Articles | Volume 17, issue 24
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-15069-2017
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-15069-2017
Research article
 | 
20 Dec 2017
Research article |  | 20 Dec 2017

How long do satellites need to overlap? Evaluation of climate data stability from overlapping satellite records

Elizabeth C. Weatherhead, Jerald Harder, Eduardo A. Araujo-Pradere, Greg Bodeker, Jason M. English, Lawrence E. Flynn, Stacey M. Frith, Jeffrey K. Lazo, Peter Pilewskie, Mark Weber, and Thomas N. Woods

Viewed

Total article views: 2,933 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
1,872 957 104 2,933 69 115
  • HTML: 1,872
  • PDF: 957
  • XML: 104
  • Total: 2,933
  • BibTeX: 69
  • EndNote: 115
Views and downloads (calculated since 20 Jan 2017)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 20 Jan 2017)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 2,933 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 2,870 with geography defined and 63 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 

Cited

Latest update: 17 Apr 2024
Download
Short summary
Satellite overlap is often carried out as a check on the stability of the data collected. We looked at how length of overlap influences how much information can be derived from the overlap period. Several results surprised us: the confidence we could have in the matchup of two records was independent of the offset, and understanding of the relative drift between the two satellite data sets improved significantly with 2–3 years of overlap. Sudden jumps could easily be confused with drift.
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint