Articles | Volume 21, issue 24
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-18465-2021
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-18465-2021
Research article
 | 
20 Dec 2021
Research article |  | 20 Dec 2021

Evaluation of SO2, SO42− and an updated SO2 dry deposition parameterization in the United Kingdom Earth System Model

Catherine Hardacre, Jane P. Mulcahy, Richard J. Pope, Colin G. Jones, Steven T. Rumbold, Can Li, Colin Johnson, and Steven T. Turnock

Viewed

Total article views: 3,348 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
2,349 947 52 3,348 33 31
  • HTML: 2,349
  • PDF: 947
  • XML: 52
  • Total: 3,348
  • BibTeX: 33
  • EndNote: 31
Views and downloads (calculated since 28 Apr 2021)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 28 Apr 2021)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 3,348 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 3,369 with geography defined and -21 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 

Cited

Latest update: 18 Jul 2024
Download
Short summary
We investigate UKESM1's ability to represent the sulfur (S) cycle in the recent historical period. The S cycle is a key driver of historical radiative forcing. Earth system models such as UKESM1 should represent the S cycle well so that we can have confidence in their projections of future climate. We compare UKESM1 to observations of sulfur compounds, finding that the model generally performs well. We also identify areas for UKESM1’s development, focussing on how SO2 is removed from the air.
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint