Articles | Volume 18, issue 8
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-5905-2018
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-5905-2018
Research article
 | Highlight paper
 | 
26 Apr 2018
Research article | Highlight paper |  | 26 Apr 2018

Global evaluation and calibration of a passive air sampler for gaseous mercury

David S. McLagan, Carl P. J. Mitchell, Alexandra Steffen, Hayley Hung, Cecilia Shin, Geoff W. Stupple, Mark L. Olson, Winston T. Luke, Paul Kelley, Dean Howard, Grant C. Edwards, Peter F. Nelson, Hang Xiao, Guey-Rong Sheu, Annekatrin Dreyer, Haiyong Huang, Batual Abdul Hussain, Ying D. Lei, Ilana Tavshunsky, and Frank Wania

Viewed

Total article views: 6,498 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total Supplement BibTeX EndNote
4,759 1,598 141 6,498 604 132 155
  • HTML: 4,759
  • PDF: 1,598
  • XML: 141
  • Total: 6,498
  • Supplement: 604
  • BibTeX: 132
  • EndNote: 155
Views and downloads (calculated since 08 Feb 2018)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 08 Feb 2018)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 6,498 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 6,417 with geography defined and 81 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Latest update: 02 Jan 2026
Download
Short summary
A new passive air sampler for gaseous mercury was tested at 20 sites on four continents. These sites have in common that they use the state-of-the-art active air sampling technique for gaseous mercury on a continuous basis and therefore allow for an evaluation and calibration of the passive sampler. The sampler proved to work exceptionally well, with a precision and accuracy on par with the active instrument and better than what has previously been achieved with passive samplers.
Share
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint