the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
Effects of cosmic ray decreases on cloud microphysics
Abstract. Using cloud data from MODIS we investigate the response of cloud microphysics to sudden decreases in galactic cosmic radiation – Forbush decreases – and find responses in effective emissivity, cloud fraction, liquid water content, and optical thickness above the 2–3 sigma level 6–9 days after the minimum in atmospheric ionization and less significant responses for effective radius and cloud condensation nuclei (<2 sigma). The magnitude of the signals agree with derived values, based on simple equations for atmospheric parameters. Furthermore principal components analysis gives a total significance of the signal of 3.1 sigma. We also see a correlation between total solar irradiance and strong Forbush decreases but a clear mechanism connecting this to cloud properties is lacking. There is no signal in the UV radiation. The responses of the parameters correlate linearly with the reduction in the cosmic ray ionization. These results support the suggestion that ions play a significant role in the life-cycle of clouds.
- Preprint
(716 KB) - Metadata XML
-
Supplement
(585 KB) - BibTeX
- EndNote
-
RC C212: 'Review', Jeffrey Pierce, 22 Feb 2012
- AC C591: 'Reply to comment by Jeff Pierce', Martin Bødker Enghoff, 14 Mar 2012
-
RC C247: 'Review of ”Effects of cosmic ray decreases on cloud microphysics” by J. Svensmark et al.', Kristoffer Rypdal, 24 Feb 2012
- AC C585: 'Response to comment by Kristoffer Rypdal', Martin Bødker Enghoff, 14 Mar 2012
-
RC C621: 'Reply to comment by Martin Bodker Enghoff', Kristoffer Rypdal, 15 Mar 2012
-
AC C717: 'Response to comment by Kristoffer Rypdal', Martin Bødker Enghoff, 19 Mar 2012
-
RC C764: 'Comment to reply from Martin Bødker Enghoff March 19th', Kristoffer Rypdal, 20 Mar 2012
- AC C897: 'Response to comment by Kristoffer Rypdal', Martin Bødker Enghoff, 26 Mar 2012
-
RC C764: 'Comment to reply from Martin Bødker Enghoff March 19th', Kristoffer Rypdal, 20 Mar 2012
-
AC C717: 'Response to comment by Kristoffer Rypdal', Martin Bødker Enghoff, 19 Mar 2012
-
SC C962: 'Comment on Svensmark et al ‘Effects of cosmic ray decreases on cloud microphysics’', Benjamin A. Laken, 27 Mar 2012
- AC C7662: 'Response to comment by B. Laken et al', Martin Bødker Enghoff, 01 Oct 2012
-
SC C1000: 'Comment on Effects of Cosmic Ray Decreases on Cloud Microphysics by Svensmark et al.', Eimear Dunne, 27 Mar 2012
-
AC C7667: 'Response to comment by E. Dunne', Martin Bødker Enghoff, 01 Oct 2012
- AC C7675: 'Figure 1+2', Martin Bødker Enghoff, 01 Oct 2012
-
AC C7667: 'Response to comment by E. Dunne', Martin Bødker Enghoff, 01 Oct 2012
- AC C7676: 'Final Response', Martin Bødker Enghoff, 01 Oct 2012
-
RC C212: 'Review', Jeffrey Pierce, 22 Feb 2012
- AC C591: 'Reply to comment by Jeff Pierce', Martin Bødker Enghoff, 14 Mar 2012
-
RC C247: 'Review of ”Effects of cosmic ray decreases on cloud microphysics” by J. Svensmark et al.', Kristoffer Rypdal, 24 Feb 2012
- AC C585: 'Response to comment by Kristoffer Rypdal', Martin Bødker Enghoff, 14 Mar 2012
-
RC C621: 'Reply to comment by Martin Bodker Enghoff', Kristoffer Rypdal, 15 Mar 2012
-
AC C717: 'Response to comment by Kristoffer Rypdal', Martin Bødker Enghoff, 19 Mar 2012
-
RC C764: 'Comment to reply from Martin Bødker Enghoff March 19th', Kristoffer Rypdal, 20 Mar 2012
- AC C897: 'Response to comment by Kristoffer Rypdal', Martin Bødker Enghoff, 26 Mar 2012
-
RC C764: 'Comment to reply from Martin Bødker Enghoff March 19th', Kristoffer Rypdal, 20 Mar 2012
-
AC C717: 'Response to comment by Kristoffer Rypdal', Martin Bødker Enghoff, 19 Mar 2012
-
SC C962: 'Comment on Svensmark et al ‘Effects of cosmic ray decreases on cloud microphysics’', Benjamin A. Laken, 27 Mar 2012
- AC C7662: 'Response to comment by B. Laken et al', Martin Bødker Enghoff, 01 Oct 2012
-
SC C1000: 'Comment on Effects of Cosmic Ray Decreases on Cloud Microphysics by Svensmark et al.', Eimear Dunne, 27 Mar 2012
-
AC C7667: 'Response to comment by E. Dunne', Martin Bødker Enghoff, 01 Oct 2012
- AC C7675: 'Figure 1+2', Martin Bødker Enghoff, 01 Oct 2012
-
AC C7667: 'Response to comment by E. Dunne', Martin Bødker Enghoff, 01 Oct 2012
- AC C7676: 'Final Response', Martin Bødker Enghoff, 01 Oct 2012
Viewed
HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
7,100 | 1,827 | 218 | 9,145 | 201 | 182 |
- HTML: 7,100
- PDF: 1,827
- XML: 218
- Total: 9,145
- BibTeX: 201
- EndNote: 182
Cited
24 citations as recorded by crossref.
- Amplitude of the Usual Cosmic Ray Diurnal and Enhanced Anisotropies: Implications for the Observed Magnitude, Timing, and Ranking of Forbush Decreases O. Okike 10.3847/1538-4357/abfe60
- Cosmic ray − global lightning causality O. Okike & A. Umahi 10.1016/j.jastp.2019.04.002
- Discussion on climate oscillations: CMIP5 general circulation models versus a semi-empirical harmonic model based on astronomical cycles N. Scafetta 10.1016/j.earscirev.2013.08.008
- What determines the observational magnitudes of Forbush events on Earth: A critique of the traditional manual method O. Okike 10.1093/mnras/stz3123
- The Empirical Implication of Conducting a Chree Analysis Using Data from Isolated Neutron Monitors O. Okike & A. Umahi 10.1007/s11207-019-1405-y
- Chree Method of Analysis: A Critique of Its Application to Forbush Events Selection Criteria and Timing O. Okike 10.3847/1538-4357/ab32db
- Solar influences on the Earth’s atmosphere: solved and unsolved questions K. Georgieva & S. Veretenenko 10.3389/fspas.2023.1244402
- A comparison of catalogues of Forbush decreases identified from individual and a network of neutron monitors: a critical perspective O. Okike et al. 10.1093/mnras/stab680
- High resolution coherence analysis between planetary and climate oscillations N. Scafetta 10.1016/j.asr.2016.02.029
- Determination of a temporally and spatially resolved supernova rate from OB stars within 5 kpc J. Schmidt et al. 10.1002/asna.201312070
- Evidence of nearby supernovae affecting life on Earth H. Svensmark 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.20953.x
- Investigation of Forbush Decreases and Other Solar/Geophysical Agents Associated With Lightning Over the U.S. Latitude Band and the Continental Africa O. Okike 10.1029/2018JA026456
- A cosmic ray-climate link and cloud observations B. Laken et al. 10.1051/swsc/2012018
- Possible effects on Earth's climate due to reduced atmospheric ionization by GCR during Forbush Decreases W. Portugal et al. 10.1017/S1743921317003647
- Chapter 7 Solar and Heliospheric Physics and Interdisciplinary Research with LHAASO * H. Jia et al. 10.1088/1674-1137/ac3fae
- Modeling theoretical radiative–dynamic response of tropospheric clouds to cosmic ray changes associated with Forbush Decrease events M. Casazza & S. Alessio 10.1016/j.asr.2015.02.029
- Testing the impact of coronal mass ejections on cosmic-ray intensity modulation with algorithm selected Forbush decreases O. Okike et al. 10.1093/mnras/staa4002
- On the astronomical origin of the Hallstatt oscillation found in radiocarbon and climate records throughout the Holocene N. Scafetta et al. 10.1016/j.earscirev.2016.09.004
- Automated detection of simultaneous/non-simultaneous Forbush decreases and the associated cosmic ray phenomena O. Okike 10.1016/j.jastp.2020.105460
- Amplitude of the Observational Forbush Decreases in the Presence of Cosmic Ray Diurnal Anisotropy During High Solar Activity in 1972 O. Okike & J. Alhassan 10.1007/s11207-021-01855-9
- Investigation of the rigidity and sensitivity dependence of neutron monitors for cosmic ray modulation using algorithm-selected Forbush decreases O. Okike & O. Nwuzor 10.1093/mnras/staa370
- Preliminary investigation of the multivariate relations between program-selected forbush decreases, worldwide lightning frequency, sunspot number and other solar-terrestrial drivers O. Okike & J. Alhassan 10.1140/epjp/s13360-022-02514-z
- Empirical implications of location-dependent cosmic ray diurnal anisotropy on small-amplitude Forbush decreases O. Okike & F. Menteso 10.1140/epjp/s13360-024-05191-2
- Composite analysis with Monte Carlo methods: an example with cosmic rays and clouds B. Laken & J. Čalogović 10.1051/swsc/2013051