Journal cover Journal topic
Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics An interactive open-access journal of the European Geosciences Union
Journal topic

Journal metrics

IF value: 5.414
IF5.414
IF 5-year value: 5.958
IF 5-year
5.958
CiteScore value: 9.7
CiteScore
9.7
SNIP value: 1.517
SNIP1.517
IPP value: 5.61
IPP5.61
SJR value: 2.601
SJR2.601
Scimago H <br class='widget-line-break'>index value: 191
Scimago H
index
191
h5-index value: 89
h5-index89
ACP | Articles | Volume 20, issue 17
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 10211–10230, 2020
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-10211-2020
© Author(s) 2020. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 10211–10230, 2020
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-10211-2020
© Author(s) 2020. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Research article 03 Sep 2020

Research article | 03 Sep 2020

Size dependence in chord characteristics from simulated and observed continental shallow cumulus

Philipp J. Griewank et al.

Related authors

Case study of a humidity layer above Arctic stratocumulus using balloon-borne turbulence and radiation measurements and large eddy simulations
Ulrike Egerer, André Ehrlich, Matthias Gottschalk, Roel A. J. Neggers, Holger Siebert, and Manfred Wendisch
Atmos. Chem. Phys. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-2020-584,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-2020-584, 2020
Preprint under review for ACP
Short summary
The Impact of CCN Concentrations on the Thermodynamic and Turbulent State of Arctic Mixed-Phase Clouds
Jan Chylik, Stephan Mertes, and Roel A. J. Neggers
Atmos. Chem. Phys. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-2019-637,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-2019-637, 2019
Preprint withdrawn
Short summary
MicroHH 1.0: a computational fluid dynamics code for direct numerical simulation and large-eddy simulation of atmospheric boundary layer flows
Chiel C. van Heerwaarden, Bart J. H. van Stratum, Thijs Heus, Jeremy A. Gibbs, Evgeni Fedorovich, and Juan Pedro Mellado
Geosci. Model Dev., 10, 3145–3165, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-10-3145-2017,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-10-3145-2017, 2017
Short summary

Related subject area

Subject: Clouds and Precipitation | Research Activity: Atmospheric Modelling | Altitude Range: Troposphere | Science Focus: Physics (physical properties and processes)
Impact of aerosols and turbulence on cloud droplet growth: an in-cloud seeding case study using a parcel–DNS (direct numerical simulation) approach
Sisi Chen, Lulin Xue, and Man-Kong Yau
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 10111–10124, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-10111-2020,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-10111-2020, 2020
Short summary
Diffusional growth of cloud droplets in homogeneous isotropic turbulence: DNS, scaled-up DNS, and stochastic model
Lois Thomas, Wojciech W. Grabowski, and Bipin Kumar
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 9087–9100, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-9087-2020,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-9087-2020, 2020
Short summary
Differences in tropical high clouds among reanalyses: origins and radiative impacts
Jonathon S. Wright, Xiaoyi Sun, Paul Konopka, Kirstin Krüger, Bernard Legras, Andrea M. Molod, Susann Tegtmeier, Guang J. Zhang, and Xi Zhao
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 8989–9030, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-8989-2020,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-8989-2020, 2020
Short summary
Vertical redistribution of moisture and aerosol in orographic mixed-phase clouds
Annette K. Miltenberger, Paul R. Field, Adrian H. Hill, and Andrew J. Heymsfield
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 7979–8001, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-7979-2020,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-7979-2020, 2020
Short summary
Improving the Southern Ocean cloud albedo biases in a general circulation model
Vidya Varma, Olaf Morgenstern, Paul Field, Kalli Furtado, Jonny Williams, and Patrick Hyder
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 7741–7751, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-7741-2020,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-7741-2020, 2020
Short summary

Cited articles

Abma, D., Heus, T., and Mellado, J. P.: Direct Numerical Simulation of Evaporative Cooling at the Lateral Boundary of Shallow Cumulus Clouds, J. Atmos. Sci., 70, 2088–2102, https://doi.org/10.1175/jas-d-12-0230.1, 2013. a
Ansmann, A., Fruntke, J., and Engelmann, R.: Updraft and downdraft characterization with Doppler lidar: cloud-free versus cumuli-topped mixed layer, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 7845–7858, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-7845-2010, 2010. a, b
Arakawa, A. and Schubert, W. H.: Interaction of a Cumulus Cloud Ensemble with the Large-Scale Environment, Part I, J. Atmos. Sci., 31, 674–701, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1974)031<0674:ioacce>2.0.co;2, 1974. a, b, c
ARM: Lasso Bundle Browser, available at: https://adc.arm.gov/lassobrowser, last access: 26 August 2020a. a
ARM: ARM Data archive, available at: https://adc.arm.gov/data/, last access: 26 August 2020b. a
Publications Copernicus
Download
Short summary
The idea that larger shallow cumulus clouds have stronger updrafts than small shallow cumulus clouds is as intuitive as it is old. In this paper we gather years of upward-pointing laser measurements from a plain in Oklahoma and combine them with 28 d of high-resolution simulations. Our approach, which has much more data than previous studies, confirms that updraft strength and cloud size are linked and that the simulations reproduce the observed cloud wind and moisture structure.
The idea that larger shallow cumulus clouds have stronger updrafts than small shallow cumulus...
Citation
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint