Articles | Volume 18, issue 2
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-1395-2018
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-1395-2018
Research article
 | 
01 Feb 2018
Research article |  | 01 Feb 2018

Emission or atmospheric processes? An attempt to attribute the source of large bias of aerosols in eastern China simulated by global climate models

Tianyi Fan, Xiaohong Liu, Po-Lun Ma, Qiang Zhang, Zhanqing Li, Yiquan Jiang, Fang Zhang, Chuanfeng Zhao, Xin Yang, Fang Wu, and Yuying Wang

Viewed

Total article views: 4,326 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total Supplement BibTeX EndNote
2,979 1,241 106 4,326 539 88 142
  • HTML: 2,979
  • PDF: 1,241
  • XML: 106
  • Total: 4,326
  • Supplement: 539
  • BibTeX: 88
  • EndNote: 142
Views and downloads (calculated since 28 Sep 2016)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 28 Sep 2016)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 4,326 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 4,270 with geography defined and 56 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 

Cited

Latest update: 20 Nov 2024
Download
Short summary
We found that 22–28 % of the low AOD bias in eastern China simulated by the Community Atmosphere Model version 5 can be improved by using a new emission inventory. The concentrations of primary aerosols are closely related to the emission, while the seasonal variations of secondary aerosols depend more on atmospheric processes. This study highlights the importance of improving both the emission and atmospheric processes in modeling the atmospheric aerosols and their radiative effects.
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint