Laboratory for Climate and Ocean–Atmosphere Studies, Department of Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences, School of Physics, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China
Youfan Chen
Laboratory for Climate and Ocean–Atmosphere Studies, Department of Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences, School of Physics, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China
Yuanhong Zhao
Laboratory for Climate and Ocean–Atmosphere Studies, Department of Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences, School of Physics, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China
Daven K. Henze
Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO 80309, USA
Liye Zhu
Department of Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA
Yu Song
State Key Joint Laboratory of Environmental Simulation and Pollution Control, Department of Environmental Science, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China
Program in Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08544, USA
Xuejun Liu
Key Laboratory of Plant–Soil Interactions of MOE, College of Resources and Environmental Sciences, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100094, China
State Key Laboratory of Atmospheric Boundary Layer Physics and Atmospheric Chemistry (LAPC), Institute of Atmospheric Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100029, China
Yi Lin
School of Earth and Space Sciences, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China
Binxiang Huang
Department of Agrometeorology, College of Resources and Environmental Sciences, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China
Viewed
Total article views: 13,288 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML
PDF
XML
Total
Supplement
BibTeX
EndNote
9,516
3,553
219
13,288
949
150
297
HTML: 9,516
PDF: 3,553
XML: 219
Total: 13,288
Supplement: 949
BibTeX: 150
EndNote: 297
Views and downloads (calculated since 17 Aug 2017)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 17 Aug 2017)
Total article views: 12,174 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML
PDF
XML
Total
Supplement
BibTeX
EndNote
8,816
3,150
208
12,174
709
138
273
HTML: 8,816
PDF: 3,150
XML: 208
Total: 12,174
Supplement: 709
BibTeX: 138
EndNote: 273
Views and downloads (calculated since 12 Jan 2018)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 12 Jan 2018)
Total article views: 1,114 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML
PDF
XML
Total
Supplement
BibTeX
EndNote
700
403
11
1,114
240
12
24
HTML: 700
PDF: 403
XML: 11
Total: 1,114
Supplement: 240
BibTeX: 12
EndNote: 24
Views and downloads (calculated since 17 Aug 2017)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 17 Aug 2017)
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Total article views: 13,288 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 13,078 with geography defined
and 210 with unknown origin.
Total article views: 12,174 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 11,978 with geography defined
and 196 with unknown origin.
Total article views: 1,114 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 1,100 with geography defined
and 14 with unknown origin.
Country
#
Views
%
Country
#
Views
%
Country
#
Views
%
Total:
0
HTML:
0
PDF:
0
XML:
0
1
1
Total:
0
HTML:
0
PDF:
0
XML:
0
1
1
Total:
0
HTML:
0
PDF:
0
XML:
0
1
1
Latest update: 06 Dec 2025
Download
The requested paper has a corresponding corrigendum published.
Please read the corrigendum first before downloading the article.
Substantial differences exist in current estimates of agricultural ammonia emissions in China, hindering understanding of their environmental consequences. This study applies both bottom-up and top-down methods to better quantify agricultural ammonia sources in China using observations from satellite and surface networks interpreted by a chemical transport model. Our estimate of annual Chinese anthropogenic ammonia emission is 11.7 tg (teragram) for 2008 with a strong seasonality peak in summer.
Substantial differences exist in current estimates of agricultural ammonia emissions in China,...
