EL resulted in dominant low pressure at the beginning and end of the study period, with a high-pressure system in the middle of the period. This resulted in an overall dominance of fairly light (average 3.0 m s−1, range 2.0–6.3 m s−1) southwesterly to northwesterly winds, with a brief period of southeasterly winds when the pressure was falling on 11–12 June. Temperatures were initially low at EL, with highs of around 10 C and lows of around 5 C, but this increased to highs of around 20 C and lows of around 10 C after the passage of the high-pressure system. Relative humidities were in the range of 24 %–84 %, averaging 55 %.

At NR, winds were predominantly northerly to northwesterly, with a brief period of southwesterly winds on 17 June. Wind speeds were slightly higher than at EL (average 3.9 m s−1, range 3.2–8.5 m s−1). Low temperatures were typically between 5 and 10 C; high temperatures were between 13 and 21 C; and relative humidities were in the range of 29 %–93 %, averaging 60 %, which was slightly more humid than at EL.

To assess the representativeness of the meteorological conditions during our study, we compared them with the means of the corresponding meteorological parameters for the period from 2000 to 2021 in the study region from the MERRA-2 reanalysis for temperature, precipitation, shortwave (SW) radiation, and specific humidity, and from MODIS for cloud cover. With the exception of SW radiation, the monthly mean values for June 2019 were within ±4 % of the long-term averages and well within 1 standard deviation (SD) of the mean (Table S1 in the Supplement). Shortwave radiation was 12 % (or 1.6 SD) greater than the long-term average. For a closer examination of the variables most likely to affect NPF (i.e., temperature and SW radiation), we plotted the time series of their daily mean values in June 2019 together with the corresponding time series for the average, standard deviation, and range for the 2000–2021 averages (Fig. S1 in the Supplement). The June 2019 values fluctuate around the long-term average values, with most 2019 values falling within the ±1 SD range. We conclude that the meteorological conditions during our study were typical for the season, with no substantial bias that might have affected our results.

https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/22/2487/2022/acp-22-2487-2022-f02

Figure 2Meteograms for the study periods at the (a) Eagle Lake and (b) Nazko River sites. Wind direction and speed are indicated by barbs at the bottom of the plots. (All data are from the NARR, North American Regional Reanalysis, database.)

Download

3.2 Air mass history

We investigated the history of the sampled air masses using 48 h and 10 d back trajectories initialized 100 m above surface level at 12:00 LT (local time = 19:00 UTC). The 48 h air mass back trajectories are shown for the two sites in Fig. 3a and b (the 72 h back trajectories for each individual day are available in the Supplement). All trajectories for the Eagle Lake site had crossed the Pacific coast 22 to 48 h before arriving at the site and then traveled across the densely forested Coast Range. This fetch area has an extremely low population density and is devoid of any industrial activity. All but two of the trajectories traveled in the boundary layer for at least 48 h before their arrival. The air masses arriving on 12 and 13 June had not made surface contact with the ocean surface; instead, they arrived from the free troposphere over the Pacific and descended rapidly after having crossed the Coast Range.

https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/22/2487/2022/acp-22-2487-2022-f03

Figure 3The 48 h back trajectories initialized on each sampling day at 19:00 UTC at 100 m a.g.l. at (a) Eagle Lake and (b) Nazko River.

With two exceptions, the air masses arriving at the Nazko River site also arrived from the Pacific coast, which they had crossed about 14 to 48 h before arriving at NR. During and after crossing the Coast Range, they remained in the boundary layer for their entire travel. Similar to the fetch at EL, there is no industrial activity and very little human population in this fetch area. Two air masses arrived from the north and had not made contact with the ocean surface in the last 72 h. These air masses originated in an area that had been influenced by the smoke from fires that had been burning for several weeks in northern Alberta, and about 24 h before arriving at NR, they crossed the small municipality of Vanderhoof, which lies 108 km from the site and has a population of about 10 000 people.

In summary, our analysis of the history of the sampled air masses shows that they had no significant input of anthropogenic emissions for at least 3 d before our measurements. An analysis of 10 d back trajectories showed that even on this timescale, almost all air masses had remained over the Pacific Ocean, with only a few trajectories crossing over remote regions of British Columbia or Alaska (Fig. S2a, b).

3.3 Aerosol concentrations and size distributions

Figure 4a and b show time series of the number concentrations of aerosol particles in the nucleation mode (Nnuc; 10–24 nm diameter) and across the entire size range covered by the NanoScan SMPS (N420; 10–420 nm) as well as the aerosol mass concentration in the 10–420 nm range (M420) derived from the number spectra by assuming spherical particles with a density of 1.2 µg cm−3. The corresponding size distributions are shown in Fig. 5a and b. The mass concentrations of dust, sea salt, and BC from the MERRA-2 models are provided in the Supplement (Fig. S3a, b).

The measurements at Eagle Lake indicate an extremely clean atmosphere: the time series plot of aerosol number size distributions (Fig. 5a) is dominated by particles below 100 nm, often with a distinct nucleation mode below 20 nm and a separate Aitken mode between 20 and 80 nm. The accumulation mode tends to be absent or weak, except for a short period on 12 and 13 June, when a mode around 100 nm could be interpreted as a more pronounced accumulation mode. The mass concentrations, M420, are very low (Fig. 4a), with an average of 0.73 (range 0.11–2.3) µg m−3, which is 10 times lower than the average PM2.5 (fine particulate matter) value of 7.3 µg m−3 for North America (Mortier et al., 2020). The BC, dust, and sea salt concentrations from MERRA-2 are also very low, at 0.041±0.011, 2.9±1.5, and 0.41±0.37µg m−3, respectively, for the measurement period (Fig. S3a). In contrast, the particle number concentrations, N420, are very high compared with other pristine sites (Andreae, 2009), with an average of 3150 (range 850–10 300) cm−3, of which a large fraction are in the nucleation mode below 24 nm (average 1100, range 55–5250 cm−3) (Fig. 4a).

https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/22/2487/2022/acp-22-2487-2022-f04

Figure 4Mass and number concentrations of aerosol particles <420 nm (M420 and N420), number concentrations of nucleation-mode particles <24 nm (Nnuc), and condensation sink at (a) Eagle Lake and (b) Nazko River.

Download

Like at EL, the BC, dust, and sea salt concentrations at the Nazko River site were very low, at 0.063±0.062, 1.3±0.8, and 0.34±0.35µg m−3, respectively (Fig. S2b). The low BC concentrations indicate the near-absence of combustion-derived pollutants, with the exception of a period during 21–22 June, when the back trajectories indicated transport from the north. During this episode, aerosol mass concentrations, BC, and the accumulation-mode number concentrations were slightly elevated (Figs. 4b, 5b), suggesting an influence of smoke from the large fires that had been burning since mid-May in northern Alberta, about 600–800 km northeast of the site. Excluding this period, BC concentrations averaged 0.036±0.017µg m−3. The average M420 concentrations at NR were similar to those at EL, with an average of 0.77±0.61µg m−3, which is reduced to 0.57±0.40µg m−3 (range 0.063–2.3 m−3) when the smoke-affected period is excluded. The number concentrations, N420 and Nnuc, were 1350±670 (range 280–4340) and 123±165 (range 3–820) cm−3, respectively, which was substantially lower than at EL.

https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/22/2487/2022/acp-22-2487-2022-f05

Figure 5Time series of aerosol number size distributions at (a) Eagle Lake and (b) Nazko River.

Download

3.4 New particle formation events

3.4.1 NPF frequency

As discussed in more detail in Sect. 2, new particle formation events were identified using the procedure and criteria of Kulmala et al. (2012). The characteristics of the NPF events at our two sites are summarized in Table 1.

Table 1New particle formation events at the Eagle Lake and Nazko River sites: timing, condensation sink at the beginning of the event, formation rate at 10 nm, and growth rate.

Download Print Version | Download XLSX

At Eagle Lake, we identified 21 distinct NPF events in a time span of only 12 d, with up to 3 events within a 24 h period (Table 1, Fig. 5a). Using the classification of Kulmala et al. (2012), which focuses on event days rather than single NPF events, all 12 d were event days. We further classified the events into daytime and nighttime events using an adjusted event start time. As the lower cutoff of our instrument is 10 nm, it will detect an event some 3 h later than an instrument with a cutoff at 3 nm would, given our average GR of 2–3 nm h−1. Thus, for the purpose of classifying events as daytime or nighttime, we adjusted the start time by subtracting 3 h from the observed start times listed in Table 1, which are based on detection with a lower cutoff at 10 nm. Events were classified as nighttime NPF if the adjusted start time fell between 21:00 and 04:30 LT (i.e., the time when the SW radiation flux was typically below 20 W m−2). Using this criterion, we found 11 nighttime events at EL, with nighttime nucleation occurring on 8 of 11 nights and some instances of two events in a single night.

The frequency of NPF was much lower at Nazko River (Fig. 5b), with only six events over 10 d and 5 d classified as event days. Nighttime NPF also occurred less frequently, with only three events during the study period. During the smoke-affected period of 21–22 June, there was no evidence of NPF, and Nnuc levels were very low, with an average of 16 cm−3. Nucleation activity resumed immediately, however, around 18:00 LT on 22 June, when accumulation-mode concentrations had dropped back down to background values.

Given the relatively short duration of our study compared with the long-term studies at some other sites, we can only make limited comparisons regarding NPF frequency at our BC sites. Our study took place during late spring, when NPF events are most frequent at other temperate and boreal sites, e.g., Hyytiälä (Dada et al., 2017) and Vavihill, Sweden (Kristensson et al., 2008). Similarly, at Pallas, a remote site at the northern edge of the boreal forest (68 N) in Finland, Asmi et al. (2011) found that the NPF event frequency peaked in spring, while the highest growth rates occurred in summer. Taking both our sites together, we had 17 event days out of a total of 23 d of observations, for a frequency of 74 %, which is significantly higher than the median frequencies of 20 %–50 % reported for the spring and summer seasons at comparable sites by Nieminen et al. (2018). This is largely a consequence of the frequent nighttime NPF at our sites, as without the nighttime events there would be only 11 NPF days, or a frequency of 48 %.

3.4.2 Diurnal behavior

New particle formation events occurred at our sites just as often during nighttime as during daytime (13 out of 27 events), in sharp contrast to what has been observed at most other sites. For example, NPF at Hyytiälä typically takes place between sunrise and noon (Dada et al., 2017), and at Egbert, Ontario, and Whistler Mountain, British Columbia, only daytime NPF has been observed (Pierce et al., 2012, 2014).

The timing of NPF is further illustrated in Figs. 6 and 7, which show the diurnal variation of the aerosol size spectra averaged over the entire measurement period and for an exemplary day at each site, respectively. At EL, Fig. 6a shows a distinct nucleation mode appearing around 23:00 LT, representing the nighttime events, which intensifies during the night to reach the highest Nnuc concentrations around 06:00 LT. Growth into the Aitken mode continues throughout the day, and the nucleation mode is absent around midday. Another set of NPF events occurs between 16:00 and 20:00 LT, also followed by growth into the Aitken mode. At NR (Fig. 6b), we see overall lower total particle concentrations; much lower Nnuc concentrations, especially at nighttime; and a relatively more prominent Aitken mode at around 70 nm. The diurnal timing of NPF events is less distinct at NR than at EL, but there is a suggestion of elevated Nnuc between 00:00 and 07:00 LT as well as around 14:00 LT.

https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/22/2487/2022/acp-22-2487-2022-f06

Figure 6Diurnal plot of the mean number size distribution of aerosol particles at (a) Eagle Lake and (b) Nazko River.

Download

The details of the aerosol evolution are illustrated for exemplary days in Fig. 7. At EL (Fig. 7a), 11 June was a day with very light winds, which resulted in a nearly stationary air mass. After midnight, particle concentrations were quite low, with a faint nucleation mode below 20 nm, an Aitken mode around 50 nm, and a weak accumulation mode around 100 nm. A distinct new nucleation mode appears at 02:00 LT, which grows throughout the day to ca. 50 nm. Additional minor NPF events are seen in the afternoon and around 23:00 LT. In contrast, at NR, Fig. 7b shows the near-complete absence of nucleation-mode particles on this night, followed by a daytime NPF event with fairly rapid growth into the Aitken range.

https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/22/2487/2022/acp-22-2487-2022-f07

Figure 7Time series plots of the aerosol number size distribution of aerosol particles on exemplary days at (a) Eagle Lake and (b) Nazko River.

Download

3.4.3 Air mass origin

As already discussed above in Sect. 3.2 and 3.3, most of the air masses sampled at our sites had crossed the Pacific coast 1–2 d before arriving at our sites, and they contained little or no detectable anthropogenic pollution. Thus, similar to other temperate and boreal sites, e.g., Hyytiälä and Pallas, our NPF events occurred in clean air masses, mostly originating from the west and northwest, which had low levels of pollution aerosols that would suppress nucleation by acting as a condensation sink (CS) (Sogacheva et al., 2005; Dada et al., 2017).

There was, however, no evidence that a marine influence on the air mass enabled or facilitated NPF at the EL site. The air masses arriving on 8–13 June had not had contact with the sea surface, as they had either remained in the continental boundary layer for the last 48 h (8 June) or had descended from the free troposphere. In these air masses, NPF was just as active as in the air masses arriving on 4–7 and 14–15 June, which had come from the surface level over the Pacific and had traveled in the boundary layer for their entire 48 h history.

On the other hand, even quite low levels of pollution were enough to suppress NPF. The air masses that had arrived on 21–22 June from a region polluted with wildfire smoke had M420 concentrations of only 1.5–3.0 µg m−3 and N420 concentrations of ca. 1000–1500 cm−3 (Fig. 4b), but even this small amount of pollution was able to completely suppress NPF.

3.4.4 Condensation sink

The surfaces of preexisting aerosol particles act as a sink for condensable species, such as gaseous H2SO4 or extremely low volatility organic compounds (ELVOCs), thereby potentially suppressing their concentrations below those required for nucleation and NPF. The CS at the start of NPF events ranged from 0.0006 to 0.0048 s−1 (Table 1), with average values of 0.0025±0.0011 s−1 at EL and 0.0012±0.0010 s−1 at NR. These CS values are similar to those for the NPF event days at Hyytiälä, which typically fell into the range of 0.002 to 0.004 s−1 during June (Dada et al., 2017). At Pallas, event days in spring typically happened at CS values in a similar range, between 0.0004 and 0.003 s−1 (Asmi et al., 2011). With only one exception (event 18), all daytime NPF events occurred when the CS was below the temperature-dependent threshold value obtained at Hyytiälä by Dada et al. (2017).

3.4.5 Growth rates

The overall range of GRs during our campaign was 0.18–6.0 nm h−1, with averages of 2.1±1.2 and 3.4±1.6 nm h−1 at EL and NR, respectively. The faster growth at NR may be related to the lower number concentrations at this site. These GR values are in good agreement with median GRs for the spring and summer seasons at the temperate and boreal sites in Eurasia (Varriö, Pallas, Abisko, Tiksi, Hyytiälä, and Aspvreten), which range between 1.6 and 4.6 nm h−1 (Nieminen et al., 2018); at Egbert, Ontario, where the mean GR was 3.1 nm h−1 (Pierce et al., 2014); and at Whistler Mountain, BC, where GRs were 2–5 nm h−1 (Pierce et al., 2012).

3.4.6 Formation rates

Given the lower cutoff of our instrument at 10 nm, we calculated the formation rate of particles >10 nm, J10, from the rate of increase of particle number concentrations in the 10–24 nm size range during the early part of the NPF events. At EL, the average value of J10 was 0.32±0.16 cm−3 s−1, whereas the formation rate was much lower at NR, with an average of 0.12±0.11 cm−3 s−1. Overall, the range of formation rates observed at our sites is in good agreement with the median values of 0.1 to 0.52 cm−3 s−1 for the spring and summer seasons at the Scandinavian and Siberian temperate and boreal sites listed by Nieminen et al. (2018). At Egbert, the mean J10 was significantly higher, likely due to the substantial anthropogenic SO2 (and, thus, elevated H2SO4 vapor) concentrations at that site (Pierce et al., 2014).

3.5 New particle formation mechanism

In previous studies, nucleation processes based on H2SO4, iodic acid (HIO3), or ELVOCs have been described as mechanisms leading to NPF in terrestrial and coastal environments. Because of the limited information obtained in our campaign, especially the lack of gas-phase measurements of precursor and nucleating species, we do not have conclusive evidence regarding the mechanism of NPF at our sites. In the following paragraphs, we will examine the potential mechanisms and discuss which one of them is the most consistent with our observations.

Iodic acid has been identified as a nucleating species at coastal sites (Sipilä et al., 2016) and in laboratory studies (He et al., 2021), and it may play an important role in pristine environments, where H2SO4 is at very low concentrations. It is, however, unlikely to play a role at our sites, as HIO3 is formed rapidly near its precursor sources and would lead to nucleation close to the coast rather than far inland. Particles nucleated at the coast would have grown over the 1–2 d of transport to our site and would show up in the Aitken mode rather than in the nucleation mode.

Nucleation based on H2SO4 and stabilizing species, such as ammonia, water, amines, or organics, is the most common mechanism identified at sites around the world. This mechanism, however, is active at remote and rural sites only during daytime, when sufficient H2SO4 vapor concentrations can be photochemically produced. At Hyytiälä, for example, NPF with growth into the nucleation mode occurs only during daytime (Dada et al., 2017). While nighttime nucleation events are quite common there, the new particles never grow beyond a few nanometers (Junninen et al., 2008).

In contrast, at our sites we found that there is no clear preference for daytime NPF and that nighttime events are about as frequent as daytime ones. Frequent nighttime NPF would not be expected if marine sulfur emissions, acting as precursors of H2SO4, played an important role at our sites, as proposed by Lawler et al. (2018), who observed that NPF events at Hyytiälä occurred preferentially in air masses that had recently been over the ocean. While most of our air masses had also had contact with the ocean within the last few days, NPF was just as abundant at night as during daytime, and NPF also occurred in air masses that had no recent contact with the ocean.

Thus, our observations argue strongly for pure organic nucleation based on ELVOC species formed from monoterpenes by autoxidation and reaction with ozone. The important role of nonphotochemical processes is further supported by the lack of a clear preference for NPF events on clear-sky days, in contrast to what has been observed at Hyytiälä (Dada et al., 2017). Nighttime NPF has been observed previously at a limited number of other sites, particularly at clean sites with high emissions of monoterpene precursors. For example, at Tumbarumba, in an Australian eucalypt forest, nighttime NPF events were 2.5 times as frequent as daytime events during summer and autumn (Lee et al., 2008; Suni et al., 2008). On the other hand, at Abisko, Sweden, Svenningsson et al. (2008) observed only occasional nighttime events, and at Värriö, Finland, nighttime NPF only accounted for a small fraction (16 of 147) of events (Vehkamäki et al., 2004). Interestingly, even though NPF is quite uncommon at the Siberian ZOTTO (Zotino Tall Tower Observatory) site, there is also a significant fraction of nighttime NPF among these rare events (Uusitalo et al., 2021).

The ELVOC species supporting nucleation at our sites are most likely HOMs produced from monoterpenes by ozonolysis and/or autoxidation of peroxy radicals following initial attack by OH (Ehn et al., 2010; Ortega et al., 2012; Bianchi et al., 2019). The high density of conifer vegetation around our sites, especially at EL, is a prolific source of monoterpenes, to the point that the conifers' characteristic odor was perceptible on warm days, especially on 11 and 12 June when warm temperatures coincided with low wind speeds. These days also produced very strong and sustained NPF events (Fig. 5a).

While the relatively short observation period does not allow a detailed analysis of the relationship between NPF and ambient temperatures, our data do suggest greater production of Nnuc at warmer temperatures. The mean Nnuc in the cooler period from 4 to 10 June was 1050±770 cm−3 (5 min averaged data, N=1759), whereas it was 1180±880 cm−3 (N=1283) during the warmer period from 11 to 15 June. While this difference is modest, it is significant at p<0.0001. The increase in Nnuc with higher temperatures could be caused by increased monoterpene emissions, which favor NPF and particle growth, as has been shown previously by Kulmala et al. (2004). Temperature effects on the rate of HOM formation and nucleation are not likely to be important over the limited range of ambient temperatures during our study. Low temperatures decrease the rate of HOM formation (Frege et al., 2018) but increase nucleation probability due to lower volatility of the oxidation products, resulting in only a modest net change in the nucleation rates from organic precursors (Simon et al., 2020). While more rapid HOM production during the warmer daytime could lead a buildup of HOMs, followed by NPF at the colder nighttime temperatures, this effect is likely to be very small for the diurnal temperature range (about 10 C) at our sites (Simon et al., 2020).

Other than the diurnal change in relative humidity, there were no systematic RH variations that would allow examination of the effect of RH on NPF events. Based on previous studies, no strong effects would be expected anyway. Low RH has been shown to favor NPF (Hamed et al., 2011; Dada et al., 2017). However, the mechanism proposed by Hamed et al. (2011) is based on reduced H2SO4 production due to lower OH at very high humidities (>80 %), which were almost never present during our study. Reduced H2SO4 production would also not affect our proposed NPF mechanism, which is based on pure organic nucleation. The increase in the CS due to hygroscopic growth is also not likely to be significant, as the particles at our BC sites are presumed to be mostly organic and, thus, are not expected to show strong hygroscopic growth over the range of RH values prevailing at our sites. Laboratory studies by Bonn et al. (2002) suggested that water vapor suppresses the formation of ELVOCs from monoterpenes. Note that this effect is a function of absolute, not relative, humidity. Contrary to what would be expected from the findings of Bonn et al. (2002), we actually observed higher Nnuc during the (warmer) period with a higher water vapor mixing ratio (11–15 June, 6.7±0.9 g kg−1) than during the (cooler) period with a lower water vapor (4–10 June, 4.4±0.8 g kg−1).

Ozone plays a critical role as a key oxidant leading to the formation of ELVOCs from monoterpenes (Ehn et al., 2014). The minimum O3 levels required to initiate NPF with monoterpenes in chamber studies were 10–19 ppb (Ortega et al., 2012). While we have no on-site ozone measurements, the ozone data from nearby sites indicate that there were sufficient O3 concentrations to fulfill this requirement. The O3 data from the Williams Lake monitoring site (the closest site to EL) ranged between an average morning low of 13 ppb and a late afternoon high of 34 ppb (https://envistaweb.env.gov.bc.ca/, last access: 20 July 2021) for our study period (Fig. S4). Hourly data were not available from Quesnel, the closest monitoring site to NR, but data for the daily maximum concentrations showed values similar to Williams Lake.

Overall, our results are most consistent with a mechanism where HOMs/ELVOCs are formed by ozonolysis and/or OH-initiated autoxidation of monoterpenes followed by pure organic nucleation. The high incidence of nighttime NPF is consistent with the findings of Sulo et al. (2021), who showed that HOM dimers have their maxima during the night, whereas the HOM monomers and H2SO4 exhibit daytime maxima. The highest concentrations of both monoterpenes and O3 can be expected in the late afternoon, which may explain why we frequently observed the onset of events with particles >10 nm around midnight, which, given growth rates of 2–3 nm h−1, would imply that the actual nucleation event began around sunset. Analogously, the nighttime nucleation events at Hyytiälä, typically occur around sunset and are driven by HOMs from monoterpene oxidation (Rose et al., 2018); however, in contrast to our sites, at Hyytiälä the particles from nighttime NPF never grow beyond a few nanometers (Junninen et al., 2008). Our observed growth rates, averaging 2.1 and 3.2 nm h−1 for the two sites, are in good agreement with the median GRs attributable to monoterpene oxidation products (1.0–3.5 nm h−1) measured at Pallas by Asmi et al. (2011).

The pronounced difference in NPF frequency between our two sites may be related to the difference in vegetation in the two areas. Whereas the landscape around EL is completely dominated by conifers, a large fraction of the area around NR has been deforested in recent years either by logging or wildfires (see Fig. 1b and c). These cleared areas are covered by a mixture of herbaceous vegetation, small conifers, and abundant aspens. Consequently, one would expect lower concentrations of monoterpenes coupled with high levels of isoprene emitted by the aspens. Suppression of NPF in an isoprene-dominated forest environment has been observed by Kanawade et al. (2011) and investigated in the laboratory by Kiendler-Scharr et al. (2009), who attributed it to OH scavenging by isoprene. This mechanism is not likely to be important at our sites, as it would only affect daytime nucleation, whereas at NR, nighttime nucleation is also less frequent than at EL. More likely is the alternative mechanism proposed by Heinritzi et al. (2020), wherein isoprene reduces the yield of dimer HOMs with 19 or 20 C atoms (C20) while increasing the yield of the more volatile dimers with 14 or 15 C atoms (C15), thereby reducing the rate of new particle formation.

4 Summary and conclusions

We conducted a pilot study on NPF at two pristine sites in the temperate–boreal transition zone of British Columbia, Canada, extending over 23 d of measurements in June 2019. While the limited duration of our study does place limits on the generalization of our results, the fact that the meteorological conditions during our study were typical of long-term average conditions at this time of year and that the land cover surrounding our sites was typical of the region does support that our results were not subject to bias from unusual weather or vegetation cover.

At both sites, we observed a high frequency of NPF events. At the Eagle Lake site, every day was an event day, and many days had multiple NPF events. At Nazko River, the NPF frequency was lower; however, 50 % of days were still event days at this site. In contrast to most sites studied previously, NPF occurred as frequently at night as during the daytime, with 14 out of a total of 27 events taking place at night.

Air mass trajectory analysis showed that most of the sampled air masses had arrived from the Pacific Ocean and traveled over land for 1–2 d before arriving at our sites. The terrestrial fetch area has an extremely low population density and no industrial activity, resulting in essentially pristine atmospheric conditions. While a marine contribution to NPF cannot be excluded at our sites due to the limited instrumentation available for our campaign, it is likely not of significance, given that there was no preference for daytime nucleation (as would be expected for HIO3 or H2SO4 as nucleating species) and that NPF events were seen just as frequently on days with no previous ocean contact.

The average condensation sink at the start of events was 0.0025±0.0011 s−1 at EL and 0.0012±0.0010 s−1 at NR, well within the range in which NPF has been observed at other temperate and boreal sites (Asmi et al., 2011; Dada et al., 2017; Kerminen et al., 2018). The particle growth rates, with averages of 2.1±1.3 and 3.2±1.6 nm h−1 at EL and NR, respectively, were also within the range typically observed during spring/summer at temperate and boreal sites in Eurasia and North America (Kerminen et al., 2018; Nieminen et al., 2018). Because of the relatively high lower cutoff diameter of our instrumentation (10 nm), we could not obtain the actual nucleation rate, J. The formation rates for particles at 10 nm, J10, averaged 0.32±0.16 and 0.12±0.11 cm−3 s−1 at EL and NR, respectively, also comparable to the Scandinavian and Siberian temperate and boreal sites listed by Nieminen et al. (2018).

Although the limited amount of data available from our campaign does not allow us to draw firm conclusions about the nucleating species responsible for NPF at our sites, several lines of evidence point to pure organic nucleation as the dominant mechanism. The strongest argument comes from the fact that nighttime NPF was as frequent as daytime NPF; this is analogous to other sites where organic nucleation has been shown to dominate and rules out the photochemical production of H2SO4 as a source of nucleating species, at least during the night. The lack of anthropogenic sources of SO2 and the independence of NPF from marine influence on the sampled air masses also argues against nucleation driven by H2SO4. Finally, the presence of abundant monoterpene sources in the fetch (to the point that they sometimes could be detected by their odor) and the potential dependence of the NPF frequency on the presence of isoprene-emitting vegetation also support organic nucleation as the dominant mechanism.

Our results are consistent with the model-derived importance of pure organic NPF in remote regions (Gordon et al., 2017; Zhu and Penner, 2019), however, they raise important questions about the extent to which pristine NPF conditions still exist in the present-day atmosphere. At the vast majority of remote sites studied so far, NPF is exclusively a daytime phenomenon, suggesting the dominance of H2SO4 as the controlling species. Would these sites have been dominated by pure organic nucleation in preindustrial times, with frequent nighttime NPF? And, why is NPF so infrequent at the remote subboreal ZOTTO site in central Siberia, which is surrounded by vast coniferous forest (Wiedensohler et al., 2019; Uusitalo et al., 2021)? Possibly, the large distance to anthropogenic sources of SO2 has allowed it to be fully converted to sulfate aerosol, removing the source of H2SO4 while providing a condensation sink that prevents organic nucleation. Is there a sequence of regimes where, under truly pristine conditions, pure organic nucleation dominates, followed by H2SO4-driven nucleation with organic-dominated growth in the presence of small amounts of anthropogenic SO2, again followed by a “nucleation valley of death” where the CS from pollution aerosols suppresses nucleation, and finally a highly polluted regime where there is so much SO2 that H2SO4-driven nucleation can overcome the suppression by the elevated CS?

Our study shows that there is a need for in-depth investigations at pristine continental sites to address these questions. A full set of instrumentation to identify nucleating species and precursors is required to elucidate nucleation and growth mechanisms. Also, our measurements were limited to a relatively short period in late spring to early summer, when previous studies at other sites have shown that both NPF events and HOM dimer precursor concentrations have their seasonal maxima (Nieminen et al., 2018; Sulo et al., 2021). Future studies should include the development of a site for continuous long-term observations to investigate the seasonal and interannual variability of NPF over the remote North American forest regions.

Data availability

The NanoScan SMPS data are archived on the Edmond database: https://doi.org/10.17617/3.7w (Andreae, 2021). The Modern-Era Retrospective analysis for Research and Applications, Version 2 (MERRA-2) data used are available at https://disc.gsfc.nasa.gov/datasets?project=MERRA-2 (last access: 1 October 2021).

Supplement

The supplement related to this article is available online at: https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-2487-2022-supplement.

Author contributions

MOA designed the experiments, and MOA and TWA carried them out. MOA and FD performed the data analysis, and CP provided the land cover and footprint analysis. MOA prepared the paper with contributions from all co-authors.

Competing interests

The contact author has declared that neither they nor their co-authors have any competing interests.

Disclaimer

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Acknowledgements

We thank the hosts at our sites, Clay and Marilyn Hett at Eagle Lake and Curtis and Theresa Sharp at Nazko River, for their hospitality and support. Some analyses and visualizations used in this paper were produced with the Giovanni online data system, developed and maintained by the NASA GES DISC. We thank Zengxin Pan for help with downloading the MERRA-2 data.

Financial support

This research was funded by the Distinguished Scientist Fellowship Program of King Saud University and the Max Planck Society.

The article processing charges for this open-access publication were covered by the Max Planck Society.

Review statement

This paper was edited by Tuukka Petäjä and reviewed by two anonymous referees.

References

Albani, S., Mahowald, N. M., Perry, A. T., Scanza, R. A., Zender, C. S., Heavens, N. G., Maggi, V., Kok, J. F., and Otto-Bliesner, B. L.: Improved dust representation in the Community Atmosphere Model, J. Adv. Model. Earth Sy., 6, 541–570, https://doi.org/10.1002/2013ms000279, 2014. 

Andreae, M. O.: Aerosols before pollution, Science, 315, 50–51, 2007. 

Andreae, M. O.: Correlation between cloud condensation nuclei concentration and aerosol optical thickness in remote and polluted regions, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9, 543–556, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-543-2009, 2009. 

Andreae, M. O.: Data for paper on new particle formation in British Columbia remote forest, Max Planck Society [data set], https://doi.org/10.17617/3.7w, 2021. 

Andreae, M. O., Acevedo, O. C., Araùjo, A., Artaxo, P., Barbosa, C. G. G., Barbosa, H. M. J., Brito, J., Carbone, S., Chi, X., Cintra, B. B. L., da Silva, N. F., Dias, N. L., Dias-Júnior, C. Q., Ditas, F., Ditz, R., Godoi, A. F. L., Godoi, R. H. M., Heimann, M., Hoffmann, T., Kesselmeier, J., Könemann, T., Krüger, M. L., Lavric, J. V., Manzi, A. O., Lopes, A. P., Martins, D. L., Mikhailov, E. F., Moran-Zuloaga, D., Nelson, B. W., Nölscher, A. C., Santos Nogueira, D., Piedade, M. T. F., Pöhlker, C., Pöschl, U., Quesada, C. A., Rizzo, L. V., Ro, C.-U., Ruckteschler, N., Sá, L. D. A., de Oliveira Sá, M., Sales, C. B., dos Santos, R. M. N., Saturno, J., Schöngart, J., Sörgel, M., de Souza, C. M., de Souza, R. A. F., Su, H., Targhetta, N., Tóta, J., Trebs, I., Trumbore, S., van Eijck, A., Walter, D., Wang, Z., Weber, B., Williams, J., Winderlich, J., Wittmann, F., Wolff, S., and Yáñez-Serrano, A. M.: The Amazon Tall Tower Observatory (ATTO): overview of pilot measurements on ecosystem ecology, meteorology, trace gases, and aerosols, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 10723–10776, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-10723-2015, 2015. 

Asmi, E., Kivekäs, N., Kerminen, V.-M., Komppula, M., Hyvärinen, A.-P., Hatakka, J., Viisanen, Y., and Lihavainen, H.: Secondary new particle formation in Northern Finland Pallas site between the years 2000 and 2010, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 12959–12972, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-12959-2011, 2011. 

Bellouin, N., Quaas, J., Gryspeerdt, E., Kinne, S., Stier, P., Watson-Parris, D., Boucher, O., Carslaw, K. S., Christensen, M., Daniau, A. L., Dufresne, J. L., Feingold, G., Fiedler, S., Forster, P., Gettelman, A., Haywood, J. M., Lohmann, U., Malavelle, F., Mauritsen, T., McCoy, D. T., Myhre, G., Mülmenstädt, J., Neubauer, D., Possner, A., Rugenstein, M., Sato, Y., Schulz, M., Schwartz, S. E., Sourdeval, O., Storelvmo, T., Toll, V., Winker, D., and Stevens, B.: Bounding global aerosol radiative forcing of climate change, Rev. Geophys., 58, e2019RG000660, https://doi.org/10.1029/2019RG000660, 2020. 

Bianchi, F., Kurten, T., Riva, M., Mohr, C., Rissanen, M. P., Roldin, P., Berndt, T., Crounse, J. D., Wennberg, P. O., Mentel, T. F., Wildt, J., Junninen, H., Jokinen, T., Kulmala, M., Worsnop, D. R., Thornton, J. A., Donahue, N., Kjaergaard, H. G., and Ehn, M.: Highly Oxygenated Organic Molecules (HOM) from gas-phase autoxidation involving peroxy radicals: A key contributor to atmospheric aerosol, Chem. Rev., 119, 3472–3509, https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.8b00395, 2019. 

Bianchi, F., Junninen, H., Bigi, A., Sinclair, V. A., Dada, L., Hoyle, C. R., Zha, Q., Yao, L., Ahonen, L. R., Bonasoni, P., Buenrostro Mazon, S., Hutterli, M., Laj, P., Lehtipalo, K., Kangasluoma, J., Kerminen, V. M., Kontkanen, J., Marinoni, A., Mirme, S., Molteni, U., Petäjä, T., Riva, M., Rose, C., Sellegri, K., Yan, C., Worsnop, D. R., Kulmala, M., Baltensperger, U., and Dommen, J.: Biogenic particles formed in the Himalaya as an important source of free tropospheric aerosols, Nat. Geosci., 14, 4–9, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41561-020-00661-5, 2021. 

Bonn, B., Schuster, G., and Moortgat, G. K.: Influence of water vapor on the process of new particle formation during monoterpene ozonolysis, J. Phys. Chem. A, 106, 2869–2881, https://doi.org/10.1021/jp012713p, 2002. 

Boucher, O., Randall, D., Artaxo, P., Bretherton, C., Feingold, G., Forster, P., Kerminen, V.-M., Kondo, Y., Liao, H., Lohmann, U., Rasch, P., Satheesh, S. K., Sherwood, S., Stevens, B., and Zhang, X. Y.: Clouds and Aerosols, in: Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis, edited by: Stocker, T. F., Qin, D., Plattner, G.-K., Tignor, M., Allen, S. K., Boschung, J., Nauels, A., Xia, Y., Bex, V., and Midgley, P. M., Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, and New York, NY, USA, 571–657, ISBN 978-1-107-05799-1, 2013. 

Bousiotis, D., Pope, F. D., Beddows, D. C. S., Dall'Osto, M., Massling, A., Nøjgaard, J. K., Nordstrøm, C., Niemi, J. V., Portin, H., Petäjä, T., Perez, N., Alastuey, A., Querol, X., Kouvarakis, G., Mihalopoulos, N., Vratolis, S., Eleftheriadis, K., Wiedensohler, A., Weinhold, K., Merkel, M., Tuch, T., and Harrison, R. M.: A phenomenology of new particle formation (NPF) at 13 European sites, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 11905–11925, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-11905-2021, 2021. 

Brean, J., Dall'Osto, M., Simó, R., Shi, Z., Beddows, D. C. S., and Harrison, R. M.: Open ocean and coastal new particle formation from sulfuric acid and amines around the Antarctic Peninsula, Nat. Geosci., 14, 383–388, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41561-021-00751-y, 2021. 

Carslaw, K. S., Lee, L. A., Reddington, C. L., Pringle, K. J., Rap, A., Forster, P. M., Mann, G. W., Spracklen, D. V., Woodhouse, M. T., Regayre, L. A., and Pierce, J. R.: Large contribution of natural aerosols to uncertainty in indirect forcing, Nature, 503, 67–71, https://doi.org/10.1038/nature12674, 2013. 

Carslaw, K. S., Gordon, H., Hamilton, D. S., Johnson, J. S., Regayre, L. A., Yoshioka, M., and Pringle, K. J.: Aerosols in the pre-industrial atmosphere, Current Climate Change Reports, 3, 1–15, https://doi.org/10.1007/s40641-017-0061-2, 2017. 

Dada, L., Paasonen, P., Nieminen, T., Buenrostro Mazon, S., Kontkanen, J., Peräkylä, O., Lehtipalo, K., Hussein, T., Petäjä, T., Kerminen, V.-M., Bäck, J., and Kulmala, M.: Long-term analysis of clear-sky new particle formation events and nonevents in Hyytiälä, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 6227–6241, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-6227-2017, 2017. 

Dada, L., Chellapermal, R., Buenrostro Mazon, S., Paasonen, P., Lampilahti, J., Manninen, H. E., Junninen, H., Petäjä, T., Kerminen, V.-M., and Kulmala, M.: Refined classification and characterization of atmospheric new-particle formation events using air ions, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 17883–17893, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-17883-2018, 2018. 

Dal Maso, M., Sogacheva, L., Anisimov, M. P., Arshinov, M., Baklanov, A., Belan, B., Khodzher, T. V., Obolkin, V. A., Staroverova, A., Vlasov, A., Zagaynov, V. A., Lushnikov, A., Lyubovtseva, Y. S., Riipinen, I., Kerminen, V.-M., and Kulmala, M.: Aerosol particle formation events at two Siberian stations inside the boreal forest, Boreal Environ. Res., 13, 81–92, 2008. 

Dal Maso, M., Liao, L., Wildt, J., Kiendler-Scharr, A., Kleist, E., Tillmann, R., Sipilä, M., Hakala, J., Lehtipalo, K., Ehn, M., Kerminen, V.-M., Kulmala, M., Worsnop, D., and Mentel, T.: A chamber study of the influence of boreal BVOC emissions and sulfuric acid on nanoparticle formation rates at ambient concentrations, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 1955–1970, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-1955-2016, 2016. 

Dunn, M. J., Jimenez, J. L., Baumgardner, D., Castro, T., McMurry, P. H., and Smith, J. N.: Measurements of Mexico City nanoparticle size distributions: Observations of new particle formation and growth, Geophys. Res. Lett., 31, L10102, https://doi.org/10.1029/2004GL019483, 2004. 

Dunne, E. M., Gordon, H., Kürten, A., Almeida, J., Duplissy, J., Williamson, C., Ortega, I. K., Pringle, K. J., Adamov, A., Baltensperger, U., Barmet, P., Benduhn, F., Bianchi, F., Breitenlechner, M., Clarke, A., Curtius, J., Dommen, J., Donahue, N. M., Ehrhart, S., Flagan, R. C., Franchin, A., Guida, R., Hakala, J., Hansel, A., Heinritzi, M., Jokinen, T., Kangasluoma, J., Kirkby, J., Kulmala, M., Kupc, A., Lawler, M. J., Lehtipalo, K., Makhmutov, V., Mann, G., Mathot, S., Merikanto, J., Miettinen, P., Nenes, A., Onnela, A., Rap, A., Reddington, C. L. S., Riccobono, F., Richards, N. A. D., Rissanen, M. P., Rondo, L., Sarnela, N., Schobesberger, S., Sengupta, K., Simon, M., Sipilä, M., Smith, J. N., Stozkhov, Y., Tomé, A., Tröstl, J., Wagner, P. E., Wimmer, D., Winkler, P. M., Worsnop, D. R., and Carslaw, K. S.: Global atmospheric particle formation from CERN CLOUD measurements, Science, 354, 1119–1124, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaf2649, 2016. 

Ehn, M., Junninen, H., Petäjä, T., Kurtén, T., Kerminen, V.-M., Schobesberger, S., Manninen, H. E., Ortega, I. K., Vehkamäki, H., Kulmala, M., and Worsnop, D. R.: Composition and temporal behavior of ambient ions in the boreal forest, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 8513–8530, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-8513-2010, 2010. 

Ehn, M., Thornton, J. A., Kleist, E., Sipila, M., Junninen, H., Pullinen, I., Springer, M., Rubach, F., Tillmann, R., Lee, B., Lopez-Hilfiker, F., Andres, S., Acir, I. H., Rissanen, M., Jokinen, T., Schobesberger, S., Kangasluoma, J., Kontkanen, J., Nieminen, T., Kurten, T., Nielsen, L. B., Jorgensen, S., Kjaergaard, H. G., Canagaratna, M., Dal Maso, M., Berndt, T., Petaja, T., Wahner, A., Kerminen, V. M., Kulmala, M., Worsnop, D. R., Wildt, J., and Mentel, T. F.: A large source of low-volatility secondary organic aerosol, Nature, 506, 476–479, https://doi.org/10.1038/nature13032, 2014. 

Franco, M. A., Ditas, F., Kremper, L. A., Machado, L. A. T., Andreae, M. O., Araújo, A., Barbosa, H. M. J., de Brito, J. F., Carbone, S., Holanda, B. A., Morais, F. G., Nascimento, J. P., Pöhlker, M. L., Rizzo, L. V., Sá, M., Saturno, J., Walter, D., Wolff, S., Pöschl, U., Artaxo, P., and Pöhlker, C.: Occurrence and growth of sub-50 nm aerosol particles in the Amazonian boundary layer, Atmos. Chem. Phys. Discuss. [preprint], https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-2021-765, in review, 2021. 

Frege, C., Ortega, I. K., Rissanen, M. P., Praplan, A. P., Steiner, G., Heinritzi, M., Ahonen, L., Amorim, A., Bernhammer, A.-K., Bianchi, F., Brilke, S., Breitenlechner, M., Dada, L., Dias, A., Duplissy, J., Ehrhart, S., El-Haddad, I., Fischer, L., Fuchs, C., Garmash, O., Gonin, M., Hansel, A., Hoyle, C. R., Jokinen, T., Junninen, H., Kirkby, J., Kürten, A., Lehtipalo, K., Leiminger, M., Mauldin, R. L., Molteni, U., Nichman, L., Petäjä, T., Sarnela, N., Schobesberger, S., Simon, M., Sipilä, M., Stolzenburg, D., Tomé, A., Vogel, A. L., Wagner, A. C., Wagner, R., Xiao, M., Yan, C., Ye, P., Curtius, J., Donahue, N. M., Flagan, R. C., Kulmala, M., Worsnop, D. R., Winkler, P. M., Dommen, J., and Baltensperger, U.: Influence of temperature on the molecular composition of ions and charged clusters during pure biogenic nucleation, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 65–79, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-65-2018, 2018. 

Giamarelou, M., Eleftheriadis, K., Nyeki, S., Tunved, P., Torseth, K., and Biskos, G.: Indirect evidence of the composition of nucleation mode atmospheric particles in the high Arctic, J. Geophys. Res., 121, 965–975, https://doi.org/10.1002/2015jd023646, 2016. 

Gordon, H., Sengupta, K., Rap, A., Duplissy, J., Frege, C., Williamson, C., Heinritzi, M., Simon, M., Yan, C., Almeida, J., Tröstl, J., Nieminen, T., Ortega, I. K., Wagner, R., Dunne, E. M., Adamov, A., Amorim, A., Bernhammer, A.-K., Bianchi, F., Breitenlechner, M., Brilke, S., Chen, X., Craven, J. S., Dias, A., Ehrhart, S., Fischer, L., Flagan, R. C., Franchin, A., Fuchs, C., Guida, R., Hakala, J., Hoyle, C. R., Jokinen, T., Junninen, H., Kangasluoma, J., Kim, J., Kirkby, J., Krapf, M., Kürten, A., Laaksonen, A., Lehtipalo, K., Makhmutov, V., Mathot, S., Molteni, U., Monks, S. A., Onnela, A., Peräkylä, O., Piel, F., Petäjä, T., Praplan, A. P., Pringle, K. J., Richards, N. A. D., Rissanen, M. P., Rondo, L., Sarnela, N., Schobesberger, S., Scott, C. E., Seinfeld, J. H., Sharma, S., Sipilä, M., Steiner, G., Stozhkov, Y., Stratmann, F., Tomé, A., Virtanen, A., Vogel, A. L., Wagner, A. C., Wagner, P. E., Weingartner, E., Wimmer, D., Winkler, P. M., Ye, P., Zhang, X., Hansel, A., Dommen, J., Donahue, N. M., Worsnop, D. R., Baltensperger, U., Kulmala, M., Curtius, J., and Carslaw, K. S.: Reduced anthropogenic aerosol radiative forcing caused by biogenic new particle formation, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 113, 12053–12058, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1602360113, 2016. 

Gordon, H., Kirkby, J., Baltensperger, U., Bianchi, F., Breitenlechner, M., Curtius, J., Dias, A., Dommen, J., Donahue, N. M., Dunne, E. M., Duplissy, J., Ehrhart, S., Flagan, R. C., Frege, C., Fuchs, C., Hansel, A., Hoyle, C. R., Kulmala, M., Kürten, A., Lehtipalo, K., Makhmutov, V., Molteni, U., Rissanen, M. P., Stozkhov, Y., Tröstl, J., Tsagkogeorgas, G., Wagner, R., Williamson, C., Wimmer, D., Winkler, P. M., Yan, C., and Carslaw, K. S.: Causes and importance of new particle formation in the present-day and pre-industrial atmospheres, J. Geophys. Res., 122, 8739–8760, https://doi.org/10.1002/2017JD026844, 2017. 

Hamed, A., Korhonen, H., Sihto, S. L., Joutsensaari, J., Jarvinen, H., Petaja, T., Arnold, F., Nieminen, T., Kulmala, M., Smith, J. N., Lehtinen, K. E. J., and Laaksonen, A.: The role of relative humidity in continental new particle formation, J. Geophys. Res., 116, D03202, https://doi.org/10.1029/2010jd014186, 2011. 

Hamilton, D. S., Hantson, S., Scott, C. E., Kaplan, J. O., Pringle, K. J., Nieradzik, L. P., Rap, A., Folberth, G. A., Spracklen, D. V., and Carslaw, K. S.: Reassessment of pre-industrial fire emissions strongly affects anthropogenic aerosol forcing, Nat. Commun., 9, 3182, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-05592-9, 2018. 

He, X. C., Tham, Y. J., Dada, L., Wang, M. Y., Finkenzeller, H., Stolzenburg, D., Iyer, S., Simon, M., Kurten, A., Shen, J. L., Rorup, B., Rissanen, M., Schobesberger, S., Baalbaki, R., Wang, D. S., Koenig, T. K., Jokinen, T., Sarnela, N., Beck, L. J., Almeida, J., Amanatidis, S., Amorim, A., Ataei, F., Baccarini, A., Bertozzi, B., Bianchi, F., Brilke, S., Caudillo, L., Chen, D. X., Chiu, R., Chu, B. W., Dias, A., Ding, A. J., Dommen, J., Duplissy, J., El Haddad, I., Carracedo, L. G., Granzin, M., Hansel, A., Heinritzi, M., Hofbauer, V., Junninen, H., Kangasluoma, J., Kemppainen, D., Kim, C., Kong, W. M., Krechmer, J. E., Kvashin, A., Laitinen, T., Lamkaddam, H., Lee, C. P., Lehtipalo, K., Leiminger, M., Li, Z. J., Makhmutov, V., Manninen, H. E., Marie, G., Marten, R., Mathot, S., Mauldin, R. L., Mentler, B., Mohler, O., Muller, T., Nie, W., Onnela, A., Petaja, T., Pfeifer, J., Philippov, M., Ranjithkumar, A., Saiz-Lopez, A., Salma, I., Scholz, W., Schuchmann, S., Schulze, B., Steiner, G., Stozhkov, Y., Tauber, C., Tome, A., Thakur, R. C., Vaisanen, O., Vazquez-Pufleau, M., Wagner, A. C., Wang, Y. H., Weber, S. K., Winkler, P. M., Wu, Y. S., Xiao, M., Yan, C., Ye, Q., Ylisirnio, A., Zauner-Wieczorek, M., Zha, Q. Z., Zhou, P. T., Flagan, R. C., Curtius, J., Baltensperger, U., Kulmala, M., Kerminen, V. M., Kurten, T., Donahue, N. M., Volkamer, R., Kirkby, J., Worsnop, D. R., and Sipila, M.: Role of iodine oxoacids in atmospheric aerosol nucleation, Science, 371, 589–595, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abe0298, 2021. 

Heinritzi, M., Dada, L., Simon, M., Stolzenburg, D., Wagner, A. C., Fischer, L., Ahonen, L. R., Amanatidis, S., Baalbaki, R., Baccarini, A., Bauer, P. S., Baumgartner, B., Bianchi, F., Brilke, S., Chen, D., Chiu, R., Dias, A., Dommen, J., Duplissy, J., Finkenzeller, H., Frege, C., Fuchs, C., Garmash, O., Gordon, H., Granzin, M., El Haddad, I., He, X., Helm, J., Hofbauer, V., Hoyle, C. R., Kangasluoma, J., Keber, T., Kim, C., Kürten, A., Lamkaddam, H., Laurila, T. M., Lampilahti, J., Lee, C. P., Lehtipalo, K., Leiminger, M., Mai, H., Makhmutov, V., Manninen, H. E., Marten, R., Mathot, S., Mauldin, R. L., Mentler, B., Molteni, U., Müller, T., Nie, W., Nieminen, T., Onnela, A., Partoll, E., Passananti, M., Petäjä, T., Pfeifer, J., Pospisilova, V., Quéléver, L. L. J., Rissanen, M. P., Rose, C., Schobesberger, S., Scholz, W., Scholze, K., Sipilä, M., Steiner, G., Stozhkov, Y., Tauber, C., Tham, Y. J., Vazquez-Pufleau, M., Virtanen, A., Vogel, A. L., Volkamer, R., Wagner, R., Wang, M., Weitz, L., Wimmer, D., Xiao, M., Yan, C., Ye, P., Zha, Q., Zhou, X., Amorim, A., Baltensperger, U., Hansel, A., Kulmala, M., Tomé, A., Winkler, P. M., Worsnop, D. R., Donahue, N. M., Kirkby, J., and Curtius, J.: Molecular understanding of the suppression of new-particle formation by isoprene, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 11809–11821, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-11809-2020, 2020. 

Huneeus, N., Chevallier, F., and Boucher, O.: Estimating aerosol emissions by assimilating observed aerosol optical depth in a global aerosol model, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 4585–4606, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-4585-2012, 2012. 

Jokinen, T., Berndt, T., Makkonen, R., Kerminen, V.-M., Junninen, H., Paasonen, P., Stratmann, F., Herrmann, H., Guenther, A. B., Worsnop, D. R., Kulmala, M., Ehn, M., and Sipilä, M.: Production of extremely low volatile organic compounds from biogenic emissions: Measured yields and atmospheric implications, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 112, 7123–7128, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1423977112, 2015. 

Junninen, H., Hulkkonen, M., Riipinen, I., Nieminen, T., Hirsikko, A., Suni, T., Boy, M., Lee, S.-H., Vana, M., Tammet, H., Kerminen, V.-M., and Kulmala, M.: Observations on nocturnal growth of atmospheric clusters, Tellus B, 60, 365–371, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0889.2008.00356.x, 2008. 

Kanawade, V. P., Jobson, B. T., Guenther, A. B., Erupe, M. E., Pressley, S. N., Tripathi, S. N., and Lee, S.-H.: Isoprene suppression of new particle formation in a mixed deciduous forest, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 6013–6027, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-6013-2011, 2011. 

Kerminen, V. M., Chen, X. M., Vakkari, V., Petaja, T., Kulmala, M., and Bianchi, F.: Atmospheric new particle formation and growth: review of field observations, Environ. Res. Lett., 13, 103003, https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aadf3c, 2018. 

Kiendler-Scharr, A., Wildt, J., Dal Maso, M., Hohaus, T., Kleist, E., Mentel, T. F., Tillmann, R., Uerlings, R., Schurr, U., and Wahner, A.: New particle formation in forests inhibited by isoprene emissions, Nature, 461, 381–384, https://doi.org/10.1038/nature08292, 2009. 

Kirkby, J., Duplissy, J., Sengupta, K., Frege, C., Gordon, H., Williamson, C., Heinritzi, M., Simon, M., Yan, C., Almeida, J., Tröstl, J., Nieminen, T., Ortega, I. K., Wagner, R., Adamov, A., Amorim, A., Bernhammer, A.-K., Bianchi, F., Breitenlechner, M., Brilke, S., Chen, X., Craven, J., Dias, A., Ehrhart, S., Flagan, R. C., Franchin, A., Fuchs, C., Guida, R., Hakala, J., Hoyle, C. R., Jokinen, T., Junninen, H., Kangasluoma, J., Kim, J., Krapf, M., Kürten, A., Laaksonen, A., Lehtipalo, K., Makhmutov, V., Mathot, S., Molteni, U., Onnela, A., Peräkylä, O., Piel, F., Petäjä, T., Praplan, A. P., Pringle, K., Rap, A., Richards, N. A. D., Riipinen, I., Rissanen, M. P., Rondo, L., Sarnela, N., Schobesberger, S., Scott, C. E., Seinfeld, J. H., Sipilä, M., Steiner, G., Stozhkov, Y., Stratmann, F., Tomé, A., Virtanen, A., Vogel, A. L., Wagner, A. C., Wagner, P. E., Weingartner, E., Wimmer, D., Winkler, P. M., Ye, P., Zhang, X., Hansel, A., Dommen, J., Donahue, N. M., Worsnop, D. R., Baltensperger, U., Kulmala, M., Carslaw, K. S., and Curtius, J.: Ion-induced nucleation of pure biogenic particles, Nature, 533, 521–526, https://doi.org/10.1038/nature17953, 2016. 

Kontkanen, J., Järvinen, E., Manninen, H. E., Lehtipalo, K., Kangasluoma, J., Decesari, S., Gobbi, G. P., Laaksonen, A., Petäjä, T., and Kulmala, M.: High concentrations of sub-3nm clusters and frequent new particle formation observed in the Po Valley, Italy, during the PEGASOS 2012 campaign, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 1919–1935, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-1919-2016, 2016. 

Kristensson, A., Dal Maso, M., Swietlicki, E., Hussein, T., Zhou, J., Kerminen, V. M., and Kulmala, M.: Characterization of new particle formation events at a background site in Southern Sweden: relation to air mass history, Tellus B, 60, 330–344, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0889.2008.00345.x, 2008. 

Kulmala, M., Vehkamaki, H., Petajda, T., Dal Maso, M., Lauri, A., Kerminen, V. M., Birmili, W., and McMurry, P. H.: Formation and growth rates of ultrafine atmospheric particles: a review of observations, J. Aerosol Sci., 35, 143–176, 2004. 

Kulmala, M., Petäjä, T., Nieminen, T., Sipilä, M., Manninen, H. E., Lehtipalo, K., Dal Maso, M., Aalto, P. P., Junninen, H., Paasonen, P., Riipinen, I., Lehtinen, K. E. J., Laaksonen, A., and Kerminen, V.-M.: Measurement of the nucleation of atmospheric aerosol particles, Nat. Protocols, 7, 1651–1667, https://doi.org/10.1038/nprot.2012.091, 2012. 

Kulmala, M., Kontkanen, J., Junninen, H., Lehtipalo, K., Manninen, H. E., Nieminen, T., Petaja, T., Sipila, M., Schobesberger, S., Rantala, P., Franchin, A., Jokinen, T., Jarvinen, E., Aijala, M., Kangasluoma, J., Hakala, J., Aalto, P. P., Paasonen, P., Mikkila, J., Vanhanen, J., Aalto, J., Hakola, H., Makkonen, U., Ruuskanen, T., Mauldin, R. L., Duplissy, J., Vehkamaki, H., Back, J., Kortelainen, A., Riipinen, I., Kurten, T., Johnston, M. V., Smith, J. N., Ehn, M., Mentel, T. F., Lehtinen, K. E. J., Laaksonen, A., Kerminen, V. M., and Worsnop, D. R.: Direct observations of atmospheric aerosol nucleation, Science, 339, 943–946, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1227385, 2013. 

Kürten, A., Li, C., Bianchi, F., Curtius, J., Dias, A., Donahue, N. M., Duplissy, J., Flagan, R. C., Hakala, J., Jokinen, T., Kirkby, J., Kulmala, M., Laaksonen, A., Lehtipalo, K., Makhmutov, V., Onnela, A., Rissanen, M. P., Simon, M., Sipilä, M., Stozhkov, Y., Tröstl, J., Ye, P., and McMurry, P. H.: New particle formation in the sulfuric acid–dimethylamine–water system: reevaluation of CLOUD chamber measurements and comparison to an aerosol nucleation and growth model, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 845–863, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-845-2018, 2018. 

Kyrö, E.-M., Väänänen, R., Kerminen, V.-M., Virkkula, A., Petäjä, T., Asmi, A., Dal Maso, M., Nieminen, T., Juhola, S., Shcherbinin, A., Riipinen, I., Lehtipalo, K., Keronen, P., Aalto, P. P., Hari, P., and Kulmala, M.: Trends in new particle formation in eastern Lapland, Finland: effect of decreasing sulfur emissions from Kola Peninsula, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 4383–4396, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-4383-2014, 2014. 

Lawler, M. J., Rissanen, M. P., Ehn, M., Mauldin, R. L., Sarnela, N., Sipila, M., and Smith, J. N.: Evidence for diverse biogeochemical drivers of boreal forest new particle formation, Geophys. Res. Lett., 45, 2038–2046, https://doi.org/10.1002/2017gl076394, 2018. 

Lee, S.-H., Young, L.-H., Benson, D. R., Suni, T., Kulmala, M., Junninen, H., Campos, T. L., Rogers, D. C., and Jensen, J.: Observations of nighttime new particle formation in the troposphere, J. Geophys. Res., 113, D10210, https://doi.org/10.1029/2007jd009351, 2008. 

Lehtipalo, K., Yan, C., Dada, L., Bianchi, F., Xiao, M., Wagner, R., Stolzenburg, D., Ahonen, L. R., Amorim, A., Baccarini, A., Bauer, P. S., Baumgartner, B., Bergen, A., Bernhammer, A.-K., Breitenlechner, M., Brilke, S., Buchholz, A., Mazon, S. B., Chen, D., Chen, X., Dias, A., Dommen, J., Draper, D. C., Duplissy, J., Ehn, M., Finkenzeller, H., Fischer, L., Frege, C., Fuchs, C., Garmash, O., Gordon, H., Hakala, J., He, X., Heikkinen, L., Heinritzi, M., Helm, J. C., Hofbauer, V., Hoyle, C. R., Jokinen, T., Kangasluoma, J., Kerminen, V.-M., Kim, C., Kirkby, J., Kontkanen, J., Kuerten, A., Lawler, M. J., Mai, H., Mathot, S., Mauldin, R. L., III, Molteni, U., Nichman, L., Nie, W., Nieminen, T., Ojdanic, A., Onnela, A., Passananti, M., Petaja, T., Piel, F., Pospisilova, V., Quelever, L. L. J., Rissanen, M. P., Rose, C., Sarnela, N., Schallhart, S., Schuchmann, S., Sengupta, K., Simon, M., Sipila, M., Tauber, C., Tome, A., Trostl, J., Vaisanen, O., Vogel, A. L., Volkamer, R., Wagner, A. C., Wang, M., Weitz, L., Wimmer, D., Ye, P., Ylisirnio, A., Zha, Q., Carslaw, K. S., Curtius, J., Donahue, N. M., Flagan, R. C., Hansel, A., Riipinen, I., Virtanen, A., Winkler, P. M., Baltensperger, U., Kulmala, M., and Worsnop, D. R.: Multicomponent new particle formation from sulfuric acid, ammonia, and biogenic vapors, Sci. Adv., 4, eaau5363, https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aau5363, 2018. 

Merikanto, J., Spracklen, D. V., Mann, G. W., Pickering, S. J., and Carslaw, K. S.: Impact of nucleation on global CCN, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9, 8601–8616, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-8601-2009, 2009. 

Mortier, A., Gliß, J., Schulz, M., Aas, W., Andrews, E., Bian, H., Chin, M., Ginoux, P., Hand, J., Holben, B., Zhang, H., Kipling, Z., Kirkevåg, A., Laj, P., Lurton, T., Myhre, G., Neubauer, D., Olivié, D., von Salzen, K., Skeie, R. B., Takemura, T., and Tilmes, S.: Evaluation of climate model aerosol trends with ground-based observations over the last 2 decades – an AeroCom and CMIP6 analysis, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 13355–13378, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-13355-2020, 2020. 

Naik, V., Szopa, S., Adhikary, B., Artaxo, P., Berntsen, T., Collins, W. D., Fuzzi, S., Gallardo, L., Kiendler-Scharr, A., Klimont, Z., Liao, H., Unger, N., and Zanis, P.: Short-Lived Climate Forcers, in: Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, edited by: Masson-Delmotte, V., Zhai, P., Pirani, A., Connors, S. L., Péan, C., Berger, S., Caud, N., Chen, Y., Goldfarb, L., Gomis, M. I., Huang, M., Leitzell, K., Lonnoy, E., Matthews, J. B. R., Maycock, T. K., Waterfield, T., Yelekçi, O., Yu, R., and Zhou, B., Cambridge University Press, in press, 2021. 

Nieminen, T., Kerminen, V.-M., Petäjä, T., Aalto, P. P., Arshinov, M., Asmi, E., Baltensperger, U., Beddows, D. C. S., Beukes, J. P., Collins, D., Ding, A., Harrison, R. M., Henzing, B., Hooda, R., Hu, M., Hõrrak, U., Kivekäs, N., Komsaare, K., Krejci, R., Kristensson, A., Laakso, L., Laaksonen, A., Leaitch, W. R., Lihavainen, H., Mihalopoulos, N., Németh, Z., Nie, W., O'Dowd, C., Salma, I., Sellegri, K., Svenningsson, B., Swietlicki, E., Tunved, P., Ulevicius, V., Vakkari, V., Vana, M., Wiedensohler, A., Wu, Z., Virtanen, A., and Kulmala, M.: Global analysis of continental boundary layer new particle formation based on long-term measurements, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 14737–14756, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-14737-2018, 2018. 

Ortega, I. K., Suni, T., Boy, M., Grönholm, T., Manninen, H. E., Nieminen, T., Ehn, M., Junninen, H., Hakola, H., Hellén, H., Valmari, T., Arvela, H., Zegelin, S., Hughes, D., Kitchen, M., Cleugh, H., Worsnop, D. R., Kulmala, M., and Kerminen, V.-M.: New insights into nocturnal nucleation, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 4297–4312, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-4297-2012, 2012. 

Pierce, J. R., Leaitch, W. R., Liggio, J., Westervelt, D. M., Wainwright, C. D., Abbatt, J. P. D., Ahlm, L., Al-Basheer, W., Cziczo, D. J., Hayden, K. L., Lee, A. K. Y., Li, S.-M., Russell, L. M., Sjostedt, S. J., Strawbridge, K. B., Travis, M., Vlasenko, A., Wentzell, J. J. B., Wiebe, H. A., Wong, J. P. S., and Macdonald, A. M.: Nucleation and condensational growth to CCN sizes during a sustained pristine biogenic SOA event in a forested mountain valley, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 3147–3163, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-3147-2012, 2012. 

Pierce, J. R., Westervelt, D. M., Atwood, S. A., Barnes, E. A., and Leaitch, W. R.: New-particle formation, growth and climate-relevant particle production in Egbert, Canada: analysis from 1 year of size-distribution observations, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 8647–8663, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-8647-2014, 2014. 

Riccobono, F., Schobesberger, S., Scott, C. E., Dommen, J., Ortega, I. K., Rondo, L., Almeida, J., Amorim, A., Bianchi, F., Breitenlechner, M., David, A., Downard, A., Dunne, E. M., Duplissy, J., Ehrhart, S., Flagan, R. C., Franchin, A., Hansel, A., Junninen, H., Kajos, M., Keskinen, H., Kupc, A., Kürten, A., Kvashin, A. N., Laaksonen, A., Lehtipalo, K., Makhmutov, V., Mathot, S., Nieminen, T., Onnela, A., Petäjä, T., Praplan, A. P., Santos, F. D., Schallhart, S., Seinfeld, J. H., Sipilä, M., Spracklen, D. V., Stozhkov, Y., Stratmann, F., Tomé, A., Tsagkogeorgas, G., Vaattovaara, P., Viisanen, Y., Vrtala, A., Wagner, P. E., Weingartner, E., Wex, H., Wimmer, D., Carslaw, K. S., Curtius, J., Donahue, N. M., Kirkby, J., Kulmala, M., Worsnop, D. R., and Baltensperger, U.: Oxidation products of biogenic emissions contribute to nucleation of atmospheric particles, Science, 344, 717–721, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1243527, 2014. 

Riipinen, I., Yli-Juuti, T., Pierce, J. R., Petaja, T., Worsnop, D. R., Kulmala, M., and Donahue, N. M.: The contribution of organics to atmospheric nanoparticle growth, Nat. Geosci., 5, 453–458, https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo1499, 2012. 

Rolph, G., Stein, A., and Stunder, B.: Real-time Environmental Applications and Display sYstem: READY, Environ. Model. Softw., 95, 210–228, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2017.06.025, 2017. 

Rose, C., Sellegri, K., Velarde, F., Moreno, I., Ramonet, M., Weinhold, K., Krejci, R., Ginot, P., Andrade, M., Wiedensohler, A., and Laj, P.: Frequent nucleation events at the high altitude station of Chacaltaya (5240 m a.s.l.), Bolivia, Atmos. Environ., 102, 18–29, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2014.11.015, 2015. 

Rose, C., Zha, Q., Dada, L., Yan, C., Lehtipalo, K., Junninen, H., Mazon, S. B., Jokinen, T., Sarnela, N., Sipila, M., Petaja, T., Kerminen, V.-M., Bianchi, F., and Kulmala, M.: Observations of biogenic ion-induced cluster formation in the atmosphere, Sci. Adv., 4, eaar5218, https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aar5218, 2018. 

Rosenfeld, D., Lohmann, U., Raga, G. B., O'Dowd, C. D., Kulmala, M., Fuzzi, S., Reissell, A., and Andreae, M. O.: Flood or drought: How do aerosols affect precipitation?, Science, 321, 1309–1313, 2008. 

Schobesberger, S., Junninen, H., Bianchi, F., Lönn, G., Ehn, M., Lehtipalo, K., Dommen, J., Ehrhart, S., Ortega, I. K., Franchin, A., Nieminen, T., Riccobono, F., Hutterli, M., Duplissy, J., Almeida, J., Amorim, A., Breitenlechner, M., Downard, A. J., Dunne, E. M., Flagan, R. C., Kajos, M., Keskinen, H., Kirkby, J., Kupc, A., Kürten, A., Kurtén, T., Laaksonen, A., Mathot, S., Onnela, A., Praplan, A. P., Rondo, L., Santos, F. D., Schallhart, S., Schnitzhofer, R., Sipilä, M., Tomé, A., Tsagkogeorgas, G., Vehkamäki, H., Wimmer, D., Baltensperger, U., Carslaw, K. S., Curtius, J., Hansel, A., Petäjä, T., Kulmala, M., Donahue, N. M., and Worsnop, D. R.: Molecular understanding of atmospheric particle formation from sulfuric acid and large oxidized organic molecules, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 110, 17223–17228, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1306973110, 2013. 

Seinfeld, J. H., Bretherton, C., Carslaw, K. S., Coe, H., DeMott, P. J., Dunlea, E. J., Feingold, G., Ghan, S., Guenther, A. B., Kahn, R., Kraucunas, I., Kreidenweis, S. M., Molina, M. J., Nenes, A., Penner, J. E., Prather, K. A., Ramanathan, V., Ramaswamy, V., Rasch, P. J., Ravishankara, A. R., Rosenfeld, D., Stephens, G., and Wood, R.: Improving our fundamental understanding of the role of aerosol-cloud interactions in the climate system, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 113, 5781–5790, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1514043113, 2016. 

Simon, M., Dada, L., Heinritzi, M., Scholz, W., Stolzenburg, D., Fischer, L., Wagner, A. C., Kürten, A., Rörup, B., He, X.-C., Almeida, J., Baalbaki, R., Baccarini, A., Bauer, P. S., Beck, L., Bergen, A., Bianchi, F., Bräkling, S., Brilke, S., Caudillo, L., Chen, D., Chu, B., Dias, A., Draper, D. C., Duplissy, J., El-Haddad, I., Finkenzeller, H., Frege, C., Gonzalez-Carracedo, L., Gordon, H., Granzin, M., Hakala, J., Hofbauer, V., Hoyle, C. R., Kim, C., Kong, W., Lamkaddam, H., Lee, C. P., Lehtipalo, K., Leiminger, M., Mai, H., Manninen, H. E., Marie, G., Marten, R., Mentler, B., Molteni, U., Nichman, L., Nie, W., Ojdanic, A., Onnela, A., Partoll, E., Petäjä, T., Pfeifer, J., Philippov, M., Quéléver, L. L. J., Ranjithkumar, A., Rissanen, M. P., Schallhart, S., Schobesberger, S., Schuchmann, S., Shen, J., Sipilä, M., Steiner, G., Stozhkov, Y., Tauber, C., Tham, Y. J., Tomé, A. R., Vazquez-Pufleau, M., Vogel, A. L., Wagner, R., Wang, M., Wang, D. S., Wang, Y., Weber, S. K., Wu, Y., Xiao, M., Yan, C., Ye, P., Ye, Q., Zauner-Wieczorek, M., Zhou, X., Baltensperger, U., Dommen, J., Flagan, R. C., Hansel, A., Kulmala, M., Volkamer, R., Winkler, P. M., Worsnop, D. R., Donahue, N. M., Kirkby, J., and Curtius, J.: Molecular understanding of new-particle formation from α-pinene between −50 and +25C, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 9183–9207, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-9183-2020, 2020. 

Sipilä, M., Berndt, T., Petäjä, T., Brus, D., Vanhanen, J., Stratmann, F., Patokoski, J., Mauldin, L., Hyvärinen, A.-P., Lihavainen, H., and Kulmala, M.: The role of sulfuric acid in atmospheric nucleation, Science, 327, 1243–1246, 2010. 

Sipilä, M., Sarnela, N., Jokinen, T., Henschel, H., Junninen, H., Kontkanen, J., Richters, S., Kangasluoma, J., Franchin, A., Peräkylä, O., Rissanen, M. P., Ehn, M., Vehkamäki, H., Kurten, T., Berndt, T., Petäjä, T., Worsnop, D., Ceburnis, D., Kerminen, V. M., Kulmala, M., and O'Dowd, C.: Molecular-scale evidence of aerosol particle formation via sequential addition of HIO3, Nature, 537, 532–534, https://doi.org/10.1038/nature19314, 2016. 

Sogacheva, L., Dal Maso, M., Kerminen, V. M., and Kulmala, M.: Probability of nucleation events and aerosol particle concentration in different air mass types arriving at Hyytiälä southern Finland, based on back trajectories analysis, Boreal Environ. Res., 10, 479–491, 2005. 

Stein, A. F., Draxler, R. R., Rolph, G. D., Stunder, B. J. B., Cohen, M. D., and Ngan, F.: NOAA's HYSPLIT atmospheric transport and dispersion modeling system, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 96, 2059–2077, https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-14-00110.1, 2015. 

Sulo, J., Sarnela, N., Kontkanen, J., Ahonen, L., Paasonen, P., Laurila, T., Jokinen, T., Kangasluoma, J., Junninen, H., Sipilä, M., Petäjä, T., Kulmala, M., and Lehtipalo, K.: Long-term measurement of sub-3 nm particles and their precursor gases in the boreal forest, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 695–715, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-695-2021, 2021. 

Suni, T., Kulmala, M., Hirsikko, A., Bergman, T., Laakso, L., Aalto, P. P., Leuning, R., Cleugh, H., Zegelin, S., Hughes, D., van Gorsel, E., Kitchen, M., Vana, M., Hõrrak, U., Mirme, S., Mirme, A., Sevanto, S., Twining, J., and Tadros, C.: Formation and characteristics of ions and charged aerosol particles in a native Australian Eucalypt forest, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 8, 129–139, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-8-129-2008, 2008. 

Svenningsson, B., Arneth, A., Hayward, S., Holst, T., Massling, A., Swietlicki, E., Hirsikko, A., Junninen, H., Riipinen, I., Vana, M., Dal Maso, M., Hussein, T., and Kulmala, M.: Aerosol particle formation events and analysis of high growth rates observed above a subarctic wetland-forest mosaic, Tellus B, 60, 353–364, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0889.2008.00351.x, 2008. 

Tröstl, J., Chuang, W. K., Gordon, H., Heinritzi, M., Yan, C., Molteni, U., Ahlm, L., Frege, C., Bianchi, F., Wagner, R., Simon, M., Lehtipalo, K., Williamson, C., Craven, J. S., Duplissy, J., Adamov, A., Almeida, J., Bernhammer, A.-K., Breitenlechner, M., Brilke, S., Dias, A., Ehrhart, S., Flagan, R. C., Franchin, A., Fuchs, C., Guida, R., Gysel, M., Hansel, A., Hoyle, C. R., Jokinen, T., Junninen, H., Kangasluoma, J., Keskinen, H., Kim, J., Krapf, M., Kürten, A., Laaksonen, A., Lawler, M., Leiminger, M., Mathot, S., Möhler, O., Nieminen, T., Onnela, A., Petäjä, T., Piel, F. M., Miettinen, P., Rissanen, M. P., Rondo, L., Sarnela, N., Schobesberger, S., Sengupta, K., Sipilä, M., Smith, J. N., Steiner, G., Tomè, A., Virtanen, A., Wagner, A. C., Weingartner, E., Wimmer, D., Winkler, P. M., Ye, P., Carslaw, K. S., Curtius, J., Dommen, J., Kirkby, J., Kulmala, M., Riipinen, I., Worsnop, D. R., Donahue, N. M., and Baltensperger, U.: The role of low-volatility organic compounds in initial particle growth in the atmosphere, Nature, 533, 527–531, https://doi.org/10.1038/nature18271, 2016. 

TSI Inc.: NanoScan SMPS Spectrometer Compared to the TSI® SMPS™ spectrometer, Application Note NANOSCAN-002, 5 pp., 2013. 

Twomey, S. A., Piepgrass, M., and Wolfe, T. L.: An assessment of the impact of pollution on global cloud albedo, Tellus, 36B, 356–366, 1984. 

Uusitalo, H., Kontkanen, J., Ylivinkka, I., Ezhova, E., Demakova, A., Arshinov, M., Belan, B. D., Davydov, D., Ma, N., Petäjä, T., Wiedensohler, A., Kulmala, M., and Nieminen, T.: Occurrence of new particle formation events in Siberian and Finnish boreal forest, Atmos. Chem. Phys. Discuss. [preprint], https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-2021-530, in review, 2021. 

Varanda Rizzo, L., Roldin, P., Brito, J., Backman, J., Swietlicki, E., Krejci, R., Tunved, P., Petäjä, T., Kulmala, M., and Artaxo, P.: Multi-year statistical and modeling analysis of submicrometer aerosol number size distributions at a rain forest site in Amazonia, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 10255–10274, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-10255-2018, 2018. 

Vehkamäki, H., Dal Maso, M., Hussein, T., Flanagan, R., Hyvärinen, A., Lauros, J., Merikanto, P., Mönkkönen, M., Pihlatie, K., Salminen, K., Sogacheva, L., Thum, T., Ruuskanen, T. M., Keronen, P., Aalto, P. P., Hari, P., Lehtinen, K. E. J., Rannik, Ü., and Kulmala, M.: Atmospheric particle formation events at Värriö measurement station in Finnish Lapland 1998-2002, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 4, 2015–2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-4-2015-2004, 2004. 

Vo, E., Horvatin, M., and Zhuang, Z. Q.: Performance comparison of field portable instruments to the scanning mobility particle sizer using monodispersed and polydispersed sodium chloride aerosols, Ann. Work Exp. Health, 62, 711–720, https://doi.org/10.1093/annweh/wxy036, 2018. 

Wang, M. and Penner, J. E.: Aerosol indirect forcing in a global model with particle nucleation, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9, 239–260, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-239-2009, 2009. 

Wiedensohler, A., Ma, N., Birmili, W., Heintzenberg, J., Ditas, F., Andreae, M. O., and Panov, A.: Infrequent new particle formation over the remote boreal forest of Siberia, Atmos. Environ., 200, 167–169, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2018.12.013, 2019. 

Wimmer, D., Buenrostro Mazon, S., Manninen, H. E., Kangasluoma, J., Franchin, A., Nieminen, T., Backman, J., Wang, J., Kuang, C., Krejci, R., Brito, J., Goncalves Morais, F., Martin, S. T., Artaxo, P., Kulmala, M., Kerminen, V.-M., and Petäjä, T.: Ground-based observation of clusters and nucleation-mode particles in the Amazon, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 13245–13264, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-13245-2018, 2018. 

Yan, C., Yin, R. J., Lu, Y. Q., Dada, L. N., Yang, D. S., Fu, Y. Y., Kontkanen, J., Deng, C. J., Garmash, O., Ruan, J. X., Baalbaki, R., Schervish, M., Cai, R. L., Bloss, M., Chan, T., Chen, T. Z., Chen, Q., Chen, X. M., Chen, Y., Chu, B. W., Dallenbach, K., Foreback, B., He, X. C., Heikkinen, L., Jokinen, T., Junninen, H., Kangasluoma, J., Kokkonen, T., Kurppa, M., Lehtipalo, K., Li, H. Y., Li, H., Li, X. X., Liu, Y. L., Ma, Q. X., Paasonen, P., Rantala, P., Pileci, R. E., Rusanen, A., Sarnela, N., Simonen, P., Wang, S. X., Wang, W. G., Wang, Y. H., Xue, M., Yang, G., Yao, L., Zhou, Y., Kujansuu, J., Petaja, T., Nie, W., Ma, Y., Ge, M. F., He, H., Donahue, N. M., Worsnop, D. R., Kerminen, V. M., Wang, L., Liu, Y. C., Zheng, J., Kulma, M., Jiang, J. K., and Bianchi, F.: The synergistic role of sulfuric acid, bases, and oxidized organics governing new-particle formation in Beijing, Geophys. Res. Lett., 48, e2020GL091944, https://doi.org/10.1029/2020gl091944, 2021. 

Yu, F. and Luo, G.: Simulation of particle size distribution with a global aerosol model: contribution of nucleation to aerosol and CCN number concentrations, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9, 7691–7710, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-7691-2009, 2009. 

Yu, H., Ortega, J., Smith, J. N., Guenther, A. B., Kanawade, V. P., You, Y., Liu, Y., Hosman, K., Karl, T., Seco, R., Geron, C., Pallardy, S. G., Gu, L., Mikkila, J., and Lee, S.-H.: New particle formation and growth in an isoprene-dominated Ozark forest: From sub-5 nm to CCN-active sizes, Aerosol Sci. Tech., 48, 1285–1298, https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2014.984801, 2014. 

Zhang, R. Y., Khalizov, A., Wang, L., Hu, M., and Xu, W.: Nucleation and growth of nanoparticles in the atmosphere, Chem. Rev., 112, 1957–2011, https://doi.org/10.1021/cr2001756, 2012. 

Zheng, G., Wang, Y., Wood, R., Jensen, M. P., Kuang, C., McCoy, I. L., Matthews, A., Mei, F., Tomlinson, J. M., Shilling, J. E., Zawadowicz, M. A., Crosbie, E., Moore, R., Ziemba, L., Andreae, M. O., and Wang, J.: New particle formation in the remote marine boundary layer, Nat. Commun., 12, 527, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-20773-1, 2021. 

Zhu, J. and Penner, J. E.: Global modeling of secondary organic aerosol with organic nucleation, J. Geophys. Res., 124, 8260–8286, https://doi.org/10.1029/2019JD030414, 2019. 

Download
Short summary
Atmospheric aerosol particles are key players in the Earth’s climate system, but there is still considerable uncertainty about where and how these particles are initially formed. We present the first study of new particle formation (NPF) at a pristine site in a subboreal forest region of North America. Our data suggest that, in this environment, there is frequent NPF from biogenic organic precursor compounds, which was likely the predominant source of particles in the preindustrial environment.
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint