Articles | Volume 17, issue 1
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-385-2017
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-385-2017
Research article
 | 
10 Jan 2017
Research article |  | 10 Jan 2017

Direct oceanic emissions unlikely to account for the missing source of atmospheric carbonyl sulfide

Sinikka T. Lennartz, Christa A. Marandino, Marc von Hobe, Pau Cortes, Birgit Quack, Rafel Simo, Dennis Booge, Andrea Pozzer, Tobias Steinhoff, Damian L. Arevalo-Martinez, Corinna Kloss, Astrid Bracher, Rüdiger Röttgers, Elliot Atlas, and Kirstin Krüger

Viewed

Total article views: 4,734 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total Supplement BibTeX EndNote
2,663 1,776 295 4,734 419 98 126
  • HTML: 2,663
  • PDF: 1,776
  • XML: 295
  • Total: 4,734
  • Supplement: 419
  • BibTeX: 98
  • EndNote: 126
Views and downloads (calculated since 12 Sep 2016)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 12 Sep 2016)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 4,734 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 4,777 with geography defined and -43 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 

Cited

Latest update: 14 Jun 2024
Download
Short summary
We present new sea surface and marine boundary layer measurements of carbonyl sulfide, the most abundant sulfur gas in the atmosphere, and calculate an oceanic emission estimate. Our results imply that oceanic emissions are very unlikely to account for the missing source in the atmospheric budget that is currently discussed for OCS.
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint