Articles | Volume 19, issue 13
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-8759-2019
© Author(s) 2019. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-8759-2019
© Author(s) 2019. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Arctic cloud annual cycle biases in climate models
Patrick C. Taylor
CORRESPONDING AUTHOR
NASA Langley Research Center, Climate Science Branch, Hampton,
Virginia, USA
Robyn C. Boeke
Science Systems Applications Inc., Hampton, Virginia, USA
Ying Li
Department of Atmospheric Science, Colorado State University, Fort
Collins, Colorado, USA
David W. J. Thompson
Department of Atmospheric Science, Colorado State University, Fort
Collins, Colorado, USA
Related authors
Baylor Fox-Kemper, Patricia DeRepentigny, Anne Marie Treguier, Christian Stepanek, Eleanor O’Rourke, Chloe Mackallah, Alberto Meucci, Yevgeny Aksenov, Paul J. Durack, Nicole Feldl, Vanessa Hernaman, Céline Heuzé, Doroteaciro Iovino, Gaurav Madan, André L. Marquez, François Massonnet, Jenny Mecking, Dhrubajyoti Samanta, Patrick C. Taylor, Wan-Ling Tseng, and Martin Vancoppenolle
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-3083, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-3083, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
The earth system model variables needed for studies of the ocean and sea ice are prioritized and requested.
Carola Barrientos-Velasco, Christopher J. Cox, Hartwig Deneke, J. Brant Dodson, Anja Hünerbein, Matthew D. Shupe, Patrick C. Taylor, and Andreas Macke
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 25, 3929–3960, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-3929-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-3929-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Understanding how clouds affect the climate, especially in the Arctic, is crucial. This study used data from the largest polar expedition in history, MOSAiC, and the CERES satellite to analyse the impact of clouds on radiation. Simulations showed accurate results, aligning with observations. Over the year, clouds caused the atmospheric surface system to lose 5.2 W m−² of radiative energy to space, while the surface gained 25 W m−² and the atmosphere cooled by 30.2 W m−².
Sean Horvath, Linette Boisvert, Chelsea Parker, Melinda Webster, Patrick Taylor, and Robyn Boeke
The Cryosphere Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-2021-297, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-2021-297, 2021
Preprint withdrawn
Short summary
Short summary
Arctic sea ice has been experiencing a dramatic decline since the late 1970s. A database is presented that combines satellite observations with daily sea ice parcel drift tracks. This dataset consists of daily time series of sea ice parcel locations, sea ice and snow conditions, and atmospheric states. This has multiple applications for the scientific community that can shed light on the atmosphere-snow-sea ice interactions in the changing Arctic environment.
J. Brant Dodson, Patrick C. Taylor, Richard H. Moore, David H. Bromwich, Keith M. Hines, Kenneth L. Thornhill, Chelsea A. Corr, Bruce E. Anderson, Edward L. Winstead, and Joseph R. Bennett
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 11563–11580, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-11563-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-11563-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
Aircraft in situ observations of low-level Beaufort Sea cloud properties and thermodynamics from the ARISE campaign are compared with the Arctic System Reanalysis (ASR) to better understand deficiencies in simulated clouds. ASR produces too little cloud water, which coincides with being too warm and dry. In addition, ASR struggles to produce cloud water even in favorable thermodynamic conditions. A random sampling experiment also shows the effects of the limited aircraft sampling on the results.
Hong Chen, Sebastian Schmidt, Michael D. King, Galina Wind, Anthony Bucholtz, Elizabeth A. Reid, Michal Segal-Rozenhaimer, William L. Smith, Patrick C. Taylor, Seiji Kato, and Peter Pilewskie
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 14, 2673–2697, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-2673-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-2673-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
In this paper, we accessed the shortwave irradiance derived from MODIS cloud optical properties by using aircraft measurements. We developed a data aggregation technique to parameterize spectral surface albedo by snow fraction in the Arctic. We found that undetected clouds have the most significant impact on the imagery-derived irradiance. This study suggests that passive imagery cloud detection could be improved through a multi-pixel approach that would make it more dependable in the Arctic.
Baylor Fox-Kemper, Patricia DeRepentigny, Anne Marie Treguier, Christian Stepanek, Eleanor O’Rourke, Chloe Mackallah, Alberto Meucci, Yevgeny Aksenov, Paul J. Durack, Nicole Feldl, Vanessa Hernaman, Céline Heuzé, Doroteaciro Iovino, Gaurav Madan, André L. Marquez, François Massonnet, Jenny Mecking, Dhrubajyoti Samanta, Patrick C. Taylor, Wan-Ling Tseng, and Martin Vancoppenolle
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-3083, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2025-3083, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
The earth system model variables needed for studies of the ocean and sea ice are prioritized and requested.
Carola Barrientos-Velasco, Christopher J. Cox, Hartwig Deneke, J. Brant Dodson, Anja Hünerbein, Matthew D. Shupe, Patrick C. Taylor, and Andreas Macke
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 25, 3929–3960, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-3929-2025, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-3929-2025, 2025
Short summary
Short summary
Understanding how clouds affect the climate, especially in the Arctic, is crucial. This study used data from the largest polar expedition in history, MOSAiC, and the CERES satellite to analyse the impact of clouds on radiation. Simulations showed accurate results, aligning with observations. Over the year, clouds caused the atmospheric surface system to lose 5.2 W m−² of radiative energy to space, while the surface gained 25 W m−² and the atmosphere cooled by 30.2 W m−².
Adam A. Scaife, Mark P. Baldwin, Amy H. Butler, Andrew J. Charlton-Perez, Daniela I. V. Domeisen, Chaim I. Garfinkel, Steven C. Hardiman, Peter Haynes, Alexey Yu Karpechko, Eun-Pa Lim, Shunsuke Noguchi, Judith Perlwitz, Lorenzo Polvani, Jadwiga H. Richter, John Scinocca, Michael Sigmond, Theodore G. Shepherd, Seok-Woo Son, and David W. J. Thompson
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 2601–2623, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-2601-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-2601-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Great progress has been made in computer modelling and simulation of the whole climate system, including the stratosphere. Since the late 20th century we also gained a much clearer understanding of how the stratosphere interacts with the lower atmosphere. The latest generation of numerical prediction systems now explicitly represents the stratosphere and its interaction with surface climate, and here we review its role in long-range predictions and projections from weeks to decades ahead.
Sean Horvath, Linette Boisvert, Chelsea Parker, Melinda Webster, Patrick Taylor, and Robyn Boeke
The Cryosphere Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-2021-297, https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-2021-297, 2021
Preprint withdrawn
Short summary
Short summary
Arctic sea ice has been experiencing a dramatic decline since the late 1970s. A database is presented that combines satellite observations with daily sea ice parcel drift tracks. This dataset consists of daily time series of sea ice parcel locations, sea ice and snow conditions, and atmospheric states. This has multiple applications for the scientific community that can shed light on the atmosphere-snow-sea ice interactions in the changing Arctic environment.
J. Brant Dodson, Patrick C. Taylor, Richard H. Moore, David H. Bromwich, Keith M. Hines, Kenneth L. Thornhill, Chelsea A. Corr, Bruce E. Anderson, Edward L. Winstead, and Joseph R. Bennett
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 11563–11580, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-11563-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-11563-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
Aircraft in situ observations of low-level Beaufort Sea cloud properties and thermodynamics from the ARISE campaign are compared with the Arctic System Reanalysis (ASR) to better understand deficiencies in simulated clouds. ASR produces too little cloud water, which coincides with being too warm and dry. In addition, ASR struggles to produce cloud water even in favorable thermodynamic conditions. A random sampling experiment also shows the effects of the limited aircraft sampling on the results.
Hong Chen, Sebastian Schmidt, Michael D. King, Galina Wind, Anthony Bucholtz, Elizabeth A. Reid, Michal Segal-Rozenhaimer, William L. Smith, Patrick C. Taylor, Seiji Kato, and Peter Pilewskie
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 14, 2673–2697, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-2673-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-2673-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
In this paper, we accessed the shortwave irradiance derived from MODIS cloud optical properties by using aircraft measurements. We developed a data aggregation technique to parameterize spectral surface albedo by snow fraction in the Arctic. We found that undetected clouds have the most significant impact on the imagery-derived irradiance. This study suggests that passive imagery cloud detection could be improved through a multi-pixel approach that would make it more dependable in the Arctic.
Cited articles
Barton, N. P., Klein, S. A., Boyle, J. S., and Zhang, Y. Y.: Arctic synoptic
regimes: Comparing domain-wide Arctic cloud observations with CAM4 and CAM5
during similar dynamics, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 117, D15205, https://doi.org/10.1029/2012JD017589, 2012.
Beesley, J. A. and Moritz, R. E.: Toward an Explanation of the Annual Cycle
of Cloudiness over the Arctic Ocean, J. Climate, 12, 395–415,
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0442(1999)012<0395:TAEOTA>2.0.CO;2,
1999.
Boeke, R. C. and Taylor, P. C.: Evaluation of the Arctic surface radiation
budget in CMIP5 models, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 121, 2016JD025099,
https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JD025099, 2016.
Boer, G., de Morrison, H., Shupe, M. D., and Hildner, R.: Evidence of liquid
dependent ice nucleation in high-latitude stratiform clouds from surface
remote sensors, Geophys. Res. Lett., 38, L01803,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2010GL046016, 2011.
Cesana, G., Kay, J. E., Chepfer, H., English, J. M., and de Boer, G.:
Ubiquitous low-level liquid-containing Arctic clouds: New observations and
climate model constraints from CALIPSO-GOCCP, Geophys. Res. Lett., 39,
L20804, https://doi.org/10.1029/2012GL053385, 2012.
Coopman, Q., Garrett, T. J., Finch, D. P., and Riedi, J.: High Sensitivity of
Arctic Liquid Clouds to Long-Range Anthropogenic Aerosol Transport,
Geophys. Res. Lett., 45, 372–381, https://doi.org/10.1002/2017GL075795,
2018.
Curry, J. A., Schramm, J. L., Rossow, W. B., and Randall, D.: Overview of
Arctic Cloud and Radiation Characteristics, J. Climate, 9, 1731–1764,
https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0442(1996)009<1731:OOACAR>2.0.CO;2,
1996.
English, J. M., Kay, J. E., Gettelman, A., Liu, X., Wang, Y., Zhang, Y., and
Chepfer, H.: Contributions of Clouds, Surface Albedos, and Mixed-Phase Ice
Nucleation Schemes to Arctic Radiation Biases in CAM5, J. Climate, 27,
5174–5197, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-13-00608.1, 2014.
English, J. M., Gettelman, A., and Henderson, G. R.: Arctic Radiative Fluxes:
Present-Day Biases and Future Projections in CMIP5 Models, J. Climate,
28, 6019–6038, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-14-00801.1, 2015.
Hahn, C. J., Warren, S. G., and London, J.: The Effect of Moonlight on
Observation of Cloud Cover at Night, and Application to Cloud Climatology,
J. Climate, 8, 1429–1446, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0442(1995)008<1429:TEOMOO>2.0.CO;2, 1995.
Huschke, R. E.: Arctic cloud statistics from “Air-Calibrated” surface
weather observations, rand corp santa monica calif, available at:
http://www.dtic.mil/docs/citations/AD0698740 (last access: 29 October 2018), 1969.
Jackson, R. C., McFarquhar, G. M., Korolev, A. V., Earle, M. E., Liu, P. S.
K., Lawson, R. P., Brooks, S., Wolde, M., Laskin, A., and Freer, M.: The
dependence of ice microphysics on aerosol concentration in arctic
mixed-phase stratus clouds during ISDAC and M-PACE, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 117, D15207, https://doi.org/10.1029/2012JD017668, 2012.
Karlsson, J. and Svensson, G.: The simulation of Arctic clouds and their
influence on the winter surface temperature in present-day climate in the
CMIP3 multi-model dataset, Clim. Dynam., 36, 623–635,
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-010-0758-6, 2011.
Karlsson, J. and Svensson, G.: Consequences of poor representation of Arctic
sea-ice albedo and cloud-radiation interactions in the CMIP5 model ensemble,
Geophys. Res. Lett., 40, 4374–4379, https://doi.org/10.1002/grl.50768,
2013.
Kato, S., Sun-Mack, S., Miller, W. F., Rose, F. G., Chen, Y., Minnis, P., and
Wielicki, B. A.: Relationships among cloud occurrence frequency, overlap,
and effective thickness derived from CALIPSO and CloudSat merged cloud
vertical profiles, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 115,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2009JD012277, 2010.
Kay, J. E. and Gettelman, A.: Cloud influence on and response to seasonal
Arctic sea ice loss, J. Geophys. Res., 114, D18204,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2009JD011773, 2009.
Kay, J. E. and L'Ecuyer, T.: Observational constraints on Arctic Ocean
clouds and radiative fluxes during the early 21st century, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 118, 7219–7236, https://doi.org/10.1002/jgrd.50489, 2013.
Kay, J. E., L'Ecuyer, T., Gettelman, A., Stephens, G., and O'Dell, C.: The
contribution of cloud and radiation anomalies to the 2007 Arctic sea ice
extent minimum, Geophys. Res. Lett., 35, L08503,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2008GL033451, 2008.
Kay, J. E., L'Ecuyer, T., Chepfer, H., Loeb, N., Morrison, A., and Cesana,
G.: Recent Advances in Arctic Cloud and Climate Research, Curr. Clim. Change
Rep., 2, 159–169, https://doi.org/10.1007/s40641-016-0051-9, 2016.
Komurcu, M., Storelvmo, T., Tan, I., Lohmann, U., Yun, Y., Penner, J. E.,
Wang, Y., Liu, X., and Takemura, T.: Intercomparison of the cloud water phase
among global climate models, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos.,
119, 3372–3400, https://doi.org/10.1002/2013JD021119, 2014.
Kretzschmar, J., Salzmann, M., Mülmenstädt, J., and Quaas, J.: Arctic cloud cover bias in ECHAM6 and its sensitivity to cloud microphysics and surface fluxes, Atmos. Chem. Phys. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-2018-1135, in review, 2018.
Li, Y., Thompson, D. W. J., Stephens, G. L., and Bony, S.: A global survey of
the instantaneous linkages between cloud vertical structure and large-scale
climate, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 119, 3770–3792,
https://doi.org/10.1002/2013JD020669, 2014a.
Li, Y., Thompson, D. W. J., Huang, Y., and Zhang, M.: Observed linkages
between the northern annular mode/North Atlantic Oscillation, cloud
incidence, and cloud radiative forcing, Geophys. Res. Lett., 41,
1681–1688, https://doi.org/10.1002/2013GL059113, 2014b.
Liu, Y. and Key, J. R.: Assessment of Arctic Cloud Cover Anomalies in
Atmospheric Reanalysis Products Using Satellite Data, J. Climate, 29,
6065–6083, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-15-0861.1, 2016.
Liu, Y., Key, J. R., Ackerman, S. A., Mace, G. G., and Zhang, Q.: Arctic
cloud macrophysical characteristics from CloudSat and CALIPSO, Remote
Sens. Environ., 124, 159–173, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2012.05.006, 2012.
Liu, Z. and Schweiger, A.: Synoptic Conditions, Clouds, and Sea Ice Melt
Onset in the Beaufort and Chukchi Seasonal Ice Zone, J. Climate, 30,
6999–7016, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-16-0887.1, 2017.
Liu, Y., Shupe, M. D., Wang, Z., and Mace, G.: Cloud vertical distribution from combined surface and space radar–lidar observations at two Arctic atmospheric observatories, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 5973–5989, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-5973-2017, 2017.
McCoy, D. T., Tan, I., Hartmann, D. L., Zelinka, M. D., and Storelvmo, T.: On
the relationships among cloud cover, mixed-phase partitioning, and planetary
albedo in GCMs, J. Adv. Model. Earth Sy., 8,
650–668, https://doi.org/10.1002/2015MS000589, 2016.
Minnis, P., Sun-Mack, S., Young, D. F., Heck, P. W., Garber, D. P., Chen,
Y., Spangenberg, D. A., Arduini, R. F., Trepte, Q. Z., Smith, W. L., Ayers,
J. K., Gibson, S. C., Miller, W. F., Hong, G., Chakrapani, V., Takano, Y.,
Liou, K., Xie, Y., and Yang, P.: CERES Edition-2 Cloud Property Retrievals
Using TRMM VIRS and Terra and Aqua MODIS Data – Part I: Algorithms, IEEE T. Geosci. Remote, 49, 4374–4400,
https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2011.2144601, 2011.
Molod, A., Takacs, L., Suarez, M., and Bacmeister, J.: Development of the GEOS-5 atmospheric general circulation model: evolution from MERRA to MERRA2, Geosci. Model Dev., 8, 1339–1356, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-8-1339-2015, 2015.
Morrison, H., de Boer, G., Feingold, G., Harrington, J., Shupe, M. D., and
Sulia, K.: Resilience of persistent Arctic mixed-phase clouds, Nat. Geosci., 5, 11–17, https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo1332, 2012.
Morrison, A. L., Kay, J. E., Chepfer, H., Guzman, R., and Yettella, V.:
Isolating the Liquid Cloud Response to Recent Arctic Sea Ice Variability
Using Spaceborne Lidar Observations, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 123, 473–490, https://doi.org/10.1002/2017JD027248, 2018.
Pavelsky, T. M., Boé, J., Hall, A., and Fetzer, E. J.: Atmospheric
inversion strength over polar oceans in winter regulated by sea ice, Clim. Dynam., 36, 945–955, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-010-0756-8, 2011.
Persson, P. O. G., Fairall, C. W., Andreas, E. L., Guest, P. S., and
Perovich, D. K.: Measurements near the Atmospheric Surface Flux Group tower
at SHEBA: Near-surface conditions and surface energy budget, J. Geophys.
Res., 107, 8045, https://doi.org/10.1029/2000JC000705, 2002.
Persson, P. O. G., Shupe, M. D., Perovich, D., and Solomon, A.: Linking
atmospheric synoptic transport, cloud phase, surface energy fluxes, and
sea-ice growth: observations of midwinter SHEBA conditions, Clim. Dynam., 49,
1341–1364, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-016-3383-1, 2017.
Pithan, F., Medeiros, B., and Mauritsen, T.: Mixed-phase clouds cause climate
model biases in Arctic wintertime temperature inversions, Clim. Dynam.,
43, 289–303, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-013-1964-9, 2014.
Shupe, M. D. and Intrieri, J. M.: Cloud Radiative Forcing of the Arctic
Surface: The Influence of Cloud Properties, Surface Albedo, and Solar Zenith
Angle, J. Climate, 17, 616–628, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0442(2004)017<0616:CRFOTA>2.0.CO;2, 2004.
Stephens, G. L., Vane, D. G., Tanelli, S., Im, E., Durden, S., Rokey, M.,
Reinke, D., Partain, P., Mace, G. G., Austin, R., L'Ecuyer, T., Haynes, J.,
Lebsock, M., Suzuki, K., Waliser, D., Wu, D., Kay, J., Gettelman, A., Wang,
Z., and Marchand, R.: CloudSat mission: Performance and early science after
the first year of operation, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos.,
113, D00A18, https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JD009982, 2008.
Tan, I. and Storelvmo, T.: Sensitivity Study on the Influence of Cloud
Microphysical Parameters on Mixed-Phase Cloud Thermodynamic Phase
Partitioning in CAM5, J. Atmos. Sci., 73, 709–728,
https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-15-0152.1, 2015.
Taylor, P. C.: Does a relationship between Arctic low clouds and sea ice
matter?, in: AIP Conference Proceedings, Vol. 1810, American Institue of
Physics, 4 pp., 2016.
Taylor, K. E., Stouffer, R. J., and Meehl, G. A.: An Overview of CMIP5 and
the Experiment Design, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 93, 485–498,
https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-11-00094.1, 2011.
Taylor, P. C., Kato, S., Xu, K.-M., and Cai, M.: Covariance between Arctic
sea ice and clouds within atmospheric state regimes at the satellite
footprint level, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 120,
12656–12678, https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JD023520, 2015.
Taylor, P. C., Hegyi, B. M.,
Boeke, R. C., and Boisvert, L. N.: On the Increasing Importance of Air-Sea
Exchanges in a Thawing Arctic: A Review, Atmosphere, 9, 41,
https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos9020041, 2018.
Winker, D. M., Pelon, J., Coakley, J. A., Ackerman, S. A., Charlson, R. J.,
Colarco, P. R., Flamant, P., Fu, Q., Hoff, R. M., Kittaka, C., Kubar, T. L.,
Le Treut, H., Mccormick, M. P., Mégie, G., Poole, L., Powell, K.,
Trepte, C., Vaughan, M. A., and Wielicki, B. A.: The CALIPSO Mission, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 91, 1211–1230, https://doi.org/10.1175/2010BAMS3009.1, 2010.
Short summary
Climate projections disagree more in the rapidly changing Arctic than anywhere else. The impact of a changing Arctic spans food and water security, economics, national security, etc. The representation of Arctic clouds within climate models is a critical roadblock towards improving Arctic climate projections. We explore the potential drivers of the diverse representation of the Arctic cloud annual cycle within climate models providing evidence that microphysical processes are a key driver.
Climate projections disagree more in the rapidly changing Arctic than anywhere else. The impact...
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint