Air Quality Research Division, Atmospheric Science and Technology Directorate, Science and Technology Branch, Environment and Climate Change Canada, Toronto, Ontario M3H 5T4, Canada
Air Quality Research Division, Atmospheric Science and Technology Directorate, Science and Technology Branch, Environment and Climate Change Canada, Toronto, Ontario M3H 5T4, Canada
Zhuanshi He
Air Quality Research Division, Atmospheric Science and Technology Directorate, Science and Technology Branch, Environment and Climate Change Canada, Toronto, Ontario M3H 5T4, Canada
Hazel Cathcart
Air Quality Research Division, Atmospheric Science and Technology Directorate, Science and Technology Branch, Environment and Climate Change Canada, Toronto, Ontario M3H 5T4, Canada
Daniel Houle
Aquatic Contaminants Research Division, Water Science and Technology Directorate, Science and Technology Branch, Environment and Climate Change Canada, Montréal, Quebec H2Y 2E7, Canada
Air Quality Research Division, Atmospheric Science and Technology Directorate, Science and Technology Branch, Environment and Climate Change Canada, Toronto, Ontario M3H 5T4, Canada
Jian Feng
Air Quality Research Division, Atmospheric Science and Technology Directorate, Science and Technology Branch, Environment and Climate Change Canada, Toronto, Ontario M3H 5T4, Canada
Jason O'Brien
Air Quality Research Division, Atmospheric Science and Technology Directorate, Science and Technology Branch, Environment and Climate Change Canada, Toronto, Ontario M3H 5T4, Canada
Anne Marie Macdonald
Air Quality Research Division, Atmospheric Science and Technology Directorate, Science and Technology Branch, Environment and Climate Change Canada, Toronto, Ontario M3H 5T4, Canada
Julian Aherne
School of Environment, Trent University, Peterborough, Ontario K9L 0G2, Canada
Jeffrey Brook
Dalla Lana School of Public Health and Department of Chemical Engineering and Applied Chemistry, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario M5T 3M7, Canada
Viewed
Total article views: 3,024 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML
PDF
XML
Total
Supplement
BibTeX
EndNote
2,148
821
55
3,024
205
59
91
HTML: 2,148
PDF: 821
XML: 55
Total: 3,024
Supplement: 205
BibTeX: 59
EndNote: 91
Views and downloads (calculated since 28 Jun 2022)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 28 Jun 2022)
Total article views: 2,107 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML
PDF
XML
Total
Supplement
BibTeX
EndNote
1,561
509
37
2,107
103
54
86
HTML: 1,561
PDF: 509
XML: 37
Total: 2,107
Supplement: 103
BibTeX: 54
EndNote: 86
Views and downloads (calculated since 18 Nov 2022)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 18 Nov 2022)
Total article views: 917 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML
PDF
XML
Total
Supplement
BibTeX
EndNote
587
312
18
917
102
5
5
HTML: 587
PDF: 312
XML: 18
Total: 917
Supplement: 102
BibTeX: 5
EndNote: 5
Views and downloads (calculated since 28 Jun 2022)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 28 Jun 2022)
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Total article views: 3,024 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 3,024 with geography defined
and 0 with unknown origin.
Total article views: 2,107 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 2,107 with geography defined
and 0 with unknown origin.
Total article views: 917 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 917 with geography defined
and 0 with unknown origin.
Nitrogen (N) and sulfur (S) deposition decreased significantly at 14 Canadian sites during 2000–2018. The greatest decline was observed in southeastern Canada owing to regional SO2 and NOx reductions. Wet deposition was more important than dry deposition, comprising 71–95 % of total N and 45–89 % of total S deposition. While critical loads (CLs) were exceeded at a few sites in the early 2000s, acidic deposition declined below CLs after 2012, which signifies recovery from legacy acidification.
Nitrogen (N) and sulfur (S) deposition decreased significantly at 14 Canadian sites during...
