Articles | Volume 20, issue 21
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-12431-2020
© Author(s) 2020. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-12431-2020
© Author(s) 2020. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Research article
| 
30 Oct 2020
Research article |
| 30 Oct 2020
| 30 Oct 2020
An AeroCom–AeroSat study: intercomparison of satellite AOD datasets for aerosol model evaluation
Department of Earth Science, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, 1081 HV Amsterdam, the Netherlands
Andrew M. Sayer
Goddard Earth Sciences, Technology, and Research (GESTAR), Universities Space Research Association, Columbia, USA
Ocean Ecology Laboratory, NASA Goddard Space Flight Center (GSFC), Greenbelt, USA
Andreas Heckel
Department of Geography, Swansea University, Swansea, UK
Christina Hsu
Climate and Radiation Laboratory, NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, USA
Hiren Jethva
Goddard Earth Sciences, Technology, and Research (GESTAR), Universities Space Research Association, Columbia, USA
Atmospheric Chemistry and Dynamics Laboratory, NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, USA
Gerrit de Leeuw
Royal Netherlands Meteorological Institute (KNMI), R&D Satellite Observations, De Bilt, the Netherlands
Peter J. T. Leonard
ADNET Systems, Inc., Lanham, MD 20706, USA
Robert C. Levy
Climate and Radiation Laboratory, NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, USA
Antti Lipponen
Atmospheric Research Centre of Eastern Finland, Finnish Meteorological Institute, Kuopio, Finland
Alexei Lyapustin
Climate and Radiation Laboratory, NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, USA
Peter North
Department of Geography, Swansea University, Swansea, UK
Thomas Popp
German Aerospace Center (DLR), German Remote Sensing Data Center Atmosphere, Oberpfaffenhofen, Germany
Caroline Poulsen
School of Earth Atmosphere and Environment, Monash University, Australia
now at: School of Earth, Atmosphere and Environment, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
Virginia Sawyer
Climate and Radiation Laboratory, NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, USA
Science Systems and Applications (SSAI), Lanham, Maryland, USA
Larisa Sogacheva
Finnish Meteorological Institute (FMI), Climate Research Programme, Helsinki, Finland
Gareth Thomas
Remote Sensing group, Rutherford Appleton Laboratory, Harwell Campus, Didcot, Oxfordshire, UK
Omar Torres
Atmospheric Chemistry and Dynamics Laboratory, NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, USA
Yujie Wang
Joint Center for Earth Systems Technology, University of Maryland Baltimore County, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
Stefan Kinne
Max-Planck-Institut für Meteorologie, Hamburg, Germany
Michael Schulz
Norwegian Meteorological Institute, Research Department, Oslo, Norway
Philip Stier
Atmospheric, Oceanic and Planetary Physics, Department of Physics, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
Viewed
Total article views: 3,621 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 03 Feb 2020)
| HTML | XML | Total | Supplement | BibTeX | EndNote | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2,186 | 1,388 | 47 | 3,621 | 156 | 60 | 60 |
- HTML: 2,186
- PDF: 1,388
- XML: 47
- Total: 3,621
- Supplement: 156
- BibTeX: 60
- EndNote: 60
Total article views: 2,318 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 30 Oct 2020)
| HTML | XML | Total | Supplement | BibTeX | EndNote | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1,658 | 630 | 30 | 2,318 | 156 | 42 | 44 |
- HTML: 1,658
- PDF: 630
- XML: 30
- Total: 2,318
- Supplement: 156
- BibTeX: 42
- EndNote: 44
Total article views: 1,303 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 03 Feb 2020)
| HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 528 | 758 | 17 | 1,303 | 18 | 16 |
- HTML: 528
- PDF: 758
- XML: 17
- Total: 1,303
- BibTeX: 18
- EndNote: 16
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Total article views: 3,621 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 3,690 with geography defined
and -69 with unknown origin.
Total article views: 2,318 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 2,538 with geography defined
and -220 with unknown origin.
Total article views: 1,303 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 1,152 with geography defined
and 151 with unknown origin.
| Country | # | Views | % |
|---|
| Country | # | Views | % |
|---|
| Country | # | Views | % |
|---|
| Total: | 0 |
| HTML: | 0 |
| PDF: | 0 |
| XML: | 0 |
- 1
1
| Total: | 0 |
| HTML: | 0 |
| PDF: | 0 |
| XML: | 0 |
- 1
1
| Total: | 0 |
| HTML: | 0 |
| PDF: | 0 |
| XML: | 0 |
- 1
1
Cited
39 citations as recorded by crossref.
- Deep Neural Networks for Aerosol Optical Depth Retrieval R. Zbizika et al. 10.3390/atmos13010101
- SEVIRI Aerosol Optical Depth Validation Using AERONET and Intercomparison with MODIS in Central and Eastern Europe N. Ajtai et al. 10.3390/rs13050844
- A Comparison of Multi-Angle Implementation of Atmospheric Correction and MOD09 Daily Surface Reflectance Products From MODIS A. Lyapustin et al. 10.3389/frsen.2021.712093
- A Climatological Assessment of Intense Desert Dust Episodes over the Broader Mediterranean Basin Based on Satellite Data M. Gavrouzou et al. 10.3390/rs13152895
- AOD Derivation from SDGSAT-1/GLI Dataset in Mega-City Area N. Wang et al. 10.3390/rs15051343
- Understanding Top‐of‐Atmosphere Flux Bias in the AeroCom Phase III Models: A Clear‐Sky Perspective W. Su et al. 10.1029/2021MS002584
- Assimilation of POLDER observations to estimate aerosol emissions A. Tsikerdekis et al. 10.5194/acp-23-9495-2023
- Exploring analog-based schemes for aerosol optical depth forecasting with WRF-Chem A. Raman et al. 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2020.118134
- Monitoring multiple satellite aerosol optical depth (AOD) products within the Copernicus Atmosphere Monitoring Service (CAMS) data assimilation system S. Garrigues et al. 10.5194/acp-22-14657-2022
- Present and future aerosol impacts on Arctic climate change in the GISS-E2.1 Earth system model U. Im et al. 10.5194/acp-21-10413-2021
- Aerosol characteristics in CMIP6 models' global simulations and their evaluation with the satellite measurements J. Bharath et al. 10.1002/joc.8324
- The MONARCH high-resolution reanalysis of desert dust aerosol over Northern Africa, the Middle East and Europe (2007–2016) E. Di Tomaso et al. 10.5194/essd-14-2785-2022
- Modeling radiative and climatic effects of brown carbon aerosols with the ARPEGE-Climat global climate model T. Drugé et al. 10.5194/acp-22-12167-2022
- Toward the Development of an Empirical Model of Air Pollution Impact on Solar PV Output for Industry Use H. Liu et al. 10.1109/JPHOTOV.2023.3317636
- Reducing Aerosol Forcing Uncertainty by Combining Models With Satellite and Within‐The‐Atmosphere Observations: A Three‐Way Street R. Kahn et al. 10.1029/2022RG000796
- Atmospheric Correction of DSCOVR EPIC: Version 2 MAIAC Algorithm A. Lyapustin et al. 10.3389/frsen.2021.748362
- The Influence of Fine-Mode Aerosols on MODIS–AERONET Aerosol Optical Depth Disparities in the Sahel West Africa O. Nwofor et al. 10.1007/s41810-023-00177-6
- A Two-Stage Machine Learning Algorithm for Retrieving Multiple Aerosol Properties Over Land: Development and Validation M. Cao et al. 10.1109/TGRS.2023.3307934
- A Coupled Evaluation of Operational MODIS and Model Aerosol Products for Maritime Environments Using Sun Photometry: Evaluation of the Fine and Coarse Mode J. Reid et al. 10.3390/rs14132978
- How well do Earth system models reproduce the observed aerosol response to rapid emission reductions? A COVID-19 case study R. Digby et al. 10.5194/acp-24-2077-2024
- Rapidly evolving aerosol emissions are a dangerous omission from near-term climate risk assessments G. Persad et al. 10.1088/2752-5295/acd6af
- Method for retrieval of aerosol optical depth from multichannel irradiance measurements M. Sztipanov et al. 10.1364/OE.493712
- Satellite-based evaluation of AeroCom model bias in biomass burning regions Q. Zhong et al. 10.5194/acp-22-11009-2022
- Continuity between NASA MODIS Collection 6.1 and VIIRS Collection 2 land products M. Román et al. 10.1016/j.rse.2023.113963
- Calibration of Maxar Constellation Over Libya-4 Site Using MAIAC Technique M. Choi et al. 10.1109/JSTARS.2024.3367250
- Urban aerosol, its radiative and temperature response in comparison with urban canopy effects in megacity based on COSMO-ART modeling N. Chubarova et al. 10.1016/j.uclim.2023.101762
- Present‐Day Patagonian Dust Emissions: Combining Surface Visibility, Mass Flux, and Reanalysis Data N. Cosentino et al. 10.1029/2020JD034459
- Arctic spring and summertime aerosol optical depth baseline from long-term observations and model reanalyses – Part 2: Statistics of extreme AOD events, and implications for the impact of regional biomass burning processes P. Xian et al. 10.5194/acp-22-9949-2022
- Long-term variability in immersion-mode marine ice-nucleating particles from climate model simulations and observations A. Raman et al. 10.5194/acp-23-5735-2023
- A Simple Band Ratio Library (BRL) Algorithm for Retrieval of Hourly Aerosol Optical Depth Using FY-4A AGRI Geostationary Satellite Data X. Jiang et al. 10.3390/rs14194861
- Emissions Background, Climate, and Season Determine the Impacts of Past and Future Pandemic Lockdowns on Atmospheric Composition and Climate J. Hickman et al. 10.1029/2022EF002959
- Uncertainty in Aerosol Optical Depth From Modern Aerosol‐Climate Models, Reanalyses, and Satellite Products A. Vogel et al. 10.1029/2021JD035483
- A novel method of identifying and analysing oil smoke plumes based on MODIS and CALIPSO satellite data A. Mereuţă et al. 10.5194/acp-22-5071-2022
- Geographical coverage analysis and usage suggestions of temporal averaged aerosol optical depth product from GOES-R satellite data X. Jiang et al. 10.1080/01431161.2024.2331978
- Assimilating aerosol optical properties related to size and absorption from POLDER/PARASOL with an ensemble data assimilation system A. Tsikerdekis et al. 10.5194/acp-21-2637-2021
- Spatiotemporal Heterogeneity of Aerosol and Cloud Properties Over the Southeast Atlantic: An Observational Analysis I. Chang et al. 10.1029/2020GL091469
- Changes in satellite retrievals of atmospheric composition over eastern China during the 2020 COVID-19 lockdowns R. Field et al. 10.5194/acp-21-18333-2021
- AEROCOM and AEROSAT AAOD and SSA study – Part 1: Evaluation and intercomparison of satellite measurements N. Schutgens et al. 10.5194/acp-21-6895-2021
- Validation of MODIS C6.1 and MERRA-2 AOD Using AERONET Observations: A Comparative Study over Turkey M. Aldabash et al. 10.3390/atmos11090905
38 citations as recorded by crossref.
- Deep Neural Networks for Aerosol Optical Depth Retrieval R. Zbizika et al. 10.3390/atmos13010101
- SEVIRI Aerosol Optical Depth Validation Using AERONET and Intercomparison with MODIS in Central and Eastern Europe N. Ajtai et al. 10.3390/rs13050844
- A Comparison of Multi-Angle Implementation of Atmospheric Correction and MOD09 Daily Surface Reflectance Products From MODIS A. Lyapustin et al. 10.3389/frsen.2021.712093
- A Climatological Assessment of Intense Desert Dust Episodes over the Broader Mediterranean Basin Based on Satellite Data M. Gavrouzou et al. 10.3390/rs13152895
- AOD Derivation from SDGSAT-1/GLI Dataset in Mega-City Area N. Wang et al. 10.3390/rs15051343
- Understanding Top‐of‐Atmosphere Flux Bias in the AeroCom Phase III Models: A Clear‐Sky Perspective W. Su et al. 10.1029/2021MS002584
- Assimilation of POLDER observations to estimate aerosol emissions A. Tsikerdekis et al. 10.5194/acp-23-9495-2023
- Exploring analog-based schemes for aerosol optical depth forecasting with WRF-Chem A. Raman et al. 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2020.118134
- Monitoring multiple satellite aerosol optical depth (AOD) products within the Copernicus Atmosphere Monitoring Service (CAMS) data assimilation system S. Garrigues et al. 10.5194/acp-22-14657-2022
- Present and future aerosol impacts on Arctic climate change in the GISS-E2.1 Earth system model U. Im et al. 10.5194/acp-21-10413-2021
- Aerosol characteristics in CMIP6 models' global simulations and their evaluation with the satellite measurements J. Bharath et al. 10.1002/joc.8324
- The MONARCH high-resolution reanalysis of desert dust aerosol over Northern Africa, the Middle East and Europe (2007–2016) E. Di Tomaso et al. 10.5194/essd-14-2785-2022
- Modeling radiative and climatic effects of brown carbon aerosols with the ARPEGE-Climat global climate model T. Drugé et al. 10.5194/acp-22-12167-2022
- Toward the Development of an Empirical Model of Air Pollution Impact on Solar PV Output for Industry Use H. Liu et al. 10.1109/JPHOTOV.2023.3317636
- Reducing Aerosol Forcing Uncertainty by Combining Models With Satellite and Within‐The‐Atmosphere Observations: A Three‐Way Street R. Kahn et al. 10.1029/2022RG000796
- Atmospheric Correction of DSCOVR EPIC: Version 2 MAIAC Algorithm A. Lyapustin et al. 10.3389/frsen.2021.748362
- The Influence of Fine-Mode Aerosols on MODIS–AERONET Aerosol Optical Depth Disparities in the Sahel West Africa O. Nwofor et al. 10.1007/s41810-023-00177-6
- A Two-Stage Machine Learning Algorithm for Retrieving Multiple Aerosol Properties Over Land: Development and Validation M. Cao et al. 10.1109/TGRS.2023.3307934
- A Coupled Evaluation of Operational MODIS and Model Aerosol Products for Maritime Environments Using Sun Photometry: Evaluation of the Fine and Coarse Mode J. Reid et al. 10.3390/rs14132978
- How well do Earth system models reproduce the observed aerosol response to rapid emission reductions? A COVID-19 case study R. Digby et al. 10.5194/acp-24-2077-2024
- Rapidly evolving aerosol emissions are a dangerous omission from near-term climate risk assessments G. Persad et al. 10.1088/2752-5295/acd6af
- Method for retrieval of aerosol optical depth from multichannel irradiance measurements M. Sztipanov et al. 10.1364/OE.493712
- Satellite-based evaluation of AeroCom model bias in biomass burning regions Q. Zhong et al. 10.5194/acp-22-11009-2022
- Continuity between NASA MODIS Collection 6.1 and VIIRS Collection 2 land products M. Román et al. 10.1016/j.rse.2023.113963
- Calibration of Maxar Constellation Over Libya-4 Site Using MAIAC Technique M. Choi et al. 10.1109/JSTARS.2024.3367250
- Urban aerosol, its radiative and temperature response in comparison with urban canopy effects in megacity based on COSMO-ART modeling N. Chubarova et al. 10.1016/j.uclim.2023.101762
- Present‐Day Patagonian Dust Emissions: Combining Surface Visibility, Mass Flux, and Reanalysis Data N. Cosentino et al. 10.1029/2020JD034459
- Arctic spring and summertime aerosol optical depth baseline from long-term observations and model reanalyses – Part 2: Statistics of extreme AOD events, and implications for the impact of regional biomass burning processes P. Xian et al. 10.5194/acp-22-9949-2022
- Long-term variability in immersion-mode marine ice-nucleating particles from climate model simulations and observations A. Raman et al. 10.5194/acp-23-5735-2023
- A Simple Band Ratio Library (BRL) Algorithm for Retrieval of Hourly Aerosol Optical Depth Using FY-4A AGRI Geostationary Satellite Data X. Jiang et al. 10.3390/rs14194861
- Emissions Background, Climate, and Season Determine the Impacts of Past and Future Pandemic Lockdowns on Atmospheric Composition and Climate J. Hickman et al. 10.1029/2022EF002959
- Uncertainty in Aerosol Optical Depth From Modern Aerosol‐Climate Models, Reanalyses, and Satellite Products A. Vogel et al. 10.1029/2021JD035483
- A novel method of identifying and analysing oil smoke plumes based on MODIS and CALIPSO satellite data A. Mereuţă et al. 10.5194/acp-22-5071-2022
- Geographical coverage analysis and usage suggestions of temporal averaged aerosol optical depth product from GOES-R satellite data X. Jiang et al. 10.1080/01431161.2024.2331978
- Assimilating aerosol optical properties related to size and absorption from POLDER/PARASOL with an ensemble data assimilation system A. Tsikerdekis et al. 10.5194/acp-21-2637-2021
- Spatiotemporal Heterogeneity of Aerosol and Cloud Properties Over the Southeast Atlantic: An Observational Analysis I. Chang et al. 10.1029/2020GL091469
- Changes in satellite retrievals of atmospheric composition over eastern China during the 2020 COVID-19 lockdowns R. Field et al. 10.5194/acp-21-18333-2021
- AEROCOM and AEROSAT AAOD and SSA study – Part 1: Evaluation and intercomparison of satellite measurements N. Schutgens et al. 10.5194/acp-21-6895-2021
1 citations as recorded by crossref.
Latest update: 04 May 2024
Short summary
We intercompare 14 different datasets of satellite observations of aerosol. Such measurements are challenging but also provide the best opportunity to globally observe an atmospheric component strongly related to air pollution and climate change. Our study shows that most datasets perform similarly well on a global scale but that locally errors can be quite different. We develop a technique to estimate satellite errors everywhere, even in the absence of surface reference data.
We intercompare 14 different datasets of satellite observations of aerosol. Such measurements...
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint