Laboratory for Climate and Ocean–Atmosphere Studies, Department of Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences, School of Physics, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China
Youfan Chen
Laboratory for Climate and Ocean–Atmosphere Studies, Department of Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences, School of Physics, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China
Yuanhong Zhao
Laboratory for Climate and Ocean–Atmosphere Studies, Department of Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences, School of Physics, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China
Daven K. Henze
Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO 80309, USA
Liye Zhu
Department of Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA
Yu Song
State Key Joint Laboratory of Environmental Simulation and Pollution Control, Department of Environmental Science, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China
Program in Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08544, USA
Xuejun Liu
Key Laboratory of Plant–Soil Interactions of MOE, College of Resources and Environmental Sciences, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100094, China
State Key Laboratory of Atmospheric Boundary Layer Physics and Atmospheric Chemistry (LAPC), Institute of Atmospheric Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100029, China
Yi Lin
School of Earth and Space Sciences, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China
Binxiang Huang
Department of Agrometeorology, College of Resources and Environmental Sciences, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China
Viewed
Total article views: 13,461 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML
PDF
XML
Total
Supplement
BibTeX
EndNote
9,612
3,626
223
13,461
970
153
300
HTML: 9,612
PDF: 3,626
XML: 223
Total: 13,461
Supplement: 970
BibTeX: 153
EndNote: 300
Views and downloads (calculated since 17 Aug 2017)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 17 Aug 2017)
Total article views: 12,337 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML
PDF
XML
Total
Supplement
BibTeX
EndNote
8,912
3,213
212
12,337
725
141
276
HTML: 8,912
PDF: 3,213
XML: 212
Total: 12,337
Supplement: 725
BibTeX: 141
EndNote: 276
Views and downloads (calculated since 12 Jan 2018)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 12 Jan 2018)
Total article views: 1,124 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML
PDF
XML
Total
Supplement
BibTeX
EndNote
700
413
11
1,124
245
12
24
HTML: 700
PDF: 413
XML: 11
Total: 1,124
Supplement: 245
BibTeX: 12
EndNote: 24
Views and downloads (calculated since 17 Aug 2017)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 17 Aug 2017)
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Total article views: 13,461 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 13,248 with geography defined
and 213 with unknown origin.
Total article views: 12,337 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 12,138 with geography defined
and 199 with unknown origin.
Total article views: 1,124 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 1,110 with geography defined
and 14 with unknown origin.
Country
#
Views
%
Country
#
Views
%
Country
#
Views
%
Total:
0
HTML:
0
PDF:
0
XML:
0
1
1
Total:
0
HTML:
0
PDF:
0
XML:
0
1
1
Total:
0
HTML:
0
PDF:
0
XML:
0
1
1
Latest update: 06 Jan 2026
Download
The requested paper has a corresponding corrigendum published.
Please read the corrigendum first before downloading the article.
Substantial differences exist in current estimates of agricultural ammonia emissions in China, hindering understanding of their environmental consequences. This study applies both bottom-up and top-down methods to better quantify agricultural ammonia sources in China using observations from satellite and surface networks interpreted by a chemical transport model. Our estimate of annual Chinese anthropogenic ammonia emission is 11.7 tg (teragram) for 2008 with a strong seasonality peak in summer.
Substantial differences exist in current estimates of agricultural ammonia emissions in China,...
