Seasonal characteristics, formation mechanisms and source origins of PM<sub>2.5</sub> in two megacities in Sichuan Basin, China

Wang, Huanbo; Tian, Mi; Chen, Yang; Shi, Guangming; Liu, Yuan; Yang, Fumo; Zhang, Leiming; Deng, Liqun; Yu, Jiayan; Peng, Chao; Cao, Xuyao

doi:https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-865-2018

Articles | Volume 18, issue 2

https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-865-2018

© Author(s) 2018. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.

https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-865-2018

© Author(s) 2018. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.

Articles | Volume 18, issue 2

Research article

|

24 Jan 2018

Research article |

| 24 Jan 2018

Seasonal characteristics, formation mechanisms and source origins of PM_2.5 in two megacities in Sichuan Basin, China

Huanbo Wang, Mi Tian, Yang Chen, Guangming Shi, Yuan Liu, Fumo Yang, Leiming Zhang, Liqun Deng, Jiayan Yu, Chao Peng, and Xuyao Cao

Download

Final revised paper (published on 24 Jan 2018)
Supplement to the final revised paper
Preprint (discussion started on 10 Apr 2017)
Supplement to the preprint

Interactive discussion

Status: closed

AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment

- Printer-friendly version

- Supplement

RC1: 'Review comment on Huanbo Wang et al.', Anonymous Referee #2, 02 May 2017
- AC1: 'Response to Referee #2', Huanbo Wang, 11 Sep 2017
RC2: 'referee comment', Anonymous Referee #3, 18 Jul 2017
- AC2: 'Response to Referee #3', Huanbo Wang, 12 Sep 2017

Peer-review completion

AR: Author's response | RR: Referee report | ED: Editor decision

AR by Huanbo Wang on behalf of the Authors (20 Sep 2017) Author's response Manuscript

ED: Referee Nomination & Report Request started (25 Sep 2017) by Aijun Ding

RR by Anonymous Referee #4 (01 Nov 2017)

Suggestions for revision or reasons for rejection

Sichuan Basin is one of the regions in China with severe aerosol pollution, while the chemical component analysis is still rare. This study fills the gap in this area. Under this condition, the short-term (four selected months) and low time resolution sampling is still acceptable. Thus, I suggest it published after major revision.

In general, the manuscript is not well organized. Authors should put related results together to support one conclusion. The results now are presented with several short paragraphs which are not carefully ordered, e.g., section 3.1.2. From line 197 to line 234, it shows the results of SNA, SNA, carbonaceous aerosols, and SNA again. The readers can hardly find the sufficient information to know and understand the results.

Presentation should be modified by native speaker before publication.

There are many qualitative speculations in the article. Without robust evidence, to do such speculations is unreliable and may even mislead readers. Many conclusions are not based on strict logic.
Line 203: “The majority of PM2.5 components showed a summer minimum, which was caused by high planetary boundary layer height favoring pollutants dispersion and abundant precipitation favoring wet scavenging. ” I think it will be more appropriate to show precipitation to support this statement.
Line 208 and 217. The statement could not only be supported by other references. Other mechanisms can also lead to similar or opposite results. More observed results are needed.
Line 237: “ Although none of the two sites alone can represent the whole region of the Sichuan basin, the similarities in the characteristics of the major pollutants between the two sites should represent the regional-scale characteristics of urban-environment pollution while the differences between the two sites should reflect the sub-regional characteristics of urban pollution.” As the authors response to previous suggestions, “The two monitoring sites selected in this study should represent the typical urban environment in their respective cities”. Thus, many similarities reflect the characteristics of urban region instead of the whole region.
Line 403, the interaction between aerosol and ozone are quite complicated. Aerosols can provide an interface for the heterogeneous reaction of ozone products. Previous study shows that this mechanism usually contributes more than the impact through photochemical process. Fig S5 also could not support that “the formation of SO42- during the polluted periods was dominated by heterogeneous aqueous processes rather than photochemical reactions”.
Line 365, “Similar diurnal variations were also found between clean and polluted periods for CO (Fig. S4), suggesting no significant extra CO emission during polluted periods.” Is that possible to give a quantitative value to support that the variations are similar? Also, I don’t consider this can support no extra CO emission directly.
Some speculations are even self-contradictory. Line 208: “It is also noted that the seasonal variations of NO3 were much larger than those of SO4 and NH4. This can be explained by the enhanced formation of NO3 under high RH in winter, and volatility of NH4NO3 in summer under high temperature condition.” And Line 348: “In contrast, RH remained high during clean or polluted periods in the present study, suggesting that high RH might not be the driving force for the pollution episodes in Sichuan Basin.” Also, it is not convinced to claim RH might not be the driving force supported by this. Many factors including meteorological conditions and emission are combined together to form polluted episodes.

The conclusions part are all qualitative even without a number.

Besides, I have some specific comments on the manuscript as follows:
1. Line 238, “regional” instead of “reginal”.
2. Line 453, It is better for understanding if “Neijiang, Zigong, Yibin and Luzhou” could be marked in Fig 1.
3. The period should be stated in caption of Fig 6 and Fig 7.
4. Line 415, the ref should not be in brackets.

Hide

ED: Reconsider after major revisions (07 Nov 2017) by Aijun Ding

AR by Huanbo Wang on behalf of the Authors (22 Nov 2017) Author's response Manuscript

ED: Referee Nomination & Report Request started (29 Nov 2017) by Aijun Ding

RR by Anonymous Referee #4 (11 Dec 2017)

ED: Publish as is (12 Dec 2017) by Aijun Ding

AR by Huanbo Wang on behalf of the Authors (14 Dec 2017) Manuscript

Download

Article (11078 KB)
Full-text XML

Seasonal characteristics, formation mechanisms and source origins of PM2.5 in two megacities in Sichuan Basin, China

Download

Interactive discussion

Peer-review completion

Seasonal characteristics, formation mechanisms and source origins of PM_2.5 in two megacities in Sichuan Basin, China