Articles | Volume 19, issue 18
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-11911-2019
© Author(s) 2019. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-11911-2019
© Author(s) 2019. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Research article
| 
25 Sep 2019
Research article |
| 25 Sep 2019
| 25 Sep 2019
MICS-Asia III: multi-model comparison and evaluation of aerosol over East Asia
Lei Chen
State Key Laboratory of Atmospheric Boundary Layer Physics and
Atmospheric Chemistry, Institute of Atmospheric Physics, Chinese Academy of
Sciences, Beijing, China
School of Environmental Science and Engineering, Nanjing University of
Information Science & Technology, Nanjing, China
Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Atmospheric Environment Monitoring and
Pollution Control, Jiangsu Collaborative Innovation Center of Atmospheric
Environment and Equipment Technology, Nanjing University of Information
Science & Technology, Nanjing, China
Yi Gao
State Key Laboratory of Atmospheric Boundary Layer Physics and
Atmospheric Chemistry, Institute of Atmospheric Physics, Chinese Academy of
Sciences, Beijing, China
State Key Laboratory of Atmospheric Boundary Layer Physics and
Atmospheric Chemistry, Institute of Atmospheric Physics, Chinese Academy of
Sciences, Beijing, China
University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
Center for Excellence in Regional Atmospheric Environment, Institute
of Urban Environment, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Xiamen, China
Joshua S. Fu
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of
Tennessee, Knoxville, TN, USA
School of Environmental Science and Engineering, Nanjing University of
Information Science & Technology, Nanjing, China
Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Atmospheric Environment Monitoring and
Pollution Control, Jiangsu Collaborative Innovation Center of Atmospheric
Environment and Equipment Technology, Nanjing University of Information
Science & Technology, Nanjing, China
Research Institute of Climatic and Environmental Governance, Nanjing
University of Information Science & Technology, Nanjing, China
Hong Liao
School of Environmental Science and Engineering, Nanjing University of
Information Science & Technology, Nanjing, China
Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Atmospheric Environment Monitoring and
Pollution Control, Jiangsu Collaborative Innovation Center of Atmospheric
Environment and Equipment Technology, Nanjing University of Information
Science & Technology, Nanjing, China
Jialin Li
State Key Laboratory of Atmospheric Boundary Layer Physics and
Atmospheric Chemistry, Institute of Atmospheric Physics, Chinese Academy of
Sciences, Beijing, China
Kan Huang
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of
Tennessee, Knoxville, TN, USA
Baozhu Ge
State Key Laboratory of Atmospheric Boundary Layer Physics and
Atmospheric Chemistry, Institute of Atmospheric Physics, Chinese Academy of
Sciences, Beijing, China
Xuemei Wang
Institute for Environment and Climate Research, Jinan University,
Guangzhou, China
Yun Fat Lam
School of Energy and Environment, City University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China
Chuan-Yao Lin
Research Center for Environmental Changes, Academia Sinica, Taipei, Taiwan
Syuichi Itahashi
Central Research Institute of Electric Power Industry, Abiko, Chiba, Japan
Department of Marine, Earth, and Atmospheric Sciences, North Carolina
State University, Raleigh, NC, USA
Tatsuya Nagashima
National Institute for Environmental Studies, Tsukuba, Japan
Mizuo Kajino
Meteorological Research Institute, Japan Meteorological Agency,
Tsukuba, Japan
Faculty of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Tsukuba,
Tsukuba, Japan
Kazuyo Yamaji
Graduate School of Maritime Sciences, Kobe University, Kobe, Hyogo, Japan
Zifa Wang
State Key Laboratory of Atmospheric Boundary Layer Physics and
Atmospheric Chemistry, Institute of Atmospheric Physics, Chinese Academy of
Sciences, Beijing, China
University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
Jun-ichi Kurokawa
Asia Center for Air Pollution Research, 1182 Sowa, Nishi-ku, Niigata, Niigata, Japan
Viewed
Total article views: 5,236 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 11 Feb 2019)
| HTML | XML | Total | Supplement | BibTeX | EndNote | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3,736 | 1,406 | 94 | 5,236 | 471 | 131 | 165 |
- HTML: 3,736
- PDF: 1,406
- XML: 94
- Total: 5,236
- Supplement: 471
- BibTeX: 131
- EndNote: 165
Total article views: 4,256 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 25 Sep 2019)
| HTML | XML | Total | Supplement | BibTeX | EndNote | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3,232 | 952 | 72 | 4,256 | 293 | 106 | 145 |
- HTML: 3,232
- PDF: 952
- XML: 72
- Total: 4,256
- Supplement: 293
- BibTeX: 106
- EndNote: 145
Total article views: 980 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 11 Feb 2019)
| HTML | XML | Total | Supplement | BibTeX | EndNote | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 504 | 454 | 22 | 980 | 178 | 25 | 20 |
- HTML: 504
- PDF: 454
- XML: 22
- Total: 980
- Supplement: 178
- BibTeX: 25
- EndNote: 20
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Total article views: 5,236 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 5,050 with geography defined
and 186 with unknown origin.
Total article views: 4,256 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 4,197 with geography defined
and 59 with unknown origin.
Total article views: 980 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 853 with geography defined
and 127 with unknown origin.
| Country | # | Views | % |
|---|
| Country | # | Views | % |
|---|
| Country | # | Views | % |
|---|
| Total: | 0 |
| HTML: | 0 |
| PDF: | 0 |
| XML: | 0 |
- 1
1
| Total: | 0 |
| HTML: | 0 |
| PDF: | 0 |
| XML: | 0 |
- 1
1
| Total: | 0 |
| HTML: | 0 |
| PDF: | 0 |
| XML: | 0 |
- 1
1
Latest update: 19 Nov 2025
Short summary
Simulated aerosol concentrations from 14 CTMs within the framework of MICS-Asia III are detailedly evaluated with an extensive set of measurements in East Asia. Similarities and differences among model performances are also analyzed. Although more considerable capacities for reproducing the aerosol concentrations and their variations are shown in current CTMs than those in MICS-Asia II, more efforts are needed to reduce diversities of simulated aerosol concentrations among air quality models.
Simulated aerosol concentrations from 14 CTMs within the framework of MICS-Asia III are...
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint