College of Global Change and Earth System Science, State Key
Laboratory of Earth Surface Processes and Resource Ecology, and Joint Center
for Global Change and Green China Development, Beijing Normal University,
Beijing, China
Department of Atmospheric Science, University of Wyoming, Laramie,
Wyoming, USA
College of Global Change and Earth System Science, State Key
Laboratory of Earth Surface Processes and Resource Ecology, and Joint Center
for Global Change and Green China Development, Beijing Normal University,
Beijing, China
College of Global Change and Earth System Science, State Key
Laboratory of Earth Surface Processes and Resource Ecology, and Joint Center
for Global Change and Green China Development, Beijing Normal University,
Beijing, China
Department of Atmospheric and Oceanic Science & ESSIC, University
of Maryland, College Park, Maryland, USA
College of Global Change and Earth System Science, State Key
Laboratory of Earth Surface Processes and Resource Ecology, and Joint Center
for Global Change and Green China Development, Beijing Normal University,
Beijing, China
College of Global Change and Earth System Science, State Key
Laboratory of Earth Surface Processes and Resource Ecology, and Joint Center
for Global Change and Green China Development, Beijing Normal University,
Beijing, China
College of Global Change and Earth System Science, State Key
Laboratory of Earth Surface Processes and Resource Ecology, and Joint Center
for Global Change and Green China Development, Beijing Normal University,
Beijing, China
Fang Wu
College of Global Change and Earth System Science, State Key
Laboratory of Earth Surface Processes and Resource Ecology, and Joint Center
for Global Change and Green China Development, Beijing Normal University,
Beijing, China
College of Global Change and Earth System Science, State Key
Laboratory of Earth Surface Processes and Resource Ecology, and Joint Center
for Global Change and Green China Development, Beijing Normal University,
Beijing, China
Viewed
Total article views: 5,340 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML
PDF
XML
Total
Supplement
BibTeX
EndNote
3,773
1,443
124
5,340
658
125
194
HTML: 3,773
PDF: 1,443
XML: 124
Total: 5,340
Supplement: 658
BibTeX: 125
EndNote: 194
Views and downloads (calculated since 28 Sep 2016)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 28 Sep 2016)
Total article views: 4,379 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML
PDF
XML
Total
Supplement
BibTeX
EndNote
3,231
1,073
75
4,379
444
97
142
HTML: 3,231
PDF: 1,073
XML: 75
Total: 4,379
Supplement: 444
BibTeX: 97
EndNote: 142
Views and downloads (calculated since 01 Feb 2018)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 01 Feb 2018)
Total article views: 961 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML
PDF
XML
Total
Supplement
BibTeX
EndNote
542
370
49
961
214
28
52
HTML: 542
PDF: 370
XML: 49
Total: 961
Supplement: 214
BibTeX: 28
EndNote: 52
Views and downloads (calculated since 28 Sep 2016)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 28 Sep 2016)
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Total article views: 5,340 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 5,295 with geography defined
and 45 with unknown origin.
Total article views: 4,379 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 4,359 with geography defined
and 20 with unknown origin.
Total article views: 961 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 936 with geography defined
and 25 with unknown origin.
We found that 22–28 % of the low AOD bias in eastern China simulated by the Community Atmosphere Model version 5 can be improved by using a new emission inventory. The concentrations of primary aerosols are closely related to the emission, while the seasonal variations of secondary aerosols depend more on atmospheric processes. This study highlights the importance of improving both the emission and atmospheric processes in modeling the atmospheric aerosols and their radiative effects.
We found that 22–28 % of the low AOD bias in eastern China simulated by the Community Atmosphere...
