Articles | Volume 18, issue 18
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-13703-2018
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-13703-2018
Research article
 | Highlight paper
 | 
27 Sep 2018
Research article | Highlight paper |  | 27 Sep 2018

How well do stratospheric reanalyses reproduce high-resolution satellite temperature measurements?

Corwin J. Wright and Neil P. Hindley

Download

Interactive discussion

Status: closed
Status: closed
AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment
Printer-friendly Version - Printer-friendly version Supplement - Supplement

Peer-review completion

AR: Author's response | RR: Referee report | ED: Editor decision
AR by Corwin Wright on behalf of the Authors (25 Aug 2018)  Author's response   Manuscript 
ED: Publish as is (12 Sep 2018) by Gabriele Stiller
AR by Corwin Wright on behalf of the Authors (12 Sep 2018)  Manuscript 
Download
Short summary
Reanalyses (RAs) are models which assimilate observations and are widely used as proxies for the true atmospheric state. Here, we resample six leading RAs using the weighting functions of four high-res satellite instruments, allowing a like-for-like comparison. We find that the RAs generally reproduce the satellite data well, except at high altitudes and in the tropics. However, we also find that the RAs more tightly correlate with each other than with observations, even those they assimilate.
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint