Can we detect regional methane anomalies? A comparison between three observing systems

Cressot, Cindy; Pison, Isabelle; Rayner, Peter J.; Bousquet, Philippe; Fortems-Cheiney, Audrey; Chevallier, Frédéric

doi:https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-9089-2016

Articles | Volume 16, issue 14

https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-9089-2016

© Author(s) 2016. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.

https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-9089-2016

© Author(s) 2016. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.

Articles | Volume 16, issue 14

Research article

|

25 Jul 2016

Research article |

| 25 Jul 2016

Can we detect regional methane anomalies? A comparison between three observing systems

Cindy Cressot, Isabelle Pison, Peter J. Rayner, Philippe Bousquet, Audrey Fortems-Cheiney, and Frédéric Chevallier

Download

Final revised paper (published on 25 Jul 2016)
Preprint (discussion started on 18 Mar 2016)

Interactive discussion

Status: closed

AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment

- Printer-friendly version

- Supplement

SC1: 'Clarifications needed', Tonatiuh Guillermo Nuñez Ramirez, 04 Apr 2016
- AC1: 'Answer to SC1', Isabelle Pison, 19 Apr 2016
RC1: 'Referee comments', Anonymous Referee #1, 25 Apr 2016
RC2: 'Review of Can we detect regional methane anomalies? A comparison between three observing systems, C. Cressot et al.', Anonymous Referee #2, 27 Apr 2016

Peer-review completion

AR: Author's response | RR: Referee report | ED: Editor decision

AR by Isabelle Pison on behalf of the Authors (17 Jun 2016) Author's response Manuscript

ED: Referee Nomination & Report Request started (20 Jun 2016) by Bryan N. Duncan

RR by Anonymous Referee #2 (29 Jun 2016)

ED: Publish as is (05 Jul 2016) by Bryan N. Duncan

Short summary

Several hypothesis have been made to attribute current trends in atmospheric methane to particular regions. In this context, this work aims at evaluating how well anomalies in methane emissions can be detected at the regional scale with currently available observing systems: two space-borne instruments and a surface network. Our results show that inter-annual analyses of methane emissions inferred by atmospheric inversions should always include an uncertainty assessment.