Articles | Volume 21, issue 22
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 16793–16795, 2021
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-16793-2021
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 16793–16795, 2021
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-16793-2021

Peer-reviewed comment 18 Nov 2021

Peer-reviewed comment | 18 Nov 2021

Comment on “Isotopic evidence for dominant secondary production of HONO in near-ground wildfire plumes” by Chai et al. (2021)

James M. Roberts

Download

Interactive discussion

Status: closed

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
  • CC1: 'Comment on acp-2021-715', Jiajue Chai, 04 Sep 2021
    • AC1: 'Author's Reply to CC1, RC1 and RC2', James Roberts, 18 Oct 2021
  • RC1: 'Comment on acp-2021-715', D.A.J. Jaffe, 21 Sep 2021
  • RC2: 'Comment on acp-2021-715', Anonymous Referee #2, 21 Sep 2021

Peer review completion

AR: Author's response | RR: Referee report | ED: Editor decision
AR by James Roberts on behalf of the Authors (19 Oct 2021)  Author's response    Author's tracked changes    Manuscript
ED: Publish as is (25 Oct 2021) by Christopher Cantrell
Short summary
This comment provides evidence that recently reported measurements of the isotope composition of wildfire-derived oxides of nitrogen have a significant interference from other nitrogen compounds. In addition, the conceptual model used to interpret the results was missing several key reactions.
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint