Articles | Volume 17, issue 2
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-855-2017
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-855-2017
Research article
 | 
19 Jan 2017
Research article |  | 19 Jan 2017

A comparison of Loon balloon observations and stratospheric reanalysis products

Leon S. Friedrich, Adrian J. McDonald, Gregory E. Bodeker, Kathy E. Cooper, Jared Lewis, and Alexander J. Paterson

Viewed

Total article views: 3,181 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
2,062 1,023 96 3,181 123 117
  • HTML: 2,062
  • PDF: 1,023
  • XML: 96
  • Total: 3,181
  • BibTeX: 123
  • EndNote: 117
Views and downloads (calculated since 27 May 2016)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 27 May 2016)

Cited

Latest update: 14 Dec 2024
Download
Short summary
Information from long-duration balloons flying in the Southern Hemisphere stratosphere during 2014 as part of X Project Loon are used to assess the quality of a number of different reanalyses. This work assesses the potential of the X Project Loon observations to validate outputs from the reanalysis models. In particular, we examined how the model winds compared with those derived from the balloon GPS information. We also examined simulated trajectories compared with the true trajectories.
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint