Journal cover Journal topic
Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics An interactive open-access journal of the European Geosciences Union
Journal topic

Journal metrics

IF value: 5.414
IF5.414
IF 5-year value: 5.958
IF 5-year
5.958
CiteScore value: 9.7
CiteScore
9.7
SNIP value: 1.517
SNIP1.517
IPP value: 5.61
IPP5.61
SJR value: 2.601
SJR2.601
Scimago H <br class='widget-line-break'>index value: 191
Scimago H
index
191
h5-index value: 89
h5-index89
ACP | Articles | Volume 20, issue 17
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 10401–10425, 2020
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-10401-2020
© Author(s) 2020. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 10401–10425, 2020
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-10401-2020
© Author(s) 2020. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Research article 08 Sep 2020

Research article | 08 Sep 2020

The global dust cycle and uncertainty in CMIP5 (Coupled Model Intercomparison Project phase 5) models

Chenglai Wu et al.

Download

Interactive discussion

Status: closed
Status: closed
AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment
Printer-friendly Version - Printer-friendly version Supplement - Supplement

Peer review completion

AR: Author's response | RR: Referee report | ED: Editor decision
AR by Chenglai Wu on behalf of the Authors (26 Jun 2020)  Author's response    Manuscript
ED: Publish as is (02 Jul 2020) by Ashu Dastoor

Post-review adjustments

AA: Author's adjustment | EA: Editor approval
AA by Chenglai Wu on behalf of the Authors (18 Aug 2020)   Author's adjustment   Manuscript
EA: Adjustments approved (23 Aug 2020) by Ashu Dastoor
Publications Copernicus
Download
Short summary
This study provides a comprehensive evaluation of the global dust cycle in 15 models participating in the fifth phase of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP5). We assess the global budget and associated uncertainties. We also quantify the discrepancies in each model. The results highlight the large uncertainties in both the locations and intensities of dust emission. Our study will serve as a useful reference for model communities and help further model improvements.
This study provides a comprehensive evaluation of the global dust cycle in 15 models...
Citation
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint