Most of the comments of the reviewers have been dealt with as far as I can tell, with the exception of the main criticism of reviewer #2, which is that the authors do not make the novelty of the dataset clear enough. While the authors address this in their rebuttal, they do not modify the text. I would ask that for the sake of presenting this as a novel dataset, the authors highlight in the manuscript the novelty of this work compared to previously published material from the region. I would suggest doing this in the introduction, where the scope of the work is defined.