Articles | Volume 21, issue 17
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-13051-2021
© Author(s) 2021. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-13051-2021
© Author(s) 2021. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Urban aerosol chemistry at a land–water transition site during summer – Part 1: Impact of agricultural and industrial ammonia emissions
Nicholas Balasus
Department of Chemical, Biochemical, and Environmental Engineering, University of Maryland, Baltimore County, Baltimore, MD, 21250, USA
Michael A. Battaglia Jr.
Department of Chemical, Biochemical, and Environmental Engineering, University of Maryland, Baltimore County, Baltimore, MD, 21250, USA
Katherine Ball
Department of Chemical, Biochemical, and Environmental Engineering, University of Maryland, Baltimore County, Baltimore, MD, 21250, USA
Vanessa Caicedo
Joint Center for Earth Systems Technology, University of Maryland, Baltimore County, Baltimore, MD, 21250, USA
Ruben Delgado
Joint Center for Earth Systems Technology, University of Maryland, Baltimore County, Baltimore, MD, 21250, USA
Annmarie G. Carlton
Department of Chemistry, University of California, Irvine, CA 92697, USA
Christopher J. Hennigan
CORRESPONDING AUTHOR
Department of Chemical, Biochemical, and Environmental Engineering, University of Maryland, Baltimore County, Baltimore, MD, 21250, USA
Related authors
Michael A. Battaglia Jr., Nicholas Balasus, Katherine Ball, Vanessa Caicedo, Ruben Delgado, Annmarie G. Carlton, and Christopher J. Hennigan
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 18271–18281, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-18271-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-18271-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
This study characterizes aerosol liquid water content and aerosol pH at a land–water transition site near Baltimore, Maryland. We characterize the effects of unique meteorology associated with the close proximity to the Chesapeake Bay and episodic NH3 events derived from industrial and agricultural sources on aerosol chemistry during the summer. We also examine two events where primary Bay emissions underwent aging in the polluted urban atmosphere.
Vikram Pratap, Christopher J. Hennigan, Bastian Stieger, Andreas Tilgner, Laurent Poulain, Dominik van Pinxteren, Gerald Spindler, and Hartmut Herrmann
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 25, 8871–8889, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-8871-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-8871-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
In this work, we characterize trends in aerosol pH and its controlling factors during the period 2010–2019 at the Melpitz research station in eastern Germany. We find strong trends in aerosol pH and major inorganic species in response to changing emissions. We conduct a detailed thermodynamic analysis of the aerosol system and discuss implications for controlling particulate matter in the region.
Daniel L. Goldberg, M. Omar Nawaz, Congmeng Lyu, Jian He, Annmarie G. Carlton, Shobha Kondragunta, and Susan C. Anenberg
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-1350, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-1350, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
This research investigates how air quality, specifically NO2 concentrations, is different under clear and cloudy skies. We find that in situ surface NO2 is, on average, +36 % larger during cloudy days versus clear sky days, with a wide distribution based on geographic region and roadway proximity: largest in the Northeast U.S. and smallest in the Southwest U.S. and near major roadways. This has implications for satellite data applications, which only use measurements in the absence of clouds.
Christopher J. Hennigan, Michael McKee, Vikram Pratap, Bryanna Boegner, Jasper Reno, Lucia Garcia, Madison McLaren, and Sara M. Lance
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 23, 14437–14449, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-14437-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-14437-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
This study characterized the optical properties of light-absorbing organic compounds, called brown carbon (BrC), in atmospheric cloud water samples. In all samples, light absorption by BrC increased linearly with increasing pH. There was variability in the sensitivity of the absorption–pH relationship, depending on the degree of influence from fire emissions. Overall, these results show that the climate forcing of BrC is quite strongly affected by its pH-dependent absorption.
Christine Wiedinmyer, Yosuke Kimura, Elena C. McDonald-Buller, Louisa K. Emmons, Rebecca R. Buchholz, Wenfu Tang, Keenan Seto, Maxwell B. Joseph, Kelley C. Barsanti, Annmarie G. Carlton, and Robert Yokelson
Geosci. Model Dev., 16, 3873–3891, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-3873-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-3873-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
The Fire INventory from NCAR (FINN) provides daily global estimates of emissions from open fires based on satellite detections of hot spots. This version has been updated to apply MODIS and VIIRS satellite fire detection and better represents both large and small fires. FINNv2.5 generates more emissions than FINNv1 and is in general agreement with other fire emissions inventories. The new estimates are consistent with satellite observations, but uncertainties remain regionally and by pollutant.
Claudia Bernier, Yuxuan Wang, Guillaume Gronoff, Timothy Berkoff, K. Emma Knowland, John T. Sullivan, Ruben Delgado, Vanessa Caicedo, and Brian Carroll
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 15313–15331, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-15313-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-15313-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Coastal regions are susceptible to variable and high ozone which is difficult to simulate. We developed a method to characterize large datasets of multi-dimensional measurements from lidar instruments taken in coastal regions. Using the clustered ozone groups, we evaluated model performance in simulating the coastal ozone variability vertically and diurnally. The approach allowed us to pinpoint areas where the models succeed in simulating coastal ozone and areas where there are still gaps.
Michael A. Battaglia Jr., Nicholas Balasus, Katherine Ball, Vanessa Caicedo, Ruben Delgado, Annmarie G. Carlton, and Christopher J. Hennigan
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 18271–18281, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-18271-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-18271-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
This study characterizes aerosol liquid water content and aerosol pH at a land–water transition site near Baltimore, Maryland. We characterize the effects of unique meteorology associated with the close proximity to the Chesapeake Bay and episodic NH3 events derived from industrial and agricultural sources on aerosol chemistry during the summer. We also examine two events where primary Bay emissions underwent aging in the polluted urban atmosphere.
Jianfeng Li, Yuhang Wang, Ruixiong Zhang, Charles Smeltzer, Andrew Weinheimer, Jay Herman, K. Folkert Boersma, Edward A. Celarier, Russell W. Long, James J. Szykman, Ruben Delgado, Anne M. Thompson, Travis N. Knepp, Lok N. Lamsal, Scott J. Janz, Matthew G. Kowalewski, Xiong Liu, and Caroline R. Nowlan
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 11133–11160, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-11133-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-11133-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
Comprehensive evaluations of simulated diurnal cycles of NO2 and NOy concentrations, vertical profiles, and tropospheric vertical column densities at two different resolutions with various measurements during the DISCOVER-AQ 2011 campaign show potential distribution biases of NOx emissions in the National Emissions Inventory 2011 at both 36 and 4 km resolutions, providing another possible explanation for the overestimation of model results.
Amy E. Christiansen, Annmarie G. Carlton, and Barron H. Henderson
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 11607–11624, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-11607-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-11607-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
We quantify differences in surface-level fine particle mass (PM2.5) chemical composition in relation to satellite-derived cloud flags and find significant differences between clear-sky and cloud days. The work suggests that future analysis in this area is warranted.
Cited articles
Adams, P. J., Seinfeld, J. H., and Koch, D. M.: Global concentrations of
tropospheric sulfate, nitrate, and ammonium aerosol simulated in a general
circulation model, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 104, 13791–13823,
https://doi.org/10.1029/1999JD900083, 1999. a
Ansari, A. S. and Pandis, S. N.: Response of inorganic PM to precursor
concentrations, Environ. Sci. Technol., 32, 2706–2714,
https://doi.org/10.1021/es971130j, 1998. a
Artíñano, B., Pujadas, M., Alonso-Blanco, E., Becerril-Valle, M., Coz,
E., Gómez-Moreno, F. J., Salvador, P., Nuñez, L., Palacios, M., and
Diaz, E.: Real-time monitoring of atmospheric ammonia during a pollution
episode in Madrid (Spain), Atmos. Environ., 189, 80–88,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2018.06.037, 2018. a, b
Athanasopoulou, E., Tombrou, M., Pandis, S. N., and Russell, A. G.: The role of sea-salt emissions and heterogeneous chemistry in the air quality of polluted coastal areas, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 8, 5755–5769, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-8-5755-2008, 2008. a
Backes, A. M., Aulinger, A., Bieser, J., Matthias, V., and Quante, M.: Ammonia
emissions in Europe, part II: How ammonia emission abatement strategies
affect secondary aerosols, Atmos. Environ., 126, 153–161,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2015.11.039, 2016. a
Battaglia Jr., M. A., Douglas, S., and Hennigan, C. J.: Effect of the urban
heat island on aerosol pH, Environ. Sci. Technol., 51, 13095–13103,
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.7b02786, 2017. a
Battaglia, M. A., Balasus, N., Ball, K., Caicedo, V., Delgado, R., Carlton, A. G., and Hennigan, C. J.: Urban aerosol chemistry at a land-water transition site during summer – Part 2: Aerosol pH and liquid water content, Atmos. Chem. Phys. Discuss. [preprint], https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-2021-368, in review, 2021. a, b, c, d
Bergström, A.-K. and Jansson, M.: Atmospheric nitrogen deposition has caused
nitrogen enrichment and eutrophication of lakes in the northern hemisphere,
Glob. Change Biol., 12, 635–643, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2006.01129.x,
2006. a
Beyersdorf, A. J., Ziemba, L. D., Chen, G., Corr, C. A., Crawford, J. H., Diskin, G. S., Moore, R. H., Thornhill, K. L., Winstead, E. L., and Anderson, B. E.: The impacts of aerosol loading, composition, and water uptake on aerosol extinction variability in the Baltimore–Washington, D.C. region, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 1003–1015, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-1003-2016, 2016. a, b
Bian, H., Chin, M., Hauglustaine, D. A., Schulz, M., Myhre, G., Bauer, S. E., Lund, M. T., Karydis, V. A., Kucsera, T. L., Pan, X., Pozzer, A., Skeie, R. B., Steenrod, S. D., Sudo, K., Tsigaridis, K., Tsimpidi, A. P., and Tsyro, S. G.: Investigation of global particulate nitrate from the AeroCom phase III experiment, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 12911–12940, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-12911-2017, 2017. a
Bishop, G. A. and Stedman, D. H.: Reactive nitrogen species emission trends in
three light-/medium-duty United States fleets, Environ. Sci. Technol., 49,
11234–11240, https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.5b02392, 2015. a
Bouwman, A., Lee, D., Asman, W., Dentener, F., Van Der Hoek, K., and Olivier,
J.: A global high-resolution emission inventory for ammonia, Global
Biogeochem. Cy., 11, 561–587, https://doi.org/10.1029/97GB02266, 1997. a
Caicedo, V., Rappenglueck, B., Cuchiara, G., Flynn, J., Ferrare, R., Scarino,
A., Berkoff, T., Senff, C., Langford, A., and Lefer, B.: Bay breeze and sea
breeze circulation impacts on the planetary boundary layer and air quality
from an observed and modeled DISCOVER-AQ Texas case study, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 124, 7359–7378, https://doi.org/10.1029/2019JD030523, 2019. a, b
Dammers, E., McLinden, C. A., Griffin, D., Shephard, M. W., Van Der Graaf, S., Lutsch, E., Schaap, M., Gainairu-Matz, Y., Fioletov, V., Van Damme, M., Whitburn, S., Clarisse, L., Cady-Pereira, K., Clerbaux, C., Coheur, P. F., and Erisman, J. W.: NH3 emissions from large point sources derived from CrIS and IASI satellite observations, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 12261–12293, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-12261-2019, 2019. a
de Gouw, J. A., Middlebrook, A. M., Warneke, C., Goldan, P. D., Kuster, W. C.,
Roberts, J. M., Fehsenfeld, F. C., Worsnop, D. R., Canagaratna, M. R.,
Pszenny, A. A. P., Keene, W. C., Marchewka, M., Bertman, S. B., and Bates,
T. S.: Budget of organic carbon in a polluted atmosphere: Results from the
New England Air Quality Study in 2002, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 110, D16305,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2004JD005623, 2005. a
Ellis, R. A., Murphy, J. G., Pattey, E., van Haarlem, R., O'Brien, J. M., and Herndon, S. C.: Characterizing a Quantum Cascade Tunable Infrared Laser Differential Absorption Spectrometer (QC-TILDAS) for measurements of atmospheric ammonia, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 3, 397–406, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-3-397-2010, 2010. a
Erisman, J. W., Otjes, R., Hensen, A., Jongejan, P., van den Bulk, P.,
Khlystov, A., Möls, H., and Slanina, S.: Instrument development and
application in studies and monitoring of ambient ammonia, Atmos. Environ.,
35, 1913–1922, https://doi.org/10.1016/S1352-2310(00)00544-6, 2001. a
Guo, H., Nenes, A., and Weber, R. J.: The underappreciated role of nonvolatile cations in aerosol ammonium-sulfate molar ratios, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 17307–17323, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-17307-2018, 2018. a
Hand, J. L., Schichtel, B. A., Malm, W. C., and Pitchford, M. L.: Particulate sulfate ion concentration and SO2 emission trends in the United States from the early 1990s through 2010, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 10353–10365, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-10353-2012, 2012a. a, b
Hand, J., Schichtel, B., Pitchford, M., Malm, W., and Frank, N.: Seasonal
composition of remote and urban fine particulate matter in the United States,
J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 117, D05209, https://doi.org/10.1029/2011JD017122, 2012b. a
Hauglustaine, D. A., Balkanski, Y., and Schulz, M.: A global model simulation of present and future nitrate aerosols and their direct radiative forcing of climate, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 11031–11063, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-11031-2014, 2014. a
Kean, A., Littlejohn, D., Ban-Weiss, G., Harley, R., Kirchstetter, T., and
Lunden, M.: Trends in on-road vehicle emissions of ammonia, Atmos. Environ.,
43, 1565–1570, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2008.09.085, 2009. a, b
Keene, W. C., Moody, J. L., Galloway, J. N., Prospero, J. M., Cooper, O. R., Eckhardt, S., and Maben, J. R.: Long-term trends in aerosol and precipitation composition over the western North Atlantic Ocean at Bermuda, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 8119–8135, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-8119-2014, 2014. a
Larsen, R. K., Steinbacher, J. C., and Baker, J. E.: Ammonia Exchange between
the Atmosphere and the Surface Waters at Two Locations in the Chesapeake Bay,
Environ. Sci. Technol., 35, 4731–4738, https://doi.org/10.1021/es010755l, 2001. a, b, c
Li, M., Su, H., Li, G., Ma, N., Pöschl, U., and Cheng, Y.: Relative importance of gas uptake on aerosol and ground surfaces characterized by equivalent uptake coefficients, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 10981–11011, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-10981-2019, 2019. a
Loughner, C. P., Allen, D. J., Pickering, K. E., Zhang, D.-L., Shou, Y.-X., and
Dickerson, R. R.: Impact of fair-weather cumulus clouds and the Chesapeake
Bay breeze on pollutant transport and transformation, Atmos. Environ., 45,
4060–4072, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2011.04.003, 2011. a
Loughner, C. P., Tzortziou, M., Follette-Cook, M., Pickering, K. E., Goldberg,
D., Satam, C., Weinheimer, A., Crawford, J. H., Knapp, D. J., Montzka, D. D.,
Diskin, G. S., and Dickerson, R. R.: Impact of bay-breeze circulations on
surface air quality and boundary layer export, J. Appl. Meteorol. Clim.,
53, 1697–1713, https://doi.org/10.1175/JAMC-D-13-0323.1, 2014. a
Loughner, C. P., Tzortziou, M., Shroder, S., and Pickering, K. E.: Enhanced dry
deposition of nitrogen pollution near coastlines: A case study covering the
Chesapeake Bay estuary and Atlantic Ocean coastline, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos.,
121, 14221–14238, https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JD025571, 2016. a
MDE: Baltimore City Composting Facility, General facility information:
Emissions certification report, Maryland Department of the Environment Air
and Radiation Management Administration, 2019a. a
MDE: Grace Davison, General facility information: Emissions certification
report, Maryland Department of the Environment Air and Radiation Management
Administration, 2019b. a
Meng, W., Zhong, Q., Yun, X., Zhu, X., Huang, T., Shen, H., Chen, Y., Chen, H.,
Zhou, F., Liu, J., Wang, X., Zeng, E. Y., and Tao, S.: Improvement of a
Global High-Resolution Ammonia Emission Inventory for Combustion and
Industrial Sources with New Data from the Residential and Transportation
Sectors, Environ. Sci. Technol., 51, 2821–2829,
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.6b03694, 2017. a
NASA: OWLETS 2018 Data, NASA [data], available at: https://www-air.larc.nasa.gov/cgi-bin/ArcView/owlets.2018, last access: 28 July 2021. a
Nenes, A., Pandis, S. N., Kanakidou, M., Russell, A. G., Song, S., Vasilakos, P., and Weber, R. J.: Aerosol acidity and liquid water content regulate the dry deposition of inorganic reactive nitrogen, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 6023–6033, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-6023-2021, 2021. a, b
NOAA: National Coastal Population Report: Population Trends from 1970 to 2020, available at: https://aambpublicoceanservice.blob.core.windows.net/oceanserviceprod/facts/coastal-population-report.pdf (last access: 30 April 2021), 2013. a
Norman, M., Spirig, C., Wolff, V., Trebs, I., Flechard, C., Wisthaler, A., Schnitzhofer, R., Hansel, A., and Neftel, A.: Intercomparison of ammonia measurement techniques at an intensively managed grassland site (Oensingen, Switzerland), Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9, 2635–2645, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-2635-2009, 2009. a, b
Orsini, D. A., Ma, Y., Sullivan, A., Sierau, B., Baumann, K., and Weber, R. J.:
Refinements to the particle-into-liquid sampler (PILS) for ground and
airborne measurements of water soluble aerosol composition, Atmos. Environ.,
37, 1243–1259, https://doi.org/10.1016/S1352-2310(02)01015-4, 2003. a
Pagans, E., Barrena, R., Font, X., and Sánchez, A.: Ammonia emissions from
the composting of different organic wastes. Dependency on process
temperature, Chemosphere, 62, 1534–1542,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2005.06.044, 2006. a
Paulot, F. and Jacob, D. J.: Hidden Cost of U.S. Agricultural Exports:
Particulate Matter from Ammonia Emissions, Environ. Sci. Technol., 48,
903–908, https://doi.org/10.1021/es4034793, 2014. a
Paulot, F., Jacob, D. J., Johnson, M. T., Bell, T. G., Baker, A. R., Keene,
W. C., Lima, I. D., Doney, S. C., and Stock, C. A.: Global oceanic emission
of ammonia: Constraints from seawater and atmospheric observations, Global
Biogeochem. Cy., 29, 1165–1178, https://doi.org/10.1002/2015GB005106, 2015. a, b, c
Paulot, F., Ginoux, P., Cooke, W. F., Donner, L. J., Fan, S., Lin, M.-Y., Mao, J., Naik, V., and Horowitz, L. W.: Sensitivity of nitrate aerosols to ammonia emissions and to nitrate chemistry: implications for present and future nitrate optical depth, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 1459–1477, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-1459-2016, 2016. a
Paulot, F., Paynter, D., Ginoux, P., Naik, V., Whitburn, S., Van Damme, M.,
Clarisse, L., Coheur, P.-F., and Horowitz, L.: Gas-aerosol partitioning of
ammonia in biomass burning plumes: Implications for the interpretation of
spaceborne observations of ammonia and the radiative forcing of ammonium
nitrate, Geophys. Res. Lett., 44, 8084–8093, https://doi.org/10.1002/2017GL074215,
2017. a
Perrino, C., Catrambone, M., Di Bucchianico, A. D. M., and Allegrini, I.:
Gaseous ammonia in the urban area of Rome, Italy and its relationship with
traffic emissions, Atmos. Environ., 36, 5385–5394,
https://doi.org/10.1016/S1352-2310(02)00469-7, 2002. a, b
Pinder, R., Gilliland, A., and Dennis, R.: Environmental impact of atmospheric
NH3 emissions under present and future conditions in the eastern United
States, Geophys. Res. Lett., 35, L12808, https://doi.org/10.1029/2008GL033732, 2008. a
Pinder, R. W., Pekney, N. J., Davidson, C. I., and Adams, P. J.: A
process-based model of ammonia emissions from dairy cows: improved temporal
and spatial resolution, Atmos. Environ., 38, 1357–1365,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2003.11.024, 2004a. a
Pinder, R. W., Strader, R., Davidson, C. I., and Adams, P. J.: A temporally and
spatially resolved ammonia emission inventory for dairy cows in the United
States, Atmos. Environ., 38, 3747–3756,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2004.04.008, 2004b. a
Pinder, R. W., Adams, P. J., Pandis, S. N., and Gilliland, A. B.: Temporally
resolved ammonia emission inventories: Current estimates, evaluation tools,
and measurement needs, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 111, D16310,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2005JD006603, 2006. a, b
Pinder, R. W., Adams, P. J., and Pandis, S. N.: Ammonia emission controls as a
cost-effective strategy for reducing atmospheric particulate matter in the
eastern United States, Environ. Sci. Technol., 41, 380–386, https://doi.org/10.1021/es060379a, 2007. a, b
Pleim, J. E., Bash, J. O., Walker, J. T., and Cooter, E. J.: Development and
evaluation of an ammonia bidirectional flux parameterization for air quality
models, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 118, 3794–3806, https://doi.org/10.1002/jgrd.50262,
2013. a, b
Poulain, L., Spindler, G., Birmili, W., Plass-Dülmer, C., Wiedensohler, A., and Herrmann, H.: Seasonal and diurnal variations of particulate nitrate and organic matter at the IfT research station Melpitz, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 12579–12599, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-12579-2011, 2011. a
Pozzer, A., Tsimpidi, A. P., Karydis, V. A., de Meij, A., and Lelieveld, J.: Impact of agricultural emission reductions on fine-particulate matter and public health, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 12813–12826, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-12813-2017, 2017. a
Reche, C., Viana, M., Karanasiou, A., Cusack, M., Alastuey, A., Artiñano, B., Revuelta, M. A., López-Mahía, P., Blanco-Heras, G., Rodríguez, S., Sánchez de la Campa, A. M., Fernández-Camacho, R., González-Castanedo, Y., Mantilla, E., Sim Tanh, Y., and Querol, X.: Urban NH3 levels and sources in six major
Spanish cities, Chemosphere, 119, 769–777,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2014.07.097, 2015. a
Robarge, W. P., Walker, J. T., McCulloch, R. B., and Murray, G.: Atmospheric
concentrations of ammonia and ammonium at an agricultural site in the
southeast United States, Atmos. Environ., 36, 1661–1674,
https://doi.org/10.1016/S1352-2310(02)00171-1, 2002. a
Schmohl, A., Miklos, A., and Hess, P.: Effects of adsorption–desorption
processes on the response time and accuracy of photoacoustic detection of
ammonia, Appl. Opt., 40, 2571–2578, https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.40.002571, 2001. a
Sickles, J. E. and Shadwick, D. S.: Comparison of particulate sulfate and
nitrate at collocated CASTNET and IMPROVE sites in the eastern US, Atmos.
Environ., 42, 2062–2073, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2007.11.051, 2008. a
Siefert, R. L., Scudlark, J. R., Potter, A. G., Simonsen, K. A., and Savidge,
K. B.: Characterization of atmospheric ammonia emissions from a commercial
chicken house on the Delmarva Peninsula, Environ. Sci. Technol., 38,
2769–2778, https://doi.org/10.1021/es0345874, 2004. a
Sorooshian, A., Murphy, S. M., Hersey, S., Gates, H., Padro, L. T., Nenes, A., Brechtel, F. J., Jonsson, H., Flagan, R. C., and Seinfeld, J. H.: Comprehensive airborne characterization of aerosol from a major bovine source, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 8, 5489–5520, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-8-5489-2008, 2008. a
Stein, A., Draxler, R. R., Rolph, G. D., Stunder, B. J., Cohen, M., and Ngan,
F.: NOAA’s HYSPLIT atmospheric transport and dispersion modeling system, B.
Am. Meteorol. Soc., 96, 2059–2077, https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-14-00110.1, 2015. a
Stelson, A. and Seinfeld, J. H.: Relative humidity and temperature dependence
of the ammonium nitrate dissociation constant, Atmos. Environ., 16, 983–992,
https://doi.org/10.1016/0004-6981(82)90184-6, 1982. a
Stull, R. B.: An Introduction to Boundary Layer Meteorology, vol. 13, Springer
Science & Business Media, the Netherlands, 1988. a
Sullivan, J. T., Berkoff, T., Gronoff, G., Knepp, T., Pippin, M., Allen, D.,
Twigg, L., Swap, R., Tzortziou, M., Thompson, A. M., Stauffer, R. M., Wolfe,
G. M., Flynn, J., Pusede, S. E., Judd, L. M., Moore, W., Baker, B. D.,
Al-Saadi, J., and McGee, T. J.: The Ozone Water–Land Environmental
Transition Study: An Innovative Strategy for Understanding Chesapeake Bay
Pollution Events, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 100, 291–306,
https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-18-0025.1, 2019. a
Sun, K., Tao, L., Miller, D. J., Pan, D., Golston, L. M., Zondlo, M. A.,
Griffin, R. J., Wallace, H. W., Leong, Y. J., Yang, M. M., Zhang, Y.,
Mauzerall, D. L., and Zhu, T.: Vehicle Emissions as an Important Urban
Ammonia Source in the United States and China, Environ. Sci. Technol., 51,
2472–2481, https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.6b02805, 2017. a, b
Sutton, M., Dragosits, U., Tang, Y., and Fowler, D.: Ammonia emissions from
non-agricultural sources in the UK, Atmos. Environ., 34, 855–869,
https://doi.org/10.1016/S1352-2310(99)00362-3, 2000. a
Sutton, M. A., Reis, S., Riddick, S. N., Dragosits, U., Nemitz, E., Theobald,
M. R., Tang, Y. S., Braban, C. F., Vieno, M., Dore, A. J., Mitchell, R. F.,
Wanless, S., Daunt, F., Fowler, D., Blackall, T. D., Milford, C., Flechard,
C. R., Loubet, B., Massad, R., Cellier, P., Personne, E., Coheur, P. F.,
Clarisse, L., Van Damme, M., Ngadi, Y., Clerbaux, C., Skjøth, C. A., Geels,
C., Hertel, O., Wichink Kruit, R. J., Pinder, R. W., Bash, J. O., Walker,
J. T., Simpson, D., Horváth, L., Misselbrook, T. H., Bleeker, A., Dentener,
F., and de Vries, W.: Towards a climate-dependent paradigm of ammonia
emission and deposition, Philos. T. Roy. Soc. B, 368, 1–13,
https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2013.0166, 2013. a, b, c, d, e
Tsigaridis, K., Daskalakis, N., Kanakidou, M., Adams, P. J., Artaxo, P., Bahadur, R., Balkanski, Y., Bauer, S. E., Bellouin, N., Benedetti, A., Bergman, T., Berntsen, T. K., Beukes, J. P., Bian, H., Carslaw, K. S., Chin, M., Curci, G., Diehl, T., Easter, R. C., Ghan, S. J., Gong, S. L., Hodzic, A., Hoyle, C. R., Iversen, T., Jathar, S., Jimenez, J. L., Kaiser, J. W., Kirkevåg, A., Koch, D., Kokkola, H., Lee, Y. H., Lin, G., Liu, X., Luo, G., Ma, X., Mann, G. W., Mihalopoulos, N., Morcrette, J.-J., Müller, J.-F., Myhre, G., Myriokefalitakis, S., Ng, N. L., O'Donnell, D., Penner, J. E., Pozzoli, L., Pringle, K. J., Russell, L. M., Schulz, M., Sciare, J., Seland, Ø., Shindell, D. T., Sillman, S., Skeie, R. B., Spracklen, D., Stavrakou, T., Steenrod, S. D., Takemura, T., Tiitta, P., Tilmes, S., Tost, H., van Noije, T., van Zyl, P. G., von Salzen, K., Yu, F., Wang, Z., Wang, Z., Zaveri, R. A., Zhang, H., Zhang, K., Zhang, Q., and Zhang, X.: The AeroCom evaluation and intercomparison of organic aerosol in global models, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 10845–10895, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-10845-2014, 2014. a
Turnock, S., Mann, G., Woodhouse, M., Dalvi, M., O'Connor, F., Carslaw, K., and
Spracklen, D.: The impact of changes in cloud water pH on aerosol radiative
forcing, Geophys. Res. Lett., 46, 4039–4048, https://doi.org/10.1029/2019GL082067,
2019. a
USDA: Census of Agriculture, Volume 1, chap. 2, County Level Data, United States Department of Agriculture, Tech.
rep., 2017. a
Valerino, M., Johnson, J., Izumi, J., Orozco, D., Hoff, R., Delgado, R., and
Hennigan, C.: Sources and composition of PM2.5 in the Colorado Front
Range during the DISCOVER-AQ study, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 122, 566–582,
https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JD025830, 2017. a
Van Damme, M., Clarisse, L., Whitburn, S., Hadji-Lazaro, J., Hurtmans, D.,
Clerbaux, C., and Coheur, P.-F.: Industrial and agricultural ammonia point
sources exposed, Nature, 564, 99–103, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-018-0747-1, 2018. a, b
von Bobrutzki, K., Braban, C. F., Famulari, D., Jones, S. K., Blackall, T., Smith, T. E. L., Blom, M., Coe, H., Gallagher, M., Ghalaieny, M., McGillen, M. R., Percival, C. J., Whitehead, J. D., Ellis, R., Murphy, J., Mohacsi, A., Pogany, A., Junninen, H., Rantanen, S., Sutton, M. A., and Nemitz, E.: Field inter-comparison of eleven atmospheric ammonia measurement techniques, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 3, 91–112, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-3-91-2010, 2010. a, b
Vutukuru, S. and Dabdub, D.: Modeling the effects of ship emissions on coastal
air quality: A case study of southern California, Atmos. Environ., 42,
3751–3764, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2007.12.073, 2008. a
Warner, J., Dickerson, R., Wei, Z., Strow, L. L., Wang, Y., and Liang, Q.:
Increased atmospheric ammonia over the world's major agricultural areas
detected from space, Geophys. Res. Lett., 44, 2875–2884,
https://doi.org/10.1002/2016GL072305, 2017. a, b
Washenfelder, R. A., Attwood, A. R., Brock, C. A., Guo, H., Xu, L., Weber,
R. J., Ng, N. L., Allen, H. M., Ayres, B. R., Baumann, K., Cohen, R. C.,
Draper, D. C., Duffey, K. C., Edgerton, E., Fry, J. L., Hu, W. W., Jimenez,
J. L., Palm, B. B., Romer, P., Stone, E. A., Wooldridge, P. J., and Brown,
S. S.: Biomass burning dominates brown carbon absorption in the rural
southeastern United States, Geophys. Res. Lett., 42, 653–664,
https://doi.org/10.1002/2014GL062444, 2015. a
Weber, R.: Short-term temporal variation in PM2.5 mass and chemical
composition during the Atlanta Supersite Experiment, 1999, J. Air Waste
Manage., 53, 84–91, https://doi.org/10.1080/10473289.2003.10466123, 2003. a
Weber, R. J., Guo, H., Russell, A. G., and Nenes, A.: High aerosol acidity
despite declining atmospheric sulfate concentrations over the past 15 years,
Nat. Geosci., 9, 282–285, https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo2665, 2016. a
Wittig, A. E., Anderson, N., Khlystov, A. Y., Pandis, S. N., Davidson, C., and
Robinson, A. L.: Pittsburgh air quality study overview, Atmos. Environ., 38,
3107–3125, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2004.03.003, 2004. a, b
Wolfe, G.: HYSPLITcontrol, GitHub [code], https://github.com/AirChem/HYSPLITcontrol, last access: 28 July 2021. a
Wyers, G., Otjes, R., and Slanina, J.: A continuous-flow denuder for the
measurement of ambient concentrations and surface-exchange fluxes of ammonia,
Atmos. Environ., 27, 2085–2090, https://doi.org/10.1016/0960-1686(93)90280-C, 1993. a, b
Xu, L., Suresh, S., Guo, H., Weber, R. J., and Ng, N. L.: Aerosol characterization over the southeastern United States using high-resolution aerosol mass spectrometry: spatial and seasonal variation of aerosol composition and sources with a focus on organic nitrates, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 7307–7336, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-7307-2015, 2015. a
Fu, X., Wang, T., Zhang, L., Li, Q., Wang, Z., Xia, M., Yun, H., Wang, W., Yu, C., Yue, D., Zhou, Y., Zheng, J., and Han, R.: The significant contribution of HONO to secondary pollutants during a severe winter pollution event in southern China, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 1–14, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-1-2019, 2019.
a
Zhao, B., Wang, S., Wang, J., Fu, J. S., Liu, T., Xu, J., Fu, X., and Hao, J.:
Impact of national NOx and SO2 control policies on particulate
matter pollution in China, Atmos. Environ., 77, 453–463,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2013.05.012, 2013. a
Zhu, L., Henze, D., Bash, J., Jeong, G.-R., Cady-Pereira, K., Shephard, M., Luo, M., Paulot, F., and Capps, S.: Global evaluation of ammonia bidirectional exchange and livestock diurnal variation schemes, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 12823–12843, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-12823-2015, 2015. a
Short summary
Measurements of aerosol and gas composition were carried out at a land–water transition site near Baltimore, MD. Gas-phase ammonia concentrations were highly elevated compared to measurements at a nearby inland site. Our analysis reveals that NH2 was from both industrial and agricultural sources. This had a pronounced effect on aerosol chemical composition at the site, most notably contributing to episodic spikes of aerosol nitrate.
Measurements of aerosol and gas composition were carried out at a land–water transition site...
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint