Articles | Volume 21, issue 9
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-7321-2021
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-7321-2021
Research article
 | 
12 May 2021
Research article |  | 12 May 2021

Source apportionment of fine organic carbon at an urban site of Beijing using a chemical mass balance model

Jingsha Xu, Di Liu, Xuefang Wu, Tuan V. Vu, Yanli Zhang, Pingqing Fu, Yele Sun, Weiqi Xu, Bo Zheng, Roy M. Harrison, and Zongbo Shi

Download

Interactive discussion

Status: closed
Status: closed
AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment
Printer-friendly Version - Printer-friendly version Supplement - Supplement

Peer-review completion

AR: Author's response | RR: Referee report | ED: Editor decision
AR by Jingsha Xu on behalf of the Authors (10 Mar 2021)  Author's response   Author's tracked changes   Manuscript 
ED: Referee Nomination & Report Request started (11 Mar 2021) by Tim Butler
RR by Anonymous Referee #1 (15 Mar 2021)
ED: Publish subject to minor revisions (review by editor) (23 Mar 2021) by Tim Butler
AR by Jingsha Xu on behalf of the Authors (23 Mar 2021)  Author's response   Author's tracked changes   Manuscript 
ED: Publish as is (23 Mar 2021) by Tim Butler
AR by Jingsha Xu on behalf of the Authors (23 Mar 2021)  Manuscript 
Download
Short summary
Source apportionment of fine aerosols in an urban site of Beijing used a chemical mass balance (CMB) model. Seven primary sources (industrial/residential coal burning, biomass burning, gasoline/diesel vehicles, cooking and vegetative detritus) explained an average of 75.7 % and 56.1 % of fine OC in winter and summer, respectively. CMB was found to resolve more primary OA sources than AMS-PMF, but the latter apportioned more secondary OA sources.
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint