Articles | Volume 18, issue 9
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-6483-2018
© Author(s) 2018. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-6483-2018
© Author(s) 2018. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Research article
| 
07 May 2018
Research article |
| 07 May 2018
| 07 May 2018
High-resolution inversion of methane emissions in the Southeast US using SEAC4RS aircraft observations of atmospheric methane: anthropogenic and wetland sources
School of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA
Daniel J. Jacob
School of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA
Alexander J. Turner
School of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA
now at: Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, University of California at Berkeley, CA, USA
Joannes D. Maasakkers
School of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA
Melissa P. Sulprizio
School of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA
A. Anthony Bloom
Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA, USA
Arlyn E. Andrews
NOAA Earth System Research Laboratory, Boulder, Colorado, USA
Debra Wunch
Department of Physics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
Viewed
Total article views: 3,585 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 18 Dec 2017)
| HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2,239 | 1,230 | 116 | 3,585 | 63 | 84 |
- HTML: 2,239
- PDF: 1,230
- XML: 116
- Total: 3,585
- BibTeX: 63
- EndNote: 84
Total article views: 2,583 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 07 May 2018)
| HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1,664 | 823 | 96 | 2,583 | 55 | 72 |
- HTML: 1,664
- PDF: 823
- XML: 96
- Total: 2,583
- BibTeX: 55
- EndNote: 72
Total article views: 1,002 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 18 Dec 2017)
| HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 575 | 407 | 20 | 1,002 | 8 | 12 |
- HTML: 575
- PDF: 407
- XML: 20
- Total: 1,002
- BibTeX: 8
- EndNote: 12
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Total article views: 3,585 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 3,546 with geography defined
and 39 with unknown origin.
Total article views: 2,583 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 2,555 with geography defined
and 28 with unknown origin.
Total article views: 1,002 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 991 with geography defined
and 11 with unknown origin.
| Country | # | Views | % |
|---|
| Country | # | Views | % |
|---|
| Country | # | Views | % |
|---|
| Total: | 0 |
| HTML: | 0 |
| PDF: | 0 |
| XML: | 0 |
- 1
1
| Total: | 0 |
| HTML: | 0 |
| PDF: | 0 |
| XML: | 0 |
- 1
1
| Total: | 0 |
| HTML: | 0 |
| PDF: | 0 |
| XML: | 0 |
- 1
1
Cited
31 citations as recorded by crossref.
- The NASA Carbon Monitoring System Phase 2 synthesis: scope, findings, gaps and recommended next steps G. Hurtt et al. 10.1088/1748-9326/ac7407
- Methane Emission Estimates by the Global High-Resolution Inverse Model Using National Inventories F. Wang et al. 10.3390/rs11212489
- Global methane budget and trend, 2010–2017: complementarity of inverse analyses using in situ (GLOBALVIEWplus CH<sub>4</sub> ObsPack) and satellite (GOSAT) observations X. Lu et al. 10.5194/acp-21-4637-2021
- Quantifying Regional Methane Emissions Using Airborne Transects and a Measurement-Model Fusion Approach A. Gonzalez et al. 10.1021/acsestair.3c00072
- Aircraft-based inversions quantify the importance of wetlands and livestock for Upper Midwest methane emissions X. Yu et al. 10.5194/acp-21-951-2021
- 2010–2015 North American methane emissions, sectoral contributions, and trends: a high-resolution inversion of GOSAT observations of atmospheric methane J. Maasakkers et al. 10.5194/acp-21-4339-2021
- Quantification of oil and gas methane emissions in the Delaware and Marcellus basins using a network of continuous tower-based measurements Z. Barkley et al. 10.5194/acp-23-6127-2023
- Practical Guide to Measuring Wetland Carbon Pools and Fluxes S. Bansal et al. 10.1007/s13157-023-01722-2
- Global distribution of methane emissions, emission trends, and OH concentrations and trends inferred from an inversion of GOSAT satellite data for 2010–2015 J. Maasakkers et al. 10.5194/acp-19-7859-2019
- Accelerating methane growth rate from 2010 to 2017: leading contributions from the tropics and East Asia Y. Yin et al. 10.5194/acp-21-12631-2021
- Assessing the capability of different satellite observing configurations to resolve the distribution of methane emissions at kilometer scales A. Turner et al. 10.5194/acp-18-8265-2018
- Underestimated Dry Season Methane Emissions from Wetlands in the Pantanal M. Li et al. 10.1021/acs.est.3c09250
- Underestimates of methane from intensively raised animals could undermine goals of sustainable development M. Hayek & S. Miller 10.1088/1748-9326/ac02ef
- National quantifications of methane emissions from fuel exploitation using high resolution inversions of satellite observations L. Shen et al. 10.1038/s41467-023-40671-6
- Seasonally Resolved Excess Urban Methane Emissions from the Baltimore/Washington, DC Metropolitan Region Y. Huang et al. 10.1021/acs.est.9b02782
- Wintertime CO2, CH4, and CO Emissions Estimation for the Washington, DC–Baltimore Metropolitan Area Using an Inverse Modeling Technique I. Lopez-Coto et al. 10.1021/acs.est.9b06619
- Attribution of the accelerating increase in atmospheric methane during 2010–2018 by inverse analysis of GOSAT observations Y. Zhang et al. 10.5194/acp-21-3643-2021
- Estimating 2010–2015 anthropogenic and natural methane emissions in Canada using ECCC surface and GOSAT satellite observations S. Baray et al. 10.5194/acp-21-18101-2021
- How well can inverse analyses of high-resolution satellite data resolve heterogeneous methane fluxes? Observing system simulation experiments with the GEOS-Chem adjoint model (v35) X. Yu et al. 10.5194/gmd-14-7775-2021
- Advancing Scientific Understanding of the Global Methane Budget in Support of the Paris Agreement A. Ganesan et al. 10.1029/2018GB006065
- Analysis of Oil and Gas Ethane and Methane Emissions in the Southcentral and Eastern United States Using Four Seasons of Continuous Aircraft Ethane Measurements Z. Barkley et al. 10.1029/2020JD034194
- Detecting high-emitting methane sources in oil/gas fields using satellite observations D. Cusworth et al. 10.5194/acp-18-16885-2018
- Methane emissions in the United States, Canada, and Mexico: evaluation of national methane emission inventories and 2010–2017 sectoral trends by inverse analysis of in situ (GLOBALVIEWplus CH<sub>4</sub> ObsPack) and satellite (GOSAT) atmospheric observations X. Lu et al. 10.5194/acp-22-395-2022
- Interannual variability on methane emissions in monsoon Asia derived from GOSAT and surface observations F. Wang et al. 10.1088/1748-9326/abd352
- Carbon Monoxide Emissions from the Washington, DC, and Baltimore Metropolitan Area: Recent Trend and COVID-19 Anomaly I. Lopez-Coto et al. 10.1021/acs.est.1c06288
- Bottom-Up Estimates of Coal Mine Methane Emissions in China: A Gridded Inventory, Emission Factors, and Trends J. Sheng et al. 10.1021/acs.estlett.9b00294
- Atmospheric Monitoring of Methane in Beijing Using a Mobile Observatory W. Sun et al. 10.3390/atmos10090554
- Quantifying methane emissions from the largest oil-producing basin in the United States from space Y. Zhang et al. 10.1126/sciadv.aaz5120
- Comparative analysis of low-Earth orbit (TROPOMI) and geostationary (GeoCARB, GEO-CAPE) satellite instruments for constraining methane emissions on fine regional scales: application to the Southeast US J. Sheng et al. 10.5194/amt-11-6379-2018
- Sustained methane emissions from China after 2012 despite declining coal production and rice-cultivated area J. Sheng et al. 10.1088/1748-9326/ac24d1
- A Gridded Inventory of Annual 2012–2018 U.S. Anthropogenic Methane Emissions J. Maasakkers et al. 10.1021/acs.est.3c05138
31 citations as recorded by crossref.
- The NASA Carbon Monitoring System Phase 2 synthesis: scope, findings, gaps and recommended next steps G. Hurtt et al. 10.1088/1748-9326/ac7407
- Methane Emission Estimates by the Global High-Resolution Inverse Model Using National Inventories F. Wang et al. 10.3390/rs11212489
- Global methane budget and trend, 2010–2017: complementarity of inverse analyses using in situ (GLOBALVIEWplus CH<sub>4</sub> ObsPack) and satellite (GOSAT) observations X. Lu et al. 10.5194/acp-21-4637-2021
- Quantifying Regional Methane Emissions Using Airborne Transects and a Measurement-Model Fusion Approach A. Gonzalez et al. 10.1021/acsestair.3c00072
- Aircraft-based inversions quantify the importance of wetlands and livestock for Upper Midwest methane emissions X. Yu et al. 10.5194/acp-21-951-2021
- 2010–2015 North American methane emissions, sectoral contributions, and trends: a high-resolution inversion of GOSAT observations of atmospheric methane J. Maasakkers et al. 10.5194/acp-21-4339-2021
- Quantification of oil and gas methane emissions in the Delaware and Marcellus basins using a network of continuous tower-based measurements Z. Barkley et al. 10.5194/acp-23-6127-2023
- Practical Guide to Measuring Wetland Carbon Pools and Fluxes S. Bansal et al. 10.1007/s13157-023-01722-2
- Global distribution of methane emissions, emission trends, and OH concentrations and trends inferred from an inversion of GOSAT satellite data for 2010–2015 J. Maasakkers et al. 10.5194/acp-19-7859-2019
- Accelerating methane growth rate from 2010 to 2017: leading contributions from the tropics and East Asia Y. Yin et al. 10.5194/acp-21-12631-2021
- Assessing the capability of different satellite observing configurations to resolve the distribution of methane emissions at kilometer scales A. Turner et al. 10.5194/acp-18-8265-2018
- Underestimated Dry Season Methane Emissions from Wetlands in the Pantanal M. Li et al. 10.1021/acs.est.3c09250
- Underestimates of methane from intensively raised animals could undermine goals of sustainable development M. Hayek & S. Miller 10.1088/1748-9326/ac02ef
- National quantifications of methane emissions from fuel exploitation using high resolution inversions of satellite observations L. Shen et al. 10.1038/s41467-023-40671-6
- Seasonally Resolved Excess Urban Methane Emissions from the Baltimore/Washington, DC Metropolitan Region Y. Huang et al. 10.1021/acs.est.9b02782
- Wintertime CO2, CH4, and CO Emissions Estimation for the Washington, DC–Baltimore Metropolitan Area Using an Inverse Modeling Technique I. Lopez-Coto et al. 10.1021/acs.est.9b06619
- Attribution of the accelerating increase in atmospheric methane during 2010–2018 by inverse analysis of GOSAT observations Y. Zhang et al. 10.5194/acp-21-3643-2021
- Estimating 2010–2015 anthropogenic and natural methane emissions in Canada using ECCC surface and GOSAT satellite observations S. Baray et al. 10.5194/acp-21-18101-2021
- How well can inverse analyses of high-resolution satellite data resolve heterogeneous methane fluxes? Observing system simulation experiments with the GEOS-Chem adjoint model (v35) X. Yu et al. 10.5194/gmd-14-7775-2021
- Advancing Scientific Understanding of the Global Methane Budget in Support of the Paris Agreement A. Ganesan et al. 10.1029/2018GB006065
- Analysis of Oil and Gas Ethane and Methane Emissions in the Southcentral and Eastern United States Using Four Seasons of Continuous Aircraft Ethane Measurements Z. Barkley et al. 10.1029/2020JD034194
- Detecting high-emitting methane sources in oil/gas fields using satellite observations D. Cusworth et al. 10.5194/acp-18-16885-2018
- Methane emissions in the United States, Canada, and Mexico: evaluation of national methane emission inventories and 2010–2017 sectoral trends by inverse analysis of in situ (GLOBALVIEWplus CH<sub>4</sub> ObsPack) and satellite (GOSAT) atmospheric observations X. Lu et al. 10.5194/acp-22-395-2022
- Interannual variability on methane emissions in monsoon Asia derived from GOSAT and surface observations F. Wang et al. 10.1088/1748-9326/abd352
- Carbon Monoxide Emissions from the Washington, DC, and Baltimore Metropolitan Area: Recent Trend and COVID-19 Anomaly I. Lopez-Coto et al. 10.1021/acs.est.1c06288
- Bottom-Up Estimates of Coal Mine Methane Emissions in China: A Gridded Inventory, Emission Factors, and Trends J. Sheng et al. 10.1021/acs.estlett.9b00294
- Atmospheric Monitoring of Methane in Beijing Using a Mobile Observatory W. Sun et al. 10.3390/atmos10090554
- Quantifying methane emissions from the largest oil-producing basin in the United States from space Y. Zhang et al. 10.1126/sciadv.aaz5120
- Comparative analysis of low-Earth orbit (TROPOMI) and geostationary (GeoCARB, GEO-CAPE) satellite instruments for constraining methane emissions on fine regional scales: application to the Southeast US J. Sheng et al. 10.5194/amt-11-6379-2018
- Sustained methane emissions from China after 2012 despite declining coal production and rice-cultivated area J. Sheng et al. 10.1088/1748-9326/ac24d1
- A Gridded Inventory of Annual 2012–2018 U.S. Anthropogenic Methane Emissions J. Maasakkers et al. 10.1021/acs.est.3c05138
Latest update: 26 Jul 2024
Short summary
We use observations of boundary layer methane from the SEAC4RS aircraft campaign over the Southeast US to estimate methane emissions in that region. Our results suggest that the EPA inventory is regionally unbiased but there are large local biases, suggesting variable emission factors. Our results also suggest that the choice of landcover map is the dominant source of error for wetland emission estimates.
We use observations of boundary layer methane from the SEAC4RS aircraft campaign over the...
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint