Air Quality Research Division, Atmospheric Science and Technology Directorate, Science and Technology Branch, Environment and Climate Change Canada, Toronto, Ontario M3H 5T4, Canada
Air Quality Research Division, Atmospheric Science and Technology Directorate, Science and Technology Branch, Environment and Climate Change Canada, Toronto, Ontario M3H 5T4, Canada
Zhuanshi He
Air Quality Research Division, Atmospheric Science and Technology Directorate, Science and Technology Branch, Environment and Climate Change Canada, Toronto, Ontario M3H 5T4, Canada
Hazel Cathcart
Air Quality Research Division, Atmospheric Science and Technology Directorate, Science and Technology Branch, Environment and Climate Change Canada, Toronto, Ontario M3H 5T4, Canada
Daniel Houle
Aquatic Contaminants Research Division, Water Science and Technology Directorate, Science and Technology Branch, Environment and Climate Change Canada, Montréal, Quebec H2Y 2E7, Canada
Air Quality Research Division, Atmospheric Science and Technology Directorate, Science and Technology Branch, Environment and Climate Change Canada, Toronto, Ontario M3H 5T4, Canada
Jian Feng
Air Quality Research Division, Atmospheric Science and Technology Directorate, Science and Technology Branch, Environment and Climate Change Canada, Toronto, Ontario M3H 5T4, Canada
Jason O'Brien
Air Quality Research Division, Atmospheric Science and Technology Directorate, Science and Technology Branch, Environment and Climate Change Canada, Toronto, Ontario M3H 5T4, Canada
Anne Marie Macdonald
Air Quality Research Division, Atmospheric Science and Technology Directorate, Science and Technology Branch, Environment and Climate Change Canada, Toronto, Ontario M3H 5T4, Canada
Julian Aherne
School of Environment, Trent University, Peterborough, Ontario K9L 0G2, Canada
Jeffrey Brook
Dalla Lana School of Public Health and Department of Chemical Engineering and Applied Chemistry, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario M5T 3M7, Canada
Viewed
Total article views: 3,263 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML
PDF
XML
Total
Supplement
BibTeX
EndNote
2,337
867
59
3,263
234
67
98
HTML: 2,337
PDF: 867
XML: 59
Total: 3,263
Supplement: 234
BibTeX: 67
EndNote: 98
Views and downloads (calculated since 28 Jun 2022)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 28 Jun 2022)
Total article views: 2,319 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML
PDF
XML
Total
Supplement
BibTeX
EndNote
1,746
532
41
2,319
120
61
92
HTML: 1,746
PDF: 532
XML: 41
Total: 2,319
Supplement: 120
BibTeX: 61
EndNote: 92
Views and downloads (calculated since 18 Nov 2022)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 18 Nov 2022)
Total article views: 944 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML
PDF
XML
Total
Supplement
BibTeX
EndNote
591
335
18
944
114
6
6
HTML: 591
PDF: 335
XML: 18
Total: 944
Supplement: 114
BibTeX: 6
EndNote: 6
Views and downloads (calculated since 28 Jun 2022)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 28 Jun 2022)
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Total article views: 3,263 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 3,263 with geography defined
and 0 with unknown origin.
Total article views: 2,319 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 2,319 with geography defined
and 0 with unknown origin.
Total article views: 944 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 944 with geography defined
and 0 with unknown origin.
Nitrogen (N) and sulfur (S) deposition decreased significantly at 14 Canadian sites during 2000–2018. The greatest decline was observed in southeastern Canada owing to regional SO2 and NOx reductions. Wet deposition was more important than dry deposition, comprising 71–95 % of total N and 45–89 % of total S deposition. While critical loads (CLs) were exceeded at a few sites in the early 2000s, acidic deposition declined below CLs after 2012, which signifies recovery from legacy acidification.
Nitrogen (N) and sulfur (S) deposition decreased significantly at 14 Canadian sites during...
