Articles | Volume 18, issue 18
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-13703-2018
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-13703-2018
Research article
 | Highlight paper
 | 
27 Sep 2018
Research article | Highlight paper |  | 27 Sep 2018

How well do stratospheric reanalyses reproduce high-resolution satellite temperature measurements?

Corwin J. Wright and Neil P. Hindley

Viewed

Total article views: 5,803 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total Supplement BibTeX EndNote
4,690 1,023 90 5,803 249 89 66
  • HTML: 4,690
  • PDF: 1,023
  • XML: 90
  • Total: 5,803
  • Supplement: 249
  • BibTeX: 89
  • EndNote: 66
Views and downloads (calculated since 20 Jun 2018)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 20 Jun 2018)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 5,803 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 5,699 with geography defined and 104 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 

Cited

Discussed (final revised paper)

Discussed (preprint)

Latest update: 29 Jun 2024
Download
Short summary
Reanalyses (RAs) are models which assimilate observations and are widely used as proxies for the true atmospheric state. Here, we resample six leading RAs using the weighting functions of four high-res satellite instruments, allowing a like-for-like comparison. We find that the RAs generally reproduce the satellite data well, except at high altitudes and in the tropics. However, we also find that the RAs more tightly correlate with each other than with observations, even those they assimilate.
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint