Articles | Volume 18, issue 15
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 11363–11374, 2018
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-11363-2018
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 11363–11374, 2018
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-11363-2018

Research article 14 Aug 2018

Research article | 14 Aug 2018

Primary and secondary organic aerosol from heated cooking oil emissions

Tengyu Liu et al.

Download

Interactive discussion

Status: closed
Status: closed
AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment
Printer-friendly Version - Printer-friendly version Supplement - Supplement

Peer-review completion

AR: Author's response | RR: Referee report | ED: Editor decision
AR by Tengyu Liu on behalf of the Authors (01 Aug 2018)  Author's response    Manuscript
ED: Publish as is (03 Aug 2018) by Daniel Knopf
Download
Short summary
POA and SOA from seven heated cooking oil emissions were investigated in a smog chamber. We found that PMF analysis separated POA and SOA better than the residual spectrum method and the traditional method, assuming first-order POA loss. The PMF factors mass spectra were compared with those of ambient PMF factors. Our results suggest that COA source analysis from ambient data is likely complicated by the cooking style and atmospheric oxidation conditions.
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint