Articles | Volume 16, issue 10
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 6595–6607, 2016
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-6595-2016
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 6595–6607, 2016
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-6595-2016

Research article 31 May 2016

Research article | 31 May 2016

Limitations of passive remote sensing to constrain global cloud condensation nuclei

Philip Stier

Viewed

Total article views: 3,040 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
1,768 1,145 127 3,040 64 140
  • HTML: 1,768
  • PDF: 1,145
  • XML: 127
  • Total: 3,040
  • BibTeX: 64
  • EndNote: 140
Views and downloads (calculated since 19 Nov 2015)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 19 Nov 2015)

Cited

Saved (preprint)

Discussed (final revised paper)

Latest update: 28 Sep 2021
Download
Short summary
Cloud droplets form on suitable nuclei from aerosol emissions. Clouds with more droplets have higher reflectance so that aerosol emissions have a cooling climate effect. Numerous publications of these effects rely on passive satellite remote sensing. In this work I use a self consistent global aerosol model to show that a commonly used assumption (passively retrieved aerosol extinction is a suitable proxy for cloud condensation nuclei) is violated for a significant fraction of the Earth.
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint