Articles | Volume 17, issue 2
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-855-2017
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-855-2017
Research article
 | 
19 Jan 2017
Research article |  | 19 Jan 2017

A comparison of Loon balloon observations and stratospheric reanalysis products

Leon S. Friedrich, Adrian J. McDonald, Gregory E. Bodeker, Kathy E. Cooper, Jared Lewis, and Alexander J. Paterson

Download

Interactive discussion

Status: closed
Status: closed
AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment
Printer-friendly Version - Printer-friendly version Supplement - Supplement

Peer-review completion

AR: Author's response | RR: Referee report | ED: Editor decision
AR by Adrian McDonald on behalf of the Authors (13 Oct 2016)
ED: Referee Nomination & Report Request started (25 Oct 2016) by Peter Haynes
RR by Anonymous Referee #2 (01 Nov 2016)
RR by Anonymous Referee #1 (30 Nov 2016)
ED: Publish subject to technical corrections (13 Dec 2016) by Peter Haynes
AR by Adrian McDonald on behalf of the Authors (21 Dec 2016)  Author's response   Manuscript 
Download
Short summary
Information from long-duration balloons flying in the Southern Hemisphere stratosphere during 2014 as part of X Project Loon are used to assess the quality of a number of different reanalyses. This work assesses the potential of the X Project Loon observations to validate outputs from the reanalysis models. In particular, we examined how the model winds compared with those derived from the balloon GPS information. We also examined simulated trajectories compared with the true trajectories.
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint