Articles | Volume 17, issue 20
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-12269-2017
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-12269-2017
Research article
 | 
16 Oct 2017
Research article |  | 16 Oct 2017

Reconciling differences in stratospheric ozone composites

William T. Ball, Justin Alsing, Daniel J. Mortlock, Eugene V. Rozanov, Fiona Tummon, and Joanna D. Haigh

Viewed

Total article views: 3,818 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
2,367 1,321 130 3,818 104 114
  • HTML: 2,367
  • PDF: 1,321
  • XML: 130
  • Total: 3,818
  • BibTeX: 104
  • EndNote: 114
Views and downloads (calculated since 15 Mar 2017)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 15 Mar 2017)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 3,818 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 3,781 with geography defined and 37 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 

Cited

Saved (final revised paper)

Saved (preprint)

Latest update: 19 May 2024
Download
Short summary
Several ozone composites show different decadal trends, even in composites built with the same data. We remove artefacts affecting trend analysis with a new method (BASIC) and construct an ozone composite, with uncertainties. We find a significant ozone recovery since 1998 in the midlatitude upper stratosphere, with no hemispheric difference. We recommend using a similar approach to construct a composite based on the original instrument data to improve stratospheric ozone trend estimates.
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint