Articles | Volume 9, issue 3
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-813-2009
© Author(s) 2009. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-813-2009
© Author(s) 2009. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
On the diagnosis of climate sensitivity using observations of fluctuations
D. B. Kirk-Davidoff
Department of Atmospheric and Oceanic Science, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742, USA
Viewed
Total article views: 4,849 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 01 Feb 2013, article published on 30 Jun 2008)
| HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2,775 | 1,853 | 221 | 4,849 | 269 | 245 |
- HTML: 2,775
- PDF: 1,853
- XML: 221
- Total: 4,849
- BibTeX: 269
- EndNote: 245
Total article views: 4,013 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 01 Feb 2013, article published on 02 Feb 2009)
| HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2,352 | 1,455 | 206 | 4,013 | 251 | 242 |
- HTML: 2,352
- PDF: 1,455
- XML: 206
- Total: 4,013
- BibTeX: 251
- EndNote: 242
Total article views: 836 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 01 Feb 2013, article published on 30 Jun 2008)
| HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 423 | 398 | 15 | 836 | 18 | 3 |
- HTML: 423
- PDF: 398
- XML: 15
- Total: 836
- BibTeX: 18
- EndNote: 3
Cited
19 citations as recorded by crossref.
- Emergent constraints on climate sensitivities M. Williamson et al. https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.93.025004
- On spurious detection of linear response and misuse of the fluctuation–dissipation theorem in finite time series G. Gottwald et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physd.2016.05.010
- Assessing Atmospheric Response to Surface Forcing in the Observations. Part I: Cross Validation of Annual Response Using GEFA, LIM, and FDT Z. Liu et al. https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-11-00545.1
- Can we use linear response theory to assess geoengineering strategies? T. Bódai et al. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5122255
- Testing the assumptions in emergent constraints: why does the “emergent constraint on equilibrium climate sensitivity from global temperature variability” work for CMIP5 and not CMIP6? M. Williamson et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-15-829-2024
- On the Validity of Linear Response Theory in High-Dimensional Deterministic Dynamical Systems C. Wormell & G. Gottwald https://doi.org/10.1007/s10955-018-2106-x
- What could we learn about climate sensitivity from variability in the surface temperature record? J. Annan et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-11-709-2020
- On the diagnosis of radiative feedback in the presence of unknown radiative forcing R. Spencer & W. Braswell https://doi.org/10.1029/2009JD013371
- Emergent constraints on climate‐carbon cycle feedbacks in the CMIP5 Earth system models S. Wenzel et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2013JG002591
- The Linear Response Function of an Idealized Atmosphere. Part II: Implications for the Practical Use of the Fluctuation–Dissipation Theorem and the Role of Operator’s Nonnormality P. Hassanzadeh & Z. Kuang https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-16-0099.1
- Beyond equilibrium climate sensitivity R. Knutti et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo3017
- Diversity of Hemodynamic Reactive Profiles across Persons—Psychosocial Implications for Personalized Medicine M. Gandarillas & N. Goswami https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11133869
- Planetary Atmospheres as Nonequilibrium Condensed Matter J. Marston https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-conmatphys-020911-125114
- An Exploration of Multivariate Fluctuation Dissipation Operators and Their Response to Sea Surface Temperature Perturbations D. Fuchs et al. https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-14-0077.1
- Linear response for macroscopic observables in high-dimensional systems C. Wormell & G. Gottwald https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5122740
- Climate constraint reflects forced signal S. Po-Chedley et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-018-0640-y
- Progressing emergent constraints on future climate change A. Hall et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-019-0436-6
- The impacts of climate change on terrestrial Earth surface systems J. Knight & S. Harrison https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate1660
- Assessing Atmospheric Response to Surface Forcing in the Observations. Part II: Cross Validation of Seasonal Response Using GEFA and LIM Z. Liu et al. https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-11-00630.1
19 citations as recorded by crossref.
- Emergent constraints on climate sensitivities M. Williamson et al. https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.93.025004
- On spurious detection of linear response and misuse of the fluctuation–dissipation theorem in finite time series G. Gottwald et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physd.2016.05.010
- Assessing Atmospheric Response to Surface Forcing in the Observations. Part I: Cross Validation of Annual Response Using GEFA, LIM, and FDT Z. Liu et al. https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-11-00545.1
- Can we use linear response theory to assess geoengineering strategies? T. Bódai et al. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5122255
- Testing the assumptions in emergent constraints: why does the “emergent constraint on equilibrium climate sensitivity from global temperature variability” work for CMIP5 and not CMIP6? M. Williamson et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-15-829-2024
- On the Validity of Linear Response Theory in High-Dimensional Deterministic Dynamical Systems C. Wormell & G. Gottwald https://doi.org/10.1007/s10955-018-2106-x
- What could we learn about climate sensitivity from variability in the surface temperature record? J. Annan et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-11-709-2020
- On the diagnosis of radiative feedback in the presence of unknown radiative forcing R. Spencer & W. Braswell https://doi.org/10.1029/2009JD013371
- Emergent constraints on climate‐carbon cycle feedbacks in the CMIP5 Earth system models S. Wenzel et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2013JG002591
- The Linear Response Function of an Idealized Atmosphere. Part II: Implications for the Practical Use of the Fluctuation–Dissipation Theorem and the Role of Operator’s Nonnormality P. Hassanzadeh & Z. Kuang https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-16-0099.1
- Beyond equilibrium climate sensitivity R. Knutti et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo3017
- Diversity of Hemodynamic Reactive Profiles across Persons—Psychosocial Implications for Personalized Medicine M. Gandarillas & N. Goswami https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11133869
- Planetary Atmospheres as Nonequilibrium Condensed Matter J. Marston https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-conmatphys-020911-125114
- An Exploration of Multivariate Fluctuation Dissipation Operators and Their Response to Sea Surface Temperature Perturbations D. Fuchs et al. https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-14-0077.1
- Linear response for macroscopic observables in high-dimensional systems C. Wormell & G. Gottwald https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5122740
- Climate constraint reflects forced signal S. Po-Chedley et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-018-0640-y
- Progressing emergent constraints on future climate change A. Hall et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-019-0436-6
- The impacts of climate change on terrestrial Earth surface systems J. Knight & S. Harrison https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate1660
- Assessing Atmospheric Response to Surface Forcing in the Observations. Part II: Cross Validation of Seasonal Response Using GEFA and LIM Z. Liu et al. https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-11-00630.1
Saved (final revised paper)
Latest update: 17 Sep 2026