Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/acpd-15-6745-2015
https://doi.org/10.5194/acpd-15-6745-2015
06 Mar 2015
 | 06 Mar 2015
Status: this preprint has been withdrawn by the authors.

Simulating CO2 profiles using NIES TM and comparison with HIAPER Pole-to-Pole Observations

C. Song, S. Maksyutov, D. Belikov, H. Takagi, and J. Shu

Abstract. We present a study on validation of the National Institute for Environmental Studies Transport Model (NIES TM) by comparing to observed vertical profiles of atmospheric CO2. The model uses a hybrid sigma-isentropic (σ–θ) vertical coordinate that employs both terrain-following and isentropic parts switched smoothly in the stratosphere. The model transport is driven by reanalyzed meteorological fields and designed to simulate seasonal and diurnal cycles, synoptic variations, and spatial distributions of atmospheric chemical constituents in the troposphere. The model simulations were run for biosphere, fossil fuel, air–ocean exchange, biomass burning and inverse correction fluxes of carbon dioxide (CO2) by GOSAT Level 4 product. We compared the NIES TM simulated fluxes with data from the HIAPER Pole-to-Pole Observations (HIPPO) Merged 10 s Meteorology, Atmospheric Chemistry, and Aerosol Data, including HIPPO-1, HIPPO-2 and HIPPO-3 from 128.0° E to −84.0° W, and 87.0° N to −67.2° S.

The simulation results were compared with CO2 observations made in January and November 2009, and March and April 2010. The analysis attests that the model is good enough to simulate vertical profiles with errors generally within 1–2 ppmv, except for the lower stratosphere in the Northern Hemisphere high latitudes.

This preprint has been withdrawn.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this preprint. The responsibility to include appropriate place names lies with the authors.
C. Song, S. Maksyutov, D. Belikov, H. Takagi, and J. Shu

Interactive discussion

Status: closed
Status: closed
AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment
Printer-friendly Version - Printer-friendly version Supplement - Supplement

Interactive discussion

Status: closed
Status: closed
AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment
Printer-friendly Version - Printer-friendly version Supplement - Supplement
C. Song, S. Maksyutov, D. Belikov, H. Takagi, and J. Shu
C. Song, S. Maksyutov, D. Belikov, H. Takagi, and J. Shu

Viewed

Total article views: 2,091 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
1,616 329 146 2,091 144 137
  • HTML: 1,616
  • PDF: 329
  • XML: 146
  • Total: 2,091
  • BibTeX: 144
  • EndNote: 137
Views and downloads (calculated since 06 Mar 2015)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 06 Mar 2015)
Latest update: 21 Nov 2024
Download

This preprint has been withdrawn.

Altmetrics