Journal cover Journal topic
Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics An interactive open-access journal of the European Geosciences Union
Journal topic

Journal metrics

IF value: 5.414
IF5.414
IF 5-year value: 5.958
IF 5-year
5.958
CiteScore value: 9.7
CiteScore
9.7
SNIP value: 1.517
SNIP1.517
IPP value: 5.61
IPP5.61
SJR value: 2.601
SJR2.601
Scimago H <br class='widget-line-break'>index value: 191
Scimago H
index
191
h5-index value: 89
h5-index89
ACP | Articles | Volume 20, issue 17
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 10401–10425, 2020
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-10401-2020
© Author(s) 2020. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 10401–10425, 2020
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-10401-2020
© Author(s) 2020. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Research article 08 Sep 2020

Research article | 08 Sep 2020

The global dust cycle and uncertainty in CMIP5 (Coupled Model Intercomparison Project phase 5) models

Chenglai Wu et al.

Viewed

Total article views: 790 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
574 197 19 790 12 15
  • HTML: 574
  • PDF: 197
  • XML: 19
  • Total: 790
  • BibTeX: 12
  • EndNote: 15
Views and downloads (calculated since 03 Apr 2020)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 03 Apr 2020)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 640 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 638 with geography defined and 2 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 

Cited

Saved (final revised paper)

No saved metrics found.

Saved (preprint)

No saved metrics found.

Discussed (final revised paper)

No discussed metrics found.

Discussed (preprint)

No discussed metrics found.
Latest update: 25 Oct 2020
Publications Copernicus
Download
Short summary
This study provides a comprehensive evaluation of the global dust cycle in 15 models participating in the fifth phase of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP5). We assess the global budget and associated uncertainties. We also quantify the discrepancies in each model. The results highlight the large uncertainties in both the locations and intensities of dust emission. Our study will serve as a useful reference for model communities and help further model improvements.
This study provides a comprehensive evaluation of the global dust cycle in 15 models...
Citation
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint