Air Quality Research Division, Atmospheric Science and Technology Directorate, Science and Technology Branch, Environment and Climate Change Canada, Toronto, Ontario M3H 5T4, Canada
Air Quality Research Division, Atmospheric Science and Technology Directorate, Science and Technology Branch, Environment and Climate Change Canada, Toronto, Ontario M3H 5T4, Canada
Zhuanshi He
Air Quality Research Division, Atmospheric Science and Technology Directorate, Science and Technology Branch, Environment and Climate Change Canada, Toronto, Ontario M3H 5T4, Canada
Hazel Cathcart
Air Quality Research Division, Atmospheric Science and Technology Directorate, Science and Technology Branch, Environment and Climate Change Canada, Toronto, Ontario M3H 5T4, Canada
Daniel Houle
Aquatic Contaminants Research Division, Water Science and Technology Directorate, Science and Technology Branch, Environment and Climate Change Canada, Montréal, Quebec H2Y 2E7, Canada
Air Quality Research Division, Atmospheric Science and Technology Directorate, Science and Technology Branch, Environment and Climate Change Canada, Toronto, Ontario M3H 5T4, Canada
Jian Feng
Air Quality Research Division, Atmospheric Science and Technology Directorate, Science and Technology Branch, Environment and Climate Change Canada, Toronto, Ontario M3H 5T4, Canada
Jason O'Brien
Air Quality Research Division, Atmospheric Science and Technology Directorate, Science and Technology Branch, Environment and Climate Change Canada, Toronto, Ontario M3H 5T4, Canada
Anne Marie Macdonald
Air Quality Research Division, Atmospheric Science and Technology Directorate, Science and Technology Branch, Environment and Climate Change Canada, Toronto, Ontario M3H 5T4, Canada
Julian Aherne
School of Environment, Trent University, Peterborough, Ontario K9L 0G2, Canada
Jeffrey Brook
Dalla Lana School of Public Health and Department of Chemical Engineering and Applied Chemistry, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario M5T 3M7, Canada
Viewed
Total article views: 1,802 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML
PDF
XML
Total
Supplement
BibTeX
EndNote
1,285
481
36
1,802
121
21
26
HTML: 1,285
PDF: 481
XML: 36
Total: 1,802
Supplement: 121
BibTeX: 21
EndNote: 26
Views and downloads (calculated since 28 Jun 2022)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 28 Jun 2022)
Total article views: 1,038 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML
PDF
XML
Total
Supplement
BibTeX
EndNote
740
280
18
1,038
53
17
22
HTML: 740
PDF: 280
XML: 18
Total: 1,038
Supplement: 53
BibTeX: 17
EndNote: 22
Views and downloads (calculated since 18 Nov 2022)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 18 Nov 2022)
Total article views: 764 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML
PDF
XML
Total
Supplement
BibTeX
EndNote
545
201
18
764
68
4
4
HTML: 545
PDF: 201
XML: 18
Total: 764
Supplement: 68
BibTeX: 4
EndNote: 4
Views and downloads (calculated since 28 Jun 2022)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 28 Jun 2022)
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Total article views: 1,802 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 1,933 with geography defined
and -131 with unknown origin.
Total article views: 1,038 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 1,154 with geography defined
and -116 with unknown origin.
Total article views: 764 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 779 with geography defined
and -15 with unknown origin.
Nitrogen (N) and sulfur (S) deposition decreased significantly at 14 Canadian sites during 2000–2018. The greatest decline was observed in southeastern Canada owing to regional SO2 and NOx reductions. Wet deposition was more important than dry deposition, comprising 71–95 % of total N and 45–89 % of total S deposition. While critical loads (CLs) were exceeded at a few sites in the early 2000s, acidic deposition declined below CLs after 2012, which signifies recovery from legacy acidification.
Nitrogen (N) and sulfur (S) deposition decreased significantly at 14 Canadian sites during...
