A laboratory investigation of the ice nucleation efficiency of three types of mineral and soil dust
- 1Institute for Atmospheric and Climate Science, ETH Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland
- 2Institute of Biogeochemistry and Pollutant Dynamics, ETH Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland
Correspondence: Mikhail Paramonov (email@example.com) and Zamin A. Kanji (firstname.lastname@example.org)
Surface-collected dust from three different locations around the world was examined with respect to its ice nucleation activity (INA) with the ETH Portable Ice Nucleation Chamber (PINC). Ice nucleation experiments were conducted with particles of 200 and 400 nm in diameter in the temperature range of 233–243 K in both the deposition nucleation and condensation freezing regimes. Several treatments were performed in order to investigate the effect of mineralogical composition, as well as the presence of biological and proteinaceous, organic and soluble compounds on the INA of mineral and soil dust. The INA of untreated dust particles correlated well with the total feldspar and K-feldspar content, corroborating previously published results. The removal of heat-sensitive proteinaceous and organic components from the particle surface with heat decreased the INA of dusts. However, the decrease in the INA was not proportional to the amount of these organic components, indicating that different proteinaceous and organic species have different ice nucleation activities, and the exact speciation is required in order to determine why dusts respond differently to the heating process. The INA of certain dusts increased after the removal of soluble material from the particle surface, demonstrating the low INA of the soluble compounds and/or the exposition of the underlying active sites. Similar to the proteinaceous organic compounds, soluble compounds seem to have different effects on the INA of surface-collected dusts, and a general conclusion about how the presence of soluble material on the particle surface affects its INA is not possible. The investigation of the heated and washed dusts revealed that mineralogy alone is not able to fully explain the observed INA of surface-collected dusts at the examined temperature and relative humidity conditions. The results showed that it is not possible to predict the INA of surface-collected soil dust based on the presence and amount of certain minerals or any particular class of compounds, such as soluble or proteinaceous/organic compounds. Instead, at temperatures of 238–243 K the INA of the untreated, surface-collected soil dust in the condensation freezing mode can be roughly approximated by one of the existing surrogates for atmospheric mineral dust, such as illite NX. Uncertainties associated with mechanical damage and possible changes to the mineralogy during treatments, as well as with the BET surface area and its immediate impact on the number of active sites (ns,BET), are addressed.
Atmospheric aerosol particles are well known to modify the microphysical properties of clouds, such as their albedo, lifetime and precipitation patterns, in what is known as the indirect effects of aerosols on climate (e.g. Lohmann and Feichter, 2005). Due to the importance of clouds in the Earth's hydrological cycle and energy and radiation balance, these aerosol-induced changes are a subject of rigorous research. However, due to the complexity of aerosol–cloud–climate interactions, the exact quantification of the radiative forcing associated with changing cloud properties has been challenging (Boucher et al., 2013).
In the atmosphere aerosol particles can form both cloud droplets and ice crystals; in such cases these aerosol particles are referred to as cloud condensation nuclei (CCN) and ice nucleating particles (INPs) forming liquid and solid hydrometeors, respectively. While the studies of cloud droplet formation have been numerous (e.g. Andreae, 2009, and references therein; Kerminen et al., 2012; Paramonov et al., 2013), the studies of atmospheric ice nucleation have been insufficient and still pose a lot of open questions (DeMott et al., 2011; Kanji et al., 2017). In general, a significant fraction of precipitating clouds in various environments contains ice, e.g. both in the tropics (Lau and Wu, 2003) and in the Nordic countries (Sporre et al., 2014). Primary nucleation of ice in the atmosphere can occur in the absence of insoluble material by way of freezing of supercooled liquid water droplets; this process is known as homogeneous freezing, and it requires temperatures below ∘C (236 K; e.g. Murray et al., 2010; Vali et al., 2015). However, the presence of INPs results in the onset of freezing at higher temperatures in what is known as heterogeneous freezing. This process has four known mechanisms: deposition nucleation, condensation freezing, immersion freezing and contact freezing (Vali, 1985; Vali et al., 2015). Condensation and immersion freezing are thought to be the dominant pathways for the first ice formation in mixed-phase clouds (de Boer et al., 2011). Since the concentration of ice crystals in the atmosphere is typically orders of magnitude larger than the INP concentration (Cantrell and Heymsfield, 2005), several secondary production mechanisms are also believed to contribute to the observed ice crystal number concentrations (e.g. Hallett and Mossop, 1974; Field et al., 2017).
Several aerosol species of atmospheric relevance have been studied and shown to act as efficient INPs. Biological aerosols (bioaerosols) have long been postulated to act as INPs (e.g. Maki et al., 1974; Lee et al., 1995; Möhler et al., 2007; Delort et al., 2010). Even though black carbon (BC or soot) is well known for its exceptionally low affinity for water (Pringle et al., 2010), it has also been studied as a potential INP (e.g. DeMott, 1990; Gorbunov et al., 2001; Dymarska et al., 2006; Kanji and Abbatt, 2006). More recently INPs of marine origin, those associated with marine biological activity and sea spray production, have seen a resurgence of interest as well (e.g. Després et al., 2012; Burrows et al., 2013; Wilson et al., 2015; DeMott et al., 2016; Ladino et al., 2016; McCluskey et al., 2017). Perhaps the most well-known INP species – primarily due to its size, morphology, significant presence in the atmosphere and its ability to be transported great distances – is mineral dust (e.g. Kumai, 1961; Cantrell and Heymsfield, 2005, and references therein; Kellogg and Griffin, 2006). Originating predominantly from major deserts, such as the Sahara and Gobi, mineral dust particles are easily lifted from soils with low vegetation cover by surface winds, with annual emission rates of the order of several thousand teragrams per year (Engelstaedter et al., 2006). Due to its sources, the occurrence and the amount of mineral dust in the atmosphere vary greatly both spatially and temporally (Tegen and Fung, 1994). Many studies have concentrated on the ability of mineral dust to form ice at atmospherically relevant thermodynamic conditions (e.g. Hoose and Möhler, 2012; Murray et al., 2012; Kanji et al., 2017, and references therein), and it has been reported as the most common INP in the formation of cirrus clouds (DeMott et al., 2003; Cziczo et al., 2013). Mineral dust has a size-dependent efficiency with respect to its ice nucleating activity (INA), with larger particles activating at higher temperatures and lower supersaturations (Archuleta et al., 2005). However, the exact mechanism of ice nucleation on mineral dust is not fully understood, although it is strongly dependent on its mineralogical composition (Pinti et al., 2012), morphology (Baustian et al., 2012) and coating (Möhler et al., 2008). This complicates the representativeness of ice formation on mineral dust in global models as both the concentration of mineral dust INPs and their mineralogical composition vary greatly depending on location. Atmospheric processing and aging during the transport of mineral dust (Kanji et al., 2013), as well as the effect of coating, are also not fully understood (Sullivan et al., 2010a).
In the atmosphere a typical mineral dust particle is mainly composed of clay minerals and quartz, especially if found close to the emission source (Broadley et al., 2012; Murray et al., 2012). However, aerosol particles partake in various photochemical, oxidative and aging processes during long-range transport, and both organic matter and biological material may condense or adsorb onto the surface of the particle, potentially altering its size, surface properties and, possibly, INA (Krueger et al., 2004; Hinz et al., 2005; Dall'Osto et al., 2010). Besides the mineral dust originating from major deserts, dust of agricultural origin is also of atmospheric importance, signified by the estimated 20 %–25 % contribution to the global atmospheric dust load (Ginoux et al., 2012; Boucher et al., 2013). The chemical composition of arable soil dust is frequently more diverse than that of naturally emitted desert dust (Simoneit et al., 2004), illustrating its more complex role in atmospheric ice nucleation processes.
In recent years, surface-collected mineral dust of both natural sources and those influenced by anthropogenic activities has been investigated with respect to its INA. Field et al. (2006) examined the INA of two types of desert dust, from the Sahara and Asia, and found no significant difference between their INA. The study reported that at temperatures above 233 K no significant ice nucleation via deposition nucleation occurred, with droplets forming simultaneously with ice crystals via the condensation freezing mode, possibly due to the presence of some soluble material on the surface of the particles. The maximum activated fraction (AF) at 253 K was ∼5 %–10 %, increasing to 20 %–40 % at temperatures below 233 K. Kulkarni and Dobbie (2010) also studied several types of Saharan dust, as well as one Spanish dust, and demonstrated that the onset of ice nucleation occurred at relative humidities with respect to ice (RHi) as low as 104 %. The small differences in the observed INA between Saharan and Spanish dusts was attributed to the increased content of Ca-rich minerals in the Spanish dust (e.g. calcite) and, therefore, its lower INA. A comprehensive study by Boose et al. (2016a) determined the INA of several types of both airborne and surface-collected dust in the immersion freezing mode in the temperature range of 233–263 K. The mineralogical analysis indicated that at temperatures above 250 K the INA is mainly driven by the feldspar content of the dust, while at lower temperatures the sum of feldspar and quartz becomes more important. Kaufmann et al. (2016) also explored the INA of several types of surface-collected dust in the immersion mode. They found that mineralogy was only able to fully explain the observed INA of 5 out of 12 dust samples; for the remainder of the dust samples mineralogy was only able to explain part of the observed INA or played no role at all. The study also reported that microcline was the most efficient ice nucleating mineral, and that while mineralogy is an important aspect in determining the INA of mineral dust, the mixture of minerals in a dust particle results in similar ice nucleation capabilities of different dusts regardless of their exact composition.
Both dry heating and the treatment of dust with hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) are known to denature the biological proteinaceous matter (Pouleur et al., 1992) and digest all organic matter (Conen et al., 2011), respectively. Several recent studies have used these techniques in an attempt to decipher the effects of biogenic dust components on the INA of soil dust. Conen et al. (2011) reported that biological residues are mainly responsible for the INA of surface-collected soil dust in the immersion mode. The study found that in the temperature range of 258–269 K the INA of soil dust particles was significantly reduced after heating to ∼373 K, demonstrating the importance of heat-sensitive compounds likely of organic origin. O'Sullivan et al. (2014) collected fertile soil dust from several locations in England and examined its INA in the immersion mode, reporting that at temperatures above 258 K the INA of soil dust is diminished after heat treatment and even more so after H2O2 treatment, pointing to the removal of biological matter (Pouleur et al., 1992) and its importance for the INA in this temperature regime. At temperatures below 249 K, the INA of soil dust, as measured by the number of active sites ns, did not significantly differ between untreated samples and those heated to 363 K, suggesting that inorganic components dominate the ice active sites in this temperature regime. Similarly, Tobo et al. (2014) investigated the INA of arable soil dust from Wyoming, USA, in the water supersaturated regime above 237 K. The study reported that both H2O2 treatment and heating to 573 K reduced the INA of the soil dust in a similar manner, with a distinct temperature dependence. At 237 K the difference between the untreated and heated or H2O2 treated dust was minimal, if present at all; however, this difference gradually increased as the temperature increased. The two aforementioned studies both agreed that as the temperature decreases towards the homogeneous freezing temperature, the importance of biogenic constituents in the INP population decreases in favour of inorganic components. Hill et al. (2016) also confirmed that the removal of soil organic matter (SOM) from soil dusts either by heat or H2O2 significantly reduced the number of active INPs at temperatures warmer than 255 K.
It is clear that the interactions of mineral dust with water vapour in the atmosphere under the cirrus and mixed-phase cloud regimes is a complex phenomenon. The motivation for this work is to disentangle the effects of the multiple mineral dust constituents on its ice nucleation activity. This work aims to establish the effect of size, surface area, soluble material, biological proteinaceous matter and total organic matter on the INA of surface-collected mineral and soil dust. This is achieved by a comprehensive analysis of three surface-collected dust samples, representative of both natural and anthropogenic origins. In addition to ice nucleation measurements, several techniques are used to characterise the dust samples and aid in the interpretation of the ice nucleation measurements. The goal is to provide an overview of mineral dust components responsible for the INA in the deposition nucleation and condensation freezing modes in the temperature range of 233–248 K.
2.1 Investigated dust samples
Three dust samples were investigated for their INA in this work. These dusts are natural surface-collected dusts from Iceland, China and the Himalaya. The dust from Iceland is a glaciogenic silt collected from the glacial river Múlakvísl about 10 km from the Mýrdalsjökull glacier in southern Iceland (63∘28′ N, 18∘38′ W); the material originates from the Katla volcanic system under the glacier. The dust from China was collected at a remote location 100 km north-west of Hohhot (41∘23′ N, 111∘07′ E). The location is a sparsely populated, dry and windy agricultural area next to a small rural road, with freely roaming cattle. The dust from the Himalaya was collected from the top of a glacier in the Khumbu Valley, about a 10 min walk from Pyramid Station (27∘58′ N, 86∘49′ E). Hereafter, the dusts are referred to by their origin, i.e. Iceland, China and Himalaya. All dusts were collected either right at or directly below the surface at each individual location. After collection the dusts were then stored in plastic bags in dark conditions at room temperature. To allow for ice nucleation experiments, the collected dust samples were sieved with a series of dry sieves to select only the particles below 45 µm in diameter (Retsch vibratory sieve shaker AS 200).
Besides the untreated dust, the samples were subjected to three treatments. The motivation behind conducting the three dust treatments was to remove certain compounds from the particle surface, to consequently examine the INA of the treated dust and to compare the results to other previously published studies. In order to remove biological proteinaceous matter, the dust samples were heated to 573 K for 2 h (Pouleur et al., 1992). The procedure was carried out in a drying oven, and the samples were cooled at room temperature following the heating.
In order to remove the soluble material, the dust samples were washed using the following technique (Welti, 2012). Ten grams of dust were suspended in 300 mL of Milli-Q water, and the suspensions were first agitated for 15 min with a magnetic stirrer and then sonicated in an ultrasonic bath for 100 min. The suspensions were then centrifuged for 15 min to separate the dust from the supernatant water, which was retained for further analysis. The washing cycle was repeated three times for each dust, and after the last centrifuging procedure, the washed dust was dried overnight in an oven at a temperature of 303 K.
To digest all organic matter, the dust samples were treated with H2O2 (O'Sullivan et al., 2014; Tobo et al., 2014) by adding 50 mL of 35 % H2O2 solution to 10 g of dust. Once the bubbling subsided, the suspensions were heated up to 323–333 K. Additional H2O2 was added to the heated suspensions until the bubbling completely stopped. The suspensions were kept overnight and then diluted by a factor of 100 with deionised water. After the dilution, the suspensions were centrifuged, and the treated dust was then dried overnight in an oven at a temperature of 303 K. In the following discussion the treated dusts are referred to as heated, washed and H2O2 treated.
The mineralogical composition of the dusts was examined using a powder X-ray diffraction technique with subsequent Rietveld quantitative phase analysis. The samples were finely powdered using a McCrone micronising mill (Retsch, Haan, Germany) and packed with random orientation into rotary disk sample holders. X-ray diffractograms were recorded in Bragg–Brentano geometry on a D8 ADVANCE diffractometer using Cu Kα radiation (λ=1.5406 Å; 40 kV, 40 mA) and a high-resolution energy-dispersive 1-D detector (LYNXEYE XE, Bruker AXS GmbH, Karlsruhe, Germany). Diffractograms were recorded from 4 to 70∘ 2θ with a step size of 0.015∘ 2θ and 10 s acquisition time per step. To quantify the amounts of X-ray amorphous material in the dusts, they were additionally analysed after adding 50 wt % of crystalline corundum powder as internal standard (CAS: 1344-28-1; purum p.a., Fluka). Following possible phase identification supported by the PDF-2 database (International Centre for Diffraction Data), Rietveld quantitative phase analysis was performed using TOPAS of the Bruker DIFFRAC.SUITE software package (version 5).
In addition to the ice nucleation measurements described in the next section, several auxiliary bulk measurements were performed to characterise the dust to aid the interpretation of the ice nucleation results. In order to investigate the presence of heat-sensitive biological proteinaceous matter, thermogravimetric analysis (TGA; Perkin Elmer Pyris 1) was performed. The procedure involved the heating of a known amount of the dust sample to the desired temperature at a desired rate while the mass of the sample was closely monitored and recorded. The three untreated dust samples were heated from 303 to 573 K at a rate of 10 K min−1, kept at 573 K for 1 h, and then heated further up to 623 K at the same rate and kept at that temperature for 20 min. For better statistics and reproducibility, TGA was repeated on each untreated dust sample three times. Total carbon content in the untreated and heated dust samples was determined using a CHNS analyser (CHNS-932, LECO). The specific surface area of all untreated and treated dust samples was determined using the BET (Brunauer et al., 1938) 11-point adsorption–desorption isotherm measurements performed with the Autosorb-1MP surface area analyser (Quantachrome, Germany). The relative pressure range p∕p0 during the measurement was 0.05–0.3, and the gas used was N2. The samples (approximately 1 g) were dried in a vacuum at 353 K for 15 h prior to the analysis. The BET surface area is expressed in m2 g−1. Due to the amount of time required for the each measurement, the BET surface area of each untreated and treated dust sample was measured only once. To investigate the presence of soluble material in the untreated dust samples, the supernatant water after the three washing procedures was examined with respect to its pH and conductivity. pH was measured using a standard pH meter (Metrohm, 691 pH meter) which is calibrated daily and has a calibration slope of >0.97. The conductivity was measured using a conductivity probe (WTW Multi 350i Universal Pocket Meter). For the scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images, the untreated dust samples were sputter coated with 4 nm of gold (SCD50 Bal-Tec). In-lens images were recorded at 5 kV with a Leo 1530 FEG SEM with Gemini column (Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany).
The dry dust samples were mixed with 100 µm bronze beads and aerosolised with a fluidised bed aerosol generator (TSI 3400A). Following aerosolisation, the sample flow passed through a cyclone to remove particles larger than 2.5 µm in diameter. After the cyclone the flow was split into two parts: one being the exhaust line with a filter for excess flow and the other being the sample flow of approximately 2 L min−1. The sample flow passed through an impactor with an aerodynamic cut-off size D50 of 900 nm (size at which 50 % of particles are lost) and a molecular sieve dryer to reduce the relative humidity in the sample flow. The sample flow further passed through a radioactive source (210Po) to neutralise the aerosol particles and achieve an equilibrium charge distribution. Aerosol particles with a known charge distribution then entered a differential mobility analyser (DMA) column (TSI 3081), where the particles of a certain size were selected based on their electrical mobility (Aalto, 2004). Once the pseudo-monodisperse particle distribution was achieved, the sample flow was split into two parts. A 1 L min−1 flow was fed to the condensation particle counter (CPC, TSI 3010) to determine a total number of particles of a certain size. The other 1 L min−1 flow passed through another impactor with a D50 of 900 nm and was further led to the ETH Portable Ice Nucleation Chamber (PINC).
The PINC is an instrument for ice nucleation measurements based on the principle of the continuous flow diffusion chamber (CFDC; Rogers, 1988), and it has proven to be a useful and reliable instrument during both field (Chou et al., 2011; Boose et al., 2016b) and laboratory (Chou et al., 2013; Kanji et al., 2013; Burkert-Kohn et al., 2017) studies. It consists of two parallel ice-coated walls, between which certain temperatures and levels of supersaturation can be reached. When both walls are at the same temperature, the air between the walls is at 100 % RHi and subsaturated with respect to water (RHw<100 %). As the temperature of the walls is changed, i.e. the temperature gradient between the walls is increased, higher levels of supersaturation can be reached, up to RHw≥100 %. As such, it is possible to scan the RHw in both sub- and supersaturated regimes at a constant temperature (the so-called RH scan). Therefore, measurements conducted with PINC are representative of both deposition nucleation (RHw<100 %) and condensation freezing (RHw>100 %) regimes. The aerosol sample flow of approximately 1 L min−1 is guided through the chamber, sandwiched between the sheath air flows of approximately 4.5 L min−1 each. As the particles travel along a nearly laminar sample flow, and depending on the RH and temperature inside the chamber, a fraction of them may activate as CCN and INP, forming liquid droplets and ice crystals, respectively. The estimated residence time (i.e. time for activation and growth) of aerosol particles inside the chamber is nominally 7 seconds. As the formed hydrometeors move further down in the chamber, they pass through a so-called evaporation section. In this section both walls are held at the same temperature, i.e. the air is saturated with respect to ice and subsaturated with respect to water. Under these conditions, liquid droplets evaporate and the ice crystals remain. At a high enough RH within the chamber, the droplets grow large enough not to evaporate completely in the evaporation section; this is referred to as droplet survival and is typically defined as RHw at a certain temperature. This RH also delineates the maximum RHw for a given temperature at which PINC measurements are performed. After the evaporation section, the sample flow, containing presumably only ice crystals and unactivated aerosol particles, passes through an optical particle counter (OPC, Lighthouse 5104 Remote), which counts the total number of particles in the size range of 0.5–25 µm binning them based on their optical size. Even after the evaporation section there is still a possibility of small droplets surviving; therefore, based on the OPC measurements, a lower size limit of ∼2 µm is set, and everything above this size is counted as ice crystals. The number of ice crystals is assumed to be representative of the number concentration of the INPs at a certain RH and temperature. Instrument characterisation and previous studies with PINC have shown that the temperature uncertainty inside the laminar flow is ±0.4 K, which translates to the RHw uncertainty of ±2 % (Chou et al., 2011).
Even though theoretically possible, CCN activation is not expected to significantly affect the ice nucleation experiments presented in this study. Under supersaturated conditions (RHw>100 %) aerosol particles are not likely to grow and change their size significantly as they are exposed to a fairly constant RHw during their residence time in the chamber (7 seconds). This will also be shown later in the “Results and discussion” section when examining the ice nucleation behaviour of dust particles at RHw>100 %. Given that the mineral and soil dust particles are generally largely insoluble, droplet activation is not expected in subsaturated conditions until RHw is very close to or above 100 %. The potential presence of soluble material on the particle surface may, in principle, result in the absorption of water below water saturation; however, this is considered to be more of a hygroscopic growth rather than CCN activation.
2.3 Experimental information and calculations
For the untreated dust samples, particle sizes of 100, 200 and 400 nm were investigated, and RH scans were performed at four different temperatures: 233, 238, 243 and 248 K. As mentioned previously, measurements have been conducted in both sub- and supersaturated regimes with respect to water. After the initial batch of experiments with untreated dusts, no significant heterogeneous INA was found for particles of 100 nm at any of the temperatures and for the temperature of 248 K for any of the particle sizes. Thereafter, for the treated dust samples, measurements were only conducted with 200 and 400 nm particles at 233, 238 and 243 K. The discussion in this work omits the particle size of 100 nm and a temperature of 248 K altogether. For each dust, for each size and for each temperature, the experiment was repeated three times to ensure reproducibility. A total of 82 experiments and 274 RH scans with PINC were performed, totalling almost 400 instrumental hours.
The AF was calculated as a ratio of the number of INPs as counted by the OPC downstream of PINC to the total number of particles entering the ice nucleation system as measured by the CPC upstream of PINC. The number of active sites (ns) was calculated in order to normalise the AF by surface area and to make the measurements at different sizes comparable. The ns is a deterministic concept (Langham and Mason, 1958) based on the assumption that particles of different sizes exhibit uniform chemical composition. This parameterisation assumes that a particle surface has sites (e.g. steps, cracks or chemical functional groups) where ice nucleation takes place, i.e. where ice embryos form (Vali, 1966), and that these sites are uniformly distributed on the particle surface. The ns per particle was calculated as follows:
where ns is the number of active sites per square metre (m−2), AF is the dimensionless activated fraction and SA is the surface area in m2. The ns was calculated using a particle density of 2.6×106 g m−3 and a shape factor of 1.3 (Hinds, 1999). The method of determining ns is based on the measurements of the BET surface area, and is hereafter denoted as ns,BET. The ns can also be calculated using the surface area of a presumably spherical particle instead of its BET surface area, denoted ns,GEO. Since the surface area of a spherical particle is, by definition, smaller than any deviation from perfect sphericity, ns,GEO values are larger than ns,BET.
3.1 Untreated dust
Figure 1 presents the values of the onset of ice nucleation (defined as AF=0.001) for the three examined dusts for both sizes. The onset values are shown as a function of temperature and supersaturation with respect to ice (Si). Several initial conclusions can be drawn from this figure. First, 400 nm particles are more active than 200 nm ones since they require a lower RH for the onset of ice nucleation. Such size dependence is consistent with previous observations (Archuleta et al., 2005; Welti et al., 2009; Kanji et al., 2011). It is important to note, however, that the overall increase in INA between 200 and 400 nm particles is rather small. In absolute AF terms, the increase is on average less than 0.01, reaching 0.02 at the highest measured RHw (not shown). Second, as expected, when temperature decreases, a lower RH is required to nucleate ice and, therefore, more particles are able to act as INPs. Lastly, for almost all dusts and temperatures the onset occurs in the deposition nucleation regime, i.e. below water saturation. The only exception here is the Iceland dust at the warmest temperature of 243 K, where RHw>100 % was required to observe the onset of ice nucleation for both particle sizes. This indicates that Iceland dust is the least IN-active dust as is further discussed below. Also visible in Fig. 1 is that China dust is the most IN-active of the examined dusts as it requires the lowest RHw to observe the ice nucleation onset. Comparing the onset values to those published in a study by Kanji et al. (2011) reveals that in the 238–243 K temperature range the Iceland, China and Himalaya dusts are all more active than the “Saharan Dust” (SD) and “Canary Island Dust” (CID) with the exception of 200 nm Iceland dust particles at 238 K (Fig. 1). At 233 K all examined dusts and particle sizes are more IN-active than the “Canary Island Dust” (Kanji et al., 2011). The referenced study examined polydisperse particles with a mode size of 200–300 nm in diameter. The onset values presented also compare well to those of “Asian desert dusts” AD1 and AD2, and “Saharan desert dust” SD2 as presented in Ullrich et al. (2017; Fig. 1). At the warmest temperature “Saharan desert dust” SD19 is more IN-active than any of the dusts examined in the current study (Fig. 1). It should be kept in mind that, with the exception of dust AD2, the onset values of Ullrich et al. (2017) seen in Fig. 1 were defined for AFs higher than the 0.001 value assumed here. The mentioned study investigated particles in polydisperse mode below 5 µm in diameter and reported that the ice nucleation onset RH increased with decreasing temperature.
It is important to note that, in absolute terms, the AF values for untreated dusts examined in this study are fairly low, even at the highest attainable RH. The highest possible RHw in PINC is limited by the droplet survival at 238 and 243 K (113 % and 110 %, respectively) and by the lowest attainable wall temperature at 233 K (101 %). At 243 K the largest maximum AF observed for China particles of 400 nm in diameter barely reaches 0.01 (1 %); at 238 K this value increases to 0.1 (10 %). Even at the coldest measured temperature of 233 K, a maximum of one-third of 400 nm China dust particles acted as INPs. A likely explanation for this is the deviation of dust particles from the laminar flow inside PINC. If particles deviate from the laminar flow, they are subjected to an RHw below that intended, thus leading to an underestimation of the INP concentration – an issue raised by DeMott et al. (2015) and recently discussed in detail by Garimella et al. (2017). The problem of particles deviating from the laminar flow is further addressed throughout the paper.
As mentioned previously, and if the AF values across the whole RHw spectra are examined (not shown), it is clear that amongst the three dusts China dust is the most active for all sizes and temperatures investigated. At 238 and 243 K, China dust is followed by Himalaya dust, with Iceland dust exhibiting the lowest INA. At 233 K Iceland dust is slightly more active than Himalaya dust. Figure 2 shows ns,BET values as a function of RHw for each untreated dust, size and temperature. Each data point is an average of ns,BET values binned in 1 % RHw intervals. Figure 2 shows that, contrary to INA based on the AF values, Himalaya dust is the most active of the examined dusts for all sizes and temperatures, followed by China and Iceland dusts. The BET surface area of the Himalaya dust was found to be smaller than that of the Iceland and China dusts, resulting in higher ns,BET. There are some instances where the differences between dusts are not well pronounced (e.g. 200 nm Himalaya and China dust particles at 233 K in the deposition nucleation regime). However, to aid the interpretation of untreated dust results, the highest INA of Himalaya dust followed by China and Iceland dusts is assumed hereafter.
Besides the differences among dusts mentioned above, several other important conclusions can be drawn from Fig. 2. First, for most of the examined dusts there is a clear increase in INA from sub- to supersaturated conditions with respect to water, i.e. from deposition nucleation to condensation freezing regime, and this increase occurs at an RHw slightly below that of 100 %. This is likely due to either the formation of liquid water on the particle surface at RHw close to 100 % (Sullivan et al., 2010b) or the wall temperatures and, hence, RHw uncertainty in the particle laminar flow as discussed in the “Methodology” section. Second, not directly seen in Fig. 2, the ns,BET of the 200 nm particles is larger than that of the 400 nm particles. The difference in ns,BET values between the two examined sizes suggests that 200 nm particles are more IN-active than 400 nm ones. While it is not possible to directly determine the reasons behind this observed difference, it may be possible that large particles contain more soluble material blocking the active sites and/or that small particles may contain more IN-active material on their surface, e.g. bacteria or active minerals. Particles of approximately 200 nm in size, including mineral dust species, have previously been reported as constituting the majority of the INPs found in the ice crystal residual size distributions (Mertes et al., 2007). The section about the dust treatments discusses in detail the presence of organic and soluble material in the dust samples, although without the differentiation based on the particle size. Third, the INA of dusts in the temperature range of 238–243 K remains fairly stable at RHw>100 %, suggesting no significant effect of CCN activation on the ice nucleation results observed for the range of the supersaturation conditions studied here.
Several previously published studies have compiled an overview of ns values and parameterisations for various types of atmospherically relevant INP species (e.g. Murray et al., 2012; Boose et al., 2016a; Ullrich et al., 2017). However, a significant fraction of these studies reported ns,GEO values which are not directly comparable to ns,BET (Murray et al., 2012; Hiranuma et al., 2015). The ns,BET values in the condensation freezing mode (RHw>100 %) from this study may be used to investigate how well the INA of examined dusts compares to that of other INP species in the immersion mode. Both Broadley et al. (2012) and Hiranuma et al. (2015) examined illite NX as a proxy for atmospheric mineral dust and reported ns,BET values that are within 1 order of magnitude of the ns,BET values of all three examined dusts investigated in this study at both 238 and 243 K. The ns,BET values of the three examined dusts are also similar to those of kaolinite presented by Murray et al. (2011). In the relevant temperature regime all three investigated dusts are more IN-active than pure quartz (Zolles et al., 2015) and less IN-active than pure K-feldspar and Na/Ca-feldspar (Atkinson et al., 2013). At 238 K the INA of Iceland and China dust is also similar to that of montmorillonite (Atkinson et al., 2013). This comparison of ns,BET values reveals that the INA of surface-collected dusts at 238–243 K in the condensation freezing mode can be roughly approximated by one of the surrogates for atmospheric mineral dust, such as illite NX, for example. It is important to note here, however, that the comparison of measurements in the immersion freezing and condensation freezing modes is not straightforward. It has been reported that instruments of the CFDC type, which are typically assumed to measure in the deposition nucleation and condensation freezing modes, can experience a deviation of aerosol particles outside of the intended lamina and a subsequent underestimation of the INP concentration (DeMott et al., 2015; Garimella et al., 2017). In such cases, particles outside the lamina experience an RH below that intended or assumed and, therefore, these particles may not activate, reducing the INP concentration. Correction factors of 3 (DeMott et al., 2015) or 1.4–9.5 (Garimella et al., 2017) have been proposed to correct the INP concentration for the particle lamina deviations, possibly allowing for a more accurate comparison of condensation freezing and immersion freezing mode measurements.
3.2 The role of mineralogy
Mineralogical composition has been shown to play a crucial role in explaining the ice nucleation behaviour of atmospherically relevant mineral dust (Hoose et al., 2008; Atkinson et al., 2013; Harrison et al., 2016). Table 1 presents the mineralogy of the three investigated untreated dust samples. Since mineralogical analysis was performed in bulk and since ns,BET is used in the upcoming discussion to describe the INA of dusts, it is assumed that the bulk mineralogy is representative of the 200 and 400 nm particle surface mineralogy. This assumption is not very accurate as it is well known that mineralogical composition is size-dependent (d'Almeida and Schütz, 1983; Knippertz and Stuut, 2014). However, within the scope of this work, it was not possible to conduct the mineralogical analysis of size-selected dust samples. Table 1 shows that a large weight percentage of each dust sample is made up of amorphous, non-crystalline material, with Iceland dust containing as much as ∼65 %. While the exact identification and speciation of this amorphous matter is not possible, it can be composed of biological components (Formenti et al., 2008), various carbonaceous organic compounds (Gómez et al., 2005; Deboudt et al., 2010), alumosilicates (Archuleta et al., 2005), non-crystalline iron minerals (Takahashi et al., 2011), soluble material (Zhu et al., 1997) and others. A more detailed investigation into the possible identity of the amorphous matter and its effect on the INA occurs in the following section when discussing the results of the auxiliary measurements of the untreated dusts. In this section an attempt is made to explain the observed INA based solely on the mineralogical composition.
Immediately obvious in Table 1 is the highest amount of total feldspar and K-feldspar in the Himalaya dust. Total feldspar contributes almost one-third to the mass of the bulk Himalaya dust. Keeping in mind that both Atkinson et al. (2013) and Harrison et al. (2016), among others, reported the highest INA for feldspar and specifically for K-feldspar, its content in the Himalaya dust correlates very well with its highest INA among the examined dusts as seen in Fig. 2. China dust is the second most active dust, and this is also well supported by its second highest total feldspar content among the dusts tested (∼27 %). Iceland dust contains the least amount of feldspar (∼14 %) and exhibits the lowest INA based on ns,BET values. Microcline has been reported to be the most active of the K-feldspars (Augustin-Bauditz et al., 2014; Kaufmann et al., 2016; Kiselev et al., 2016). It is present in China and Himalaya dusts, albeit in small amounts (<5 %). It is, therefore, not possible to draw any conclusions about the effect of microcline on the observed INA of the examined dusts. Plagioclase feldspar is also present in all three examined dusts in significant amounts, although less than K-feldspar. Plagioclase feldspar minerals are also known to be efficient INPs (Atkinson et al., 2013); however, their INA is reported to be lower than that of the K-feldspars (Zolles et al., 2015). Due to the particles in the examined dusts being complex mixtures of several types of minerals, it is not possible to disentangle the effects of potassium and plagioclase feldspar minerals on the observed INA. Boose et al. (2016a) reported that in the temperature range of 238–245 K, which is similar to the temperature range investigated here, the total content of feldspar and quartz in polydisperse aerosol is more important in determining the INA of mineral dust than the feldspar content alone. In the study presented here the highest total content of quartz and feldspar is present in the China dust (>53 %), the second most IN-active; however, this total content for the Himalaya dust is not much less at over 48 %. Schütz and Sebert (1987) have reported that quartz is found mostly in the coarse mode aerosol (>1 µm), meaning that the large amounts of bulk quartz visible in Table 1 are likely non-representative of the mineralogy of 200 and 400 nm dust particles, rendering the effect of quartz on the observed INA insignificant. For the temperature range of 233–243 K both the total feldspar and the K-feldspar content are observed to be the most important for the INA of sub-micrometre surface-collected mineral dust examined in this study. Iceland dust is the only examined dust containing the minerals of the pyroxene group (augite and enstatite). It is, however, not possible to determine whether the minerals in this group are responsible for the lowest INA among the examined dusts as augite has been reported as a fairly good ice nucleating mineral (Isono and Ikebe, 1960) and enstatite as an inefficient one (Schill et al., 2015).
3.3 Dust treatments
Figures 3 and 4 present the results of the dust treatments shown as ns,BET as a function of RHw for particle sizes of 400 and 200 nm, respectively. The temperature of 243 K is omitted due to the higher INP concentrations measured at 238 K compared to 243 K. This allowed for a more robust statistical examination of the results, and, hereafter, the discussion focuses only on temperatures of 233 and 238 K.
As seen in Figs. 3 and 4, the INA of Iceland dust did not change as a result of heating to 573 K for 2 h; this is true for both particle sizes and both temperatures shown. Figure 5 presents the results of the TGA analysis, and Table 2 shows total carbon measurements of untreated and heated dust samples. These measurements revealed that, even though Iceland dust lost the second highest amount of mass as a result of heating to 573 K for 1 h (almost 4 %, Fig. 5), none of this lost mass was of the organic nature (Table 2). In fact, Iceland dust contained the lowest amount of total carbon among the three dusts. This suggests that during the heating process Iceland dust lost mostly adsorbed water, and, accordingly, the INA of Iceland dust remained unchanged after heating. Corroborating the results of Conen et al. (2011), this may also suggest that the heating process did not significantly affect the IN-relevant mineralogical composition of the dusts. The effect of heating and the loss of biological proteinaceous matter and the chemical species volatile at temperatures up to 573 K on the INA of dusts is more pronounced for China and Himalaya dusts at 238 K (Figs. 3 and 4, upper middle and upper right panels). For both particle sizes, the INA clearly decreased following the heat treatment, with Himalaya dust exhibiting the largest absolute decrease in the INA compared to that of China dust. Combining the TGA and the total carbon measurements demonstrated that Himalaya and China dusts lost ∼0.5 % and ∼1.5 % of their mass, respectively, due to the volatilisation of proteinaceous and carbon-containing species as a result of heating. The rest of the mass lost, as seen in Fig. 5, can probably be attributed to the loss of adsorbed water. Considering what is known about the dusts and taking into account the fraction of heat-sensitive, organic species that was lost during heating, it is only possible to say that the proteinaceous and carbon-containing species present in Himalaya dust, while smaller in amount, substantially modified the INA. Similarly, while comprising roughly 1.5 % of the total bulk mass, the proteinaceous and carbon-containing material of China dust was comparatively less IN-active than that of Himalaya dust. This indicates that different proteinaceous and organic species have different ice nucleation activities, and the exact speciation is required in order to determine why dusts responded differently to the heating process. The results of the heat treatment also demonstrate that it is not possible to predict the INA of surface-collected dusts at the investigated temperature and RH conditions based on the presence and amount of heat-sensitive, organic material.
The loss of active sites on the surface of the INP as a result of heating has been previously reported (Sullivan et al., 2010a; Hill et al., 2016); however, the latter study examined the INA at temperatures above 253 K, higher than those discussed here. Sullivan et al. (2010a) examined the INA of 300 nm Arizona Test Dust (ATD) particles at 243 K and demonstrated a decrease in the INA after heating of the dust to 523 K. In the current study the decrease in the INA of dusts after heating was observed for measurements at 243 K as well (not shown); although the decrease was dust dependent, similar to the measurements at 238 K as discussed above. When the temperature of 233 K is examined (Figs. 3 and 4, lower panels), the effect of heating on the INA of China and Himalaya dusts disappears, in line with results previously reported by O'Sullivan et al. (2014) and Tobo et al. (2014). O'Sullivan et al. (2014) reported that heating did not affect the INA of soil dust at temperatures below 249 K, and Tobo et al. (2014) noted that at 237 K the difference in the INA of soil dust after heating was minimal. In the present study, the effect of heating disappears only as the temperature of homogeneous freezing is approached. This likely hints at a change in mechanism from heterogeneous freezing at 238 K supported by the presence of heat-sensitive, proteinaceous compounds to homogeneous freezing in pores at 233 K as expected with a pore condensation and freezing mechanism (Marcolli, 2014). At 238 K heating decreased the number of active sites on the particle surface by as much as 1 order of magnitude (200 nm Himalaya dust in the condensation freezing mode; Fig. 4, upper right panel). It is important to note here that the INA of China and Himalaya dusts at 238 K did not decrease uniformly across the examined RHw range. Figure 3 shows that in the deposition nucleation mode the decrease in INA after heating is minimal and becomes more pronounced in the condensation freezing mode. Similar behaviour is found for smaller particles (Fig. 4); however, at this size the difference is also observed in the deposition nucleation mode. This is contradictory to the results presented by Sullivan et al. (2010a) reporting that heating decreased the INA of ATD particles at 243 K only in the deposition nucleation mode and not in the condensation freezing mode. In the study presented here it is possible to conclude that IN-active proteinaceous and carbon-containing species have the largest effect on the INA of dust at smaller particle sizes, warmer temperatures and higher relative humidities. However, the magnitude of this effect largely depends on the identity of these proteinaceous and carbon-containing species. At 233 K (Figs. 3 and 4, lower panels) heating has no significant impact on the INA of surface-collected dusts. The only exception here are the 400 nm China dust particles (Fig. 3, lower middle panel), where heating slightly increased the INA. However, this again suggests a different freezing mechanism such as pore condensation and freezing (Marcolli, 2014).
Finally, it is important to examine how the INA of different dusts compares after the heat treatment. Figure 6 presents the ns,BET values as a function of RHw for heated dusts only, for both particle sizes at 238 K. When compared to untreated dust results (Fig. 2, middle panels), it can be said that the heated dusts compare similarly to the untreated dusts, with Himalaya dust still being the most active even after heating. The noted difference from the untreated dusts visible in Fig. 6 is the fact that the INA of China and Iceland dusts in the condensation mode converges after heating. If it is assumed that the INA of soil dusts can be explained by the mineralogy alone, as was done in the previous section, and if it is assumed that heating of dusts to 573 K does not change the mineralogy (Conen et al., 2011), then the heating should have no effect on how dusts compare to each other with respect to their INA. Since this is not the case, the INA of untreated China dust is second highest among dusts not only because of the second highest content of total feldspar and K-feldspar, but also due to the presence of IN-active proteinaceous and organic species. The main conclusion here is that, if it is assumed that the heating of dusts to 573 K does not change the mineralogy, then mineralogy alone cannot fully explain the observed ice nucleation behaviour of the surface-collected dusts in the condensation freezing mode at 238 K, and proteinaceous and organic material on the particle surface also has a non-negligible effect on the INA of soil dust. This is in agreement with Conen et al. (2011) and Tobo et al. (2014) who reported that for temperatures around 265 K and warmer than 237 K, respectively, the INA of soil dust is governed mostly by the content of biological and organic matter rather than the mineral phases.
Figures 3 and 4 also present the result of the ice nucleation experiments with the washed dusts. Table 3 contains results of the auxiliary measurements of the pH and conductivity of the supernatant water after the three washing procedures (see “Methodology” section for details). As seen in Figs. 3 and 4, washing some of the soil dusts results in an increase in its INA. After the washing procedure Himalaya dust exhibited a clear increase in its INA for all examined temperatures and sizes, with the increase present in both the deposition nucleation and condensation freezing regimes. At 238 K the INA of Iceland dust also increased, albeit only in the condensation freezing regime (RHw>100 %). Such behaviour has been previously hinted at by Welti (2012), who reported that for 400 nm ATD particles washing might have resulted in a slight increase in their INA; however, the increase was deemed insignificant. The same study reported that the washing of 800 nm ATD particles resulted in a decrease in the INA. If the washing procedure is assumed to only remove the soluble material from the particle surface, there are two possible reasons for an increase in INA after washing. This could either be attributed to the low INA of removed soluble species or the exposition of active sites on the particle surface that are otherwise blocked by the soluble material. Conductivity and pH measurements show that, naturally, most of the soluble material was removed during the first washing cycle – this is signified by the highest supernatant conductivity as well as the lowest pH levels. Similarly to the TGA, it was not possible to directly determine the chemical species removed during the washing process; however, the conductivity and pH may provide insight. Since the first washing resulted in the pH being more acidic than the third washing, the possible identity of removed species may be that of organic acids. Species such as formic acid and acetic acid, among others, have been found in atmospheric particulate matter and in soils in many locations around the world (Sanhueza and Andreae, 1991; Khwaja, 1995; Kawamura et al., 1996; Yuan et al., 2015), and formic acid, for instance, has been reported to decrease the INA of ice nucleating macromolecules (Pummer et al., 2015). If the low weight carboxylic acids are assumed to have a low INA, their removal could, in principle, increase the INA of soil dust as seen in the results presented here. Besides soluble organics, salts may also be present on the particle surface of the soil dust, increasing the conductivity of the Milli-Q water after washing (Table 3). Salts such as sodium chloride, NaCl, are also considered to constitute a fairly inefficient INP at temperatures investigated here (Kanji et al., 2017, and references therein). A size dependence of the washing effect can also be observed in Figs. 3 and 4. Washing resulted in a greater increase in the INA of larger, 400 nm Iceland and Himalaya dust particles. For 400 nm Iceland dust particles in the condensation freezing mode and for Himalaya dust particles across the whole RHw regime, washing increased the average ns,BET values by as much as 1 order of magnitude. Alpert et al. (2011) have reported that soluble compounds may, in fact, block the active sites on the particle surface; however, this was only postulated for the deposition nucleation, and did not include the notion of particle size. The current study is one of the first to report that for certain surface-collected soil dusts, washing resulted in an increase in the INA of the dusts by removing the soluble compounds of low INA and/or the exposition of the underlying active sites. The increase in the INA of the washed dusts observed in the deposition regime suggests that the hygroscopic uptake of water on the larger particles due to the soluble material can reduce INA compared to the washed dusts.
Similar to the results of the heat treatment, Figs. 3 and 4 and Table 3 reveal that the change in the INA following the washing procedure is unrelated to the amount of soluble material that was washed off the surface of the dust particles. The conductivity of supernatant water and, hence, the deduced amount of soluble material was highest for Iceland dust (Table 3), and its INA increased only in the condensation freezing mode at 238 K. Based on conductivity measurements, Himalaya dust contained the lowest amount of soluble material, and, yet, its INA increased significantly across the whole RH range at both 238 and 233 K. Additionally, China dust, which is the dust containing the second highest amount of soluble material (Table 3), did not respond to the washing procedure and its INA remained unchanged at all temperatures and particle sizes (Figs. 3 and 4). This again indicates that different soluble compounds have different ice nucleation activities, and that it is not possible to predict the INA of surface-collected dusts at the investigated temperature and RH conditions based on the presence and the amount of soluble compounds.
Figure 7 presents ns,BET as a function of RHw for washed dusts only, for both particle sizes at 238 K. Similar to Fig. 2 (middle panels), Fig. 7 shows that the INA of Himalaya dust after washing remains the highest among the three dusts. In the previous section about the heated dusts it was reported that the INA of China and Iceland dusts in the condensation mode converged after heating, and the same can be said about the washed dusts. China dust, as noted above, did not respond to the washing procedure and maintained its original untreated INA (Figs. 3 and 4, middle panels). The INA of Iceland dust increased in the condensation mode only, to ns,BET values similar to that of China dust. This argument again demonstrates that mineralogy alone is not able to explain the observed INA of the untreated dusts because washing, presumably, does not affect the mineralogy, and, yet, the INA of Iceland dust in the condensation mode increased significantly enough to be comparable to that of a dust more active in the untreated state. Therefore, the INA of the untreated Iceland dust may be the lowest not only due to the lowest amounts of total feldspar and K-feldspar minerals, but also due to a significant presence of relatively IN-inactive soluble material blocking the active sites on the particle mineral surface. The amount and the exact chemical species of the soluble material on the surface of the soil dust particle, as well as the morphology and mineralogy of the underlying surface, most likely exert a non-trivial influence on the INA of the soil dust, and the investigation of these characteristics would likely enhance the understanding of how soluble compounds on the surface of an INP affect its INA. This can be especially true in the realm of cloud processing, during which the soluble material may be redistributed or removed completely from a particle surface as a result of previous CCN or INP activation.
3.3.3 H2O2 treatment
Of the three treatments applied to the surface-collected soil dusts in this study, the treatment with H2O2 provided fairly inconclusive results. As seen in Figs. 3 and 4, for Iceland and China dusts the treatment with H2O2 did not affect their INA at any temperatures or sizes investigated, while the INA of Himalaya dust increased after the H2O2 treatment. Considering similar H2O2 treated soil dust measurements and previously published results (Conen et al., 2011; O'Sullivan et al., 2014; Tobo et al., 2014; Hill et al., 2016), the initial hypothesis was that the H2O2 treatment would reduce the INA of dusts. As it turned out, the initial hypothesis had to be rejected as the H2O2 treatment either resulted in an increase in the INA or did not affect it at all. Before an attempt is made to decipher the reasons behind the observed unexpected behaviour, it may be worthwhile to examine in detail the procedure of the H2O2 treatment. As mentioned in the “Methodology” section, the addition of H2O2 to the dust resulted in bubbling and in a significant heat release, heating up the mixture. Once the bubbling subsided, the slurry was still heated to 323–333 K. Thus, it is not possible to completely separate the effects of heating and H2O2 on the dusts' surface properties. Certainly, both heating and H2O2 are aimed at removing a fraction or all of the organic matter from the particle surface. However, if one is to assume that heating or H2O2 may also somehow influence the inorganic fraction, then the effects of both heating and H2O2 treatments become more complex and difficult to disentangle with respect to their effects on the INA of soil dust. Once the bubbling of the slurries completely stopped, the mixtures were stored overnight. Since H2O2 is thermodynamically unstable and decomposes to form O2 and H2O, the dusts were also exposed to water for a significant amount of time. Furthermore, the slurries were then diluted with deionised water by a factor of 100 before separation. All this suggests that besides the effect of H2O2 on the chemistry of the soil dust particles, an effect of water akin to that of the washing procedure is also to be expected. In general this indicates that the effect of H2O2 treatment also includes, to an extent, the effects of heating and washing of the soil dust, and that, given the treatment procedure, it is not possible to exclusively separate the effect of H2O2 from that of washing and heating. A change in the INA after the H2O2 treatment (e.g. Himalaya dust) may be somehow explained by the difference in the INA of the removed and exposed particle surface species as was previously seen after the washing of the Iceland dust, i.e. the removal of certain species from the particle surface frees up the active sites. At the same time, the fact that H2O2 treatment did not have any visible effect on the INA of Iceland and China dusts is puzzling. Assuming no measurement, instrumental, numerical or interpretation errors, the overall INA of the species that were removed by H2O2, medium heat and some washing has to be similar to that of whatever surface properties were exposed after the removal of said species. Additionally, Mikutta et al. (2005) provided a comprehensive overview of the effect of H2O2 on mineralogy itself and reported that, contrary to the initial assumption that H2O2 only affects the organic fraction, mineral phases can be altered by H2O2 as well. The study showed that H2O2 can result in the disintegration of the expandable clay minerals, transformation of vermiculite into mica-like structures and dissolution of poorly crystalline minerals. Since all three dusts contain minerals of the clay group and Iceland dust contains some vermiculite, changes to mineralogy induced by the H2O2 treatment cannot be ruled out. These potential changes cannot be confirmed or quantified, and their effect on the INA of dusts remains unknown, adding yet another level of uncertainty related to the ice nucleation results of the H2O2 treated dusts.
Other uncertainties related to the changes in the particle surface induced by treatments are addressed in the following section. How the combination of the assumed effects of the H2O2 treatment and the resulting INA of dusts are related to the question of what is important for ice nucleation on the particle surface and what is not is discussed in the “Conclusion” section.
3.4 Surface area uncertainties and limitations
In the preceding sections the discussion about the soil dusts and their INA revolved mainly around the ns,BET values, which were calculated using the BET surface area (Table 4). The table shows that the surface area of the dust particles is rather small, 1–2 orders of magnitude lower than, for example, for porous illite NX particles (Broadley et al., 2012; Hiranuma et al., 2015), although similar to the laboratory-generated hematite particles (Hiranuma et al., 2014). When considering the surface area of untreated and treated dusts, the initial hypothesis was that untreated particles would have smaller surface area, as the cracks, steps and cavities that are commonly present in dust particles (Pruppacher and Klett, 1997) would be blocked and/or covered by organic and soluble compounds. This would possibly explain the low surface area of untreated dust particles. However, as seen in Table 4, the hypothesis did not stand, and in most cases the surface area of treated particles was either lower after the treatment or remained similar. This means that after the organic and soluble compounds were removed and the cavities, cracks and steps were presumably exposed, the surface area actually decreased, which is somewhat counter-intuitive. Such a decrease could be expected if, for instance, the untreated dust particle would be of very irregular shape, more irregular than the underlying mineral morphology. Figure 8 shows three scanning electron microscopy images representative of each of the three untreated dusts. The images show fairly normal surface morphologies expected from mineral dust particles, with cracks and cavities easily visible. Of the three treatments, the only treatment with consistent results is the washing procedure (Table 4), as the surface area of all three dusts decreased after washing. After heating the surface area also decreased with the exception of Himalaya dust, for which the surface area slightly increased. The notion that has not been addressed thus far and that is, at this point, impossible to accurately assess is the potential mechanical damage to the dust particles during the treatments. As mentioned previously, it is expected that none of the treatments are supposed to alter the mineralogy of the particles; however, it seems as though the possibility of changes to the mineral morphology cannot be excluded. For example, the washing procedure was the most rigorous one (see “Methodology”, Sect. 2.1). It is possible that such harsh treatment led to the collapse of the cracks, cavities and other irregularities. Some irregular fragments present on the particle surface could have also completely broken off the parent particle. Such changes to the particle morphology could potentially explain a decrease in particle surface area after the washing; however, this same argument cannot be applied to the results of the heated dusts, as 573 K heat is supposed to be rather mild and should not affect the mineral morphology (Conen et al., 2011).
Another limitation is that the BET surface area determination is conducted in bulk, similar to many other auxiliary measurements presented here, making it difficult to say how representative the bulk BET surface area is of the 200 and 400 nm particles. Inhomogeneities in the sample are possible, and the examination of all available SEM images reveals a wide variety of particle morphologies across sub-micrometre sizes. Moreover, as explained in the “Methodology” section, the BET measurement itself was preceded by the evacuation of the sample at 353 K heat for 15 h. Returning to Fig. 5, one can see that a non-negligible amount of particle bulk mass was lost already at 353 K. Of the total amount of mass lost after heating the particles for 1 h at 573 K, a third was lost already at 353 K. As discussed previously, this loss can quite likely be attributed to the loss of adsorbed water. However, even if it is assumed that bulk BET surface area is applicable to the 200 and 400 nm particles, the untreated BET values reported in Table 4 are not, strictly speaking, representative of the truly untreated particles as changes to the particle surface morphology cannot be ruled out. This also applies, possibly to a lesser degree, to the BET measurements of the treated dusts.
Since ns is sensitive to the surface area, the uncertainties in the BET surface area and its measurement discussed above question the appropriateness of the ns,BET parameterisation. Therefore, the ns,BET values that form the basis of the discussion of the INA of dusts in this paper are as uncertain as the BET surface area itself. It is important to keep this notion of uncertainty in mind when discussing the INA of atmospheric mineral dust in terms of ns,BET. One of the reasons for the widespread use of the ns parameterisation in the ice nucleation community is that it removes the effect of particle size when examining the INA of any given species. The initial basic assumption of using ns is chemical uniformity across particle sizes. This assumption is likely not met in this study as for any given untreated dust, the 200 nm particles have higher ns,BET values than the 400 nm particles, indicating a varying chemical composition across sizes. The varying mineralogical composition across sizes is, in fact, a well-known phenomenon (e.g. Atkinson et al., 2013; Boose et al., 2016a), calling into question the applicability of the ns parameterisation when examining the INA of species with non-uniform composition as a function of size. The AF, though dependent on the size, is another parameter that is frequently used to describe the INA of any given species. In Sect. 3.1 it was shown that if the INA of untreated dusts is compared based on AF values, the conclusion is different than if the comparison is based on the ns,BET values, with China dust exhibiting highest AF values across the whole examined RHw spectrum (Fig. 1). The main reason for this difference is the fact that the BET surface area of Himalaya dust is 1 order of magnitude smaller than that of the other dusts (Table 4), having an immediate and significant impact on how the INA of a selected dust is perceived. Had the discussion of the INA of dusts been based on the AF values instead of ns,BET values, some of the arguments and conclusions, especially, for example, the effect of mineralogy on the INA of soil dust, would have to be reconsidered.
Some of the questions that remain open in this discussion are related to whether the ns parameterisation is an appropriate quantity for examining the INA since it depends so much on the, presumably uncertain, surface area of a particle. Additionally, the points to be addressed in the future include how the INA expressed as ns compares to that based on AF and why there are differences, and which of these two frequently used parameters is truly representative of the INA of a species in the atmosphere.
The INA of untreated dust particles correlated well with the total feldspar and K-feldspar content, corroborating previously published results. It was shown that at temperatures of 238–243 K, the ice nucleation activity of the untreated, surface-collected soil dust in the condensation freezing mode can be roughly approximated by one of the existing surrogates for the atmospheric mineral dust, such as illite NX, for example. The results of the heating and washing treatments revealed that mineralogy alone is not able to fully explain the observed INA of surface-collected dusts at the examined temperature and relative humidity conditions. It was shown that all untreated dusts contained a certain amount of soluble material and some also contained heat-sensitive, organic material; however, the dusts responded differently and inconsistently to each treatment. The magnitude of change in the INA of treated dusts was not proportional to the amount of the removed heat-sensitive, organic or soluble compounds. In order to explain the observed ice nucleation behaviour it was necessary to attribute the loss or gain of dust INA to the INA of particular species, the exact identities of which are unknown. Within the current context, the variability in the INA of individual soluble and/or heat-sensitive, organic species is only an assumption, and, considering that the soil dust particles are complex mixtures of various compounds, their examination is beyond the scope of this work. Part of the interpretation is also complicated by the bulk nature of treatments and auxiliary measurements and the single-particle nature of the ice nucleation experiments. Within the framework of this study it is, therefore, not possible to predict the INA of surface-collected soil dust based on the presence and amount of certain minerals or any particular class of compounds, such as soluble/proteinaceous or organic compounds. Due to the complex nature of atmospheric mineral dust, it is postulated that a fraction of mineral dust will always nucleate ice, regardless of its exact origin and composition. The validity of this hypothesis has been probed in several previously published studies by conducting ambient measurements of ice crystal residuals and interstitial aerosol particles in various cloud types. Knopf et al. (2014) reported that particles in the atmosphere nucleating ice seem to not be of any particular special composition or predisposition to ice nucleation. Additionally, studies on several INP types in the immersion mode have shown that ice nucleation in this mode can be accurately predicted by temperature and solution water activity alone, with little to no dependence on the exact nature of an INP (Knopf and Alpert, 2013). Alternatively, Schmidt et al. (2017) demonstrated that the chemistry of INPs and interstitial aerosol particles is, indeed, different under the mixed-phase cloud regime at a high Alpine station Jungfraujoch. The question of whether and to which extent the chemical composition of atmospheric aerosol particles, namely mineral dust, affects the likelihood of an aerosol particle to act as an INP remains open. More ambient studies examining the chemical composition of ice crystal residuals and interstitial aerosol under various cloud regimes are required to properly assess the significance of the chemical composition of mineral and soil dust in atmospheric ice crystal formation.
The data discussed and presented in this publication are available at https://doi.org/10.3929/ethz-b-000303568 (Paramonov et al., 2018).
MP conducted the experiments, processed and analysed the data, and wrote most of the manuscript. MP, ROD and ZAK designed the experiments. ROD helped with experiments and data processing. RK conducted mineralogical analysis. MP, ROD, RK and ZAK interpreted data and aided the writing of the manuscript. ZAK wrote parts of the manuscript and oversaw the project.
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Mikhail Paramonov has received funding from the European Union's Horizon 2020
research and innovation programme under the Marie Sklodowska Curie grant
agreement no. 751470 “ATM-METFIN”. Robert O. David acknowledges funding
from SNF grant number 200021_156581. Pavla Dagsson Waldhauserova,
Luisa Ickes and Federico Bianchi are gratefully acknowledged for the
collection and provision of the surface-collected dusts examined in this
study. The authors would like to thank Eszter Barthazy and ScopeM for
conducting the SEM and EDX analyses, Joanna C. H. Wong from the Laboratory of
Composite Materials and Adaptive Structures for her training and help with
the TGA, Michael Plötze from the Institute for Geotechnical Engineering
for training and help with the BET surface area measurements, and
Kurt Barmettler from the Institute of Biogeochemistry and Pollutant Dynamics
for assistance with the X-ray diffraction and total carbon measurements.
Martin H. Schroth, Kristopher McNeill and Nadine Borduas-Dedekind from the
Institute of Biogeochemistry and Pollutant Dynamics are all acknowledged for
their help with additional measurements and equipment. Mikhail Paramonov and
Zamin A. Kanji would also like to sincerely thank Ulrike Lohmann and
James Atkinson for plenty of helpful discussions and Fabian Mahrt for help in
Edited by: Athanasios Nenes
Reviewed by: two anonymous referees
Aalto, P.: Atmospheric ultrafine particle measurements, PhD thesis, University of Helsinki, Finland, 40 pp., 2004.
Alpert, P., Aller, J., and Knopf, D.: Initiation of the ice phase by marine biogenic surfaces in supersaturated gas and supercooled aqueous phases, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 13, 19882–19894, https://doi.org/10.1039/c1cp21844a, 2011.
Andreae, M. O.: Correlation between cloud condensation nuclei concentration and aerosol optical thickness in remote and polluted regions, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9, 543–556, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-543-2009, 2009.
Archuleta, C. M., DeMott, P. J., and Kreidenweis, S. M.: Ice nucleation by surrogates for atmospheric mineral dust and mineral dust/sulfate particles at cirrus temperatures, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 5, 2617–2634, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-5-2617-2005, 2005.
Atkinson, J. D., Murray, B. J., Woodhouse, M. T., Whale, T. F., Baustian, K. J., Carslaw, K. S., Dobbie, S., O'Sullivan, D., and Malkin, T. L.: The importance of feldspar for ice nucleation by mineral dust in mixed-phase clouds, Nature, 498, 355–358, 2013.
Augustin-Bauditz, S., Wex, H., Kanter, S., Ebert, M., Niedermeier, D., Stolz, F., Prager, A., and Stratmann, F.: The immersion mode ice nucleation behavior of mineral dusts: A comparison of different pure and surface modified dusts, Geophys. Res. Lett., 41, 1–8, https://doi.org/10.1002/2014GL061317, 2014.
Baustian, K. J., Cziczo, D. J., Wise, M. E., Pratt, K. A., Kulkarni, G., Gannet Hallar, A., and Tolbert, M. A.: Importance of aerosol composition, mixing state, and morphology for heterogeneous ice nucleation: A combined field and laboratory approach, J. Geophys. Res., 117, D06217, https://doi.org/10.1029/2011JD016784, 2012.
Boose, Y., Welti, A., Atkinson, J., Ramelli, F., Danielczok, A., Bingemer, H. G., Plötze, M., Sierau, B., Kanji, Z. A., and Lohmann, U.: Heterogeneous ice nucleation on dust particles sourced from nine deserts worldwide – Part 1: Immersion freezing, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 15075–15095, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-15075-2016, 2016a.
Boose, Y., Sierau, B., García, M. I., Rodríguez, S., Alastuey, A., Linke, C., Schnaiter, M., Kupiszewski, P., Kanji, Z. A., and Lohmann, U.: Ice nucleating particles in the Saharan Air Layer, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 9067–9087, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-9067-2016, 2016b.
Boucher, O., Randall, D., Artaxo, P., Bretherton, C., Feingold, G., Forster, P., Kerminen, V.-M., Kondo, Y., Liao, H., Lohmann, U., Rasch, P., Satheesh, S. K., Sherwood, S., Stevens, B., and Zhang, X. Y.: Clouds and aerosols, in: Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis, Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, edited by: Stocker, T. F., Qin, D., Plattner, G.-K., Tignor, M., Allen, S. K., Boschung, J., Nauels, A., Xia, Y., Bex, V., and Midgley, P. M., Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK and New York, NY, USA, 571–657, 2013.
Broadley, S. L., Murray, B. J., Herbert, R. J., Atkinson, J. D., Dobbie, S., Malkin, T. L., Condliffe, E., and Neve, L.: Immersion mode heterogeneous ice nucleation by an illite rich powder representative of atmospheric mineral dust, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 287–307, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-287-2012, 2012.
Brunauer, S., Emmet, P. S., and Teller, E.: Adsorption of gases in multimolecular layers, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 60, 309–319, 1938.
Burkert-Kohn, M., Wex, H., Welti, A., Hartmann, S., Grawe, S., Hellner, L., Herenz, P., Atkinson, J. D., Stratmann, F., and Kanji, Z. A.: Leipzig Ice Nucleation chamber Comparison (LINC): intercomparison of four online ice nucleation counters, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 11683–11705, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-11683-2017, 2017.
Burrows, S. M., Hoose, C., Pöschl, U., and Lawrence, M. G.: Ice nuclei in marine air: biogenic particles or dust?, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 245–267, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-245-2013, 2013.
Cantrell, W. and Heymsfield, A.: Production of ice in tropospheric clouds: A review, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 86, 795–807, 2005.
Chou, C., Stetzer, O., Weingartner, E., Jurányi, Z., Kanji, Z. A., and Lohmann, U.: Ice nuclei properties within a Saharan dust event at the Jungfraujoch in the Swiss Alps, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 4725–4738, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-4725-2011, 2011.
Chou, C., Kanji, Z. A., Stetzer, O., Tritscher, T., Chirico, R., Heringa, M. F., Weingartner, E., Prévôt, A. S. H., Baltensperger, U., and Lohmann, U.: Effect of photochemical ageing on the ice nucleation properties of diesel and wood burning particles, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 761–772, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-761-2013, 2013.
Conen, F., Morris, C. E., Leifeld, J., Yakutin, M. V., and Alewell, C.: Biological residues define the ice nucleation properties of soil dust, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 9643–9648, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-9643-2011, 2011.
Cziczo, D. J., Froyd, K. D., Hoose, C., Jensen, E. J., Diao, M., Zondlo, M. A., Smith, J. B., Twohy, C. H., and Murphy, D. M.: Clarifying the dominant sources and mechanisms of cirrus cloud formation, Science, 340, 1320–1324, 2013.
d'Almeida, G. A. and Schütz, L.: Number, mass and volume distributions of mineral aerosol and soils of the Sahara, J. Clim. Appl. Meteorol., 22, 233–243, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0450(1983)022<0233:NMAVDO>2.0.CO;2, 1983.
Dall'Osto, M., Harrison, R. M., Highwood, E. J., O'Dowd, C., Ceburnis, D., Querol, X., and Achterberg, E. P.: Variation of the mixing state of Saharan dust particles with atmospheric transport, Atmos. Environ., 44, 3135–3146, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2010.05.030, 2010.
de Boer, G., Morrison, H., Shupe, M. D., and Hildner, R.: Evidence of liquid dependent ice nucleation in high-latitude stratiform clouds from surface remote sensors, Geophys. Res. Lett., 38, L01803, https://doi.org/10.1029/2010GL046016, 2011.
Deboudt, K., Flament, P., Choël, M., Gloter, A., Sobanska, S., and Colliex, C.: Mixing state of aerosols and direct observation of carbonaceous and marine coatings on African dust by individual particle analysis, J. Geophys. Res., 115, D24207, https://doi.org/10.1029/2010JD013921, 2010.
Delort, A.-M., Vaïtilingom, M., Amato, P., Sancelme, M., Parazols, M., Mailhot, G., Laj, P., and Deguillaume, L.: A short overview of the microbial population in clouds: Potential roles in atmospheric chemistry and nucleation processes, Atmos. Res., 98, 249–260, 2010.
DeMott, P. J.: An exploratory study of ice nucleation by soot aerosols, J. Appl. Meteor., 29, 1072–1079, 1990.
DeMott, P. J., Cziczo, D. J., Prenni, A. J., Murphy, D. M., Kreidenweis, S. M., Thomson, D. S., Borys, R., and Rogers, D. C.: Measurements of the concentration and composition of nuclei for cirrus formation, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 100, 14655–14660, 2003.
DeMott, P. J., Möhler, O., Stetzer, O., Vali, G., Levin, Z., Petters, M. D., Murakami, M., Leisner, T., Bundke, U., Klein, H., Kanji, Z. A., Cotton, R., Jones, H., Benz, S., Brinkmann, M., Rzesanke, D., Saathoff, H., Nicolet, M., Saito, A., Nillius, B., Bingemer, H., Abbatt, J., Ardon, K., Ganor, E., Georgakopoulos, D. G., and Saunders, C.: Resurgence in ice nuclei measurement research, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 92, 1623–1635, 2011.
DeMott, P. J., Prenni, A. J., McMeeking, G. R., Sullivan, R. C., Petters, M. D., Tobo, Y., Niemand, M., Möhler, O., Snider, J. R., Wang, Z., and Kreidenweis, S. M.: Integrating laboratory and field data to quantify the immersion freezing ice nucleation activity of mineral dust particles, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 393–409, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-393-2015, 2015.
DeMott, P. J., Hill, T. C. J., McCluskey, C. S., Prather, K. A., Collins, D. B., Sullivan, R. C., Ruppel, M. J., Mason, R. H., Irish, V. E., Lee, T., Hwang, C. Y., Rhee, T. S., Snider, J. R., McMeeking, G. R., Dhaniyala, S., Lewis, E. R., Wentzell, J. J. B., Abbatt, J., Lee, C., Sultana, C. M., Ault, A. P., Axson, J. L., Martinez, M. D., Venero, I., Santos-Figueroa, G., Dale Stokes, M., Deane, G. B., Mayol-Bracero, O. L., Grassian, V. H., Bertram, T. H., Bertram, A. K., Moffett, B. F., and Franc, G. D.: Sea spray aerosol as a unique source of ice nucleating particles, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 113, 5797–5803, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1514034112, 2016.
Després, V. R., Huffman, J. A., Burrows, S. M., Hoose, C., Safatov, A. S., Buryak, G., Fröhlich-Nowoisky, J., Elbert, W., Andreae, M. O., Pöschl, U., and Jaenicke, R.: Primary biological aerosol particles in the atmosphere: a review, Tellus B, 64, 15598, https://doi.org/10.3402/tellusb.v64i0.15598, 2012.
Dymarska, M., Murray, B. J., Sun, L., Eastwood, M. L., Knopf, D. A., and Bertram, A. K.: Deposition ice nucleation on soot at temperatures relevant for the lower troposphere, J. Geophys. Res., 111, D04204, https://doi.org/10.1029/2005JD006627, 2006.
Engelstaedter, S., Tegen, I., and Washington, R.: North African dust emissions and transport, Earth-Sci. Rev., 79, 73–100, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2006.06.004, 2006.
Field, P. R., Möhler, O., Connolly, P., Krämer, M., Cotton, R., Heymsfield, A. J., Saathoff, H., and Schnaiter, M.: Some ice nucleation characteristics of Asian and Saharan desert dust, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 6, 2991–3006, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-6-2991-2006, 2006.
Field, P. R., Lawson, R. P., Brown, P. R. A., Lloyd, G., Westbrook, C., Moisseev, D., Miltenberger, A., Nenes, A., Blyth, A., Choularton, T., Connolly, P., Buehl, J., Crosier, J., Cui, Z., Dearden, C., DeMott, P., Flossmann, A., Heymsfield, A., Huang, Y., Kalesse, H., Kanji, Z. A., Korolev, A., Kirchgaessner, A., Lasher-Trapp, S., Leisner, T., McFarquhar, G., Phillips, V., Stith, J., and Sullivan, S.: Secondary ice production: Current state of the science and recommendations for the future, Meteor. Mon., 58, 7.1–7.20, https://doi.org/10.1175/AMSMONOGRAPHS-D-16-0014.1, 2017.
Formenti, P., Rajot, J. L., Desboeufs, K., Caquineau, S., Chevaillier, S., Nava, S., Gaudichet, A., Journet, E., Triquet, S., Alfaro, S., Chiari, M., Haywood, J., Coe, H., and Highwood, E.: Regional variability of the composition of mineral dust from western Africa: Results from the AMMA SOP0/DABEX and DODO field campaigns, J. Geophys. Res., 113, D00C13, https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JD009903, 2008.
Garimella, S., Rothenberg, D. A., Wolf, M. J., David, R. O., Kanji, Z. A., Wang, C., Rösch, M., and Cziczo, D. J.: Uncertainty in counting ice nucleating particles with continuous flow diffusion chambers, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 10855–10864, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-10855-2017, 2017.
Ginoux, P., Prospero, J. M., Gill, T. E., Hsu, N. C., and Zhao, M.: Global-scale attribution of anthropogenic and natural dust sources and their emission rates based on MODIS Deep Blue aerosol products, Rev. Geophys., 50, RG3005, https://doi.org/10.1029/2012RG000388, 2012.
Gómez, E. T., Sanfeliu, T., Rius, J., and Jordán, M. M.: Evolution, sources and distribution of mineral particles and amorphous phase of atmospheric aerosol in an industrial and Mediterranean coastal area, Water Air Soil Poll., 167, 311–330, 2005.
Gorbunov, B., Baklanov, A., Kakutkina, N., Windsor, H. L., and Toumi, R.: Ice nucleation on soot particles, J. Aerosol Sci., 32, 199–215, 2001.
Hallett, J. and Mossop, S. C.: Production of secondary ice particles during the riming process, Nature, 249, 26–28, 1974.
Harrison, A. D., Whale, T. F., Carpenter, M. A., Holden, M. A., Neve, L., O'Sullivan, D., Vergara Temprado, J., and Murray, B. J.: Not all feldspars are equal: a survey of ice nucleating properties across the feldspar group of minerals, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 10927–10940, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-10927-2016, 2016.
Hill, T. C. J., DeMott, P. J., Tobo, Y., Fröhlich-Nowoisky, J., Moffett, B. F., Franc, G. D., and Kreidenweis, S. M.: Sources of organic ice nucleating particles in soils, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 7195–7211, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-7195-2016, 2016.
Hinds, W.: Aerosol Technology Properties, Behavior, and Measurement of Airborne Particles, 2nd Edn., John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, USA, 1999.
Hinz, K.-P., Trimborn, A., Weingartner, E., Henning, S., Baltensperger, U., and Spengler, B.: Aerosol single particle composition at the Jungfraujoch, J. Aerosol Sci., 36, 123–145, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaerosci.2004.08.001, 2005.
Hiranuma, N., Hoffmann, N., Kiselev, A., Dreyer, A., Zhang, K., Kulkarni, G., Koop, T., and Möhler, O.: Influence of surface morphology on the immersion mode ice nucleation efficiency of hematite particles, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 2315–2324, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-2315-2014, 2014.
Hiranuma, N., Augustin-Bauditz, S., Bingemer, H., Budke, C., Curtius, J., Danielczok, A., Diehl, K., Dreischmeier, K., Ebert, M., Frank, F., Hoffmann, N., Kandler, K., Kiselev, A., Koop, T., Leisner, T., Möhler, O., Nillius, B., Peckhaus, A., Rose, D., Weinbruch, S., Wex, H., Boose, Y., DeMott, P. J., Hader, J. D., Hill, T. C. J., Kanji, Z. A., Kulkarni, G., Levin, E. J. T., McCluskey, C. S., Murakami, M., Murray, B. J., Niedermeier, D., Petters, M. D., O'Sullivan, D., Saito, A., Schill, G. P., Tajiri, T., Tolbert, M. A., Welti, A., Whale, T. F., Wright, T. P., and Yamashita, K.: A comprehensive laboratory study on the immersion freezing behavior of illite NX particles: a comparison of 17 ice nucleation measurement techniques, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 2489–2518, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-2489-2015, 2015.
Hoose, C. and Möhler, O.: Heterogeneous ice nucleation on atmospheric aerosols: a review of results from laboratory experiments, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 9817–9854, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-9817-2012, 2012.
Hoose, C., Lohmann, U., Erdin, R., and Tegen, I.: The global influence of dust mineralogical composition on heterogeneous ice nucleation in mixed-phase clouds, Environ. Res. Lett., 3, 025003, https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/3/2/025003, 2008.
Isono, K. and Ikebe, Y.: On the ice-nucleating ability of rock-forming minerals and soil particles, J. Meteorol. Soc. Jpn. Ser. II, 38, 213–230, https://doi.org/10.2151/jmsj1923.38.5_213, 1960.
Kanji, Z. A. and Abbatt, J. P. D.: Laboratory studies of ice formation via deposition mode nucleation onto mineral dust and n-hexane soot particles, J. Geophys. Res., 111, D16204, https://doi.org/10.1029/2005JD006766, 2006.
Kanji, Z. A., DeMott, P. J., Möhler, O., and Abbatt, J. P. D.: Results from the University of Toronto continuous flow diffusion chamber at ICIS 2007: instrument intercomparison and ice onsets for different aerosol types, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 31–41, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-31-2011, 2011.
Kanji, Z. A., Welti, A., Chou, C., Stetzer, O., and Lohmann, U.: Laboratory studies of immersion and deposition mode ice nucleation of ozone aged mineral dust particles, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 9097–9118, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-9097-2013, 2013.
Kanji, Z. A., Ladino, L. A., Wex, H., Boose, Y., Burkert-Kohn, M., Cziczo, D. J., and Krämer, M.: Overview of ice nucleating particles, Meteor. Mon., 58, 1.1–1.33, https://doi.org/10.1175/AMSMONOGRAPHS-D-16-0006.1, 2017.
Kaufmann, L., Marcolli, C., Hofer, J., Pinti, V., Hoyle, C. R., and Peter, T.: Ice nucleation efficiency of natural dust samples in the immersion mode, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 11177–11206, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-11177-2016, 2016.
Kawamura, K., Kasukabe, H., and Barrie, L. A.: Source and reaction pathways of dicarboxylic acids, ketoacids and dicarbonyls in arctic aerosols: One year of observations, Atmos. Environ., 30, 1709–1722, https://doi.org/10.1016/1352-2310(95)00395-9, 1996.
Kellogg, C. A. and Griffin, D. W.: Aerobiology and the global transport of desert dust, Trends Ecol. Evol., 21, 638–644, 2006.
Kerminen, V.-M., Paramonov, M., Anttila, T., Riipinen, I., Fountoukis, C., Korhonen, H., Asmi, E., Laakso, L., Lihavainen, H., Swietlicki, E., Svenningsson, B., Asmi, A., Pandis, S. N., Kulmala, M., and Petäjä, T.: Cloud condensation nuclei production associated with atmospheric nucleation: a synthesis based on existing literature and new results, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 12037–12059, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-12037-2012, 2012.
Khwaja, H. A.: Atmospheric concentrations of carboxylic acids and related compounds at a semiurban site, Atmos. Environ., 29, 127–139, https://doi.org/10.1016/1352-2310(94)00211-3, 1995.
Kiselev, A., Bachmann, F., Pedevilla, P., Cox, S. J., Michaelides, A., Gerthsen, D., and Leisner, T.: Active sites in heterogeneous ice nucleation – the example of K-rich feldspars, Science, 355, 367–371, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aai8034, 2016.
Knippertz, P. and Stuut, J.-B. W. (Eds.): Mineral Dust: A Key Player in the Earth System, Springer, Dordrecht, Heidelberg, New York, London, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-8978-3, 2014.
Knopf, D. A. and Alpert, P. A.: A water activity based model of heterogeneous ice nucleation kinetics for freezing of water and aqueous solution droplets, Faraday Discuss., 165, 513–534, https://doi.org/10.1039/c3fd00035d, 2013.
Knopf, D. A., Alpert, P. A., Wang, B., O'Brien, R. E., Kelly, S. T., Laskin, A., Gilles, M. K., and Moffet, R. C.: Microspectroscopic imaging and characterization of individually identified ice nucleating particles from a case field study, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 119, 10365–10381, https://doi.org/10.1002/2014JD021866, 2014.
Koop, T., Luo, B. P., Tsias, A., and Peter, T.: Water activity as the determinant for homogeneous ice nucleation in aqueous solutions, Nature, 406, 611–614, https://doi.org/10.1038/35020537, 2000.
Krueger, B. J., Grassian, V. H., Cowin, J. P., and Laskin, A.: Heterogeneous chemistry of individual mineral dust particles from different dust source regions: the importance of particle mineralogy, Atmos. Environ., 38, 6253–6261, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2004.07.010, 2004.
Kulkarni, G. and Dobbie, S.: Ice nucleation properties of mineral dust particles: determination of onset RHi, IN active fraction, nucleation time-lag, and the effect of active sites on contact angles, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 95–105, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-95-2010, 2010.
Kumai, M.: Snow crystals and the identification of the nuclei in the northern United States of America, J. Meteorol., 18, 139–150, 1961.
Ladino, L. A., Yakobi-Hancock, J. D., Kilthau, W. P., Mason, R. H., Si, M., Li, J., Miller, L. A., Schiller, C. L., Huffman, J. A., Aller, J. Y., Knopf, D. A., Bertram, A. K., and Abbatt, J. P. D.: Addressing the ice nucleating abilities of marine aerosol: A combination of deposition mode laboratory and field measurements, Atmos. Environ., 132, 1–10, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2016.02.028, 2016.
Langham, E. J. and Mason, B. J.: The Heterogeneous and Homogeneous Nucleation of Supercooled Water, P. Roy. Soc. A, 247, 493–504, https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.1958.0207, 1958.
Lau, K. M. and Wu, H. T.: Warm rain processes over tropical oceans and climate implications, Geophys. Res. Lett., 30, 2290, https://doi.org/10.1029/2003GL018567, 2003.
Lee, R. E., Warren, G. J., and Gusta, L. V. (Eds.): Biological ice nucleation and its applications. American Phytopathological Society, St. Paul, Minn., 1995.
Lohmann, U. and Feichter, J.: Global indirect aerosol effects: a review, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 5, 715–737, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-5-715-2005, 2005.
Maki, L. R., Galyan, E. L., Chang-Chien, M.-M., and Caldwell, D. R.: Ice nucleation induced by Pseudomonas syringae, Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 28, 456–459, 1974.
Marcolli, C.: Deposition nucleation viewed as homogeneous or immersion freezing in pores and cavities, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 2071–2104, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-2071-2014, 2014.
McCluskey, C. S., Hill, T. C. J., Malfatti, F., Sultana, C. M., Lee, C., Santander, M. V., Beall, C. M., Moore, K. A., Cornwell, G. C., Collins, D. B., Prather, K. A., Jayarathne, T., Stone, E. A., Azam, F., Kreidenweis, S. M., and DeMott, P. J.: A dynamic link between ice nucleating particles released in nascent sea spray aerosol and oceanic biological activity during two mesocosm experiments, J. Atmos. Sci., 74, 151–166, 2017.
Mertes, S., Verheggen, B., Walter, S., Connolly, P., Ebert, M., Schneider, J., Bower, K. N., Cozic, J., Weinbruch, S., Baltensperger, U., and Weingartner, E.: Counterflow virtual impactor based collection of small ice particles in mixed-phase clouds for the physico-chemical characterization of tropospheric ice nuclei: Sampler description and first case study, Aerosol Sci. Tech., 41, 848–864, https://doi.org/10.1080/02786820701501881, 2007.
Mikutta, R., Kleber, M., Kaiser, K., and Jahn, R.: Review: Organic matter removal from soils using hydrogen peroxide, sodium hypochlorite, and disodium peroxodisulfate, Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 69, 120–135, https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj2005.0120, 2005.
Möhler, O., DeMott, P. J., Vali, G., and Levin, Z.: Microbiology and atmospheric processes: the role of biological particles in cloud physics, Biogeosciences, 4, 1059–1071, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-4-1059-2007, 2007.
Möhler, O., Benz, S., Saathoff, H., Schnaiter, M., Wagner, R., Schneider, J., Walter, S., Ebert, V., and Wagner, S.: The effect of organic coating on the heterogeneous ice nucleation efficiency of mineral dust aerosol, Environ. Res. Lett., 3, 025007, https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/3/2/025007, 2008.
Murray, B. J., Broadley, S. L., Wilson, T. W., Bull, S. J., Wills, R. H., Christenson, H. K., and Murray, E. J.: Kinetics of the homogeneous freezing of water, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 12, 10380–10387, https://doi.org/10.1039/C003297B, 2010.
Murray, B. J., Broadley, S. L., Wilson, T. W., Atkinson, J. D., and Wills, R. H.: Heterogeneous freezing of water droplets containing kaolinite particles, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 4191–4207, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-4191-2011, 2011.
Murray, B. J., O'Sullivan, D., Atkinson, J. D., and Webb, M. E.: Ice nucleation by particles immersed in supercooled cloud droplets, Chem. Soc. Rev., 41, 6519–6554, 2012.
O'Sullivan, D., Murray, B. J., Malkin, T. L., Whale, T. F., Umo, N. S., Atkinson, J. D., Price, H. C., Baustian, K. J., Browse, J., and Webb, M. E.: Ice nucleation by fertile soil dusts: relative importance of mineral and biogenic components, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 1853–1867, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-1853-2014, 2014.
Paramonov, M., Aalto, P. P., Asmi, A., Prisle, N., Kerminen, V.-M., Kulmala, M., and Petäjä, T.: The analysis of size-segregated cloud condensation nuclei counter (CCNC) data and its implications for cloud droplet activation, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 10285–10301, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-10285-2013, 2013.
Paramonov, M., David, R. O., Kretzschmar, R., and Kanji, Z. A.: A laboratory investigation of the ice nucleation efficiency of three types of mineral and soil dust, dataset, https://doi.org/10.3929/ethz-b-000303568, 2018.
Pinti, V., Marcolli, C., Zobrist, B., Hoyle, C. R., and Peter, T.: Ice nucleation efficiency of clay minerals in the immersion mode, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 5859–5878, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-5859-2012, 2012.
Pouleur, S., Richard, C., Martin, J. G., and Antoun, H.: Ice nucleation activity in Fusarium acuminatum and Fusarium avenaceum, Appl. Environ. Microb., 58, 2960–2964, 1992.
Pringle, K. J., Tost, H., Pozzer, A., Pöschl, U., and Lelieveld, J.: Global distribution of the effective aerosol hygroscopicity parameter for CCN activation, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 5241–5255, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-5241-2010, 2010.
Pruppacher, H. and Klett, J.: Microphysics of clouds and precipitation, Atmospheric and oceanographic sciences library, v. 18, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, London, 1997 (includes bibliographical references and index previous Edn.: 1978 “With an introduction to cloud chemistry and cloud electricity.”).
Pummer, B. G., Budke, C., Augustin-Bauditz, S., Niedermeier, D., Felgitsch, L., Kampf, C. J., Huber, R. G., Liedl, K. R., Loerting, T., Moschen, T., Schauperl, M., Tollinger, M., Morris, C. E., Wex, H., Grothe, H., Pöschl, U., Koop, T., and Fröhlich-Nowoisky, J.: Ice nucleation by water-soluble macromolecules, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 4077–4091, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-4077-2015, 2015.
Rogers, D.: Development of a continuous flow thermal gradient diffusion chamber for ice nucleation studies, Atmos. Res., 22, 149–181, 1988.
Sanhueza, E. and Andreae, M. O.: Emission of formic and acetic acids from tropical savanna soils, Geophys. Res. Lett., 18, 1707–1710, https://doi.org/10.1029/91GL01565, 1991.
Schill, G. P., Genareau, K., and Tolbert, M. A.: Deposition and immersion-mode nucleation of ice by three distinct samples of volcanic ash, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 7523–7536, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-7523-2015, 2015.
Schmidt, S., Schneider, J., Klimach, T., Mertes, S., Schenk, L. P., Kupiszewski, P., Curtius, J., and Borrmann, S.: Online single particle analysis of ice particle residuals from mountain-top mixed-phase clouds using laboratory derived particle type assignment, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 575–594, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-575-2017, 2017.
Schütz, L. and Sebert, M.: Mineral aerosols and source identification, J. Aerosol Sci., 18, 1–10, https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-8502(87)90002-4, 1987.
Simoneit, B. R. T., Elias, V. O., Kobayashi, M., Kawamura, K., Rushdi, A. I., Medeiros, P. M., Rogge, W. F., and Didyk, B. M.: Sugars dominant water-soluble organic compounds in soils and characterization as tracers in atmospheric particulate matter, Environ. Sci. Technol., 38, 5939–5949, https://doi.org/10.1021/Es0403099, 2004.
Sporre, M. K., Swietlicki, E., Glantz, P., and Kulmala, M.: A long-term satellite study of aerosol effects on convective clouds in Nordic background air, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 2203–2217, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-2203-2014, 2014.
Sullivan, R. C., Petters, M. D., DeMott, P. J., Kreidenweis, S. M., Wex, H., Niedermeier, D., Hartmann, S., Clauss, T., Stratmann, F., Reitz, P., Schneider, J., and Sierau, B.: Irreversible loss of ice nucleation active sites in mineral dust particles caused by sulphuric acid condensation, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 11471–11487, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-11471-2010, 2010a.
Sullivan, R. C., Miñambres, L., DeMott, P. J., Prenni, A. J., Carrico, C. M., Levin, E. J. T., and Kreidenweis, S. M.: Chemical processing does not always impair heterogeneous ice nucleation of mineral dust particles, Geophys. Res. Lett., 37, L24805, https://doi.org/10.1029/2010GL045540, 2010b.
Takahashi, Y., Higashi, M., Furukawa, T., and Mitsunobu, S.: Change of iron species and iron solubility in Asian dust during the long-range transport from western China to Japan, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 11237–11252, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-11237-2011, 2011.
Tegen, I. and Fung, I.: Modeling of mineral dust in the atmosphere: Sources, transport, and optical thickness, J. Geophys. Res., 99, 22897–22914, https://doi.org/10.1029/94JD01928, 1994.
Tobo, Y., DeMott, P. J., Hill, T. C. J., Prenni, A. J., Swoboda-Colberg, N. G., Franc, G. D., and Kreidenweis, S. M.: Organic matter matters for ice nuclei of agricultural soil origin, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 8521–8531, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-8521-2014, 2014.
Ullrich, R., Hoose, C., Möhler, O., Niemand, M., Wagner, R., Höhler, K., Hiranuma, N., Saathoff, H., and Leisner, T.: A new ice nucleation active site parameterization for desert dust and soot, J. Atmos. Sci., 74, 669–717, https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-16-0074.1, 2017.
Vali, G.: Sizes of Atmospheric Ice Nuclei, Nature, 212, 384–385, https://doi.org/10.1038/212384a0, 1966.
Vali, G.: Nucleation terminology, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 66, 1426–1427, 1985.
Vali, G., DeMott, P. J., Möhler, O., and Whale, T. F.: Technical Note: A proposal for ice nucleation terminology, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 10263–10270, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-10263-2015, 2015.
Welti, A.: Experimental studies on deposition and immersion mode ice nucleation on mineral dust, PhD thesis, ETH Zurich, Switzerland, 146 pp., 2012.
Welti, A., Lüönd, F., Stetzer, O., and Lohmann, U.: Influence of particle size on the ice nucleating ability of mineral dusts, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9, 6705–6715, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-6705-2009, 2009.
Wilson, T. W., Ladino, L. A., Alpert, P. A., Breckels, M. N., Brooks, I. M., Browse, J., Burrows, S. M., Carslaw, K. S., Huffmann, J. A., Judd, C., Kilthau, W. P., Mason, R. H., McFiggans, G., Miller, L. A., Nájera, J. J., Polishchuk, E., Rae, S., Schiller, C. L., Si, M., Temprado, J. V., Whale, T. F., Wong, J. P. S., Wurl, O., Yakobi-Hancock, J. D., Abbatt, J. P. D., Aller, J. Y., Bertram, A. K., Knopf, D. A., and Murray, B. J.: A marine biogenic source of atmospheric ice-nucleating particles, Nature, 525, 234–238, https://doi.org/10.1038/nature14986, 2015.
Yuan, B., Veres, P. R., Warneke, C., Roberts, J. M., Gilman, J. B., Koss, A., Edwards, P. M., Graus, M., Kuster, W. C., Li, S.-M., Wild, R. J., Brown, S. S., Dubé, W. P., Lerner, B. M., Williams, E. J., Johnson, J. E., Quinn, P. K., Bates, T. S., Lefer, B., Hayes, P. L., Jimenez, J. L., Weber, R. J., Zamora, R., Ervens, B., Millet, D. B., Rappenglück, B., and de Gouw, J. A.: Investigation of secondary formation of formic acid: urban environment vs. oil and gas producing region, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 1975–1993, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-1975-2015, 2015.
Zhu, X. R., Prospero, J. M., and Millero, F. J.: Diel variability of soluble Fe(II) and soluble total Fe in North African dust in the trade winds at Barbados, J. Geophys. Res., 102, 21297–21306, 1997.
Zolles, T., Burkart, J., Häusler, T., Pummer, B., Hitzenberger, R., and Grothe, H.: Identification of ice nucleation active sites on feldspar dust particles, J. Phys. Chem., 119, 2692–2700, https://doi.org/10.1021/jp509839x, 2015.