Articles | Volume 16, issue 10
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 6595–6607, 2016
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-6595-2016
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 6595–6607, 2016
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-6595-2016

Research article 31 May 2016

Research article | 31 May 2016

Limitations of passive remote sensing to constrain global cloud condensation nuclei

Philip Stier

Download

Interactive discussion

Status: closed
Status: closed
AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment
Printer-friendly Version - Printer-friendly version Supplement - Supplement

Peer-review completion

AR: Author's response | RR: Referee report | ED: Editor decision
AR by Philip Stier on behalf of the Authors (02 May 2016)  Author's response    Manuscript
ED: Publish subject to technical corrections (15 May 2016) by Graham Feingold
AR by Philip Stier on behalf of the Authors (18 May 2016)  Author's response    Manuscript
Download
Short summary
Cloud droplets form on suitable nuclei from aerosol emissions. Clouds with more droplets have higher reflectance so that aerosol emissions have a cooling climate effect. Numerous publications of these effects rely on passive satellite remote sensing. In this work I use a self consistent global aerosol model to show that a commonly used assumption (passively retrieved aerosol extinction is a suitable proxy for cloud condensation nuclei) is violated for a significant fraction of the Earth.
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint