After I reviewed responses to referees' comments. I suggest authors should clarify the comments listed below and revise the manuscript before the consideration for publication.

#1. The current title is misleading and I would suggest the authors consider rename it. “Long-Range transport mechanisms” indicated this paper will mainly address transport mechanisms, but only smoke from the maritime continent and typhoon were mentioned. The manuscript briefly mentioned the southwesterly initiated the transport and low precipitation permits the transport, but the more detailed discussion shall be included if the authors want to emphasize the impact of transport mechanisms. The main content of this paper is analyzing the sources/sinks and chemical components of aerosols measured at one site but the title refers to “East and Southeast Asia”, which is not really representative. The response argued that they also included NAAPS model results, but numerous modeling papers have already thoroughly explored the regional transport of air pollutants in Southeast Asia, so one site data couldn't “broaden the scope”. Please consider rephrase the title or include more in-depth discussion of transport mechanisms.

#2. Abstract need to present the innovative findings, not general self-comment as “Results of this study have implications for a better understanding of …”

#3. This manuscript has too many general statements that are improper for scientific publications. Reviewer#3 pointed out a lot of examples but the authors need to properly refine their writing.

#4. Response for comment#8, Line#110-111: does anthropogenic emission itself has seasonality, like higher SO2/NOx in winter and lower in summer?

#5. For the description of Fig.1 and Fig.2 and responses to comment#13 and #14, authors do not respond clearly. Transport of air pollutants is in 3-D, Fig.1 shows 850hPa level transport, so did Fig.2, they are both 2-D.