Air Quality Research Division, Atmospheric Science and Technology Directorate, Science and Technology Branch, Environment and Climate Change Canada, Toronto, Ontario M3H 5T4, Canada
Air Quality Research Division, Atmospheric Science and Technology Directorate, Science and Technology Branch, Environment and Climate Change Canada, Toronto, Ontario M3H 5T4, Canada
Zhuanshi He
Air Quality Research Division, Atmospheric Science and Technology Directorate, Science and Technology Branch, Environment and Climate Change Canada, Toronto, Ontario M3H 5T4, Canada
Hazel Cathcart
Air Quality Research Division, Atmospheric Science and Technology Directorate, Science and Technology Branch, Environment and Climate Change Canada, Toronto, Ontario M3H 5T4, Canada
Daniel Houle
Aquatic Contaminants Research Division, Water Science and Technology Directorate, Science and Technology Branch, Environment and Climate Change Canada, Montréal, Quebec H2Y 2E7, Canada
Air Quality Research Division, Atmospheric Science and Technology Directorate, Science and Technology Branch, Environment and Climate Change Canada, Toronto, Ontario M3H 5T4, Canada
Jian Feng
Air Quality Research Division, Atmospheric Science and Technology Directorate, Science and Technology Branch, Environment and Climate Change Canada, Toronto, Ontario M3H 5T4, Canada
Jason O'Brien
Air Quality Research Division, Atmospheric Science and Technology Directorate, Science and Technology Branch, Environment and Climate Change Canada, Toronto, Ontario M3H 5T4, Canada
Anne Marie Macdonald
Air Quality Research Division, Atmospheric Science and Technology Directorate, Science and Technology Branch, Environment and Climate Change Canada, Toronto, Ontario M3H 5T4, Canada
Julian Aherne
School of Environment, Trent University, Peterborough, Ontario K9L 0G2, Canada
Jeffrey Brook
Dalla Lana School of Public Health and Department of Chemical Engineering and Applied Chemistry, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario M5T 3M7, Canada
Viewed
Total article views: 3,333 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML
PDF
XML
Total
Supplement
BibTeX
EndNote
2,395
879
59
3,333
247
70
101
HTML: 2,395
PDF: 879
XML: 59
Total: 3,333
Supplement: 247
BibTeX: 70
EndNote: 101
Views and downloads (calculated since 28 Jun 2022)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 28 Jun 2022)
Total article views: 2,385 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML
PDF
XML
Total
Supplement
BibTeX
EndNote
1,803
541
41
2,385
129
64
95
HTML: 1,803
PDF: 541
XML: 41
Total: 2,385
Supplement: 129
BibTeX: 64
EndNote: 95
Views and downloads (calculated since 18 Nov 2022)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 18 Nov 2022)
Total article views: 948 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML
PDF
XML
Total
Supplement
BibTeX
EndNote
592
338
18
948
118
6
6
HTML: 592
PDF: 338
XML: 18
Total: 948
Supplement: 118
BibTeX: 6
EndNote: 6
Views and downloads (calculated since 28 Jun 2022)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 28 Jun 2022)
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Total article views: 3,333 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 3,333 with geography defined
and 0 with unknown origin.
Total article views: 2,385 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 2,385 with geography defined
and 0 with unknown origin.
Total article views: 948 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 948 with geography defined
and 0 with unknown origin.
Nitrogen (N) and sulfur (S) deposition decreased significantly at 14 Canadian sites during 2000–2018. The greatest decline was observed in southeastern Canada owing to regional SO2 and NOx reductions. Wet deposition was more important than dry deposition, comprising 71–95 % of total N and 45–89 % of total S deposition. While critical loads (CLs) were exceeded at a few sites in the early 2000s, acidic deposition declined below CLs after 2012, which signifies recovery from legacy acidification.
Nitrogen (N) and sulfur (S) deposition decreased significantly at 14 Canadian sites during...
