Articles | Volume 20, issue 14
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-8709-2020
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-8709-2020
Research article
 | 
23 Jul 2020
Research article |  | 23 Jul 2020

Sensitivity of age of air trends to the derivation method for non-linear increasing inert SF6

Frauke Fritsch, Hella Garny, Andreas Engel, Harald Bönisch, and Roland Eichinger

Download

Interactive discussion

Status: closed
Status: closed
AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment
Printer-friendly Version - Printer-friendly version Supplement - Supplement

Peer-review completion

AR: Author's response | RR: Referee report | ED: Editor decision
AR by Frauke Fritsch on behalf of the Authors (21 Feb 2020)  Author's response   Manuscript 
ED: Referee Nomination & Report Request started (15 Mar 2020) by Peter Haynes
RR by Anonymous Referee #2 (04 Apr 2020)
RR by Anonymous Referee #1 (07 Apr 2020)
ED: Publish subject to minor revisions (review by editor) (11 Apr 2020) by Peter Haynes
AR by Frauke Fritsch on behalf of the Authors (21 Apr 2020)  Author's response   Manuscript 
ED: Publish as is (03 May 2020) by Peter Haynes
AR by Frauke Fritsch on behalf of the Authors (25 May 2020)  Author's response   Manuscript 
Download
Short summary
We test two methods to derive age of air as a diagnostic of the Brewer–Dobson circulation from non-linear increasing trace gases such as SF6 using a chemistry-climate model and observations. Both the model and the observations show systematic variation of the age of air trend dependent on the chosen assumptions that are required when deriving age of air from measurements. This provides insight into the differences in age of air trends of observations and models.
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint