Air Quality Research Division, Atmospheric Science and Technology Directorate, Science and Technology Branch, Environment and Climate Change Canada, Toronto, Ontario M3H 5T4, Canada
Air Quality Research Division, Atmospheric Science and Technology Directorate, Science and Technology Branch, Environment and Climate Change Canada, Toronto, Ontario M3H 5T4, Canada
Zhuanshi He
Air Quality Research Division, Atmospheric Science and Technology Directorate, Science and Technology Branch, Environment and Climate Change Canada, Toronto, Ontario M3H 5T4, Canada
Hazel Cathcart
Air Quality Research Division, Atmospheric Science and Technology Directorate, Science and Technology Branch, Environment and Climate Change Canada, Toronto, Ontario M3H 5T4, Canada
Daniel Houle
Aquatic Contaminants Research Division, Water Science and Technology Directorate, Science and Technology Branch, Environment and Climate Change Canada, Montréal, Quebec H2Y 2E7, Canada
Air Quality Research Division, Atmospheric Science and Technology Directorate, Science and Technology Branch, Environment and Climate Change Canada, Toronto, Ontario M3H 5T4, Canada
Jian Feng
Air Quality Research Division, Atmospheric Science and Technology Directorate, Science and Technology Branch, Environment and Climate Change Canada, Toronto, Ontario M3H 5T4, Canada
Jason O'Brien
Air Quality Research Division, Atmospheric Science and Technology Directorate, Science and Technology Branch, Environment and Climate Change Canada, Toronto, Ontario M3H 5T4, Canada
Anne Marie Macdonald
Air Quality Research Division, Atmospheric Science and Technology Directorate, Science and Technology Branch, Environment and Climate Change Canada, Toronto, Ontario M3H 5T4, Canada
Julian Aherne
School of Environment, Trent University, Peterborough, Ontario K9L 0G2, Canada
Jeffrey Brook
Dalla Lana School of Public Health and Department of Chemical Engineering and Applied Chemistry, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario M5T 3M7, Canada
Viewed
Total article views: 3,898 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML
PDF
XML
Total
Supplement
BibTeX
EndNote
2,759
1,061
78
3,898
296
94
121
HTML: 2,759
PDF: 1,061
XML: 78
Total: 3,898
Supplement: 296
BibTeX: 94
EndNote: 121
Views and downloads (calculated since 28 Jun 2022)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 28 Jun 2022)
Total article views: 2,855 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML
PDF
XML
Total
Supplement
BibTeX
EndNote
2,129
667
59
2,855
159
86
115
HTML: 2,129
PDF: 667
XML: 59
Total: 2,855
Supplement: 159
BibTeX: 86
EndNote: 115
Views and downloads (calculated since 18 Nov 2022)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 18 Nov 2022)
Total article views: 1,043 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML
PDF
XML
Total
Supplement
BibTeX
EndNote
630
394
19
1,043
137
8
6
HTML: 630
PDF: 394
XML: 19
Total: 1,043
Supplement: 137
BibTeX: 8
EndNote: 6
Views and downloads (calculated since 28 Jun 2022)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 28 Jun 2022)
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Total article views: 3,898 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 3,898 with geography defined
and 0 with unknown origin.
Total article views: 2,855 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 2,855 with geography defined
and 0 with unknown origin.
Total article views: 1,043 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 1,043 with geography defined
and 0 with unknown origin.
Nitrogen (N) and sulfur (S) deposition decreased significantly at 14 Canadian sites during 2000–2018. The greatest decline was observed in southeastern Canada owing to regional SO2 and NOx reductions. Wet deposition was more important than dry deposition, comprising 71–95 % of total N and 45–89 % of total S deposition. While critical loads (CLs) were exceeded at a few sites in the early 2000s, acidic deposition declined below CLs after 2012, which signifies recovery from legacy acidification.
Nitrogen (N) and sulfur (S) deposition decreased significantly at 14 Canadian sites during...
