Articles | Volume 18, issue 12
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 9011–9023, 2018
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-9011-2018
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 9011–9023, 2018
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-9011-2018
Research article
28 Jun 2018
Research article | 28 Jun 2018

Comparison of primary aerosol emission and secondary aerosol formation from gasoline direct injection and port fuel injection vehicles

Zhuofei Du et al.

Viewed

Total article views: 2,563 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total Supplement BibTeX EndNote
1,471 1,030 62 2,563 305 33 57
  • HTML: 1,471
  • PDF: 1,030
  • XML: 62
  • Total: 2,563
  • Supplement: 305
  • BibTeX: 33
  • EndNote: 57
Views and downloads (calculated since 16 Oct 2017)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 16 Oct 2017)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 2,558 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 2,532 with geography defined and 26 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 

Cited

Latest update: 06 Jul 2022
Download
Short summary
By combining approaches involving chassis dynamometer measurements and environmental chamber simulations, we find that gasoline direct injection (GDI) vehicles contribute more primary aerosol and secondary organic aerosol than port fuel injection (PFI) vehicles. Our results highlight the considerable potential contribution of GDI vehicles to urban air pollution, since the market share of GDI vehicles will dominate over that of PFI vehicles in the future.
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint