Articles | Volume 17, issue 18
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-11683-2017
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-11683-2017
Research article
 | 
29 Sep 2017
Research article |  | 29 Sep 2017

Leipzig Ice Nucleation chamber Comparison (LINC): intercomparison of four online ice nucleation counters

Monika Burkert-Kohn, Heike Wex, André Welti, Susan Hartmann, Sarah Grawe, Lisa Hellner, Paul Herenz, James D. Atkinson, Frank Stratmann, and Zamin A. Kanji

Viewed

Total article views: 3,399 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
2,189 1,097 113 3,399 58 103
  • HTML: 2,189
  • PDF: 1,097
  • XML: 113
  • Total: 3,399
  • BibTeX: 58
  • EndNote: 103
Views and downloads (calculated since 27 Apr 2017)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 27 Apr 2017)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 3,399 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 3,403 with geography defined and -4 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 

Cited

Latest update: 23 Apr 2024
Download
Short summary
Several instruments can investigate properties of ice-nucleating particles (INPs), which are crucial to understanding ice cloud formation. We intercompare four online ice nucleation counters and reasonable agreement is found when the same ice nucleation mode is tested. A variable scaling factor was necessary to reconcile condensation freezing results with immersion freezing. Factors related to instrumental setup and aerosol generation are discussed to explain observed differences.
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint