Comments from the Editor:
This time one of the previous reviewers (reviewer #2) and a new reviewer (reviewer #1) made comments. Minor revision is necessary based on the comments from the reviewer #1. My comments as follows should also be taken into account:

1. The manuscript is improved but became lengthy and conciseness is preferred. I understand that contents were added based on the first comments by the reviewers. But as the nature of the journal review process, it would be better to focus on the original points that the authors made without quite large expansion during the revision. In the background subsections (2.1, 3.1, 4.1, and 5.1), papers published in 2017 are even found. Some of them might be better mentioned only in the findings subsections. The background description on the monoterpene chemistry (lines 211-251 in the track change version) is even longer than the findings in the following section (lines 391-397) and could be shortened.

2. residual layer (line 371 in the track change version) should be written as RL, as already appeared in line 339. Please check abbreviation thoroughly.

3. Lee et al. 2016a (line 654, in the track change version) is not found in the literature list. Completeness should be checked also for other cited papers.

Comments by the reviewers and the editor were adequately addressed. The following technical correction should be made, before publication.

1. Section number 3.2.8 is duplicated. 3.2.9 should be used for Climate relevant properties.