Articles | Volume 16, issue 12

• Article
• Assets
• Peer review
• Metrics
• Related articles

Articles | Volume 16, issue 12

Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 7725–7741, 2016

https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-7725-2016

© Author(s) 2016. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.

Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 7725–7741, 2016

https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-7725-2016

© Author(s) 2016. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.

Articles | Volume 16, issue 12

• Article
• Assets
• Peer review
• Metrics
• Related articles

Research article 24 Jun 2016

Research article | 24 Jun 2016

Understanding isoprene photooxidation using observations and modeling over a subtropical forest in the southeastern US

Luping Su et al.

Interactive discussion

Status: closed

Status: closed

AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment

- Printer-friendly version - Supplement

• RC C10529: 'Review of Su et al.', Anonymous Referee #1, 16 Dec 2015
  • AC C12536: 'Response to acpd-15-C10529-2015', Luping Su, 19 Feb 2016
• RC C11186: 'Review', Anonymous Referee #2, 06 Jan 2016
  • AC C12537: 'Response to acpd-15-C11186-2016', Luping Su, 19 Feb 2016

Peer-review completion

AR: Author's response | RR: Referee report | ED: Editor decision

AR by Luping Su on behalf of the Authors (23 Feb 2016)  Author's response    Manuscript

ED: Referee Nomination & Report Request started (11 Mar 2016) by Robert McLaren

RR by Anonymous Referee #2 (23 Mar 2016)

Suggestions for revision or reasons for rejection

I have two more comments: 1. It seems that the good agreement on ISOPN could be due to the cancellation between fast photolysis and lack of hydrolysis. Given that these two processes have been discussed extensively in recent literature, the authors should at least provide some caveats here. 2. While the authors mentioned the interference on HO2 measurement, could the authors clarify the interference in OH measurements? I notice that there are two types of OH measurements from Brune group, OHwave and OHchem (Mao et al., 2012). Which one is used here?

Hide

ED: Reconsider after minor revisions (Editor review) (17 May 2016) by Robert McLaren

The paper is accepted pending the minor revisions below. I will review these changes myself. Thank-you

Hide

AR by Lorena Grabowski on behalf of the Authors (24 May 2016)  Author's response

ED: Publish as is (08 Jun 2016) by Robert McLaren

The paper is now accepted.

Hide