Articles | Volume 19, issue 9
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-6085-2019
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-6085-2019
Research article
 | 
08 May 2019
Research article |  | 08 May 2019

How robust are stratospheric age of air trends from different reanalyses?

Felix Ploeger, Bernard Legras, Edward Charlesworth, Xiaolu Yan, Mohamadou Diallo, Paul Konopka, Thomas Birner, Mengchu Tao, Andreas Engel, and Martin Riese

Viewed

Total article views: 3,273 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
2,389 818 66 3,273 71 56
  • HTML: 2,389
  • PDF: 818
  • XML: 66
  • Total: 3,273
  • BibTeX: 71
  • EndNote: 56
Views and downloads (calculated since 14 Jan 2019)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 14 Jan 2019)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 3,273 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 3,201 with geography defined and 72 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 

Cited

Latest update: 22 Nov 2024
Download
Short summary
We analyse the change in the circulation of the middle atmosphere based on current generation meteorological reanalysis data sets. We find that long-term changes from 1989 to 2015 are similar for the chosen reanalyses, mainly resembling the forced response in climate model simulations to climate change. For shorter periods circulation changes are less robust, and the representation of decadal variability appears to be a major uncertainty for modelling the circulation of the middle atmosphere.
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint