Authors, There are a few additional revisions requested as follows:
* The use of "binned" data in the figures following Fig. 3 requires some clarification in the text. I suggest that the authors consider including revised figures including "unbinned" data in either the main manuscript or as supplementary material.
* The residual UV spectra included in Figure 2 should be plotted on an expanded scale to more clearly show the quality of the subtractions and potential systematic deviations, if any.
* Table 1: The table should be expanded to include any relevant physical conditions for each measurement but more importantly the concentrations of ClO, Cl2O2, and OClO(if observed) and their uncertainties for each experiment. The precision of the determined Keq should also be provided.
* Table 1: The temperatures quoted in table 1 to 0.01 C is unrealistic considering the accuracy of the temperature measurement in the experiment. Appropriate temperature values should be quoted and possibly used in the data analysis.
* Conclusions: The text for comparing the JPL recommended uncertainty and the statistical uncertainty obtained in the present work needs to be revised to clearly state that the JPL value was not derived from a statistical analysis.